• 0

How is FireFox great?


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
yea a great way to speed it up is to search for ways to speed it up and then use the advice given there

that type of language is not accepted on neowin

he was simply saying that if you looked for ways, there ARE ways it can be optimized.

Edited by Toxikk
  • 0
yea a great way to speed it up is to search for ways to speed it up and then use the advice given there

Funny, you wish people to "Get Firefox" but when a fellow firefox user requests help, you spit in his face. Great job there buddy.

And yeah, it doesn't start as fast as IE which is why I haven't made the switch yet even though it still sits in my Start menu.

  • 0
Funny, you wish people to "Get Firefox" but when a fellow firefox user requests help, you spit in his face. Great job there buddy.

And yeah, it doesn't start as fast as IE which is why I haven't made the switch yet even though it still sits in my Start menu.

There is a reason why FF doesn't load as fast as IE. That is because IE is already partially loaded as part of windows. IE is built into the OS and is loaded when the OS starts.

FF has to do a cold start when it is first started...but after that it takes only 2-3 seconds.

FF has many great advantages over IE

1. adblocker

2. tab browsing

3. no activex

4. no spyware

5. tons of extensions

6. W3C standard complaint (unlike IE)

Just to let you guys know, I figured its not worth the hassle with FireFox. I'm going back to Internet Explorer.

I will admit there is a learning curve when switching....but I promise that if you use it for a couple of days you will not want to switch back.

  • 0
Hey,

Why is FireFox so great? I find its way too slow. Any ways on speeeding it up?

What extenstions are you using? In my experience, the plugin "Tabbrowser Extensions" seems to slow the browser down somewhat.

I dont really notice any difference between FF render speeds and IE, but thats just me.

  • 0
anytime you switch from something you are familiar with, there is a learning curve.

windows > osx

msie > firefox

auto transmission > manual transmission

etc etc

it's the payoff you have to look at... if you stick with it, will the hassle be worth it?

I agree with you on all, specially on manual transmission :)

  • 0
There is a reason why FF doesn't load as fast as IE.? That is because IE is already partially loaded as part of windows.? IE is built into the OS and is loaded when the OS starts.

FF has to do a cold start when it is first started...but after that it takes only 2-3 seconds.

FF has many great advantages over IE

1. adblocker

2. tab browsing

3. no activex

4. no spyware

5. tons of extensions

6. W3C standard complaint (unlike IE)

I will admit there is a learning curve when switching....but I promise that if you use it for a couple of days you will not want to switch back.

1. Use one of many programs to do this such as ProtoWall (recommended, especially for P2P users) or Norton Firewall

2. Use one of many programs to utilize tabbed browsing in IE

3. Can make browsing certain pages a hassle

4. IE contains no spyware

5. IE has more

6. W3C standards do play an important role but nearly all websites are tuned to load IE without errors being that it's the most common browser by a longshot.

  • 0
it does not load up instantly like IE does...

And it never will. IE is hooked into Windows, and so is technically running all of the time. That is why one gets such fast start-up times. It is also the number-one (well, number-two) reason I have stuck with IE. The number-one reason is website rendering. However, Firefox is great because it has literally hundreds of useful plugins, a nice, simple interface, and standards-compliant rendering. However, those won't keep me away from my trusted Internet Explorer [clicks on IE icon in Quickbar and opens another window instantly]

  • 0
And you are supporting a free cause to better the internet :yes:

Not really. For example, I have downloaded and occasionally use Firefox, but I don't promote its use, and I don't contribute to its development, so I'm not supporting the browser or its cause at all. I think you have to do a little bit more than just use the browser to really support the idea of standards-compliance.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 27 is out.
    • My ice blue precision 3550 laptop
    • A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com AI companies often rely on readily available internet content to train their chatbots and provide users with instant answers. This method of AI training is fast and relatively inexpensive, but using a website’s content without permission or compensation is not something publishers like to see, and this is exactly why Microsoft and OpenAI are now being sued. As reported by Bloomberg, a group of publishers that collectively own nearly 400 newspapers has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The coalition argues that the two companies scraped their content to build AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Copilot without paying any compensation. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that while AI products have generated billions of dollars in market value using publishers’ work, none of that value has been shared with the publishers. The plaintiffs are seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief for alleged copyright infringement and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. “Defendants systematically and secretly crawled the Publishers’ websites—including content behind paywalls and other access restrictions—and copied the Publishers’ articles, stories, and other original works onto their own servers without authorization,” the complaint states. The publishers also described the AI boom as a “death knell for local journalism” if AI companies that scrape content for free are not held accountable. Former New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin and his law firm, Platkin LLP, are representing the publishers. “Our models empower innovation, are trained on publicly available data, and are grounded in fair use,” OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Bloomberg. This is not the first lawsuit involving the unauthorized use of publishers’ content by AI firms, but it is one of the largest coalitions ever formed against the free use of content by AI chatbots. In 2024, OpenAI and Microsoft also faced a similar lawsuit from eight newspapers that claimed AI products were benefiting from their content without permission.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      443
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!