• 0

How is FireFox great?


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
1. Use one of many programs to do this such as ProtoWall (recommended, especially for P2P users) or Norton Firewall

2. Use one of many programs to utilize tabbed browsing in IE

3. Can make browsing certain pages a hassle

4. IE contains no spyware

5. IE has more

6. W3C standards do play an important role but nearly all websites are tuned to load IE without errors being that it's the most common browser by a longshot.

1) Who wants to use a bunch of extras to fix a broken browser?

2) Same as above ^

3) Been using firefox since .4, active x issues have never come up once

4) Yes, but can be hijacked by spyware

5) Did you research that, I'd doubt it. If so, more *useful* ones? No.

6) True, but these days web standards are becoming more and more popular and widely used.

Also, using IE opens you to the occasional security hole, such as the one we saw a while back that could change the URL bar to display any domain name.

  • 0

Also, another minor quibble about Firefox (two actually) is its portrayal of buttons, and its inability to uninstall plugins. I like the way IE renders clickable buttons much more than Firefox's way. Why can't they emulate IE more closely and make a nicer-looking button? Also, why has the ability to automatically uninstall plugins that don't come with an uninstaller not already been integrated into Firefox? I realize it may be in nightly builds, but I want it in a landmark build (or whatever such builds are called). I've had to re-install Firefox one time too many because of plugins messing up my Firefox installation.

  • 0
How are the clickable buttons different??

I don't use any plugins, and you can only blame yourself for installing too many, or useless ones really in the first place.

The font in the boxes on Firefox is much bigger and closer to the edges of the boxes, and there isn't a huge difference, but they just seem much uglier than those in Internet Explorer. Also, I've installed some plugins that I thought I might need, but then find out that either I don't, or the plugin doesn't work properly (and these are plugins that I get from the main plugin download page from Firefox). I suppose I should be more cautious when installing plugins (even though I don't use many), but I thought that Firefox was supposed to have "much better" plugin support than IE. One can easily remove plugins from IE (using other programs, true, but it is still possible), when one can't from Firefox.

  • 0

I have used Firefox since the pheonix days and have never thought it was very tough to cope with. The transition was simple and Firefox for me is the best browser Ive used (And believe me I have used more than 20 browsers... frm the days of Mosiac).

After the switch to Firefox, using IE is a little boring and u have to wait a little longer. May be ppl use Mozilla, not Firefox and complain that it loads slow! Although compared to IE, Firefox takes 2 sec extra to load, but after that it approx 30-50% faster than IE. Includes, page loading, productivity due to tabbed browsing, and due to ad blocking it does not have to load scrap images!

  • 0
The font in the boxes on Firefox is much bigger and closer to the edges of the boxes, and there isn't a huge difference, but they just seem much uglier than those in Internet Explorer. Also, I've installed some plugins that I thought I might need, but then find out that either I don't, or the plugin doesn't work properly (and these are plugins that I get from the main plugin download page from Firefox). I suppose I should be more cautious when installing plugins (even though I don't use many), but I thought that Firefox was supposed to have "much better" plugin support than IE. One can easily remove plugins from IE (using other programs, true, but it is still possible), when one can't from Firefox.

wtf was you smoking when using Firefox?

  • 0
I have used Firefox since the pheonix days and have never thought it was very tough to cope with. The transition was simple and Firefox for me is the best browser Ive used (And believe me I have used more than 20 browsers... frm the days of Mosiac).

After the switch to Firefox, using IE is a little boring and u have to wait a little longer. May be ppl use Mozilla, not Firefox and complain that it loads slow! Although compared to IE, Firefox takes 2 sec extra to load, but after that it approx 30-50% faster than IE. Includes, page loading, productivity due to tabbed browsing, and due to ad blocking it does not have to load scrap images!

true man :yes:

i had also used a lot of browser and firefox is still the best

on the other hand,even my 11 year old sister uses firefox in her 500mhz and it launches automatically,so dont talk that firefox is difficult to use or slow:rolleyes:

  • 0
So don't use it, simple as that. If you don't like it, why do you care what everyone else thinks about it?

Agreed! Until you dont believe in something dont do it! And the biggest mistake of all is loving something that you actually dont love by heart!

  • 0
I'm gonna have to side with you on this one, bangbang. Clearly these people don't like it, so why can't they just move on?

its better to knock something they don't like than to admit that its just as good if not better. Its just simple human reaction.

  • 0

Like many have said in here, all this is relative. All browsers have their pros and cons, it depends on what you want and/or are used to. It is natural that when switching from something you have used all the time to something new, you will have many issues.

I have used Opera, Ie and Firefox/Mozilla. They all have their good things and personally I like them all. Currently I'm using Firefox because of all 3 major browsers, FF was the only one I hadnt tried ( and I like to try new things and compare). I once used Mozilla, but didnt like it much because I found it slow. Now that I use FF and have had time to test it throughtly I like it a lot. There are a lot of advantages in using this browser which I wont mention because they already have been mention. I like the way it render pages and it's extension capabilities.

My suggestion to all those people who haven't try this browser yet, but feel curious about it , is to try it and test it throughtly before jumping to any conclusions. Maybe you get to like it better than your previous browser.

  • 0
I'm gonna have to side with you on this one, bangbang. Clearly these people don't like it, so why can't they just move on?

its better to knock something they don't like than to admit that its just as good if not better. Its just simple human reaction.

  • 0
Why are people not getting the fact Firefox has lot of spyware too these days, I get asked to install some spyware plug-ins on many web pages.

uhhh i've been using Firefox since probably about .3 release and i've never gotten any of that...make sure your popup block is enabled!

  • 0
Why are people not getting the fact Firefox has lot of spyware too these days, I get asked to install some spyware plug-ins on many web pages.

That doesnt mean firefox has the spyware, its just the sites that you're going to that try to make you install it.

At the worst, Firefox cant block these requests as well as IE, but i dont think so.

  • 0

I've used Firefox for over a year now and it loads instantly on my computers (1900+ and 2.0 Celeron Laptop). The pages render very quickly and it's great on my cable connection. Even when I visit my parents and use their 56k dialup , it's still faster than IE. I use it at school because it loads faster than IE and renders faster on the slower school machines I use. I got really annoyed with popups, and IE was just slow. Firebird(fox) was what I needed and I stuck with it. If you don't like it, don't use it. I tried using MyIE2, and Opera, but didn't like them at all.

  • 0
There is a reason why FF doesn't load as fast as IE. That is because IE is already partially loaded as part of windows. IE is built into the OS and is loaded when the OS starts.

FF has to do a cold start when it is first started...but after that it takes only 2-3 seconds.

Damn, I use to think that that was a myth because a lot of people say that Firefox loads just as fast on startup. But if there is a logical reason for IE to load faster than I've been owned! :blush: Well, that means back to IE for me.

  • 0

Try viewing some pornographical pages, they include many spyware/adware for FireFox, you get promted to install a Mozilla extension and it shows you the green puzzle icon. And the funny thing is they are selected by default, the same problem as with IE's ActiveX so if user does not read but rather hits enter he will install it, the difference is the Firefox user does not believe he has spyware because he has not been using IE

  • 0
Why are people not getting the fact Firefox has lot of spyware too these days, I get asked to install some spyware plug-ins on many web pages.

You must be smoking something too. I have only gotten one from one website, where it happens once you click a button. Even so, all you do it click cancel and its gone. With IE not only do you get more, and get them just by entering the website ect, plus in the end you get a TON more with IE than with firefox.

Too add another point also, firefox's default interface has to be the most well thought out, clean, and most usefull I have ever seen.

And the bookmark manager in IE makes me want to :x

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • How can it beat a Steam machine without a serious GPU? The two CU iGPU only provides about 5fps in gaming. That's not going to make any gamer happy.
    • Anthropic introduces Claude Tag, a new AI teammate for Slack by Fiza Ali Anthropic has announced Claude Tag, a new feature that lets teams work with Claude directly inside Slack. The idea is simple: once Claude is added to a Slack workspace and given access to selected channels, users can tag @Claude in conversations and assign tasks. Claude can then work through those requests using connected tools and data sources before posting its results back into a Slack thread. What makes Claude Tag different from a typical chatbot is that it's designed to operate as a shared assistant for an entire team rather than a single user. Everyone in a channel interacts with the same Claude instance. This allows the team members to see ongoing work and continue tasks started by others. Furthermore, Anthropic says the AI can build context over time by following conversations in channels where it has permission to operate. This means users don't have to repeatedly provide the same background information for every request. The system is also designed for asynchronous work. Instead of waiting for responses in a chat window, users can assign a task to Claude and return later once the work is complete. Anthropic says Claude can break larger requests into multiple steps and use connected tools to complete them. Moreover, the system can also schedule follow-up tasks and continue working on projects over extended periods. Another feature allows Claude to keep the users updated and follow up on unresolved tasks when its optional "ambient" mode is enabled. The company says the tool is already being used internally for software development, data analysis, support workflows, and debugging. According to Anthropic, around 65% of its product team's code is now generated through its internal version of Claude Tag. For organisations concerned about security, administrators can control which channels, tools, and data sources Claude can access. Separate Claude instances can also be configured for different departments, helping keep information isolated between teams. Administrators can also monitor activity logs, review completed tasks, and set spending limits at both the organisation and channel level. Claude Tag is now available in beta for Claude Enterprise and Claude Team customers and runs on Claude Opus 4.8 that was announced this May. The feature will also replace Anthropic's existing Claude in Slack application, with current users able to migrate within a 30-day migration window. Lastly, eligible customers will receive introductory credits to help teams evaluate the new experience.
    • Beats Studio Pro wireless over-ear ANC headphones drop to their lowest price yet by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the Beats Studio Pro headphones at their all-time low price. The Studio Pro use 40mm active drivers which are designed to improve clarity and reduce distortion compared to previous models, with up to an 80% improvement over the Beats Studio3 Wireless. A built-in digital processor adjusts frequency response to keep the sound balanced rather than overly boosted in any one area. They also include Active Noise Cancelling that adapts to your surroundings to reduce background noise along with a Transparency mode that lets outside sound in when you need awareness of what’s going on around you. Furthermore, the headphones support personalised Spatial Audio with dynamic head tracking as well as Dolby Atmos playback on supported content. Moreover, built-in voice-targeting microphones improve call quality. You can also switch between three sound profiles including Beats Signature for balanced music playback, Entertainment for films and gaming, and Conversation for clearer voice in calls and podcasts. Physically, they are designed to be worn for long periods without feeling heavy or awkward. The ear cushions use UltraPlush engineered leather while metal sliders allow you to adjust the fit. On the connectivity side, the Studio Pro use Class 1 Bluetooth for a stable, long-range wireless connection. There is also a 3.5mm input if you want to plug in directly, including use with in-flight entertainment systems. Controls are located on the headphones and include a "b" button for music and call control, a volume rocker, and a multifunction button used for switching listening modes, EQ settings, power, and pairing. In addition, the headphones offer integration with both Apple and Android devices. On Apple devices, they support one-touch pairing with iCloud-linked devices, hands-free Siri access, Find My tracking based on last connected location, and automatic software updates. On Android devices, they support Google Fast Pair, Audio Switch between compatible devices, and Google Find My Device tracking, with additional features available through the Beats app. When it comes to the battery performance, it is rated at up to 40 hours of listening time with ANC turned off, and up to 24 hours with ANC or Transparency mode enabled. A 10-minute Fast Fuel charge should provide up to 4 hours of playback. Finally, the headphones use a rechargeable lithium-ion battery and charge via USB-C. Beats Studio Pro Wireless Over-Ear ANC Headphones: $149.95 (Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • "lets you pause updates by choosing an end date, for up to 35 days" Wasn't it "indefinitely"?
    • Those extra reboots are related to the UEFI Secure Boot certificate update thing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      110
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!