[DEFINITIVE] Gmail queue !


Recommended Posts

,Jun 15 2004, 22:22] I think one thing you could do to this thread (although it might be a bit too late) is have the mods delete all the non-requests messages (eg the ones where people are just chatting) leaving behind just those that have not been "satisfied" yet. So essentially this thread just becomes a list of names in posts and no chatting of any kind...

...perhaps. I dunno. Just thought I'd throw in my 0.000000000000002 bucks

A little bit too late. That's what happens when you have a life... I go work and when I come back someone "hijacks" the idea because I wasn't there for a couple hours.

they're having this in Genmay and it's working out nicely :) http://genmay.net/showthread.php?t=373322

and i'm in!

[email protected]

Lol, it used to be called "The world's longest short bus" (at least it was when it was still part of HardOCP forums) now it's called "The worlds shortest long bus", who changed the caption?

,Jun 16 2004, 09:24] Lol, it used to be called "The world's longest short bus" (at least it was when it was still part of HardOCP forums) now it's called "The worlds shortest long bus", who changed the caption?

General [M]ayhem (341 Viewing)

The world's shortest longbus.

the title was renamed to Google [M]ail a few days ago :laugh:

let me get this straight... did you just use this thread to redirect people to your blog ? Sorry but I won't be updating this anymore... because there's no point in doing it. This thread was doing more than fine and now someone creates a blog and a dozen more invites have been given away. It just mixed everything up and I don't really feel like seeking for all the info. I'm sure you wanted to help, but to me its sh*tty. You wanted to get more hits on  your site or something ? :huh:

Yes, I think that's exactly what he did. The reason he did it was because there is no clear way on this thread to tell anymore who has been invited and who hasn't, and he wanted to make an easier way to send out his invitations (although not necessarily a fairer way). Xplatinum, I think that your idea for a centralized thread like this is very noble, and you should continue trying to do it, but you should make sure that you or a friend of yours can be on at all times monitoring the thread to ensure that it doesn't get out of control (as it has). I'm all for helping you, if you want the help (I'm on when you're not a lot of the time, it seems, as I live in California and am on summer break). The thread won't work perfectly, but I think you should continue in this endeavor to get invites out to those who have requested them earliest.

a list of all the people in line plus their emails.

I agree; rather than sorting through threads, when someone posts, wanting an account, add their account name and e-mail address to a list, and continually update that list (or as often as you can), so that people can easily see who to invite. The only problem with that is that the list needs to be continually updated, so you'd need someone else who could edit the list as well, so I'm not sure how it would work.

Yes, I think that's exactly what he did. The reason he did it was because there is no clear way on this thread to tell anymore who has been invited and who hasn't, and he wanted to make an easier way to send out his invitations (although not necessarily a fairer way). Xplatinum, I think that your idea for a centralized thread like this is very noble, and you should continue trying to do it, but you should make sure that you or a friend of yours can be on at all times monitoring the thread to ensure that it doesn't get out of control (as it has). I'm all for helping you, if you want the help (I'm on when you're not a lot of the time, it seems, as I live in California). The thread won't work perfectly, but I think you should continue in this endeavor to get invites out to those who have requested them earliest.

Funny thing is, he only assumed that I wasn't updating anything. Instead of sending me a PM like anyone with principles would do, he decided to do this out of the blue.

There's a reason why I can't update the "next person". Its because people PM me about who they have to invite and I reply to them with the next in the list BUT I still have to wait for an answer, thus making me unable to update it since i'm not sure of anything!

But yeah, that's exactly what he did and it ****ed me off.

Thanks for the help by the way. I'm not sure what i'm gonna do since it doesn't have anything to do with lack of updates. Gotta love people who assume all the damn time without asking questions FIRST.

-- Jason: That's already what I tried to do here. Look at my first post. Also it will be impossible to make people only post emails without this going offtopic.

You don't get invitations for about a week, I believe. Just be patient.

Edit: it might be a day; I've heard a week, but I'm not certain, as I just got my account today.

I can confirm that XXDes got invites after approx 1-2days... and subsequently gave me an invite (Y)

Whether this applies to every user, or whether XXDes happened to signup when Google dished out invites on a periodical basis anyway...is quite frankly anyone's guess :)

Funny thing is, he only assumed that I wasn't updating anything. Instead of sending me a PM like anyone with principles would do, he decided to do this out of the blue.

Thanks for the help by the way. I'm not sure what i'm gonna do since it doesn't have anything to do with lack of updates. Gotta love people who assume all the damn time without asking questions FIRST.

I think the donors who came here when your PM box was full and you were away wanted to get their invitations "out the door" as quickly as possible and so didn't follow the rules you set up. Unfortunately, there is nothing that one can really do, as there is no way to control how donors give out their accounts (the accounts ARE theirs, after all). However, I think that all posts where donors offer accounts without following the queue should be removed, as that is not the point of this thread. I don't know how this could really be done without a dedicated moderator for this thread, but it's a thought (imagine the title: "Supreme Gmail donor moderator" :p)

can some one give me the three next people on the list?

Here you go...

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showuser=54835

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showuser=12306

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showuser=26664

Trang: I already said to Opio a couple pages back that the donators can give their accounts to whoever they want... but no need to hijack the idea and bring half of it somewhere else. My PM box was full... I have my msn and email listed below :)

I think the donors who came here when your PM box was full and you were away wanted to get their invitations "out the door" as quickly as possible and so didn't follow the rules you set up. Unfortunately, there is nothing that one can really do, as there is no way to control how donors give out their accounts (the accounts ARE theirs, after all). However, I think that all posts where donors offer accounts without following the queue should be removed, as that is not the point of this thread. I don't know how this could really be done without a dedicated moderator for this thread, but it's a thought (imagine the tital: "Supreme Gmail donor moderator" :p)

i want to follow the guidelines set up at the begining but i dont know whos next and who to give to, cuz some peopel might have gotten one already...???

Here you go...

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showuser=54835

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showuser=12306

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showuser=26664

Trang: I already said to Opio a couple pages back that the donators can give their accounts to whoever they want... but no need to hijack the idea and bring half of it somewhere else. My PM box was full... I have my msn and email listed below :)

i thought u were suppose to have 300 plus posts? ayub has 63 or something??

i want to follow the guidelines set up at the begining but i dont know whos next and who to give to, cuz some peopel might have gotten one already...???

That's true; it is hard to properly invite people if the "up next" part of the first post is not consistently updated. I guess the best thing to do is to post and wait until someone actually figures out who that person is. It is slower but fairer that way. The reason we've had so many "illegal" Gmail transfers (illegal by the rules of this thread) is that no one was around to figure out who was next and/or donors didn't bother to ask.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Audacious 4.6.1 by Razvan Serea Audacious is a lightweight, open-source audio player that emphasizes simplicity, performance, and sound quality. Designed for Linux, Windows, and macOS, it supports a wide range of audio formats, internet radio streaming, and playlist management. Users can customize the interface with Winamp-style skins or modern themes, making it flexible for different preferences. Audacious also includes an equalizer, advanced audio effects, and a plugin system for extending functionality. Its low resource usage makes it especially suitable for older computers or users who value efficiency without sacrificing playback quality. Audacious key features: High audio quality – delivers clean, gapless playback with minimal distortion. Wide format support – plays MP3, FLAC, Ogg Vorbis, AAC, WAV, WMA, and more. Internet radio streaming – supports Shoutcast, Icecast, and other online streams. Winamp skin support – classic, nostalgic look for users who prefer the old-school style. Modern GTK-based interface – clean, simple UI with a more modern feel. Customizable themes – change appearance through skins and themes. Advanced playlist management – organize, save, and edit playlists with ease. Equalizer – fine-tune audio output with a built-in graphical equalizer. Audio effects – built-in DSP options like crossfade, replay gain, and more. Plugin system – extend functionality with additional components. File metadata support – displays and organizes music based on tags. Drag-and-drop support – quickly add songs or playlists. Global hotkey support – control playback without switching windows. Bit-perfect output modes – bypass system mixers for pure audio output. ReplayGain support – normalizes track loudness automatically. Cue sheet support – play entire albums from a single audio file with .cue. MPRIS2 integration – integrates with Linux desktop environments for media controls. Advanced resampling options – adjust playback quality with different resampler settings. Gapless playback – seamless transition between tracks encoded properly. Crossfade plugin – blend one song into the next smoothly. Last.fm scrobbling plugin – track listening history online. Remote control support – control Audacious via command-line or scripts. Lyrics plugin – display song lyrics if available. Alarm / timer plugin – start or stop playback at set times. SOX resampler plugin – high-quality resampling for audiophiles. Spectrum analyzer / visualization plugins – visual feedback while playing music. Headphone crossfeed effect – simulates speaker listening for headphones. Customizable buffer size – tweak latency and playback smoothness. Audacious 4.6.1 changelog: Use XDG cache dir to store temporary files (#1817) Accept embedded lyrics in more cases (#1818) Bump .so and plugin ABI versions retrospectively (#1819) Include Georgian translation (#1820) Fix build on systems using musl instead of glibc (#1823) Download: Audacious 4.6.1 | 48.2 MB (Open Source) Download: Portable Audacious 4.6.1 | 69.8 MB View: Audacious Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • I really wonder if this has to do with the built in VPN or "private DNS" of browsers that trip up legal requirements like cookie consent and Cloudflare (to avoid all the botnet attacks we get). And BTW some botnets still manage to get past Cloudflare, we are constantly having to tweak it to block malicious traffic that ultimately cause a DDoS.
    • CPPC states can also be messed around with in most UEFI settings but aren't as robust as the ones that the Windows Scheduler can provide! Make sure you look into what your motherboard also has before customizing for the Windows Scheduler.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!