[DEFINITIVE] Gmail queue !


Recommended Posts

That was a good post dude.

Bizkit: If that was referring to me, thanks. It just irks the hell out of me when these type of things happen on forums, need XXXX posts rather than been a member for XXXX days/months/years, etc. Like I said, I admire the membership length, if people were only signing up for this to get an invite (in this case), by the time the required membership period comes into effect, GMail *should* be available. Minimal number of posts requirements on any forum for anything is a load of BS to me because as I said before, I (and I'm sure lots of others as I've seen a few here already) don't post often but when I (we when it applies) do post, the post actually means something or contributes in a positive manner to the topic on hand.

Edited by PiMPiN
Since I don't want to go through all 18+ 40 posts-per-page pages to see if this has been mentioned (although I did see a few comments saying basically the same thing), I just thought I'd drop a little note here about the rules. The 5 month member is great, but the bit about 300 or more posts (of course this would since I haven't reached that yet) is what I personally think is a little sad. Just because someone doesn't post every day, or every week for that matter (this is probably my first post in months), that shouldn't exclude them. I've yet to reach 200 posts let alone 300, but I've been here for over two years. I visit Neowin on average 4 times per day, every day, but because I don't post a lot it excludes me from this? Not that I want in or anything, or that I would refuse an invite if given, I'm just expressing my views on how the post limit rule is unfair for those members like myself prefer to lurk rather than post. Now if it was by seniority I would have nothing to complain about, even if there were 2000 people ahead of me, as it wouldn't mean I'd have to post in topics that a) questions have been answered, b) my opinion would cause a flamewar, c) just to add another comment praising something when 200 other people have, and I could go on. Besides, it isn't all about the number of posts, but the quality of posts. Isn't it? That's just my two cents.

I said something to that extent, as of now I've given away 3 accounts to people at Neowin (and have 2 more), 2 of which were people with well under 1,000 posts. My point was, I'm not going to give it to someone I've never seen here before, but I'd be more than happy to add my name to this list to help some people out. Last time I said I had some invites, I got a handfuls of PMs from people with 50 or less posts, who had signed up in the last month!

So I'll rephrase, since I have two more to hand out, 1,000 posts or you've been here longer than I have. I don't want to give them to just random people, I didn't want to start my own thread, but I'd like to give them to Neowin users.

I said something to that extent, as of now I've given away 3 accounts to people at Neowin (and have 2 more), 2 of which were people with well under 1,000 posts. My point was, I'm not going to give it to someone I've never seen here before, but I'd be more than happy to add my name to this list to help some people out. Last time I said I had some invites, I got a handfuls of PMs from people with 50 or less posts, who had signed up in the last month!

So I'll rephrase, since I have two more to hand out, 1,000 posts or you've been here longer than I have. I don't want to give them to just random people, I didn't want to start my own thread, but I'd like to give them to Neowin users.

also I think people with more posts are more trustworthy and would most likley donate them to neowin as opposed to a person with 5 posts who signed up just to get them.

I said something to that extent, as of now I've given away 3 accounts to people at Neowin (and have 2 more), 2 of which were people with well under 1,000 posts. My point was, I'm not going to give it to someone I've never seen here before, but I'd be more than happy to add my name to this list to help some people out. Last time I said I had some invites, I got a handfuls of PMs from people with 50 or less posts, who had signed up in the last month!

So I'll rephrase, since I have two more to hand out, 1,000 posts or you've been here longer than I have. I don't want to give them to just random people, I didn't want to start my own thread, but I'd like to give them to Neowin users.

I can understand your point of view [yours as well FatCat] with "not seeing someone here before", so looking at it that way opens my eyes a little more on the post count requirement, but doesn't entirely change my stance. As stated, I wasn't posting to put my name in the running, and if in fact it is, please remove my name as I have received an invite from a friend ::wink::, but surely pass it on to somone else here. And threetonesun, I really do applaud your the way you intend to handle your invites by offering them to the users who not only have the high post counts, but have been here for as long as we have. I also plan to give at least one of my initial invites back to Neowin (family requested two), and will most likely do it the same way you are planning to do so.

Bizkit: If that was referring to me, thanks. It just irks the hell out of me when these type of things happen on forums, need XXXX posts rather than been a member for XXXX days/months/years, etc. Like I said, I admire the membership length, if people were only signing up for this to get an invite (in this case), by the time the required membership period comes into effect, GMail *should* be available. Minimal number of posts requirements on any forum for anything is a load of BS to me because as I said before, I (and I'm sure lots of others as I've seen a few here already) don't post often but when I (we when it applies) do post, the post actually means something or contributes in a positive manner to the topic on hand.

It was made toward your post. Very good post and I like the way that you only post the good qyality posts. You are right, its not how many posts you have, but how good they are.

I have to agree with threetonesun. I don't have much posts on these forums. But I have been here for a long time. Everyday I'm here reading stuff for some hours (news and forums). That might not be a contribution (or how is that called) but it does mean loyalty to neowin.net. If I get an invite, I'll sure try too bring an invite or two back to neowin

christophe_oosterlynck [at] hotmail.com

4 Invites for Gmail; 1 on hold

Provide your first name, last name, and a valid reason for wanting it. (I did this earlier, this morning they gave me 6 invites, and now 5 tonight.)

Also, since im doing this VERY SELECTIVELY, you may offer to trade me things you have and if I like them ill give you the Gmail Invite no questions asked. Sorry, becoming very selective on who gets them.

Post your replies! Ill edit this post and post another when they've been used.

Here's the list, if you want to give invites in this thread then pm these 4 people.

ChicoCahill

RaGe-

Kombatant

Test Zero

If not following the thread then make a new, we are using the list for a reason :p

If you are asking for trades, etc go to ebay.

I have three invites to give away, I want to know who the next three on the list are ??? in order to stop any fighting over the invites. :)

If someone can PM the next 3 people in the list I would be very grateful. :)

Edited by bluephoenix3007
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!