[ENGLAND] Time to say bye to Sven ?


Should Mr.Sven be sacked?  

42 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Mr.Sven be sacked?

    • Yes, We need a new style of coach.
      9
    • No, Give him another chance.
      33


Recommended Posts

Hello, Well I think he should go. He is on 4 Million pounds per year from the FA, his style is to calm for the England team. I think England had the skill to win Euro 2004 this year but they were not pushed by the coach, I think Sven doesnt take any "risks" he lets england just get 1-0 up and lets them sits back. Also why the hell does he bring crap players for example Heskey, Vassell and Both Nevs. I think we need a new style of coaching Im looking to Germany World Cup 2006 with a new coach...

Sven you had your chance, your mucked it up for England.. :pinch:

What do you think??

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/183038-england-time-to-say-bye-to-sven/
Share on other sites

I think he should have another chance, but I wouldn't mind someone on the line who jumps about at every decision made and shouts from the sideline, as from my experience playing it shows that your manager is into the game as much as you and not sat there thinking about what he is goin to do later tonight.

How many losses have we had since Sven has been in charge? Not that many. It always seems to be that once something bad happens we get a new manager, the team become unsettled again and then we go all over again.

At the end of the day, we had a bit of bad luck and thats the name of the game. Everyone is a pundit but how can we judge when we dont do the job

As far as I am concerned its not about 'giving him another chance'. He is yet to spurn his 'first' chance yet! By this I mean he has been a great manager and has made no mistakes in picking the right squad. His attitude towards the game is impeccable, and he creates a great team spirit in the side. As for 'sitting back' against Portugal, I do not believe this was a tactical decision. The players simply failed to perform to the standards we know they are capable of, and the manager cannot be blamed for this.

England have no real world class players: no Figos, no Zidanes, no Ronaldos. Beckham is good, but no match-changer. Rooney and perhaps Ashley Cole are the closest we have had this tournament to a real world class player, and neither of these players would be in the world top 10. And yet with the team we have, Sven has taken us a long way, and for this we have to respect him.

As for his style being more calm, this contributes to a smoother running of the side. A more agressive manager could easily alienate players, or cause devisions in the England camp. A more calm nature allows for more tactical approach to a game, and an approach that is working very well for England.

First of all even though i'm from scotland, I do support england when they play.

You guys have to face facts one cup in 40 years is poor, th current squad is pretty good but by no way are they a winning side.

Your media builds up to much hype about the team that gets you all believing you are going to win things, and then you all call for blood after they get knocked out, You should support your team until the death.

Look at scotland, we suck but at least we know it.

I think if England stick with Sven and he gets more time with the players he will have a very strong squad for the world cup.

I hate to see teams getting rid of managers when the have not had long enough with the squad (leads)

any here's to Scotland V England World Cup final ;)

I agree with Fozzieb, England were not good enough to win, and the media built them up into the best team in the competition (which they were not IMO). So many of the squad didnt play well, especially in the last game where no body wanted to go forward. Why didnt Sven put Dyer on?? but anyways be thankful that you have a team that can score more than 1 goal every 3 years - Come on Northern Ireland!! we're gonna vbe the next world cup winners!! ermmm...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!