Evanescence new Album?


Recommended Posts

I think the whole idea of "selling out" doing the "media way of making a record" don't really exist except in a fan's mind.

It's all fine and good then a band gets too big and sells out and supposedly leaves it's fans behind. Well basically I think this doesn't actually happen, but in reality it's some kind of minority thing, or anti-mainstream movement. It's all good to like something, new, underground, or unique, Until everyone else likes it then those very same people who liked it turn on it for no other reason other than it's "mainstream".

The whole thing just makes no sense. I have a feeling that if Lacuna Coil were to somehow all of a sudden go "mainstream" that alot of thier fans would leave to, and not because thier music sucks, but because the fans who activley seek out little known music in certain genres aren't necessarilly looking for great music or whatever, but are merely looking for something that other people aren't listening to so they can feel better about themselves and how unique they are.

Me I'm taking a wait and see attitude on this album, but I'm sure it'll be better than ny Lacuna Coil offering, because I'm not a huge fan of thier lyrics. Evanescence seemed superior to them so far from everything I've heard from them both.

I think the whole idea of "selling out" doing the "media way of making a record" don't really exist except in a fan's mind.

It's all fine and good then a band gets too big and sells out and supposedly leaves it's fans behind. Well basically I think this doesn't actually happen, but in reality it's some kind of minority thing, or anti-mainstream movement. It's all good to like something, new, underground, or unique, Until everyone else likes it then those very same people who liked it turn on it for no other reason other than it's "mainstream".

The whole thing just makes no sense. I have a feeling that if Lacuna Coil were to somehow all of a sudden go "mainstream" that alot of thier fans would leave to, and not because thier music sucks, but because the fans who activley seek out little known music in certain genres aren't necessarilly looking for great music or whatever, but are merely looking for something that other people aren't listening to so they can feel better about themselves and how unique they are.

Me I'm taking a wait and see attitude on this album, but I'm sure it'll be better than ny Lacuna Coil offering, because I'm not a huge fan of thier lyrics. Evanescence seemed superior to them so far from everything I've heard from them both.

I think you fail to see the point that mainstream is not the same as well known and that non-mainstream is not the same as underground, you can get big.

Lacuna Coil is hugely well known in europe and I dont see fans complaining, and, about your opinion about them, well, I cant argue with that because its, like I said, your opinion, but then I dont know how you can compare them if you dont know Lacuna Coil that well (like you said)

I didn't mean it as a good thing. I just meant the old "Rock Star" persona that people used to percieve. It was especially big in the 70's and 80's, everyone wanted to be a big rock star. The movie called Rock Star is an example of what i'm talking about. No, I don't support what the music industry is doing by making music that appeals to the masses. It is however what is happening on a daily basis for quite some time now. There are exceptions to the rule as you've mentioned.

Tool isn't my favorite band, but I respect your devotion to their music, and I understand what it is to have that feeling about a certain band. Bands like Tool, Metallica (Metallica being my favorite band) have proven themselves over and over again with their music. They both have the freedom to do what it is they want to do. They can make their music, not have it sell well, and still draw in massive audiences at concerts (where all the money is truly made anyways) Why can they do that? Respect and devotion from their fans. They'll both stand the test of time, for years to come.

Things are different now, than they once were. Being liked by the masses is what these bands have to do to stay afloat. I don't like their strangle hold on the artists. Especially Clearchannel, who is known for taking out bands at the knees when its something they don't want.

I'd like to believe in a perfect world that bands could start at the bottom playing clubs, and working their way to stardom by doing things their way, and their way only. This is why we need to boycott the things that are happening out there now. My hope is that the bands that change themselves to get the break they need, will eventually have the freedom to do things their way. Selling your soul to the devil is a terrible way to acheive your goal, but what else can they do? That's what I'm hoping with bands like Evanescence. The talent is there, and hopefully with the success comes the freedom to take things more in the direction they want.

No I own 3 LC albums, I know they're big in Europe, but here in the States they're not that big at all(Although I think they did tour here this year). I just plain think Evanescence is better, I think Amy Lee has better vocals, although LC's Scabbia is hotter, I think Evanescence has better writing, and a better sound, that's how I'm comparing them.

Now of course I'm not necessarily right since Art is all subjective, so I'm not trying to say liking one over the other is wrong.

My mainstream comment however is a trend here in the US that I seem to notice, I'm not going to even pretend I know how it goes down in other parts of the world, because I don't have a clue. I checked out some kids today selling back a bunch of small band cd's and instantly realized they were posers, so when I asked where their Britney Spears cd's where they replied "dude, we soo aren't mainstream". They're the people I mean, the ones who truly sell out in a strange quest to not sell out with the rest of the masses.

I didn't mean it as a good thing. I just meant the old "Rock Star" persona that people used to percieve. It was especially big in the 70's and 80's, everyone wanted to be a big rock star. The movie called Rock Star is an example of what i'm talking about. No, I don't support what the music industry is doing by making music that appeals to the masses. It is however what is happening on a daily basis for quite some time now. There are exceptions to the rule as you've mentioned.

Tool isn't my favorite band, but I respect your devotion to their music, and I understand what it is to have that feeling about a certain band. Bands like Tool, Metallica (Metallica being my favorite band) have proven themselves over and over again with their music. They both have the freedom to do what it is they want to do. They can make their music, not have it sell well, and still draw in massive audiences at concerts (where all the money is truly made anyways) Why can they do that? Respect and devotion from their fans. They'll both stand the test of time, for years to come.

Things are different now, than they once were. Being liked by the masses is what these bands have to do to stay afloat. I don't like their strangle hold on the artists. Especially Clearchannel, who is known for taking out bands at the knees when its something they don't want.

I'd like to believe in a perfect world that bands could start at the bottom playing clubs, and working their way to stardom by doing things their way, and their way only. This is why we need to boycott the things that are happening out there now. My hope is that the bands that change themselves to get the break they need, will eventually have the freedom to do things their way. Selling your soul to the devil is a terrible way to acheive your goal, but what else can they do? That's what I'm hoping with bands like Evanescence. The talent is there, and hopefully with the success comes the freedom to take things more in the direction they want.

you see? thats why I like to talk with you.

To be honest there are still certain recent bands that are going to keep rock in a good level, bands that like you said started playing in clubs and now, they are huge but not mainstream, Radiohead is the oldest example, Sigur Ros next to them, I think europe has the key for the next classic music (well, they have it since the 70's :p) I suggest you to give some of those bands a try, so, I think its still possible to bands to become huge and still maintain themselves

@:

i wouldnt say its gonna be mainstream, and therefor bad (there is good mainstream music...). id listen to it before i judge it.

but still, you might b right.

i have two of their albums, and they are pretty much different... weird. i guess youre right, but some people might consider the new sound even better.

(except for:

WAKE ME UP!

CANT WAKE UP!

WAKE ME UP!

CANT WAKE UP!

WAKE ME UP!

CANT WAKE UP!

WAKE ME UP!

CANT WAKE UP!

WAKE ME UP!

CANT WAKE UP!

WAKE ME UP!

CANT WAKE UP!

WAKE ME UP!

CANT WAKE UP!

WAKE ME UP!

CANT WAKE UP!

lol

^^ i wouldnt go that far.

^i wouldnt compare evanescence to beatles.

i'm not comparing their music but the truth is Ringo Star is THE WORST DRUMMER EVER!!! :laugh:

*don't mind me*

now seriously... the reason i made that statement is that many people don't think Evanescence has any talent, just make some catchy tunes, suck, sold out and **** but just think about the beatles, their talent wasn't anything special and they made some ****ty catchy tunes (*thinks obladi oblada) so it's kind of the same but no one is comparing the music or the decade here.

Just because Evanescence is *popular* you people have the need to say their music sucks, if you wanna say something sucks just talk about britney because i bet she can suck pretty well. :whistle:

*again don't mind me* my opinion is the suxxors and whatever

Edited by Apollo
Just because Evanescence is *popular* you people have the need to say their music sucks, if you wanna say something sucks just talk about britney because i bet she can suck pretty well. :whistle:

personal experience?

i mean did you listen to it... hehehe.

i'm not comparing their music but the truth is Ringo Star is THE WORST DRUMMER EVER!!! :laugh:

*don't mind me*

now seriously... the reason i made that statement is that many people don't think Evanescence has any talent, just make some catchy tunes, suck, sold out and **** but just think about the beatles, their talent wasn't anything special and they made some ****ty catchy tunes (*thinks obladi oblada) so it's kind of the same but no one is comparing the music or the decade here.

Just because Evanescence is *popular* you people have the need to say their music sucks, if you wanna say something sucks just talk about britney because i bet she can suck pretty well. :whistle:

*again don't mind me* my opinion is the suxxors and whatever

Hmm, no they suck. I hate mainstream, wanna know why? Because you're right all it takes is a "Obladi Oblada. I mean come on Nightwish is 100x better sounding then Evanescence, and so is Within Temptation. Where are they? Still in Europe because America's mainstream taste in music is bad. People don't even like rap for the lyrics, they like it for the beat. Do you see what is wrong with that picture?

Hmm, no they suck. I hate mainstream, wanna know why? Because you're right all it takes is a "Obladi Oblada. I mean come on Nightwish is 100x better sounding then Evanescence, and so is Within Temptation. Where are they? Still in Europe because America's mainstream taste in music is bad. People don't even like rap for the lyrics, they like it for the beat. Do you see what is wrong with that picture?

i didnt know nightwish werent popular in america.

it actually surprised me to see them over here on tv.

yeah, america sucks :p

Lacuna Coil - Heaven's A Lie is better. Oh and what is this? They also have an acoustic version of the song Lacuna Coil - Heaven's A Lie - (Studio Acoustic). Really don't say mainstream is good until you've heard underground or other stuff that isn't mainstream in the US.

Growing up with REAL rock music from the 60's to the 80's, I can't stand what they call "rock" nowadays. After the meltdown of the Seattle-based garage bands, there's probably more crap out there than the music industry knows what to do with. You never hear anyone quoting most lyrics from the last 10 years, but I'll bet everyone here knows Beatles lyrics. One of my gripes with modern music is that there are a LOT of bands that burn out too fast, whereas the opposite was true when I was growing up. People lasted FOREVER, to the point where they're STILL writing and touring.

Today's music is so prefab; I can't stand it. That's why I like Evanescence so much. They seem to really take those rock roots and use them without sounding like every other pseudo-rock band that's out there now. There are people that think Nickleback or Queens of the Stone Age are the best things to happen to rock and I just roll my eyes and listen to some Eric Clapton.

I'm not saying that Evanescence is the end-all, be-all of modern rock, but they are a refreshing change.

Mike

See, I've always felt that Nickleback and Effernesense, effervensese, effing whetever were on the same page. Junk.

Effervesense isn't crap? I've never understood why anyone could listen to them...

Of course, I've only heard that one song that they play obsessively on the radio, so maybe I can't judge them fairly.

Of course, I've only heard that one song that they play obsessively on the radio, so maybe I can't judge them fairly.

AH! That's how most of the people judge music nowadays!

People say Nickelback sucks and **** but only listen to the singles and i say Nickelback is a very good ROCK band but people ONLY listen to the singles which get tiresome and aren't that great.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • MPC-BE 1.9.0 by Razvan Serea Media Player Classic - BE is a free and open source audio and video player for Windows. Media Player Classic - BE is based on the original "Media Player Classic" project (Gabest) and "Media Player Classic Home Cinema" project (Casimir666), contains additional features and bug fixes. The BE mod (Black Edition Mod) is a skinned version of Media Player Classic Home Cinema, much better looking than the plain old MPC. MPC-BE 1.9.0 changelog: Splitters Fixed crashes in some situations. AudioSplitter Added support for the RF64 format. Fixed reading of channel layout for some WavPack files. Added support for ID3 tags for Wave64 files. Unknown Wave64 chunks are now ignored. AviSplitter Added support for 'y408' video. Improved support for 'HEVC' video. FLVSplitter Added support for VVC video. MP4Splitter Improved handling of corrupted files. MatroskaSplitter Expanded support for V_UNCOMPRESSED video codecs. Fixed support for frame rotation (ProjectionPoseRoll). Improved support for "V_MS/VFW/FOURCC / HEVC". MpcDvdVideoDecoder Fixed conversion to YUY2. Fixed display of menus for some DVD-Videos. RoQVideoDecoder Output in NV12 and YV12 formats is allowed. Full range is used. MPC Video Decoder RGB32 format will be output as a top-down bitmap by default. Added support for the "IID_MediaSideDataDOVIMetadataV2" interface. Removed support for the deprecated "IID_MediaSideDataDOVIMetadata" interface. Fixed retrieving the name of the video adapter when using NVDEC. Fixed crashes in some situations. MPC Video Converter Added support for AYUV video format. MpcAudioRenderer Improved input format validation. Optimized retrieval of supported formats for exclusive mode. Added the "Keep audio device active when paused" setting. Fixed crashes and freezes in various situations. Subtitles Added the ability to open the properties of an external subtitle renderer in the "Subtitles" settings panel. Fixed external subtitle connections for VSFilter. Fixed a crash when rendering PGS/SUP subtitles when using AVX2. YouTube Improved support for yt-dlp. The built-in YouTube parser is no longer used. Player The HTTP read strategy has been changed. If the playlist contains one entry, more key combinations can be used to control the player (jump through chapters, adjust volume). Improved support for reading ASX playlists. The translation of the MediaInfo report for Chinese, Korean and Japanese has been removed. Added blocking of 32-bit filter "PICVideo Lossless JPEG Decompressor" (pvljpg20.dll), because it crashes. Added blocking of the system filter "AVI Decompressor", which will eliminate the crash of VFW codecs. Fixed a rare crash when using the "/slave" key. Fixed a crash when getting a list of fonts for OSD. Added the ability to load an external audio file using hotkeys. Fixed opening a network path starting with \?\UNC. The "Determine duration when adding" playlist setting now works for YouTube video URLs. The "Online media services" settings panel has been redesigned. Added a "Merge files using FFmpeg" option to the file saving dialog. This option is activated when playing multiple streams obtained using yt-dlp. Added loading of local .dpl playlists ("DAUMPLAYLIST"). Fixed a hang when the user closes the player during the URL opening process. Various interface fixes. Installer Updated MPC Video Renderer 0.10.5. Updated MPC Script Source 0.2.17. Added MPC Image Source 0.3.6. Translations Updated Japanese translation (by tsubasanouta). Updated Chinese (Traditional) and Dutch translation (by beter). Updated Romanian translation (by Andrei Miloiu). Updated Hungarian translation (by mickey). Updated Turkish translation (by cmhrky). Updated German translation (by Klaus1189). Updated Chinese (Simplified) translation (by wushantao). Updated Italian translation (by mapi68). Updated Korean translation (by Hackjjang). Updated Chinese (Traditional) (by udfbe). Updated libraries dav1d 1.5.3-6-g04b69f9; ffmpeg n8.2-dev-1857-g4653e68aab; libpng git-v1.6.55-9-g7d52a8087; Little-CMS git-lcms2.18-26-gf739cda; MediaInfo git-v26.05-38-g702c9b7fd; ZenLib git-v0.4.41-91-g073f297; zlib 1.3.2. Download: MPC-BE 64-bit | Portable MPC-BE 64-bit | ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: MPC-BE 32-bit | Portable MPC-BE 32-bit Link: Media Player Classic - BE Home Page Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Apple reportedly looks to blacklisted Chinese memory chips as RAM prices climb by Karthik Mudaliar Image via Apple Apple is reportedly trying to get a clearance from the Trump administration to buy memory from ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT) to get some relief from soaring DRAM prices. As per a report by the Financial Times, Apple approached the Commerce Department more than a month ago and also spoke to other officials and allies in Washington. For starters, CXMT is a company that's already been placed on the Pentagon's list of Chinese military companies. The Chinese company is the country's top DRAM maker. For Apple, the timing is certainly awkward but not surprising. Tim Cook had recently warned that Apple would have to raise prices because AI companies are buying up large amounts of memory for data centers, and just like that, Apple raised MacBook and iPad prices. Micron also recently revealed that customers have committed billions of dollars to secure memory supply years in advance, which shows us how aggressive securing infrastructure has become. This gives suppliers such as Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron more leverage, while pushing hardware makers to look for alternatives. CXMT is one of those alternatives, but not the simplest one. Apple has spent many years trying to diversify parts of its supply chain away from China, especially for final assembly, while still depending heavily on Chinese manufacturing and suppliers. Even domestic brands from China are moving towards CXMT and YMTC instead of relying on Samsung, Micron, and SK Hynix. For Apple, though, it would invite more scrutiny than local Chinese companies. For now, this is more like a lobbying effort rather than a confirmed supply deal. There's no official statement from either of the parties. What is clearer, though, is the pressure behind such a request. AI demand has certainly made hardware a bottleneck, and companies are trying everything they can to bring things back to normal, even if that means making politically sensitive choices. Source: Financial Times
    • I did test it a month or so back, but ... the results I expect to be on the first page are not there.
    • Neowin is saying these are good prices? Thats crazy. As others have said they are just ######. Time for big tech to bring down the prices for real not this fake crap.
    • The iFlyTek AINote 2 is among the thinnest E-Ink tablets. It has an EMR stylus, a built-in fingerprint reader, and plenty of built-in AI features. You had me until "and plenty of built-in AI features." That and any company that still does the iProduct naming trope is an immediate pass. It suggests the company isn't very imaginative or creative and is trying to piggyback off another company's success. Extremely lame. Also kind of expensive. Better choices at lower prices out there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      486
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      220
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!