Evanescence new Album?


Recommended Posts

I think the whole idea of "selling out" doing the "media way of making a record" don't really exist except in a fan's mind.

It's all fine and good then a band gets too big and sells out and supposedly leaves it's fans behind. Well basically I think this doesn't actually happen, but in reality it's some kind of minority thing, or anti-mainstream movement. It's all good to like something, new, underground, or unique, Until everyone else likes it then those very same people who liked it turn on it for no other reason other than it's "mainstream".

The whole thing just makes no sense. I have a feeling that if Lacuna Coil were to somehow all of a sudden go "mainstream" that alot of thier fans would leave to, and not because thier music sucks, but because the fans who activley seek out little known music in certain genres aren't necessarilly looking for great music or whatever, but are merely looking for something that other people aren't listening to so they can feel better about themselves and how unique they are.

Me I'm taking a wait and see attitude on this album, but I'm sure it'll be better than ny Lacuna Coil offering, because I'm not a huge fan of thier lyrics. Evanescence seemed superior to them so far from everything I've heard from them both.

I think the whole idea of "selling out" doing the "media way of making a record" don't really exist except in a fan's mind.

It's all fine and good then a band gets too big and sells out and supposedly leaves it's fans behind. Well basically I think this doesn't actually happen, but in reality it's some kind of minority thing, or anti-mainstream movement. It's all good to like something, new, underground, or unique, Until everyone else likes it then those very same people who liked it turn on it for no other reason other than it's "mainstream".

The whole thing just makes no sense. I have a feeling that if Lacuna Coil were to somehow all of a sudden go "mainstream" that alot of thier fans would leave to, and not because thier music sucks, but because the fans who activley seek out little known music in certain genres aren't necessarilly looking for great music or whatever, but are merely looking for something that other people aren't listening to so they can feel better about themselves and how unique they are.

Me I'm taking a wait and see attitude on this album, but I'm sure it'll be better than ny Lacuna Coil offering, because I'm not a huge fan of thier lyrics. Evanescence seemed superior to them so far from everything I've heard from them both.

I think you fail to see the point that mainstream is not the same as well known and that non-mainstream is not the same as underground, you can get big.

Lacuna Coil is hugely well known in europe and I dont see fans complaining, and, about your opinion about them, well, I cant argue with that because its, like I said, your opinion, but then I dont know how you can compare them if you dont know Lacuna Coil that well (like you said)

I didn't mean it as a good thing. I just meant the old "Rock Star" persona that people used to percieve. It was especially big in the 70's and 80's, everyone wanted to be a big rock star. The movie called Rock Star is an example of what i'm talking about. No, I don't support what the music industry is doing by making music that appeals to the masses. It is however what is happening on a daily basis for quite some time now. There are exceptions to the rule as you've mentioned.

Tool isn't my favorite band, but I respect your devotion to their music, and I understand what it is to have that feeling about a certain band. Bands like Tool, Metallica (Metallica being my favorite band) have proven themselves over and over again with their music. They both have the freedom to do what it is they want to do. They can make their music, not have it sell well, and still draw in massive audiences at concerts (where all the money is truly made anyways) Why can they do that? Respect and devotion from their fans. They'll both stand the test of time, for years to come.

Things are different now, than they once were. Being liked by the masses is what these bands have to do to stay afloat. I don't like their strangle hold on the artists. Especially Clearchannel, who is known for taking out bands at the knees when its something they don't want.

I'd like to believe in a perfect world that bands could start at the bottom playing clubs, and working their way to stardom by doing things their way, and their way only. This is why we need to boycott the things that are happening out there now. My hope is that the bands that change themselves to get the break they need, will eventually have the freedom to do things their way. Selling your soul to the devil is a terrible way to acheive your goal, but what else can they do? That's what I'm hoping with bands like Evanescence. The talent is there, and hopefully with the success comes the freedom to take things more in the direction they want.

No I own 3 LC albums, I know they're big in Europe, but here in the States they're not that big at all(Although I think they did tour here this year). I just plain think Evanescence is better, I think Amy Lee has better vocals, although LC's Scabbia is hotter, I think Evanescence has better writing, and a better sound, that's how I'm comparing them.

Now of course I'm not necessarily right since Art is all subjective, so I'm not trying to say liking one over the other is wrong.

My mainstream comment however is a trend here in the US that I seem to notice, I'm not going to even pretend I know how it goes down in other parts of the world, because I don't have a clue. I checked out some kids today selling back a bunch of small band cd's and instantly realized they were posers, so when I asked where their Britney Spears cd's where they replied "dude, we soo aren't mainstream". They're the people I mean, the ones who truly sell out in a strange quest to not sell out with the rest of the masses.

I didn't mean it as a good thing. I just meant the old "Rock Star" persona that people used to percieve. It was especially big in the 70's and 80's, everyone wanted to be a big rock star. The movie called Rock Star is an example of what i'm talking about. No, I don't support what the music industry is doing by making music that appeals to the masses. It is however what is happening on a daily basis for quite some time now. There are exceptions to the rule as you've mentioned.

Tool isn't my favorite band, but I respect your devotion to their music, and I understand what it is to have that feeling about a certain band. Bands like Tool, Metallica (Metallica being my favorite band) have proven themselves over and over again with their music. They both have the freedom to do what it is they want to do. They can make their music, not have it sell well, and still draw in massive audiences at concerts (where all the money is truly made anyways) Why can they do that? Respect and devotion from their fans. They'll both stand the test of time, for years to come.

Things are different now, than they once were. Being liked by the masses is what these bands have to do to stay afloat. I don't like their strangle hold on the artists. Especially Clearchannel, who is known for taking out bands at the knees when its something they don't want.

I'd like to believe in a perfect world that bands could start at the bottom playing clubs, and working their way to stardom by doing things their way, and their way only. This is why we need to boycott the things that are happening out there now. My hope is that the bands that change themselves to get the break they need, will eventually have the freedom to do things their way. Selling your soul to the devil is a terrible way to acheive your goal, but what else can they do? That's what I'm hoping with bands like Evanescence. The talent is there, and hopefully with the success comes the freedom to take things more in the direction they want.

you see? thats why I like to talk with you.

To be honest there are still certain recent bands that are going to keep rock in a good level, bands that like you said started playing in clubs and now, they are huge but not mainstream, Radiohead is the oldest example, Sigur Ros next to them, I think europe has the key for the next classic music (well, they have it since the 70's :p) I suggest you to give some of those bands a try, so, I think its still possible to bands to become huge and still maintain themselves

@:

i wouldnt say its gonna be mainstream, and therefor bad (there is good mainstream music...). id listen to it before i judge it.

but still, you might b right.

i have two of their albums, and they are pretty much different... weird. i guess youre right, but some people might consider the new sound even better.

(except for:

WAKE ME UP!

CANT WAKE UP!

WAKE ME UP!

CANT WAKE UP!

WAKE ME UP!

CANT WAKE UP!

WAKE ME UP!

CANT WAKE UP!

WAKE ME UP!

CANT WAKE UP!

WAKE ME UP!

CANT WAKE UP!

WAKE ME UP!

CANT WAKE UP!

WAKE ME UP!

CANT WAKE UP!

lol

^^ i wouldnt go that far.

^i wouldnt compare evanescence to beatles.

i'm not comparing their music but the truth is Ringo Star is THE WORST DRUMMER EVER!!! :laugh:

*don't mind me*

now seriously... the reason i made that statement is that many people don't think Evanescence has any talent, just make some catchy tunes, suck, sold out and **** but just think about the beatles, their talent wasn't anything special and they made some ****ty catchy tunes (*thinks obladi oblada) so it's kind of the same but no one is comparing the music or the decade here.

Just because Evanescence is *popular* you people have the need to say their music sucks, if you wanna say something sucks just talk about britney because i bet she can suck pretty well. :whistle:

*again don't mind me* my opinion is the suxxors and whatever

Edited by Apollo
Just because Evanescence is *popular* you people have the need to say their music sucks, if you wanna say something sucks just talk about britney because i bet she can suck pretty well. :whistle:

personal experience?

i mean did you listen to it... hehehe.

i'm not comparing their music but the truth is Ringo Star is THE WORST DRUMMER EVER!!! :laugh:

*don't mind me*

now seriously... the reason i made that statement is that many people don't think Evanescence has any talent, just make some catchy tunes, suck, sold out and **** but just think about the beatles, their talent wasn't anything special and they made some ****ty catchy tunes (*thinks obladi oblada) so it's kind of the same but no one is comparing the music or the decade here.

Just because Evanescence is *popular* you people have the need to say their music sucks, if you wanna say something sucks just talk about britney because i bet she can suck pretty well. :whistle:

*again don't mind me* my opinion is the suxxors and whatever

Hmm, no they suck. I hate mainstream, wanna know why? Because you're right all it takes is a "Obladi Oblada. I mean come on Nightwish is 100x better sounding then Evanescence, and so is Within Temptation. Where are they? Still in Europe because America's mainstream taste in music is bad. People don't even like rap for the lyrics, they like it for the beat. Do you see what is wrong with that picture?

Hmm, no they suck. I hate mainstream, wanna know why? Because you're right all it takes is a "Obladi Oblada. I mean come on Nightwish is 100x better sounding then Evanescence, and so is Within Temptation. Where are they? Still in Europe because America's mainstream taste in music is bad. People don't even like rap for the lyrics, they like it for the beat. Do you see what is wrong with that picture?

i didnt know nightwish werent popular in america.

it actually surprised me to see them over here on tv.

yeah, america sucks :p

Lacuna Coil - Heaven's A Lie is better. Oh and what is this? They also have an acoustic version of the song Lacuna Coil - Heaven's A Lie - (Studio Acoustic). Really don't say mainstream is good until you've heard underground or other stuff that isn't mainstream in the US.

Growing up with REAL rock music from the 60's to the 80's, I can't stand what they call "rock" nowadays. After the meltdown of the Seattle-based garage bands, there's probably more crap out there than the music industry knows what to do with. You never hear anyone quoting most lyrics from the last 10 years, but I'll bet everyone here knows Beatles lyrics. One of my gripes with modern music is that there are a LOT of bands that burn out too fast, whereas the opposite was true when I was growing up. People lasted FOREVER, to the point where they're STILL writing and touring.

Today's music is so prefab; I can't stand it. That's why I like Evanescence so much. They seem to really take those rock roots and use them without sounding like every other pseudo-rock band that's out there now. There are people that think Nickleback or Queens of the Stone Age are the best things to happen to rock and I just roll my eyes and listen to some Eric Clapton.

I'm not saying that Evanescence is the end-all, be-all of modern rock, but they are a refreshing change.

Mike

See, I've always felt that Nickleback and Effernesense, effervensese, effing whetever were on the same page. Junk.

Effervesense isn't crap? I've never understood why anyone could listen to them...

Of course, I've only heard that one song that they play obsessively on the radio, so maybe I can't judge them fairly.

Of course, I've only heard that one song that they play obsessively on the radio, so maybe I can't judge them fairly.

AH! That's how most of the people judge music nowadays!

People say Nickelback sucks and **** but only listen to the singles and i say Nickelback is a very good ROCK band but people ONLY listen to the singles which get tiresome and aren't that great.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
    • Putin was behind Farage/Brexit and behind Trump/MAGA. Different idiot lying beasts, same fascist master. Same screwed up results for both nations.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      217
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!