[FX] bangbang023: 07-01-30 [Trunk/Win32](O2/GAL)


Recommended Posts

The newer AXP's support SSE2, I believe. You should be ok in installing it over, at this point.

585108422[/snapback]

Oh well, thnx for the reply, but after a little research, seems my processor doesnt do SSE2, prolly somat new with the 64bit ones, mines only a 2600+ :/

Does that mean you can run it side by side with the regular 1.0 version??

585108775[/snapback]

Supposedly? Yes. That said, 1.0 Final couldn't read some changes that 1.0+ made to the profile and therefore didn't work for me during the initial testing.

You're not wrong there, I just downloaded the official nightly(CPU doesn't support SSE2) and it renders much quicker than 1.0 Final.

585109912[/snapback]

Thnx for that post man, would of never tried it if it wernt for you, and its so much better than the final :)

Thnx for that post man, would of never tried it if it wernt for you, and its so much better than the final :)

585111287[/snapback]

It's decidedly quicker than 1.0 final (P4 with HT, so it supports SSE2) but then so is the Netscape prototype (*Firescape*). Apparently you and the source of the prototype are doing something that the Firefox dev team didn't do with Firefox 1.0; otherwise, where is all the extra speed coming from?

When installing your builds over 1.0 final, how much cleaning do I need to do before hand? Can I just uninstall 1.0 final, or do I need to manually go in a delete all of the profiles folders, etc? Thanks

EDIT - I just deleted everything for a fresh start and installed your version. It's very speedy but why are some of the graphical elements different? The Firefox icon, for starters, but also the little puzzle piece which appears when there are components to intall on a web page (like flash). I'm a huge fan of the normal firefox graphical look - is there a way to either make your builds to look the same, or, more likely, how can I edit them myself? Thanks

Edited by chrisa107

I just backed up my profile and installed over 1.0 final and it worked great, the icon was probably changed by bangbang since the official nightlies have the normal one. The puzzle icon has been there for as long as I can remember.

Edit- Optimized builds are not allowed to use the official artwork, thats why it is different. :)

Edited by flightmike1
It's decidedly quicker than 1.0 final (P4 with HT, so it supports SSE2) but then so is the Netscape prototype (*Firescape*).  Apparently you and the source of the prototype are doing something that the Firefox dev team didn't do with Firefox 1.0; otherwise, where is all the extra speed coming from?

585113125[/snapback]

It's the use of the 1.8a6 engine from Mozilla. It's much faster than 1.7.

Thanks for the answer - all clear now.

Is there anyway to change it to the official artwork myself, or is that a no-no?

585117471[/snapback]

It has to be done pre-building.

12/17 is out

I have it installed now..and you guys are right the page rendering is awesome. I did lose some extensions though. I lost spellbound for one (one I need badly), but it was well worth it for the added speed. And spellbound will work with it soon, just the author has to figure out how to fix it and still have it work on 1.0. Thanks bangbang023, awesome builds.

Please excuse any spelling mistakes till spellbound is working again :D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
    • it dosnt support onprem exchange. it dosnt support mapi-calls. the views are all worse/limited. its slower. it cant see public folder calendars. we already have webmail. the list of other missing features is pretty huge but i only see it when customers call to say their email isnt working, and 9/10 times its cause they accidentality changed to outlooknew(new). Hold the line everyone!
    • yeah, this looks beautiful. Damn this winter's going to be great.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!