• 0

fastest booting OS needed


Question

whats the fastest booting OS out there? im setting up my P3 667 256MB, 25GB, some passive 4MB AGP as a music thing in the basement, and i need an OS that would load in less then 15 seconds. linux windows anything that cam play MP3 MP3 pro and WMA (winamp really)

Edited by musicmaster
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/192395-fastest-booting-os-needed/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Look dont listen to this stability and linux v windows crap very simply

Linux generally loads reasonably fast but to this day the fastest boot ive seen has to be WindowsME. It even boots fast off old crap machines so it should be quite fine for what you have.

Additionally you could just run any Windows higher then 98? and just use Standby and Hibernate modes. Standby will load up damn quick.

But yeah for running winamp, stability, usability etc none of those are your concerns so personally if you want bootup im thinking WindowsMe. Or if your happy to waste a cpl cents a day, just use standby mode and use whatever you want.

  • 0

i was just about to suggest geexbox :p

the longest bit about the boot is the bios posts and that ****... I would though go with Windows XP Embedded... Get it at www.microsoft.com/windows/embedded.. use the evaluation.. you can use it for 180 days but you can either reinstall it every 6 months or you will find a way around it ;)

windows embedded is a program which you run, you can then choose what part you want.. i would select drivers + winlogon + (cant remember what it is called the basics that you must have) + network support (if you want to stream music over the network) + winamp... it will boot really fast...

edit: geexbox will not boot in 5 seconds on a p3... but it is fast as well...

edit2: sorry did se that you said it booten in 5 seconds for you...

Edited by Fredde87
  • 0

Not got any suggestions other than what you've got so far but I'd just like to say.

I've got a second sys like this, I call it my M-Box (multimedia-box) It's connected to my TV in a little Shuttle Case I use it for recording TV and playing Divx/WMA/DVD as well as some games that play good through a usb gamepad like NFSU and PSPE as well as some basic web browsing like checking local cinema times and reading film reviews. Helps if you got a tv that can accept a 800x600 signal without getting too blurry. It's a real nice thing to have next to your TV if you can get a quiet enough PSU/Cooling Fan/HDD

Heartily Recommended

Ascii

  • 0

I'm running an AMD Athlon XP 2800+ with 512MB DDR RAM.

Here's what I did:

  • Imported my hardware configuration into Target Designer
  • Modified the Target Device Settings* (using the Settings panel)
  • Added the Information Appliance Design Template
  • Configured the Information Appliance component (using the Settings panel)
  • Ran a Dependency Check (F5)
  • Removed components that I don't use
  • Configured the User Interface Core component (using the Settings panel)
  • Added and configured the Automatic Logon component (using the Settings panel)
  • Built the target image without running a Dependency Check (F7)

* specifically, Boot ARC Path and Boot Partition Size

Here's a list of the components I added:

  • Automatic Logon
  • Add Hardware Control Panel
  • Add/Remove Programs Control Panel
  • Date/Time Control Panel
  • Device Manager
  • Display Control Panel
  • Keyboard & Mouse Control Panel
  • Map Network Drives/Network Places Wizard
  • Power Meter Control Panel
  • Registry Editor
  • System Control Panel
  • Task Manager
  • Tray Icon Add/Remove Support
  • Users Control Panel
  • Windows Accessories (minus Wordpad)
  • CMD - Windows Command Processor

I'm having problems installing the ATi drivers though. :wacko:

  • 0

XP boots faster than 2000 and NT, so stay away from those. If you disabled the eye-candy from XP you might find it fast enough.

Other than that, you could boot from a CD-ROM that creates a 128MB RAM drive that contained Windows 95 and a music player.

Assuming that this guy hasn't stripped the networking components then you get your music from the network.

http://www.geocities.com/politalk/win95/emrgcy95.htm

He says you can boot in as little a 2 seconds.

n.b. I've noticed that CD burners seem to add a few seconds to the 9x boot time but perhaps that's only when burning software is installed.

Edit: I guess it does support networking

With Network access you can transfer long filenames from one computer to the other without having Windows installed.
  • 0
whats the fastest booting OS out there? im setting up my P3 667 256MB, 25GB, some passive 4MB AGP as a music thing in the basement, and i need an OS that would load in less then 15 seconds. linux windows anything that cam play MP3 MP3 pro and WMA (winamp really)

install DOS 6.22 on your rig and it will boot in less than 10 seconds...that's a promise!!!

:D LOL :D

  • 0
I'm running an AMD Athlon XP 2800+ with 512MB DDR RAM.

Here's what I did:

  • Imported my hardware configuration into Target Designer
  • Modified the Target Device Settings* (using the Settings panel)
  • Added the Information Appliance Design Template
  • Configured the Information Appliance component (using the Settings panel)
  • Ran a Dependency Check (F5)
  • Removed components that I don't use
  • Added components from Software > Sytem > User Interface
  • Added the Windows Installer Service and Autologin components
  • Configured the User Interface Core component (using the Settings panel)
  • Added and configured the Automatic Logon component (using the Settings panel)
  • Built the target image without running a Dependency Check (F7)

* specifically, Boot ARC Path and Boot Partition Size

I'm having problems installing the ATi drivers though. :wacko:

AHHHH you're working with XP embedded!!! That will boot like lightning :woot: :woot:

  • 0

If you dont mind the PC using a little bit of power and you have the hardware to do it then I would say Win XP with Stand by in the S3 position (bios setting)

This starts up in about the time it takes the monitor to warm up ie. about 2-3 secs. (Remember this is not an actual cold boot)

Stand by in S3 dumps the hibernate file into the RAM and the pc just keeps this powered so there are no fans or anything else running (which happens with standby in S1). Just a little juice to keep the memory up. On restarting it just loads the hibernate file out of ram which is the quickest possible method. No bios / raid load up as its all still detected.

Been using standby for a long time now (about a year) and it totally rocks imo. Also cool for WOL as dont have to wait ages for it to boot up.

Only side effect you sometimes have is it takes a little while for the DNS service to start after coming out of standby so you might not be able to browse the web by names for the first 5-10 secs after boot, but for music this would be no probs

  • 0
If you dont mind the PC using a little bit of power and you have the hardware to do it then I would say Win XP with Stand by in the S3 position (bios setting)

This starts up in about the time it takes the monitor to warm up ie. about 2-3 secs. (Remember this is not an actual cold boot)

Stand by in S3 dumps the hibernate file into the RAM and the pc just keeps this powered so there are no fans or anything else running (which happens with standby in S1). Just a little juice to keep the memory up. On restarting it just loads the hibernate file out of ram which is the quickest possible method. No bios / raid load up as its all still detected.

Been using standby for a long time now (about a year) and it totally rocks imo. Also cool for WOL as dont have to wait ages for it to boot up.

Only side effect you sometimes have is it takes a little while for the DNS service to start after coming out of standby so you might not be able to browse the web by names for the first 5-10 secs after boot, but for music this would be no probs

Actually, it does not dump any hibernate file into RAM, the contents of the RAM which you need to preserve are already in the RAM. All that S3 does is keep it powered.

  • 0
If you dont mind the PC using a little bit of power and you have the hardware to do it then I would say Win XP with Stand by in the S3 position (bios setting)

This starts up in about the time it takes the monitor to warm up ie. about 2-3 secs. (Remember this is not an actual cold boot)

Stand by in S3 dumps the hibernate file into the RAM and the pc just keeps this powered so there are no fans or anything else running (which happens with standby in S1). Just a little juice to keep the memory up. On restarting it just loads the hibernate file out of ram which is the quickest possible method. No bios / raid load up as its all still detected.

Been using standby for a long time now (about a year) and it totally rocks imo. Also cool for WOL as dont have to wait ages for it to boot up.

Only side effect you sometimes have is it takes a little while for the DNS service to start after coming out of standby so you might not be able to browse the web by names for the first 5-10 secs after boot, but for music this would be no probs

Actually, it does not dump any hibernate file into RAM, the contents of the RAM which you need to preserve are already in the RAM. All that S3 does is keep it powered.

what the hell :laugh: :laugh:

S1 is Standby, the system is put in Sleep Mode

and Hibernate, the contents of the ram is saved into the Hibernate file. :rolleyes:

S3 is Suspend to ram, PC is powered off but the DDR is Kept Powered.

:rofl:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • There are so many of these apps now that do this, what do people recommend?
    • Just the price of doing business. The scamble to pull as much from the web as possible is happening, and it's happening before a case like this changes how or what is legal do to with AI in terms of data harvesting. But even then as we've seen with the likes of Google who ignore cookie requests and just accept the fact they'll get fined, it's built into their business price model now. AI is here, its not going away. Their reward if any from the court case would be best suited to trying to incorprate AI or licence their end points as authentic human verified content. The problem is, as we've seen these same news papers are using AI themselves.
    • Which finger's fingernail are we talking about? I can see how not having this info can lead to massive differences in interpretation.
    • This Chinese company is reportedly developing a feature Apple and Samsung can only dream of by Hamid Ganji While companies like Apple and Samsung have been relatively conservative with their devices’ battery capacities in recent years, Chinese manufacturers have taken the competition to the next level by introducing significantly larger batteries. However, the latest report from China suggests that a local company may already be developing a smartphone with a whopping 14,000mAh battery. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claimed on Weibo that a smartphone maker is developing a device with a 14,000mAh battery. If true, it would be the largest battery ever used in a smartphone and could, in theory, provide up to a week of battery life on a single charge. The leaker did not reveal the name of the company behind the device, but there are some clues. This week, HONOR unveiled the X80 Pro Max in China with an 11,000mAh battery and 90W wired charging support. The company also launched the Honor Win in January, which packs a 10,000mAh battery. HONOR, a former subsidiary of Huawei, has a proven track record of developing smartphones with unusually large batteries. However, other Chinese brands, including Xiaomi, have also launched devices such as the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max with 7,500mAh batteries. Though Chinese users on Weibo also believe the company behind the new battery is HONOR. Interestingly, Digital Chat Station said the device with the 14,000mAh battery weighs around 220 grams, making it lighter than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 grams) and slightly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (214 grams). The iPhone 17 Pro Max currently packs a 5,088mAh battery in eSIM-only versions, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 5,000mAh battery. Neither device is expected to see a dramatic increase in battery capacity in its next-generation successor. So when it comes to battery comparison, Chinese brands are unbeaten. HONOR smartphones are currently available in the EU, but the Chinese brand has no official presence in the United States due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. government.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!