XPSP2 will limit your max. connections/sec


Recommended Posts

P2P is not legal? Thats news to me.. maybe what you are downloading is not legal.. but as far as I know P2P is probably the next great filesharing technology.. And the internet/webpages could eventually goto a peer to peer type of deal to speed up browsing.

BT will be the future I think. It's already showing its worth when FX 0.9 came out and torrents were made to help ease the load of the main server.

Look, guys... this is a GOOD thing. I don't think this is really getting through to you. What this security measure does is put a cap on the number of attempts that can be made to random addresses from your computer by 'corking' the outgoing attempts after a certain number of failures. Why? well it makes sense that if something like sasser is trying to spread by trying to connect to random addresses, there will be a lot of failed attempts because many of the addys it tries to get to won't actually exist.

This is good. And a 'workaround' to dissable this.... is bad. That would mean that if you become infected by some new virus that attempts to do what this security measure tries to slow down, your computer would help the threat spread faster and do more damage than the computer belonging to someone who didn't bother to dissable this security measure. That would just be plain stupid.

And for the record, this has no effect on p2p programs, since p2p clients don't try to connect to random addresses.

Correct me if I'm wrong, guys.

good move microsoft... this will defently protect the normal user and let face it guys.. we will easly deactivate it... it wont be hard... isnt it better to have it activated as standard? do you think my grandmother will know how to activate it? No she wont, but we do know how to disable it so why complain?

Exactamundo! However, maybe a check box under internet options might be nice to enable/disable this procativeness. :D

So many people are complaining about other people how they don't know how to use a PC. Many people who buy a PC just get one that's finished in the shop, but in many cases there isn't any AV software on it. And will those people go to the store to get one? no, unless they hear it from a friend who knows this is needed. Sollution: build AV software in Windows => Result => people complaining about why MS put's crap in their OS.

Hi

First of all, I?m the guy who wrote this at warp2search.

I emailed some guy at M$ about the problem and thats what he wrote:

"Hello,

Thank you for contacting Microsoft Online Customer Service

I understand that you wish to switch off the number of TCP/IP connection attempts that can be made to a program. I understand the importance of your issue and look forward to assisting you.

As a Customer Service Representative, I have researched and found that if you are working on a network of computers and if the programs are accessed by a number of users, you may have to contact the administrator of the network to reset the settings as he will be in a better position to assist you."

I wrote him that i actually ARE the admin of the systems. And now i wait for answer from him. And forget about this registry entry. I checked this out with build 2086 (that was the first XPSP2 i used and the first where i experienced this) already along with "MaxUserPort" and other little switches but it was no go.

Waiting for the M$-Guy to respond but don`t think he will know the answer.

BTW: I?m in contact with Max A. Kostioukovitch and we are trying to find the solution ourselves.

When i find the fix/switch i will post here immediately..

PS: Didn`t think i would cause so much discussion about this cause till now everyone told me "check your router, your PC is crap, your ISP is crap" so i?m glad this problem FINALLY spreads around.....

Benny12345

Just tried that reg-entry again for fun and guess what i get when i started emule....:

"EventID 4226

TCP/IP has reached the security limit imposed on the number of concurrent TCP connect attempts"

Just what i thought....

Edited by benny12345

Bad, bad news guys.

Just received an email from the M$-guy.

The limitation is set in the TCP/IP-stack so unless somebody rewrites the tcpip.sys we`re stuck at this point.

he gave me a phone number where i can talk to "professionals" but i don?t live in the USA so the number is useless unless i want to produce a high phone bill....

I think this means goodbye XPSP2.........

Writing MS as M$ makes you super cool!

Who cares how he writes it.

I'm ****ed at MS for changing tcpip.sys so some people won't get a virus on their system.

Its MS's fault for making a poor security system. Its their fault for not updating IE to make it less vulerable to viruses.

I haven't heard of and Unix or Linux kernels which limit the number of incoming/outgoing connections.

Any chance on using tcpip.sys from a previous version to get around this?

If this is made a registry setting then viruses would just change the registry setting and spread. 0 protection.

The only way to implement this would to ask the user if they want to enable or disable this functionality during SP2 setup (if used as a standalone patch), Windows XP setup (if slipstreamed), or the first boot of the computer (if slipstreamed into an OEM install). The OS would proceed to install one of 2 DLL files: one for enabled or one for disabled.

If a user changes his/her mind, Microsoft could make a tool that would change the DLLs out. However, the tool would be able 5 MB, take about 5 minutes to complete, and not have a silent mode, so that it would be unfeasible to integrate it into a virus.

Oh you poor poor guys using WinXP. Glad I have Win2k. I don't think that MS should have done this, but I think the real purpose of it was to limit P2P as well as worms. And it is going to work, isn't it?

[nelson voice]ha ha, your operating system is obsolete :p [/nelson voice]

Um, I do. I thought this board had enough class not to resort to such immature spellings, and then have people defend that behavior. Guess I was wrong, my apologies, carry on. 
really dont take offence to a spelling someone make half way around the world, ifyour upset by it then you are more imature than he is

anyway, on to the main problem here, i have a small amout of confidence that Microsoft will fix this, that is to say about %50 they fix it. but on the bright side, if they dont, there will always be a hack for it :devil:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
    • 38% off a super insane price is still an INSANE price.
    • 1TB Samsung T9 and Samsung 9100 PRO SSDs are now selling at great prices by Fiza Ali Amazon is now offering the 1TB variant of Samsung T9 and Samsung 9100 PRO SSD at great prices with limited-time 38% and 39% discounts, respectively, so you may want to check them out if you have been looking to upgrade your storage solution. The Samsung T9 connects via a USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20Gbps) interface and delivers sequential read speeds of up to 2,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 1,950MB/s, making it suitable for transferring large files, backing up data, and handling high-resolution media content. When it comes to the security features, the SSD includes AES 256-bit hardware encryption to help protect sensitive data. Designed for portability, the drive is reportedly resistant to drops from heights of up to 3 metres. Furthermore, it operates within a temperature range of 0°C to 60°C and can be stored at temperatures between -40°C and 85°C. Samsung Magician Software is included for drive management, firmware updates, performance optimisation, and health monitoring. Finally, the T9 is certified to multiple international standards, including CE, FCC, UL, UKCA, and RoHS 2 compliance, and is backed by a five-year limited warranty as well. 1TB Samsung T9 SSD: $179.99 (Amazon US) - 38% off The Samsung 9100 PRO uses the M.2 2280 form factor and connects through a PCIe 5.0 x4 interface with NVMe 2.0 support. Built with Samsung V-NAND TLC flash memory, an in-house controller, and 1GB of low-power DDR4X cache memory, the 9100 PRO is engineered for high-performance computing and gaming workloads. Furthermore, the SSD delivers sequential read speeds of up to 14,700MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 13,300MB/s. Random performance is rated at up to 1,850,000 IOPS for reads and up to 2,600,000 IOPS for writes, depending on system hardware and configuration. The drive supports TRIM, S.M.A.R.T monitoring, automatic garbage collection, and device sleep mode to help maintain performance and efficiency over time. In terms of security features, it includes AES 256-bit encryption, TCG Opal support, and IEEE 1667 compliance. The 9100 PRO operates within a temperature range of 0°C to 70°C, is rated for 1.5 million hours MTBF, and can reportedly withstand shocks of up to 1,500G for 0.5 milliseconds. Finally, Samsung Magician Software is also included for firmware updates, performance monitoring, drive management, and optimisation. 1TB Samsung 9100 PRO SSD: $206.99 (Amazon US) - 39% off Alternatively, you can also check out other SSD deals here. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • This is about the already discredited 2025 announcement. Not the current one, which I've heard nothing negative about in the academic literature.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!