ZoneAlarm Security Suite


Recommended Posts

ZoneAlarm Security Suite v5 is the newest ZoneAlarm ZoneLabs has created. All the features that come with ZoneAlarm Pro, along with web filtering, IM Security and virus scanning have been integrated into this suite. But do the new features deliver more security, or is it just a waste of resources?

Installation:

Will go without a hitch as long as the system is clean to begin with and there are no conflicting software (like other software firewalls). If upgrading from an old version, your settings will be kept, unless you are upgrading from a *really* old version or had corrupt settings to begin with. Upon installation, you will be greated with a nice wizard to setup the very basic elements of the firewall, then given the option of a tutorial. When done, you must restart and proceed to setting up the firewall. While the nice wizard tells us we are done with configuration, that is hardly the case. A user can choose to just stick with answering prompts about programs, but why not take full advantage of the firewall that cost $70? A user opening up ZoneAlarm will quickly find there is a lot more too it than just a wizard.

Firewall:

ZoneLabs has always been noted for the robustness in firewall software, featuring strong and intelligent stateful packet inspection. While the workings of the firewall itself are unknown to me, I can confidently say that I have yet to be hacked. It is certainly enough to stop worms like MSBlaster. The interface for setting computers to the trusted zone is easy, but setting up ICS or manually opening ports will require a bit of knowledge, some use from the help file or a friend who knows. Expert rules provide a great medium for the more advanced of users to take more control over their connection, from opening ports for only a specific range of IP addresses to opening ports to closing internet access at specific times.

Program Control:

A program may be allowed or denied access by giving checks or X's, but even that may be too hard for some users, as there are programs like Generic Host Processes for Win32 services and Services and Controller App that need access, but wtf are they? To fix that problem, the alertadvisor can give advice on program access right in the prompt, or automatically give access to known trusted programs. This prevents people from foolishly giving GHP server rights, or blocking it completely and getting annoyed because internet won't work.

While users may not touch the other aspects of program control, there is still much that can be configured to increase security. Openprocess control to prevent abuse of the openprocess function and advanced program control to keep a program from gaining access by using another program. There is also component control to help you keep track of changed components to prevent the action of a trojan gaining access by replacing components of an allowed program. While all this extra security is nice, it takes someone with time and patience to configure it all, else there will be many prompts about advanced program control, or a program trying to load new components.

AntiVirus:

ZoneAlarm Security Suite uses the VET antivirus engine provided by Computer Associates. It comes with all the standard stuff you would expect from a virus scanner. Real time protection and the like. While it may be able to stand up to Norton, it just can't compare with AVG or Avast. It simply lacks the features and the database to compare. And spyware? Pfft, forget it.

Email Protection:

This basically works by blocking certain file attachments that can be dangerous and giving a warning prompt about said attachment. To quarantine the file, ZoneAlarm changes the file extention depending on what the origonal one was. There is also outbound email protection to limit how many emails can be sent out in a unit of time. My only complaint is that it should support more email clients.

Privacy:

Popups are annoying, ads stink and mobile code (ActiveX, scripts) can install spyware on your computer. This can all be managed/blocked in this tab. THe privacy tab also has a site list so that you may allow stuff for the sites you trust. There is also a cache cleaner. The cache cleaner isn't as good as Window washer, but it is good enough in my opinion. Certainly beats having to clean all that stuff manually, or buy a seperate program. It will work with any browser, but firefox users need to turn it on manually. Yep, that is what you get for having it at 0.x

ID Lock:

A somewhat useless feature, you can store stuff like your name, PIN number, credit card number, address, diameter of your left testicle and phone number in a "vault". If a program tries to send out what is in the vault, it will be replaced by astriks ******. You can set sites that you trust with this information. One-way encryption also exists, which prevents someone from getting that info from ZoneAlarm itself. I consider it useless because there isn't very much to bypassing it. Encrypting the connection, or putting spaces inbetween the data is all that is really needed.

Web Filtering:

This feature is provided by a third party. A basic web filter program, it will block bad web pages and replace it with a "web filter violation omfg" page. It also has an automatic update thing. Pretty good job of blocking, but there is no way to edit the list of blocked pages, you can only allow/disallow content of certain catagories.

IM Security:

A nice tool for parents, but I don't see much other use of it other than the supposed vulnerability protection and encryption. This supports any client that uses the AOL/ICQ/MSN/Yahoo! protocols, so even programs like GAIM are protected. You can prevent audio/video/file for those clients as well as block HTML tags and active content if so desired. This is nearly useless though, most of that can be configured to off in the clients themselves, but I guess it is good for a parent/business owner to keep control (so long as a password is set ). The encryption idea is OK, but I would definately like to see it support encryption by other programs that encrypt IM programs.

Support:

email can be hit or miss. They may respond to you in three days, maybe a week, maybe not at all! Phone tech support costs money (so forget that). Their forum system seems to be the most effective, and ironically the people giving help don't get paid. Sadly, they are unofficial, so they dont' know what is actually going on at ZoneLabs HQ. The help file is OK, but one cannot learn a program by help files alone.

Bugs/stability:

Bugs plague ZoneAlarm, but none more than with version 5 of pretty much their entire ZoneAlarm line. A wide range of problems croped up with version 5. Problems with P2P and games, disabled Norton email scanner, IIS/apache problems, chkdsk gets disabled, the list goes on. Some have been fixed already, others will be fixed in the future. However, it is quite clear that ZoneLabs needs more beta testers and a better testing department, as well as a good ear for problems.

Rating:

I give it eight stars. It is a great security product, but it's major problem is the bugs which are far too many in version 5 and just plain don't get fixed fast enough. If security suites aren't your thing, stick with ZoneAlarm/ZoneAlarm Pro.

Trial versions for all ZA products

post-104-1090381595.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/192959-zonealarm-security-suite/
Share on other sites

I believe it is a decent product for the average user. I don't think its possible to have a decent sized program with all features incorporated into it, but ZoneLabs are heading in the right direction with this product. Its only version 5 anyway, most companies don't get their product rolling until Version 7 or 8 (norton on version 11 now?)

I liked the change in interface, but it just didn't feel 1337 anymore. I think it is because of the tabs and the fact that it was so compact. Unfortunately you can't fit all the settings you can make for it in those little tabs. So, they changed it to side buttons and tabs.

I also remember grc.com raving about how it checks the program path for each program to make sure it wasn't replaced by a trojan. Wow the ultimate in firewall technology :o It checks the whole program path :o :o The funny thing is, that page is still there. Steve hasn't updated it. :p

Same here, almost. I didn't even bother to upgrade to version 5 after reading all the complaints about it. Had been using ZA since way back at 2.6. Hate companies that bundle crap. ZA is a firewall. They were very good at that. Not at AV.

It's now Kaspersky Anti Hacker and Kaspersky AV for me.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!