Recommended Posts

:huh: Pardon my ignorance, but I've got a couple of questions to ask. :p Has the 2MB Free Hotmail service upgraded to 250MB storage yet, since there has been so much talk about the 2GB upgrade? Will they implement it in stages? Hope that someone could clarify my doubts. Thanks in advance.

Cheers :D,

user_plex

:huh: Pardon my ignorance, but I've got a couple of questions to ask. :p Has the 2MB Free Hotmail service upgraded to 250MB storage yet, since there has been so much talk about the 2GB upgrade? Will they implement it in stages? Hope that someone could clarify my doubts. Thanks in advance.

Cheers :D,

user_plex

Yes, they have upgraded it 250mb.... If you are a subscriber then you get 2GB :)

Yes, they have upgraded it 250mb.... If you are a subscriber then you get 2GB :)

So does that means that they're upgrading our accounts in stages, since some people including me :( have not seen the addition of another 248MB storage in our accounts? Thanks in advance.

Cheers :D,

user_plex

Hi all

I have downloaded and installed MSN Explorer 7.02. I have signed up twice for new account, it says 2mb. So how can i get 2000mb, was that a joke or what. I followed whatever was written. But only got 2mb

Can anybody plz sign up for me as saad_khan786@msn/ hotmail.com or saad_khan100@msn/ hotmail.com.

Looks like it's all over now people. Me and a few of my buddies have been trying to register for these "2Gb" accounts and we keep getting stuck with the 2Mb ones instead.

Think it's safe to say M$ have cottoned on to the bug/glitch or whatever caused the 2gb accounts to appear.

How to get an msn.com account.

Go to http://hotmail.com.

At the .NET Passport Sign-in box, enter anything for the email address, but make sure you add @msn.com and enter anything for the password.

You should just get an sign in error.

Click on Register with .NET Passport, if you haven't already.

Now when the sign up page has loaded up, you should see [username box]@msn.com

this was the method that didn't work for me, 'cos it only gave me 2mb storage space.

so i just went to an xp com and created an account with msn explorer, and presto! 2 gigs :D.

Edited by [M]
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If you don't care to read what I said, then you prove my point. Maybe written media is beyond your attention span. Titles are not summaries my friend.
    • Nobody asked... in fact, I said "I don't care about political leanings"  
    • TLDR. Here is a far better title (just a basic example): Windows 11 26H2 to allow disabling Web search results
    • Restore will get my vote, only if to see if things are any different, doubt it though but Labour and Conservatives too out of touch and same thing over and over and over…, Lib Dem who?
    • There is nothing wrong with this title. You have completely missed the plot when it comes to "clickbait." The issue was never that a title tries to entice you to click, that is how titles have worked for over 100 years. The issue is when the title subverts expectations, getting you to click expecting something that isn't there. The classic clickbait example is "Boyfriend caught cheating, what happens next will shock you," then what happened next is the girlfriend was upset...which is probably the least shocking outcome imaginable. If sounds like what you want is for the titles to be a collection of 10-word summaries that you can skim, get the just of the story, and only click if you want more details. That is not, never has been, and never will be what titles are. You can go all the way back to print newspapers during the great depression and see the same thing. The newspaper was locked in a vending machine, all you can see is the headline, you choose to put in 5¢ to buy the paper and read the rest if you want. Those headlines were written in a way to sell the paper, not just to provide a summery. Here are two actual headlines from that time, "Wall Street Lays an Egg," or "Stocks Hit Bottom?" Maybe you'd say something like "it was wrong then and it's still wrong now." Okay, fine opinion to have, but it isn't like Neowin is doing something unjurnalistic, they are just following the age-old standards for written media.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!