Doom III is out there! W00T!


Recommended Posts

5900XT is fine, I think its compareable to the 9800XT.

I have a 9800xt but my old GeforceTi 4600 knackered up my motherboard and screwed it for life, it seems, becauses no ATI cards work properly on it. Even after I ran Drivercleaner and all.

I have a 9800xt but my old GeforceTi 4600 knackered up my motherboard and screwed it for life, it seems, becauses no ATI cards work properly on it. Even after I ran Drivercleaner and all.

That sucks. Yeah, if your motherboard won't work with the videocard you have, you're better off just getting a new computer than putting in a new motherboard, since then you're going to have to change the RAM and everything else.

i'm amazed at how well this game performs.

xp 2500+

512mb

9800 pro

i have it set at 1024*768/high quality/2x AA/16x AF

it runs flawlessly and looks great! it seems to be more cpu dependant than anything else.

reallly? thats great coz i have a similar config as you. Waiting for my copy is unbearable :blush: .

That sucks. Yeah, if your motherboard won't work with the videocard you have, you're better off just getting a new computer than putting in a new motherboard, since then you're going to have to change the RAM and everything else.

I blame Nvidia for a lot of my problems with my computer. Mainly the overheating problem(had to install 3 fans when once I needed no fans at all), then there was the constant crashing, not THIS. I bought an 9800xt and now I can't use it. :cry: The pinnacle of graphics cards wasted on me! All because of Nvidia.

As for putting in a new motherboard....that sounds like a process to me. :wacko: Especially since I suppose I would have to replace the CPU.

There is hope for me though, since Doom 3 is configured to work with Nvidia.

:shifty: My 3dmark score: 5698 marks. :cry:

I blame Nvidia for a lot of my problems with my computer. Mainly the overheating problem(had to install 3 fans when once I needed no fans at all), then there was the constant crashing, not THIS. I bought an 9800xt and now I can't use it. :cry: The pinnacle of graphics cards wasted on me! All because of Nvidia.

As for putting in a new motherboard....that sounds like a process to me. :wacko: Especially since I suppose I would have to replace the CPU.

There is hope for me though, since Doom 3 is configured to work with Nvidia.

Everyone is so worried about not being able to run Doom 3, don't worry. The thing about the engine in this game is that it looks fantastic even at 800x600, and with low detail settings. Trust me. The only difference between the settings are just sharper graphics, but you probably wont care too much in the heat of battle..

Your system is fine, ive got a similar setup and I ran the Alpha demo at 1600x1260 (or whatever) and it ran very nicely, around 30fps I think (which is fine, thats the speed that movies go at).

Everyone is so worried about not being able to run Doom 3, don't worry. The thing about the engine in this game is that it looks fantastic even at 800x600, and with low detail settings. Trust me. The only difference between the settings are just sharper graphics, but you probably wont care too much in the heat of battle..

Your system is fine, ive got a similar setup and I ran the Alpha demo at 1600x1260 (or whatever) and it ran very nicely, around 30fps I think (which is fine, thats the speed that movies go at).

:woot: Yeah, the engine is optimized to run even with terrible cards, but no one wants another FAR CRY debacle. :pinch:

Although my 3dmark score is terrible. :wacko:

:woot: Yeah, the engine is optimized to run even with terrible cards, but no one wants another FAR CRY debacle. :pinch:

Although my 3dmark score is terrible. :wacko:

Speaking of Far Cry. I recently played it and set everything to the utmost maximum, and I have to say the human characters look much better than the Doom 3 human beings do. Ill post some screens to compare in a bit.

ok.. when i checked this thread this morning it was at 23 pages... how in the hell did it get to 81 already!?

because it got leaked, and now the whole world is playing it.

My plan tomorrow is to get up at around 9, go to the dentist and pick up some chinese food on the way out, go home, and by then it should be around 10:30 or 11:00. I then call EB to check if they got it in, if not, I go insane and wait it out another day, if they do have it, I immediatley drive over there and CLAIM IT. :devil:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • In the boot options in the UEFI is set to legacy or CMS? It needs to be set to UEFI if it's not already.
    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
    • Because of what they have done to VMware I will never buy anything Broadcom again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      465
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!