Recommended Posts

Nice! I like what they have done with Opera - but I wish it didn't cost that much :blush:

I'm pretty sure you can get it for $20 at certain times.

$20 one time fee is more than fair for something you use daily.

I paid the full $40 for mine because I want to support the developers with the awesome work they've done.

I am always ID'd as opera.

I have also tried what Chode suggested.

It's not important at the moment because I don't use my gmail account I was just checking to see if it worked.

excellent, got it installed and am using this as my main browser, but still got opera 7.5 installed.

This is yet another boost for the opera community, and another cool and useful feature which firefox and other browsers do not support. Well done yet again to the opera team, and look forward to this going final

These seem like very good changes.

However, it does still show that Opera's real-world javascript support is still lacking. They may be ahead on (x)HTML and CSS support, but I still rate Gecko browsers far higher than it in JS performance. And with the increasing shift to using JS to cut down on full page refreshes, it's going to challenge Opera.

I do like the new error pages, voice seems cool but a bit gimmicky.

These seem like very good changes.

However, it does still show that Opera's real-world javascript support is still lacking. They may be ahead on (x)HTML and CSS support, but I still rate Gecko browsers far higher than it in JS performance. And with the increasing shift to using JS to cut down on full page refreshes, it's going to challenge Opera.

I do like the new error pages, voice seems cool but a bit gimmicky.

What? Opera has full JS compliance and has always been faster with JS than any other browser for me.

Could you expand?

These seem like very good changes.

However, it does still show that Opera's real-world javascript support is still lacking. They may be ahead on (x)HTML and CSS support, but I still rate Gecko browsers far higher than it in JS performance. And with the increasing shift to using JS to cut down on full page refreshes, it's going to challenge Opera.

I do like the new error pages, voice seems cool but a bit gimmicky.

You are repeating the tired old meme that Opera's JS support is bad. It might have been in Opera 6, but isn't in Opera 7.

The problem isn't that Opera's JS sucks. The problem is that sites block Opera on purpose or use browser detection that send Opera outdated JS code made for Opera 6.

Opera 7 has excellent support for JS/DOM, but sites aren't taking advantage of it.

You are repeating the tired old meme that Opera's JS support is bad. It might have been in Opera 6, but isn't in Opera 7.

The problem isn't that Opera's JS sucks. The problem is that sites block Opera on purpose or use browser detection that send Opera outdated JS code made for Opera 6.

Opera 7 has excellent support for JS/DOM, but sites aren't taking advantage of it.

Well look, I use Mozilla (Firefox) and whenever I use Opera I have tons of JS problems, and no, it's not just down to buggy webpages.

I think that Google is implementing support for Safari and Konquerer (who have pretty basic JS engines) before Opera is just testament to that.

I have no qualms about it's CSS support - it's probably one of the best and fastest updated in the industry, but Opera's JS support is really lacking.

Well look, I use Mozilla (Firefox) and whenever I use Opera I have tons of JS problems, and no, it's not just down to buggy webpages.

I think that Google is implementing support for Safari and Konquerer (who have pretty basic JS engines) before Opera is just testament to that.

I have no qualms about it's CSS support - it's probably one of the best and fastest updated in the industry, but Opera's JS support is really lacking.

I ask that you back up your statement. I will back up mine.

http://www.opera.com/docs/specs/#ecmascript

Are you still sure Opera's JS support is lacking?

can anyone tell me how is Opera faster than the other browsers out there in running JAVAScript and other in-built code of HTML ?? Can anyone tell me how ???

It just is.. ;)

Anyways, trying to sot out this speech thing. I dont see how its necerssery (I no, ive never been able to spell that) to use the speech plugins though, In the final release they should habe a option to download with or without (like they do with java).

Anyways, trying to sot out this speech thing. I dont see how its necerssery (I no, ive never been able to spell that) to use the speech plugins though, In the final release they should habe a option to download with or without (like they do with java).

They are doing that when final :cool:

Why? It doesn't make anything slower. It may slow down start-up time by a whopping .10 second if anything. You guys need to learn how code affects a program.

Maybe because the download takes twice as long :rolleyes:

Im on 56K Btw. Thats why i said 'I'...

those of you on 7.61. is there any noticeable difference with wmv. files? i've been having a problem with these since 7.50 (now on 7.54) it's not Opera's fault though, it's the host site. just wondered if anything has changed there. i'll wait a few previews before i go to 7.61. just got 7.54 situated a few weeks ago.

I ask that you back up your statement.  I will back up mine.

http://www.opera.com/docs/specs/#ecmascript

Are you still sure Opera's JS support is lacking?

http://www.quirksmode.org/dom/w3c_core.html

http://www.quirksmode.org/dom/w3c_css.html

http://www.quirksmode.org/dom/w3c_events.html

It drops huge parts of the Core spec, very, very little support for the event's spec (and some of it is wrong) and quite poor support for the CSS DOM.

Mozilla is way ahead of every other browser apart from IE on IE specific extensions.

Also, I'd take a tested version of the spec better than a list of the commands it implements.

Finally you can set it to browser only! Excellent :yes:

I just installed it and it loads like 4 times faster (which is impessive as it loaded at the same speed as Firefox before). This is now my default browser, might have to buy it if the final version is this good :)

Also I love how good Opera is for accessibility (spl?). Before it had the excellent page zooming (not just text but the WHOLE page!) and now it has speech recognition (spl?) as well. It is an excellent browser for people who are disabled. My mum works in a special needs school for children with Mild to Serious Handicaps (both physical and mental) and Opera opens them up to a world they never knew existed. Mozilla (Firefox) and IE (and its clones) are good but Opera is light years ahead for some things. If it wasn't for Opera these kids whouldn't be able to use the internet and I think it is excellent that the Opera Team do so much to make their life easier and more enjoyable. I will probably never (I hope) need to have features like page zooming and speech browsing however if I do at least I know I can use Opera :)

Edited by deadmonkey
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Samsung Galaxy Watch8 is now selling at its lowest price ever by Fiza Ali Amazon is now offering Samsung Galaxy Watch8 at its lowest price yet with a 34% discount (purchase link down below). The Galaxy Watch8 is equipped with a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480x480 pixels and support for 16 million colours. The watch is powered by a penta-core processor with clock speeds of up to 1.6GHz, runs Wear OS, and includes 2GB of RAM and 32GB of internal storage. For connectivity, the watch supports Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n on both 2.4GHz and 5GHz bands, and NFC. Furthermore, supported Bluetooth profiles include A2DP, AVRCP, HFP, and HSP. Location services are provided through GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, and Galileo satellite systems. Moreover, the Galaxy Watch8 includes a range of sensors as well, including an accelerometer, barometer, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) sensor, electrical heart sensor (ECG), optical heart rate sensor, gyroscope, geomagnetic sensor, infrared temperature sensor, and ambient light sensor. For media playback, the watch supports MP3, M4A, 3GA, AAC, OGG, OGA, WAV, AMR, and AWB audio formats. In terms of water resistance, it has a 5 ATM rating, which should make it suitable for swimming and everyday exposure to water. Finally, the device is powered by a 435mAh lithium-ion battery, and when it comes to its performance, Samsung rates the battery for up to 40 hours of use with the Always-On Display turned off. Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 (2025) 44mm Smartwatch: $249.99 (Amazon US) - 34% off Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Remarkably based article from Garter - apparently there IS someone working there that actually understands mainframe systems.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Harris Gilbert earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      591
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      65
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!