Recommended Posts

Nice! I like what they have done with Opera - but I wish it didn't cost that much :blush:

I'm pretty sure you can get it for $20 at certain times.

$20 one time fee is more than fair for something you use daily.

I paid the full $40 for mine because I want to support the developers with the awesome work they've done.

I am always ID'd as opera.

I have also tried what Chode suggested.

It's not important at the moment because I don't use my gmail account I was just checking to see if it worked.

excellent, got it installed and am using this as my main browser, but still got opera 7.5 installed.

This is yet another boost for the opera community, and another cool and useful feature which firefox and other browsers do not support. Well done yet again to the opera team, and look forward to this going final

These seem like very good changes.

However, it does still show that Opera's real-world javascript support is still lacking. They may be ahead on (x)HTML and CSS support, but I still rate Gecko browsers far higher than it in JS performance. And with the increasing shift to using JS to cut down on full page refreshes, it's going to challenge Opera.

I do like the new error pages, voice seems cool but a bit gimmicky.

These seem like very good changes.

However, it does still show that Opera's real-world javascript support is still lacking. They may be ahead on (x)HTML and CSS support, but I still rate Gecko browsers far higher than it in JS performance. And with the increasing shift to using JS to cut down on full page refreshes, it's going to challenge Opera.

I do like the new error pages, voice seems cool but a bit gimmicky.

What? Opera has full JS compliance and has always been faster with JS than any other browser for me.

Could you expand?

These seem like very good changes.

However, it does still show that Opera's real-world javascript support is still lacking. They may be ahead on (x)HTML and CSS support, but I still rate Gecko browsers far higher than it in JS performance. And with the increasing shift to using JS to cut down on full page refreshes, it's going to challenge Opera.

I do like the new error pages, voice seems cool but a bit gimmicky.

You are repeating the tired old meme that Opera's JS support is bad. It might have been in Opera 6, but isn't in Opera 7.

The problem isn't that Opera's JS sucks. The problem is that sites block Opera on purpose or use browser detection that send Opera outdated JS code made for Opera 6.

Opera 7 has excellent support for JS/DOM, but sites aren't taking advantage of it.

You are repeating the tired old meme that Opera's JS support is bad. It might have been in Opera 6, but isn't in Opera 7.

The problem isn't that Opera's JS sucks. The problem is that sites block Opera on purpose or use browser detection that send Opera outdated JS code made for Opera 6.

Opera 7 has excellent support for JS/DOM, but sites aren't taking advantage of it.

Well look, I use Mozilla (Firefox) and whenever I use Opera I have tons of JS problems, and no, it's not just down to buggy webpages.

I think that Google is implementing support for Safari and Konquerer (who have pretty basic JS engines) before Opera is just testament to that.

I have no qualms about it's CSS support - it's probably one of the best and fastest updated in the industry, but Opera's JS support is really lacking.

Well look, I use Mozilla (Firefox) and whenever I use Opera I have tons of JS problems, and no, it's not just down to buggy webpages.

I think that Google is implementing support for Safari and Konquerer (who have pretty basic JS engines) before Opera is just testament to that.

I have no qualms about it's CSS support - it's probably one of the best and fastest updated in the industry, but Opera's JS support is really lacking.

I ask that you back up your statement. I will back up mine.

http://www.opera.com/docs/specs/#ecmascript

Are you still sure Opera's JS support is lacking?

can anyone tell me how is Opera faster than the other browsers out there in running JAVAScript and other in-built code of HTML ?? Can anyone tell me how ???

It just is.. ;)

Anyways, trying to sot out this speech thing. I dont see how its necerssery (I no, ive never been able to spell that) to use the speech plugins though, In the final release they should habe a option to download with or without (like they do with java).

Anyways, trying to sot out this speech thing. I dont see how its necerssery (I no, ive never been able to spell that) to use the speech plugins though, In the final release they should habe a option to download with or without (like they do with java).

They are doing that when final :cool:

Why? It doesn't make anything slower. It may slow down start-up time by a whopping .10 second if anything. You guys need to learn how code affects a program.

Maybe because the download takes twice as long :rolleyes:

Im on 56K Btw. Thats why i said 'I'...

those of you on 7.61. is there any noticeable difference with wmv. files? i've been having a problem with these since 7.50 (now on 7.54) it's not Opera's fault though, it's the host site. just wondered if anything has changed there. i'll wait a few previews before i go to 7.61. just got 7.54 situated a few weeks ago.

I ask that you back up your statement.  I will back up mine.

http://www.opera.com/docs/specs/#ecmascript

Are you still sure Opera's JS support is lacking?

http://www.quirksmode.org/dom/w3c_core.html

http://www.quirksmode.org/dom/w3c_css.html

http://www.quirksmode.org/dom/w3c_events.html

It drops huge parts of the Core spec, very, very little support for the event's spec (and some of it is wrong) and quite poor support for the CSS DOM.

Mozilla is way ahead of every other browser apart from IE on IE specific extensions.

Also, I'd take a tested version of the spec better than a list of the commands it implements.

Finally you can set it to browser only! Excellent :yes:

I just installed it and it loads like 4 times faster (which is impessive as it loaded at the same speed as Firefox before). This is now my default browser, might have to buy it if the final version is this good :)

Also I love how good Opera is for accessibility (spl?). Before it had the excellent page zooming (not just text but the WHOLE page!) and now it has speech recognition (spl?) as well. It is an excellent browser for people who are disabled. My mum works in a special needs school for children with Mild to Serious Handicaps (both physical and mental) and Opera opens them up to a world they never knew existed. Mozilla (Firefox) and IE (and its clones) are good but Opera is light years ahead for some things. If it wasn't for Opera these kids whouldn't be able to use the internet and I think it is excellent that the Opera Team do so much to make their life easier and more enjoyable. I will probably never (I hope) need to have features like page zooming and speech browsing however if I do at least I know I can use Opera :)

Edited by deadmonkey
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know The ONLY thing I need to know is the price, which I know will be way higher than I (and most people) are willing to pay for a phone... so basically nothing here I need to know. PS: Nice job getting that Apple reference to a non-existent and unrevealed product as "competition" in there. Cheque is in the mail.
    • Well I really think the repasting helped if your higher clocks have returned, maybe the next thing to look at is if there is a problem with your case airflow? I guess this because your 3080 has returned to optimal state, but is still staying too warm, which might suggest it was thermal throttling before you repasted, of which the only logical conclusion could be outside factors.
    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know by Hamid Ganji Galaxy Z Fold 7 - Image via Samsung The next generation of Samsung foldables is set to be unveiled next month at the second Unpacked event of the year. Samsung’s 2026 foldables are not expected to offer significant upgrades over their predecessors, with the Korean firm instead focusing on design refinements and conventional upgrades such as faster processors and better cameras. However, Samsung is reportedly planning to unveil an all-new passport-style foldable this year to rival Apple’s first foldable iPhone, which is expected to debut this September. Here’s a roundup of everything we know about Samsung’s upcoming foldable devices ahead of their official debut. When can we expect Samsung’s new foldables? The Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Z Flip 7 series were unveiled in July, and Samsung is expected to maintain this timeframe in 2026. Based on previous reports from Korean sources, Samsung will hold its Unpacked event on July 22 in London, UK, to pull back the curtain on the Galaxy Z Fold 8 series. The devices are also expected to hit the shelves a few weeks after launch. However, Samsung has yet to announce an official date. A new naming scheme? One of the most interesting changes we might see this year is a new naming scheme for Samsung’s latest foldables. SamMobile reported that since Samsung is expected to unveil three foldables this year, it has adopted a new naming strategy to simplify product identification for customers. Accordingly, the standard Galaxy Z Fold 8 will reportedly be called the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and will serve as the direct successor to last year’s Galaxy Z Fold 7. The “Ultra” suffix suggests the phone could feature higher-end specifications, such as additional rear camera modules. Samsung’s new passport-style foldable is expected to carry the Galaxy Z Fold 8 name without any suffix. This model is reportedly equipped with two rear cameras. No major changes are expected for the Flip model. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 anticipated specs Rumors over the past few months suggest Samsung is preparing several upgrades for its upcoming foldables, although the devices may continue to rely on larger batteries and faster charging speeds rather than dramatic design changes. The primary focus this year is expected to be the Galaxy Z Fold 8 and its wide-screen design. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here are the anticipated specifications for the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra based on previous leaks: 6.5-inch outer display and 8-inch inner display, 120Hz refresh rate, and 2,600 nits peak brightness Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, paired with 12GB or 16GB of RAM and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB of storage 4.1mm thickness when unfolded and a weight of 210g 200MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, 10MP or 12MP telephoto camera, 10MP cover camera, and 10MP selfie camera 5,000mAh battery with 45W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 As for the Galaxy Z Flip 8, the device is not expected to be a major departure from its predecessor, although it could become slightly slimmer. Expected specifications include: Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 or Exynos 2600 processor 12GB of RAM with 256GB and 512GB storage options 6.9-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X inner dispaly and 4.1-inch Super AMOLED outer dispaly 50MP main camera, 12MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera 4,300mAh battery with 25W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 Samsung’s foldables are also expected to launch with Gemini Intelligence, Google’s AI suite for automating tasks in Android ecosystem. Moreover, given current memory and component costs, some Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 variants could see a price hike. Galaxy Z Fold 8 adopts a wide-screen design The centerpiece of the upcoming Unpacked event could be the Galaxy Z Fold 8, previously rumored as the Galaxy Z Fold Wide. This model adopts a passport-style form factor and is expected to compete directly with Apple’s iPhone Fold. Galaxy Z Fold 8 official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here’s what to expect: 7.6-inch primary OLED display and 5.4-inch cover display, 120Hz refresh rate, 2,600 nits peak brightness, and 4:3 aspect ratio Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, 12GB or 16GB of RAM, and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB storage options 4,800mAh battery with 45W wired charging 50MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera Android 17 and One UI 9 The three new foldable phones are unlikely to be the only devices unveiled at Samsung’s Unpacked event. The company is also expected to introduce the Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 and the Galaxy Watch 9 series.
    • Thanks
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      140
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!