Apple delayed by Nvidia


Recommended Posts

APPLE ANNOUNCED its new range of LCD displays over a month ago now, and have begun shipping the 20-inch and 23-inch displays in volume. There are a fair few at the Apple store here in sunny SanFran, and also down the road at CompUSA. Beautiful they are too.

Those friendly CompUSA fellas spun us an interesting yarn, however, about the complete lack of 30-inch displays. If you're an Apple follower, you'll know that the 30-inch is the flagship display to accompany its G5 range of machines. Since it's running at such a huge resolution, 2560x1600, the display requires a dedicated graphics card - the GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL card, with dual DVI outputs to connect to the same screen.

Unfortunately, it seems, Nvidia just can't produce these. Our sources told us that whilst Apple is raring to go, Nvidia hasn't got the cards working yet. With 6800 Ultras in short supply on the PC, and the marketing machine telling everyone to buy 6800GTs, this special edition 6800 Ultra must be a niche of a niche of a niche - and possibly even less viable to produce. The board, which you can see at the Apple website, looks monstrously huge - we are talking Voodoo 5 6000 size here. It ain't cheap, and it don't appear to be easy.

Apple is well known for flirting with both graphics cards giants - its laptop range uses both ATI and Nvidia chips. If Nvidia can't deliver its end of the deal soon, it's unlikely it will get another stab at leading Apple technology for a while. Is Nvidia over-stretching itself, or is Apple just awkward to the core?

http://theinquirer.net/?article=18300

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/214569-apple-delayed-by-nvidia/
Share on other sites

It's not Nvidia's fault, all the pressure from Apple - Apple should of waited for a working model before releasing it. Patience is a virtue.

No doubt Nvidia will send over cards as soon as they're ready, why have a faulty card by rushing it when they can take their time and get it right.

How is it that the 30 inch display requires so much juice and 2 dvi ports. I was in compusa the other day and they had a Media Center comp with a 50 inch plasma display which u could run either 1 dvi or 1 vga off of it. It was 3.06 ghz and had 1gb of ram

this time, size doesn't matter. it's how you use it :laugh:

the apple display runs at 2560x1600 pixels. the 50" plasma at compusa was running in a much lower res, though i can't give you an exact number, it certainly wasn't as high as apple's. some of the largest monitors today only run at 1920x1200, so apple just "raised the bar" for regular displays, if you will.

Okay okay, I admit (via Avatar) that I'm an Nvidia fanboy. We're all fanboys/girls in one way or another.

True ATi vs Nvidia is my sig...however, this isn't an ATi vs Nvidia thread (for a change). Just hope Apple & Nvidia sort this out quickly otherwise Apple will get half of the complaints and Nvidia will get the other half...this isn't good for Nvidia agreed, so fingers crossed.

The long card for the Mac reminds me of the Voodoo cards being 12" long. This was just before 3DFX was bought out.

P.S.

Looks like we all have preferences within our signatures :)

How is it that the 30 inch display requires so much juice and 2 dvi ports. I was in compusa the other day and they had a Media Center comp with a 50 inch plasma display which u could run either 1 dvi or 1 vga off of it. It was 3.06 ghz and had 1gb of ram

Simple, It doesnt. The monitor only uses one connector, and the technology used in each connector is called "dual-link", which is just a really high bandwith DVI.

Calling a technology for a single connector "dual link" is definetly confusing, but im not sure who coined the term

like ATI even has the technology to do it :NOT:

hahhhahahahahhaah....dude ATI does have the technology and don't go all ballistic on us here because your card doesn't work right, or that the fact show that NVidia does a ****ty job producing the cards. FYI All-in-Wonder X800XT is coming out real soon and they have most of the GL series of cards switched to X800 chip. I know a lot of people who have X800XT PE (so do I). I don't really care about NVidia VS ATI talk, I've owned ATI and I love their cards, but don't consider myself a fanboy (too old), but I just get upset with moronic statements like that. How old are you? 10? 12? ATI has been on the market since the days of 386 PCs while NVidia became a company like 7-8 years ago. They need to grow up as a company (their statements bashing ATI in their leaked marketing sheets for training, just proves my point)

Do you have any idea how long ago 30" Cinema Display was announced and showcased on WWDC. They had plenty of time to do their thing and make the card work.

Of course, Apple on the other hand is coming out with all the fancy talk as usual, Dual Link Dual Turbo crap, like it's something so unique.

Edited by Boz
hahhhahahahahhaah....dude ATI does have the technology and don't go all ballistic on us here because your card doesn't work right, or that the fact show that NVidia does a ****ty job producing the cards. FYI All-in-Wonder X800XT is coming out real soon and they have most of the GL series of cards switched to X800 chip. I know a lot of people who have X800XT PE (so do I). I don't really care about NVidia VS ATI talk, I've owned ATI and I love their cards, but don't consider myself a fanboy (too old), but I just get upset with moronic statements like that. How old are you? 10? 12? ATI has been on the market since the days of 386 PCs while NVidia became a company like 7-8 years ago. They need to grow up as a company (their statements bashing ATI in their leaked marketing sheets for training, just proves my point)

That was a little harsh, but you do make a very good point ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • That reminds me. Now that i have Quest 3 I should go back and try the first one in VR. ... last time i did that I tried it in some janky VR setup which was still really good.
    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!