[CRICKET] USA humiliated, ICC Trophy


Recommended Posts

The US didn't have a team... until very very recently. The ICC decided to expand this year by including a few other teams taken from a qualification tournament that really do not deserve to even be considered for the international level.

Cricket is an amazing sport, thoroughly intellectual and a lot more exciting then it may appear to be at first glance. It's good to see that the US at least has a team, which shows that they are finally expanding their horizons not only in terms of awareness but in participation as well. Unfortunately this thread shows a splendid sample of fantastically ignorant individuals who don't represent that trend very well.

If only your military endeavours were as geographically limited as your global awareness...

I agree, totally. An American resident that shares my views, few and far between.

so we are supposed to know about every little tourneyment and every sport/game? Especially why would they want to let the country know they were enterting a international tourny where they were most likely going to lose...

eRad: Way to bring this into a political debate, so im just going to stay out of it this time. Next time keep your comments to where they belong...

As mentioned before, this "little" international tournament is for a sport that is second only to soccer is spectators.

how can you call this team americans when you only have one of them in the team and he thinks he is playing baseball the way he throws the ball, the rest of the team arnt even american born :)

I was watching the highlights, one of the bowlers clean bowled an Australian and shouted "strrrrrrrrriiiiiiikkkke"

So let me get this straight, we are at fault for not being globally aware of sports that we do not really care for as a country?

Yes, Cricket and Soccer are very popular around the world and were European Sports. The reason why they are popular is because of European Colinization and Empire building where they transfered their culture to the inhabitors of that region correct? So just because a large part of the USA does not care for your sports we are not globally aware and you believe that you are so much better than us? Napoleon Complex?

I agree, totally. An American resident that shares my views, few and far between.

You might want to look at the location before you say that he is an American that shares your views. As to the US loseing in cricket... so what? Are you merely coming here to rub dirt in a countries/peoples face? I knew that we had a cricket team... I had no idea they went to tournaments though. Besides I don't really care about sports US or Otherwise or the Olympics for that matter.

Hah.. its so funny.

If the USA had kicked ass it would have been "HAH! A sport we hardly have anything to do with and we beat the British who are fanatical about it! HAHAH!"

And when you lose its like "Pfft - ghey sport that no one cares about" (yeah, in the USA maybe) "so who cares if we lost in your crappy game."

You guys can be REAL good sportsmen sometimes.

Er, actually no....I could care less if the US beat any outside country at anything frankly. International sports don't interest me much at all, outside of the world cup.

Besides...we already play cricket. We just call it baseball. :D (sarcasm, yet again)

I was watching the highlights, one of the bowlers clean bowled an Australian and shouted "strrrrrrrrriiiiiiikkkke"

LOL :D

A little correction. Australian batsman wasn't cleaned bowled, he was caught.

Just wondering what do you guys have against cricket? It's just a game. Take it easy.

The US didn't have a team... until very very recently. The ICC decided to expand this year by including a few other teams taken from a qualification tournament that really do not deserve to even be considered for the international level.

Cricket is an amazing sport, thoroughly intellectual and a lot more exciting then it may appear to be at first glance. It's good to see that the US at least has a team, which shows that they are finally expanding their horizons not only in terms of awareness but in participation as well. Unfortunately this thread shows a splendid sample of fantastically ignorant individuals who don't represent that trend very well.

If only your military endeavours were as geographically limited as your global awareness...

May i shake your hand. Excellent post.

More than likely the reason we didnt know, was because even if we did we wouldnt care. American Football just started and Baseball is ending soon. We have our own sports to think about rather than a sport mostly played in former british colonial interests.

Its pretty sad when a country like the US, dont actually make its residents aware that they are entering in a international tournament.

:rolleyes: Because we all know that the prime reason the government exists is to inform the populace about games.

Hah.. its so funny.

If the USA had kicked ass it would have been "HAH! A sport we hardly have anything to do with and we beat the British who are fanatical about it! HAHAH!"

And when you lose its like "Pfft - ghey sport that no one cares about" (yeah, in the USA maybe) "so who cares if we lost in your crappy game."

You guys can be REAL good sportsmen sometimes.

you hit it right on the spot there..!! :laugh: :laugh:

I am pretty sure that CRICKET will gain momentum in countries like USA and other american countries once the 20-20 cricket start's.

It will have just 20 over's a side and will take just 2 n half hrs for the entire game 2 complete.

As for now for a one day international there are 50 over's per side and take easily 7 n half hrs 2 complete and the Test Cricket is played for 5 days.

And well CRICKET IS CALLED AS THE GENTLEMAN'S GAME.

Maybe tat's y it isnt popular in the West as it is in Europe and Asia.

For a country that just added cricket as a sport and made it to this competition is a good thing. Different countries play what they want and how they want. Cricket is not a sport we play incessantly,so it doesn't really matter,whether they win or lose.Either way good going to the USA cricket team for making it that far.

And the quote of the thread goes to mohan_168. :)

"And well CRICKET IS CALLED AS THE GENTLEMAN'S GAME.

Maybe tat's y it isnt popular in the West as it is in Europe and Asia."

And by the way...Golf is considered the Gentleman's game.

This thread is going nowhere, it's pure bashing the US, which isn't permitted here.

Thread Closed.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think the car analogy is more this: Left hand drive, basic commands on the left side of the infotainment screen. Right hand drive, basic commands on the right side of the infotainment screen. Granted, you're not swapping between the two often so it's doesn't really work. But it's to do with the proximity of you (your mouse, or the driver) to the controls.
    • I mean, the old one was broken and so stupidly complex for many users, so I don't see that as a feasible option. A context menu needs to be simple to use, and for me the Windows 11 style actually worked really well for me, and many others. I used to have to scroll the damn context menu just to get to "file properties" in Windows 10. That was not a good experience, and I'm sure you'd agree. What they're trying to do is make it the best of both worlds, as clearly you'd prefer the Win10 style. I'm curious how they're going to do this.
    • The "Show more options" has its place, as does the simpler context menu, but it should perhaps be a separate fly-out rather than relaunching the entire, old context menu. The old context menu was getting absurd in Windows 10. Often I'd have to make the context menu scroll just to get to "File properties" on my old laptop. Even without much installed, the amount of items was just too much. It's a context menu, not a "do all" menu. Making it configurable is fraught with challenges too, so I'm interested to see how Microsoft tackles this one.
    • I don't hate the new menus, I am not a fan of the lack of features and how they went live when they clearly are not complete. The menu itself presents much better than the previous - but what's lacking (IMO) is: 1) Any kind of automated manipulation such as: "this goes on the new menu because you use this feature more often on this filetype" "this is rarely used and will fall back to the old menu" 2) Any kind of user manipulation such as: "a UI to add/remove/order items to the new menu"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      484
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      260
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      84
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!