Does WindowBlinds Slow your system or make it unstable?


Recommended Posts

Well, the good thing is that WindowsBlindsXP didn't make WinXP unstable (nothing does :-D), the bad point is that the skins are based on the classicwindows skin, but they indeed slowdown the system, even when one's not using a WindowsBlinds skin!

WindowBlinds does slow down the pc on 98/ME I noticed also.

I only have 64mb of ram, and I believe it requires quite a bit.

Have you tried running WB without anything running?

Or are you using it with other things like ICQ, Winamp?

This site is amazing!

Keep up the good work Neowin!

WindowsBlinds is rubbish. The skins for the XP version are the same as the old 9x version and it OBVIOUSLY slows down your system. Basically, stick with the themes that come with XP until some better official ones are released.

PS - I have WindowsBlinds on another computer right now and it crashed like 5 times straight after installing it. It really is a piece of junk you can live with out, but my brother seems to like it... he ALSO has DesktopX on with the Linux KDE theme.

Windows blinds beta for xp give a 30-280% performance boost.

And yes it works and it dont crash the system or makes it slow.

Besides xp is based on a older version of windowsblinds.

To bad its sucks when it comes to performance.

The beta has ofcourse some work left, but i find it to be more faster then using the one that comes with xp.

TweakXp

I've tried using WindowBlinds on Windows 2000 before and yes it does slow my system but luckily my computer survives with no crashes. I haven't tried the WindowBlinds XP yet but anyway if the final release comes out I will reconsider using it again :)

I think I don't need to use WindowBlinds, I like the way my desktop feels now...with the standard blue XP theme, well at least until an year or so, then got to find the alternative :D.

Yeah that is sometimes become the question....before the XP is on my computer I use anything to make my computer looks like WinXP by installing Window blinds, icon packager and desktop X ..but performance is not really good....even though I have 320 MB of RAM.

Originally posted by Giant

Windows blinds beta for xp give a 30-280% performance boost.

And yes it works and it dont crash the system or makes it slow.

Besides xp is based on a older version of windowsblinds.

To bad its sucks when it comes to performance.

The beta has ofcourse some work left, but i find it to be more faster then using the one that comes with xp.

TweakXp

It seems that most don't care for Window Blinds but Giant seems to like it:ponder:

-Does He work for them??? :D

There are a few skins that take advantage of the Luna interface, but they bog down your system. The only one that I really like that does not bog down your system is the Whistler skin. It also skins the start menu/taskbar using the Visual Styles API included in XP.

Nope i dont work for "them" i just giving you facts both from various pages and myself.

Windowsblinds never crashed for me. Neither did it slow my system down or made it unstable.

Guess i'm lucky perhaps.

For the time being i'm using the old good w2k layout in xp.

And i'm looking forward to the final release of windowsblinds.

I used WB at work and how no problems at all. SO, when I bought my new Dell 1 Gig 2 months ago, I bought into the whole Desktop X thing (includes window blinds). Now, if I try to use almost any of the programs (WB, Weblinds, WindowsFX, etc), my PC freezes, usually with a stack overflow, but often with the desktop freezing. I have 32 meg of video (NVidia video card) and am using WinME (piece of cr@p!). Currently, I use icon packager only from the whole schmeel as it doesn't require any graphics interface. The rest you can toss down the t01let!:right:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • No, "a great deal" for 32GB of DDR5 is $50, not $350. I mean I see what you mean, that it's a decent price compared to what's currently available, but you really should put a disclaimer in this articles explaining that it's still multiple times more expensive than it used to be.
    • Linux 7.1 stable launch looms as Linus Torvalds releases the final release candidate by Paul Hill Linus Torvalds has just released what’s expected to be the final release candidate of Linux 7.1, rc7. The Linux founder said that this RC is not small, but smaller than recent releases, which is a good sign because he expects the stable version to drop next week if things continue on this trajectory. Linux kernels see a merge window for the first two weeks of their life, where developers add new features, then there are about seven or eight weeks of release candidates before the stable version. Typically, there are seven release candidates, but if more time is needed, then an eighth release candidate is released too. This week’s RC’s biggest area of fixes was for GPUs, with networking just behind. Torvalds said that the rest of the release was “pretty random and spread out” with some architecture fixes, driver fixes, filesystem improvements, and build fixes for more unusual configs. In terms of specific pieces of hardware receiving improvements in this update, we had more AMD Zen6 models supported and fixes for AMD SDMA 7.1 and GFX11. Hardware that got improvements includes Lenovo laptops, HONOR laptops, and MSI laptops. Here are the changelogs for those: ASoC: amd: acp: Add DMI quirk for Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15ASH11 Input: atkbd - add DMI quirk for Lenovo Yoga Air 14 (83QK) Input: atkbd - skip deactivate for HONOR BCC-N's internal keyboard ASoC: amd: yc: Add MSI Raider A18 HX A9WJG to quirk table ASoC: amd: yc: Enable internal mic on MSI Bravo 17 C7VF When the stable Linux 7.1 is released, it will be up to distribution maintainers, such as Canonical and Red Hat, to release the update to their users via the update manager. Some versions of Linux will get it before others, and some will never get it at all. Fedora and Arch-based distros will be among the first to get it, though. If you don’t get it, the security fixes will be backported to your system’s kernel, so you won’t be at risk, but you won’t get newer hardware support, which is fine if your computer works now.
    • Ideally, the algorithm is smart enough to see the real sender ID and non-spoofed address to block it. Ideally.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      68
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!