Tenn and Florida home job call


Recommended Posts

I've never said this before but I think the ref should be fired today. The ref called a 15 yard penalty againsts Florida when the Tenn player hit the Florida player in the face and the Florida player hit him back and the ref saw the whole thing as I watched him watch it and he called the penalty only on the Florida guy that led to a 50 yard game winning field goal for Tenn.

This is the worst home job and call I've ever seen and this guy should be fired after this. No excuse. It should have been one of two calls. Either 15 yards on Tenn only or offsetting calls but no only on the Florida guy. If the ref didn't see the first guy but only the second I could understand that but I watched the guy on the TV replay looking right at both of them and only throwing the flag very fast when the Florida guy hit back.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/219676-tenn-and-florida-home-job-call/
Share on other sites

Since the team of the player that instigated the personal foul was penalized, the ruling stands.

--ScottKIn

No your wrong the Tenn player hit first and wasn't called for a penalty so maybe you should watch that replay because it clearly shows the Tenn player hitting the Florida guy and the Florida guy hitting back and only the Florida guy got called for the penalty. These players can talk smack and it doesn't make a difference whether one player caused it but it only matters when contact comes into play and it clearly shows that the Tenn player made the first contact but he wasn't called for that but worse when the Florida guy hit back he was the only guy called with a penalty. The fact is you can make excuses all you want about the Florida guy should have not hit back it still has to be enforced fairly and that means that either one of two calls should have been made.

One being a penalty only on the Tenn player because he hit first and if he didn't hit the Florida guy the Florida guy would have never hit back.

Two being both players getting called for the penalty and that would offset any gain or loss for both teams. What should have never ever been callled is a penalty only on the Florida guy.

They saw him first (most likely the case) so they called it. No referee's are perfect, therefore errors are made. Take the loss like a Gator fan you are.

I'm on fire today, I chose Auburn over LSU and Tenn over FL and I got them both right in my fantasy league :D

How can you tell the ref saw the hole thing? Watching on tv, you have no clue how it went down. Since it's next to impoosible for a ref to be bias anymore, especially on conference games. So either the Florida guy started it, or the ref missed the first hit and saw the second.

Florida lost. Deal with it. Quit blaming it on someone else.

Well, on the replay the ref was clearly looking at the play when it happened. What I think he did was wait to see of the Florida player was going to retaliate. If not, he SHOULD have flagged the UT player. But, regardless of that, Baker never, EVER should have put himself in that position. Those guys played so composed and professional for 58 minutes only to completely distruct at the end.

And being a fan of the Gators and seeing this rivalry for about 12 years now, I just knew Wilhoit was going to have redemption. If you watch enough UT-UF games in your life, you shouldn't be surprised by this. It almost ALWAYS comes down to a play in the end, and after that penalty, I knew it was over. Plus, our defense did absolutely nothing to stop them the whole game, no reason why they would in the end.

I will say this, though: the ref should have made an off-setting penalty call. I'm not saying the ref lost the game because Baker CLEARLY did not need to retaliate. And the defense should have put some pressure on the QB instead of playing a semi-prevent defense. That was the ballgame.

That's my point, how can you tell where a ref is looking. Sure his head may be faced in that direction, but they are taught to keep their eyes and head on a swivel...no different than football players. In other words, his eyes could have very well been in another direction...something you can't judge on tv

Well I read in the newspapers that the head of the refs was in the stands and is going to suspend all the refs in the game saying it was a disgrace to all the other refs. Here is what he had to say. He talked to the ref and asked him how much he saw and he said everything but he said that the Florida player was saying things to get the Tenn player going so he didn't call the original hit from the Tenn player but called it when the Florida guy hit back because the Florida guy started it first. Also the head of the refs said that on the play before it was a running play and they should have kept the clock running after the first down but they kept it stopped and that should have ran another 25 seconds off of the less than 1 minute clock which was well before the Tenn offense got going. Either way the head of the refs said it was a disgrace to have their fellow refs work so hard on going a good job and then see this happen. He suspended all the refs because one of them should not noticed that a running play should not have stopped the clock and there was no excuse for missing that.

Yeah, regardless of the penalty or not (even though I'm very annoyed by it), the clock should have burned those 25 seconds! That clock should have never stopped in the first place. There was no way in hell UT was going to score if the clock had 20-something seconds left with no timeouts.

Also, I couldn't beleive Matt Leech missed that field goal! :blink: I was like WTF?!

At least the officiating wasn't as bad as the ACC refs for the UF-FSU game last season :x. Now if any officiating crew deserves to be fired, it should be THAT ONE! That was ****ing unbelievable. This is more of a reason why they need to bring instant replay to college footbal. It is absolutely necessary! Oh well... hopefully we will have a good season this year. I'm looking forward to sitting in the Swamp sweating my ass off yelling with the other 90,000+ people around me! ;) :happy:

All I can say is that "It's great to be a Florida Gator!"

PS: **** YOU ROCKY TOP! :laugh: ;)

The official who ruined the game for us, Bobby Moreau, has been suspended from working a Florida game for the remainder of the season and the season after. Any other punishments have been kept secret by the SEC.

And what about the officials from the reFSU game last year? Oh yeah...I forgot. The ACC (aka All-Convict Conference) doesn't discipline their officials.

Oh well, nothing the SEC does to Booby Moreau will get the loss off the record.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!