"Lost" TV Show - Currently Season 2 (US aired)


Recommended Posts

Yeah luckily it doesn't really give away much more of the juicy bits than you could see for youself in the promo vids.

It looks like it'll be a sweet episode!

LIGHT 'EM UP is going to be a new catchphrase I guess, I claim first dibs!

Someone mentioned earlier how Michael is starting to look like the French woman because of the hair, etc. but if you think about it, they are nearly identical in behavior since they BOTH have had their child taken away from them. It's interesting how their erratic behavior is paralleled. I wonder if Micheal will end up in following the French woman's footsteps thinking everyone is "infected" and starts killing people... who knows?!

OMFG, it just went to commercial, at the worst possible time!

the guy who origionally captured walt, came out of the jungle, and you can hear his voice.. but cant see his face.. then it cut to commercial

this show is AMAZING!!

this show gets better and better every week. i can't stop watching. Is anyone getting a strange vibe in the nature of "the beach", where they didn't want word of the island to get out, and tried to keep it a secret?

:omg: I was so not expecting that! This is getting good :yes:

very very good :o i can't wait for this

war to start. one more thing.. WHY doesn't jack bone kate already??? he's a fool not to.

and i gotta say.. right at the end, i was shocked, and i felt it on the inside too.

When jack's wife said she was leaving him.. i was about to cry.. so sad for jack :( but now we know about jack and his wife

i dont know about next weeks episode.. didn't look that good on the preview.

Did anyone notice that when the "boatman" brought Kate out he said "Alex bring her here." Isn't Alex the boy that the French woman lost?

Yes. I don't think the writers would double a name just for the hell of it. I think this episode started something huge...we'll find out what it is over the season :cool:

Alex is a girl.

Also, Jack isn't going to 'bone' Kate because Kate is more into Sawyer and has been since almost the start of the show. There are only a few episodes where it seems like there's chemistry between them then it becomes clear that she is far more interested in Sawyer.

As for war, well I think it would only be realistic if the Losties got totally beaten, surely? Methinks the Losties find a way of getting an advantage (security system?).

Gabriel is very hot!

Alex is a girl.

Also, Jack isn't going to 'bone' Kate because Kate is more into Sawyer and has been since almost the start of the show. There are only a few episodes where it seems like there's chemistry between them then it becomes clear that she is far more interested in Sawyer.

As for war, well I think it would only be realistic if the Losties got totally beaten, surely? Methinks the Losties find a way of getting an advantage (security system?).

Then why hasn't Sawyer Boned Kate yet, he wanted it! So if you think about it, it makes NO sense other than the writers are saving the Love for Jack and Kate later!

I think you are wrong. I think Kate secretly wants Jack!

i doubt theyre starting an army, rather, jack want to know the amount of time the others took to build their army, that would be my approach to the situation

No, that wouldn't be my read on it.

Basically, Jack realized that sooner or later, the Others will come after everyone. The Others look like they have a decent amount of people. If the suvivors don't train up and prepare for that, they will be dead at some point. You saw how easily the others tore apart the unarmed tailies, 4-5 of the armed survivors cannot protect the other 40 unarmed ones.

If almost everyone gets armed and some basic gun training, they could probably hold off the others if an attack happened. It would be their only shot, as it is clear they are living on borrowed time.

No, that wouldn't be my read on it.

Basically, Jack realized that sooner or later, the Others will come after everyone. The Others look like they have a decent amount of people. If the suvivors don't train up and prepare for that, they will be dead at some point. You saw how easily the others tore apart the unarmed tailies, 4-5 of the armed survivors cannot protect the other 40 unarmed ones.

If almost everyone gets armed and some basic gun training, they could probably hold off the others if an attack happened. It would be their only shot, as it is clear they are living on borrowed time.

Disagree with you somewhat. I think it's more to do with Jack's character being unwilling to loose anything. As his wife said, he needs to have a problem to fix at all times. Add to that his desire over the past season to always come out on top in any situation....

• New theory I am wondering about. Maybe this is all an imagined scenario? What if “the island” wasn’t real? Everyone is knocked out, or connected via some kind of group consciousness. The black smoke is maybe contact from the outside world? “Special people” like Walt have maybe either woken up, or somehow have “dream control” and can alter the “reality” of their group consciousness”? What do you all think?

Edited by Wolvereen
? New theory I am wondering about. Maybe this is all an imagined scenario? What if ?the island? wasn?t real? Everyone is knocked out, or connected via some kind of group consciousness. The black smoke is maybe contact from the outside world? ?Special people? like Walt have maybe either woken up, or somehow have ?dream control? and can alter the ?reality? of their group consciousness?? What do you all think?

I think you miss '";)e Matrix".... ;)

Jack looks to be on a suicide run. He's always telling people what to do and imposing his will on the others. Maybe Jack is the;)#39;plant'.... ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Limited time Prime Day deal cuts price of this Hisense 65" 4K smart TV in half by Ivan Jenic It’s Amazon Prime Day, and brands are offering great deals to consumers. One of the best deals of the day is definitely this Hisense 65" U7, which is currently $799.99 on Amazon, down from $1,499.99. That's nearly 50% off and $700 saved on this feature-packed 4K TV (purchase link down below). The U7 uses Mini-LED backlighting with up to 3,000 local dimming zones and up to 3,000 nits of peak brightness. That means blacks are truly deep and highlights are punchy enough to hold up even in bright rooms. The screen is covered with a dual-layer anti-reflection coating, which prevents the afternoon overhead lights from washing the picture. For gaming, the native 165Hz refresh rate and VRR 330 support make this one a great TV option for PS5 and Xbox Series X. The TV even features a native game mode, which should help minimize the input lag for a better gaming experience. Audio is handled by a 2.1.2 channel system tuned by Devialet, which is a notable partnership for a TV at this price. Additionally, Dolby Vision IQ, Dolby Atmos, and IMAX Enhanced are all supported. It runs Fire TV with Alexa+ built in. So, if you’re looking for a sharp, large screen to watch the World Cup on, the U7 at this price is definitely an attractive option. Speaking of which, Hisense is the official sponsor of the World Cup, which should mean absolutely nothing to you, and isn’t the reason why you should by this TV. The reason why you should buy it is that it’s “la bella televisione, HDTV-compatible, beautiful,” and available at half the price. Hisense 65" U7 Mini-LED 4K Smart Fire TV - $799.99 | 47% off on Amazon Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • eM Client 10.4.5600.0 by Razvan Serea eM Client is a full featured e-mail client with a modern and easy to use interface. eM Client also offers calendar, tasks, contacts and chat. eM Client supports all major services including Gmail, Exchange, iCloud, and Outlook.com. You can easily import your data from most of the other e-mail clients. This includes Microsoft Outlook, Outlook Express, Windows Mail, Windows Live Mail, Thunderbird, The Bat and more. eM Client fully supports touch devices like touch-enabled laptops, tablets and hybrid devices. Use your email client easily in a modern way. eM Client PRO vs. Free version While the Free license allows you to set up the maximum of two accounts in the application, it is possible to add an unlimited number of accounts with the PRO license. The PRO license also enables you to use eM Client for commercial purposes. Commercial use is any activity that helps you make profit, the Free license therefore cannot be used in company settings or on personal computers for business correspondence. PRO users also gain access to the dedicated support system and to the licensing manager. eM Client has been fully optimized to run smoothly on Windows Vista, 7, 8, 10 and 11. eM Client 10.4.5600.0 changelog: Improved memory management Improved MS Teams support A lot of other fixes Download: eM Client 10.4.5600 | 128.0 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) View: eM Client Website | eM Client Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Re: Capitalism. It's just 1 of dozens of economic models currently-adopted worldwide; most national models separate money from politics thereby limiting the influence wealth carries over the economy (due to limited tentacles wealth politics has over the broader economy). The "American model" of unfettered financial influence should NOT be the variant of pure capitalism adopted worldwide. More regulations formulated within this variant is effectively useless due to the misalignment between regulatory objectives and fundamental influence wealth politics carry over the market. Re: enough money. Without constraining the breadth/depth/scope/scale that any measure of money/wealth can have within a market, there will always inherently be those who have "enough money" and those who do not. Those without "enough money" will always lose -- regardless if a bedroom DJ, indie developer, or million-dollar corporation going against a billion-dollar mega-corporation. The evil is the absence of guardrails against the influence of wealth; not the mere existence of wealth. Re: dragged through the courts. The liberalist nature of litigation does not exclude anyone, anywhere, for any reason for getting dragged through the courts. Rather than formalize remediation pathways for various perceived ills, everything is left up to flawed interpretations... and this is where a litigation-averse community fails to thrive (thus a losing proposition when dragged to courts). Everyone should have more protections and clear remediation strategies! Going to an alternate remediation arbitration is OK so long as the case review and remediation processes are clear and transparent. For corporations, hit them where it hurts: automatic financial penalties. (PS: This is where corporate risk management strategies would do well to behave more ethically.) Overall, failure to truly shake-up the incentive core and regulatory extremities of the economic market will necessarily mean that all other actions are simply applying lipstick on a pig. Change begins from the inside. Is the root cause of the problem that a majority of consumers within a market goes for Option Brand-name versus Option Indie? Or that brand-name is spending foreign money to control domestic markets? Or that money is the objective measure for success across all walks of life? Or that deep pockets dictate the moral and ethical rights/wrongs of entire societies? Regardless of the answer (and there's nothing inherently wrong with being a socialist or communist or whatever label your surroundings deem 'cool' or 'uncool') there's a common thread: If a market truly wants to nurture domestic innovation, then performative finger-wagging will do nothing to that end.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      407
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      167
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      71
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!