"Lost" TV Show - Currently Season 2 (US aired)


Recommended Posts

wow

that's very subtle! what would be the meaning of that?

Well theres a lot of weird things happening with Chalie and Eko in this episode

- Eko Marks Trees, that Charlie Burns

- Charlie saw the drug plane that Eko should have been on

- Eko tells him the baby needs to be baptised, so Charlie does it, in his crazy way

Also dont know if anyones noticed this, on the ABC website the only character from the tailies thats missing in the picture is Eko, is'nt he going to stay for too long? He's a pretty big character in it, why is he not in the picture when Libbie and Ana Lucia are?

Thanks Sane404 :D

Edited by Riz360

People are still saying that Charlie burnt the trees that Eko marked.

This is not the case. Eko was kneeling in the charred area, but not because the trees he marked were burnt.

If you watch again, Eko is marking trees in the entrance to the jungle. There are trees all around, and he is putting 'X's on some of them. Also, the area where he's marking trees is directly behind some of the little huts that people have built.

The area that Charlie sets fire to is an open area, away from camp and before the treeline that is mostly brush with a few large bushes and/or small trees.

I definetly agree that Locke is acting very un=Lockeish, he also has started to really **** me off this season. I am much more a fan o' Jack. Its great now that Sawyer is all liked now so he is all softened up. Like other I was relatively dissapointed with this episode. Charlie was being super rediculous Locke was being a tool and hardly anything happened, but like somone said, not every show can be fantastically adrenalinesh.

The beechcraft is there to symbolise the drugs.

Anyway it's not a head on the power station it's part of the cranes in front. Trust me, this has been checked on HD.

There is a sign on the right of the power station which says "unreadable construction." This may appear in a later episode.

Yeah, it is a crane, assuming that's the part of the picture the person was referring to. It's not even close to looking like a head.

I'm not sure if they planted that sign or if that's actually on the real building. If they planted it, you would figure they'd make it more readable.

Well theres a lot of weird things happening with Chalie and Eko in this episode

- Eko Marks Trees, that Charlie Burns

- Charlie saw the drug plane that Eko should have been on

- Eko tells him the baby needs to be baptised, so Charlie does it, in his crazy way

Also dont know if anyones noticed this, on the ABC website the only character from the tailies thats missing in the picture is Eko, is'nt he going to stay for too long? He's a pretty big character in it, why is he not in the picture when Libbie and Ana Lucia are?

Thanks Sane404 :D

Well, the first thing didn't happen. Charlie burned some brush, not trees.

Charlie and Eko went to the drug plane together and Charlie had been there previously as well with Sayid. The plane was his temptation and like someone said it represented his battle with his addiction. It's almost as though he had to make a choice between saving the baby and his addiction.

And yes on the last thing. Charlie thought the baby was in danger and needed some way to save it. Eko interpreted Charlie's dream as being like the story of John the Baptist baptizing Jesus since there was a dove in his dream.

did anyone else get a bad vibe when clair asked locke about baptism and locke kind of shrugged it off as nothing really that important? it's almost as if he was trying to prevent charlie from getting clair to baptise the baby. not sure if it's anything but it just seemed to stand out to me.

did anyone else get a bad vibe when clair asked locke about baptism and locke kind of shrugged it off as nothing really that important?

I think Locke was trying to put across the point that you shouldn't just baptise a child because it's the norm. You should understand the reasons behind it first.

People can use Spoiler Tags whether they want to or not, how hard is it to put your cursor over the text?

:) I just find it tough to read and scroll because I usually click the scroll wheel and slide down...it's tough to read tags and do that at the same time.

I actually felt kind of sorry for Charlie this episode. Admittedly, what he was doing was stupid, but I think he was really honestly trying to help the baby and now a lot of people will not trust him/hate him. I guess what I'm saying is, if something seems real in your head... then to you, it IS real. And in Charlie's head, the baby really needed to be baptized, whether the baby actually does or not, who knows.

I also agree with a lot of people that Locke seems a lot different. He was more likeable when he was just the handy hunter guy. From his point of view I suppose I can see why he punched Charlie, but also, knowing the show, Charlie might be on to something. I don't think his hallucinations/sleep walking is drug related. I think he has been clean for a while now and never used any of the found heroin from the plane.

i think locke became so rash in this episode is because of charlie's premanitions of the baby being in danger, and charlie trying to take it.

i think this is the case because somehow the baby is important (aswell as the other child walt), and locke is possibly the danger to the baby that charlie dreams about, and that the baby means more to locke alive (i.e. he didnt understand that charlie meant well and would never intentionally hurt the baby).....

battersea power station was the iconic building....there was some text but without hdtv and very clear screen you couldnt make it out :no:

What about the posters in the alleyway as

Charlie's brother leaves for Oz

? I see posters that read:

Lost Cat

<picture>

Missing For 3 Weeks

Please call

(something like) 020 7818 1118

Reward

If someone can get a HD cap of that I'll gladly call the number.

Personally I think the cat has orchistrated the whole thing. When they find the cat, they will find the answers to all their questions.

Er.... not.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Onkyo Dolby Atmos AV receivers are really solid deals by Sayan Sen Recently we covered great deals on several soundbar models from the likes of Sony, JBL, Samsung and others for really good prices (the lowest in several months). Aside from that we also reported on the Edifier S3000MKII, a hi-fi two-way bookshelf monitor that's available for only $800. Today we bring a list of AV receivers from Onkyo that are available at great prices including the Onkyo NR7100, RZ30, and 8470 (purchase links under the specs table down below). The Onkyo TX-NR7100 and Onkyo TX-RZ30 are both 9.2-channel AV receivers designed for immersive home theater setups but they occupy slightly different tiers within Onkyo’s lineup with the RZ30 positioned as the more advanced model. The TX-NR7100 is a THX Certified 9.2-channel receiver offering up to 100 W per channel (8 ohms, 2 channels driven). It supports Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, and IMAX Enhanced formats, with flexible configurations such as 5.1.4 or 7.1.2 speaker layouts. A key highlight is its built-in Dirac Live Room Correction which should help optimize sound based on your room and its acoustics. In comparison, both models share several core capabilities though the RZ30 is geared toward enthusiasts seeking more precise calibration and system flexibility, while the NR7100 is positioned as a slightly more accessible, value-focused option with strong all-round performance. The technical specs of the RZ30 and NR7100 9.2 AVRs are given in the table below: Specification Onkyo TX-RZ30 Onkyo TX-NR7100 Power Output (FTC, 2ch driven) ~100 W/ch (8Ω, 20Hz–20kHz, 0.08% THD) 100 W/ch (8Ω, 20Hz–20kHz, 0.08% THD) Dynamic / Peak Power 9 × 170 W (6Ω, 1kHz, 1% THD, 1ch driven) 220 W/ch (6Ω, 1kHz, 10% THD, 1ch driven) Frequency Response 5 Hz – 100 kHz (+1/-3 dB) 10 Hz – 100 kHz (+1/-3 dB) THD 0.08% 0.08% Room Correction Dirac Live (full bandwidth) Dirac Live (with AccuReflex support) Immersive Audio Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, IMAX Enhanced Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, IMAX Enhanced Speaker Layout Support Up to 7.2.2 / 5.2.4 / 9.2 processing Up to 7.2.4 / 5.2.4 / 9.2 processing HDMI Inputs / Outputs 6 inputs / 2 outputs (eARC) 6 inputs / 2 outputs (Main + Sub/Zone 2) HDMI 2.1 Support 8K/60, 4K/120, VRR, ALLM, QFT, DSC, eARC 8K/60, 4K/120, VRR, ALLM, QFT, DSC, eARC Video Formats HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDCP 2.3 HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDCP 2.3 Streaming / Network Wi-Fi, AirPlay 2, Chromecast, Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi Wi-Fi, AirPlay 2, Chromecast, Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi Get them at the links below: Onkyo TX-RZ30 9.2-Channel AV Receiver: $797.00 (Sold and shipped by Electronic Expo) Onkyo TX-NR7100 9.2-Channel AV Receiver: $699.00 (Sold and shipped by Adorma) Onkyo TX-8470 2 Ch Stereo Receiver: $449.00 (Sold and Shipped by Adorma) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links or authorized dealer links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from such links only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • A different thing with Russia. When you say is it better, depends on things. It is better that we don't have the E.U making rules and laws that have nothing to do with them. Is the trading part better? No, that is really mucked up, but then we knew that was going to happen and we would have make agreements, like we do with other parts of the world. Freedom of movement is certainly better, but could be improved, we still need more control over our borders. do you live in the U.K?
    • So what am I quoting from them? I never listened to what Farage or his cronies said. I wanted the U.K to leave the E.u years before the referendum and it had nothing to do with Farage and his cronies. So what country do you live in? Did we work much better together? We were always at logger heads with the E.U because we disagreed with them so much. Maggie was always on at them. I would have thought the E.U was glad to get rid of us as we stopped the integration or made it a two tier. Now without us they can integrate more. I would not have voted out if it was just a trading block and we can still work together on somethings.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      498
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      224
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!