"Lost" TV Show - Currently Season 2 (US aired)


Recommended Posts

wow

that's very subtle! what would be the meaning of that?

Well theres a lot of weird things happening with Chalie and Eko in this episode

- Eko Marks Trees, that Charlie Burns

- Charlie saw the drug plane that Eko should have been on

- Eko tells him the baby needs to be baptised, so Charlie does it, in his crazy way

Also dont know if anyones noticed this, on the ABC website the only character from the tailies thats missing in the picture is Eko, is'nt he going to stay for too long? He's a pretty big character in it, why is he not in the picture when Libbie and Ana Lucia are?

Thanks Sane404 :D

Edited by Riz360

People are still saying that Charlie burnt the trees that Eko marked.

This is not the case. Eko was kneeling in the charred area, but not because the trees he marked were burnt.

If you watch again, Eko is marking trees in the entrance to the jungle. There are trees all around, and he is putting 'X's on some of them. Also, the area where he's marking trees is directly behind some of the little huts that people have built.

The area that Charlie sets fire to is an open area, away from camp and before the treeline that is mostly brush with a few large bushes and/or small trees.

I definetly agree that Locke is acting very un=Lockeish, he also has started to really **** me off this season. I am much more a fan o' Jack. Its great now that Sawyer is all liked now so he is all softened up. Like other I was relatively dissapointed with this episode. Charlie was being super rediculous Locke was being a tool and hardly anything happened, but like somone said, not every show can be fantastically adrenalinesh.

The beechcraft is there to symbolise the drugs.

Anyway it's not a head on the power station it's part of the cranes in front. Trust me, this has been checked on HD.

There is a sign on the right of the power station which says "unreadable construction." This may appear in a later episode.

Yeah, it is a crane, assuming that's the part of the picture the person was referring to. It's not even close to looking like a head.

I'm not sure if they planted that sign or if that's actually on the real building. If they planted it, you would figure they'd make it more readable.

Well theres a lot of weird things happening with Chalie and Eko in this episode

- Eko Marks Trees, that Charlie Burns

- Charlie saw the drug plane that Eko should have been on

- Eko tells him the baby needs to be baptised, so Charlie does it, in his crazy way

Also dont know if anyones noticed this, on the ABC website the only character from the tailies thats missing in the picture is Eko, is'nt he going to stay for too long? He's a pretty big character in it, why is he not in the picture when Libbie and Ana Lucia are?

Thanks Sane404 :D

Well, the first thing didn't happen. Charlie burned some brush, not trees.

Charlie and Eko went to the drug plane together and Charlie had been there previously as well with Sayid. The plane was his temptation and like someone said it represented his battle with his addiction. It's almost as though he had to make a choice between saving the baby and his addiction.

And yes on the last thing. Charlie thought the baby was in danger and needed some way to save it. Eko interpreted Charlie's dream as being like the story of John the Baptist baptizing Jesus since there was a dove in his dream.

did anyone else get a bad vibe when clair asked locke about baptism and locke kind of shrugged it off as nothing really that important? it's almost as if he was trying to prevent charlie from getting clair to baptise the baby. not sure if it's anything but it just seemed to stand out to me.

did anyone else get a bad vibe when clair asked locke about baptism and locke kind of shrugged it off as nothing really that important?

I think Locke was trying to put across the point that you shouldn't just baptise a child because it's the norm. You should understand the reasons behind it first.

People can use Spoiler Tags whether they want to or not, how hard is it to put your cursor over the text?

:) I just find it tough to read and scroll because I usually click the scroll wheel and slide down...it's tough to read tags and do that at the same time.

I actually felt kind of sorry for Charlie this episode. Admittedly, what he was doing was stupid, but I think he was really honestly trying to help the baby and now a lot of people will not trust him/hate him. I guess what I'm saying is, if something seems real in your head... then to you, it IS real. And in Charlie's head, the baby really needed to be baptized, whether the baby actually does or not, who knows.

I also agree with a lot of people that Locke seems a lot different. He was more likeable when he was just the handy hunter guy. From his point of view I suppose I can see why he punched Charlie, but also, knowing the show, Charlie might be on to something. I don't think his hallucinations/sleep walking is drug related. I think he has been clean for a while now and never used any of the found heroin from the plane.

i think locke became so rash in this episode is because of charlie's premanitions of the baby being in danger, and charlie trying to take it.

i think this is the case because somehow the baby is important (aswell as the other child walt), and locke is possibly the danger to the baby that charlie dreams about, and that the baby means more to locke alive (i.e. he didnt understand that charlie meant well and would never intentionally hurt the baby).....

battersea power station was the iconic building....there was some text but without hdtv and very clear screen you couldnt make it out :no:

What about the posters in the alleyway as

Charlie's brother leaves for Oz

? I see posters that read:

Lost Cat

<picture>

Missing For 3 Weeks

Please call

(something like) 020 7818 1118

Reward

If someone can get a HD cap of that I'll gladly call the number.

Personally I think the cat has orchistrated the whole thing. When they find the cat, they will find the answers to all their questions.

Er.... not.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I and many others did not vote to get out of the E.u because of Putin or Farage, we did so for our own reasons. You don't have to tel me what my own did or did not do when it comes to the E.U. The EEC is or was the European Economic Community, a different beast to what the E.U is now.The EEC was a mainly about trading, the E.U have gone far beyond that and as I have said before, is now more of a United States of Europe. The U.K did not vote to join a United States of Europe. Anyway, they did not want us in there in the first place, Charles de Gaulle stopped us joining as he claimed we didn’t agree with the core ideas of integration. He was not wrong and that is why we voted out of the E.U when the time came. I was not old enough to vote the first time. My only regret is that we did not have the referendum years ago and got out years ago. If we rejoined, we would have to agree to join the Euro and no doubt Schengen, agree with freedom of movement, we have enough problem with people coming over here as it is. i have no problem with people coming over here if they work and don't try to push their way of life onto us. The E.U has a currency, freedom of movement, an anthem a flag, a parliament, well they are there, not sure if they do anything. Don't sound like something that is just for trading. Oh yeah, also wanted a euro Army. How many stupid rules have the E.U made that we had to follow? I doubt I will see the Uk rejoin the E.U, which suits me. Oh yeah, my partner is Polish, she came over here before Poland joined the E.U and she got fed up of people just coming over here with ease, while she had to struggle. She is now a British citizen and have been for a fair few years
    • Hello, Paul. Thanks for the editorial. It was interesting. I'm going research more into the app and its concept. Of course, if you know me at all, you know that I'd say your articles needs some editing! I a;ways do, don't I? For instance, the article occasionally mentions a concept before defining it, e.g., relays.
    • Screamer is 50% off on Steam, making it £24.99 here in the UK: https://store.steampowered.com/app/2814990/Screamer/ You might remember the series from the mid 90s / early 2000s, this new game is also by Milestone who created the older games.
    • U.S. partially reverses Anthropic AI ban for Mythos but keeps Fable 5 off the market by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic says that the U.S. government has finally allowed it to restore Claude Mythos 5. But of course, there's a catch. The rollout is again for a limited set of U.S. organizations that operate and defend critical infrastructure. The company announced this in a post on X (formerly Twitter). This does not mean that Anthropic's latest frontier models are back to normal availability. Fable 5, which was a tuned version of Mythos 5 for public release, remains unavailable. Anthropic said that it is still working with the government to expand Mythos 5 access and make Fable 5 available again, but there's no timeline. Reports from Bloomberg and Reuters say that this decision actually came through a letter from the U.S. Commerce Department. According to Reuters, this would allow more than 100 companies and institutions access to Mythos 5. Reuters also reported that Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick’s letter removes the need for export licenses for approved companies’ non-US citizen employees, as well as Anthropic’s own non-US citizen employees, while restrictions remain for organizations outside the approved list. Anthropic isn't alone with this kind of controlled rollout. OpenAI's newest model family, GPT 5.6, was announced just yesterday, but isn't available for everyone yet. In its announcement, OpenAI also said that access to these models is initially limited to a select group of trusted partners and organizations, with broader access planned later this year. Both of these cases show that frontier AI launches are no longer just ordinary product releases and more like slow and vetted deployments shaped heavily by the U.S. government.
    • Sol, Terra, Luna - aren't those the names of failed crypto coins? 🤣🤣🤣
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      500
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!