"Lost" TV Show - Currently Season 2 (US aired)


Recommended Posts

People can use Spoiler Tags whether they want to or not, how hard is it to put your cursor over the text?

The mod already said that there's no need to use spoiler tags for things that have already happened.

If you haven't seen the latest episode, why would you want to be in here anyway?

Plus, the tagline for the thread is "spoilers & theories, be warned"

this is by far the best, most thought out, theory ive seen yet... also one i cant help but agree with, what do you guys think?

http://www.4815162342.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3377

that is the most thought out theory i have read, and yet i cant argue, nor have the knowledge to argue. it is a must read

this is by far the best, most thought out, theory ive seen yet... also one i cant help but agree with, what do you guys think?

http://www.4815162342.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3377

While some of it is a bit of a stretch (collective consiousness, survivors having been cryogenically preserved for years), the reasoning behind the computer seems too logical to be wrong.

Do a bit of googling, and 108 minutes is indeed a standard orbit time for satellites, including NOAA's satellites. It's also how long it took Yuri Gagarin to orbit Earth once. So the idea that the computer on the island needs to download data from a satellite every 108 minutes makes perfect sense.

I'm not sure about the whole satellite theory. If it was launched in 1999, then this hasn't been going on for too long. The French woman, however, has been there for 16 years and the Others have been there for at least that long. All this equipment has been there for too long to just take data from that satellite. It's been going on for a long time. Desmond was there what? 5 years? And the guy before him was there even longer. So it's been going on since before 1999 (unless it's in the future, but they've left too much present day stuff in there for it to be in the future).

I don't agree with the comb theory either. Electrostatic charge can be built up by anything and I don't see how it would interrupt the collective consciousness (assuming that theory is correct too). I've also got to wonder if there's a comb somewhere in the hatch.

I don't agree with the cryogenically preserved for years either. Since even if that happened and it's far past 1999 so that the satellite theory holds together, Desmond hasn't aged any since Jack saw him last. Unless Desmond was in cryo too, but then he remembers coming onto the island.

Edited by kjordan2001

kjordan2001 that was my argument exactly: Oested satellite went up in 1999, that equiptment has been there since the '70s...HOWEVER remember on the orientation video Dr. Candle says that they only had to start pressing the button after an 'incident' occured. HOWEVER the orientation tape is dated 1980.

kjordan2001 that was my argument exactly: Oested satellite went up in 1999, that equiptment has been there since the '70s...HOWEVER remember on the orientation video Dr. Candle says that they only had to start pressing the button after an 'incident' occured. HOWEVER the orientation tape is dated 1980.

Sure but that assumes that the movie is authentic, it could just be nothing but a red herring.

It's like the Bermuda Triangle...

On another note, I just finished watching 'The Stand' by Stephen King, and HOLY CRAP! There are SO many similarities between LOST and The Stand it's unbelievable! Everything from the characters to the dog to a mural, to the dreams... etc.. wow! Check it out if you can, it's pretty odd. Beware though, this movie has terrible acting and is pretty cheesy, but for a LOST fan the parallels are similar.

It's like the Bermuda Triangle...

On another note, I just finished watching 'The Stand' by Stephen King, and HOLY CRAP! There are SO many similarities between LOST and The Stand it's unbelievable! Everything from the characters to the dog to a mural, to the dreams... etc.. wow! Check it out if you can, it's pretty odd. Beware though, this movie has terrible acting and is pretty cheesy, but for a LOST fan the parallels are similar.

I read somewhere that the LOST creators have stated that LOST is "The Stand" on an island.

Here's my take on Locke, copied and pasted from another forum I posted at (I'm a slow typist - please forgive my laziness):

Locke's motivations are odd, and that makes him an interesting character. Most of the time he seems to really have his s**t together, but a couple of times when things don't seem to follow his ideas of what the island has planned for him, he really starts to crack. So far situations have usually turned back his way, but I'd hate to see what he'd be capable of if he became really desperate. Desperate men can be very dangerous, especially if they are as capable as Locke has become.

Another interesting thing about Locke's motivations is how close he plays his cards to his chest. Locke does a lot of seemingly altruistic things for people like making the cradle for Claire and such, but I recall that Locke made a comment to Boone when they were excavating the hatch about "we're gonna need him on our side" in regards to another character (I can't remember the exact ep so I don't have more clear info). What I'm saying is, is Locke only being kind to people to win them over for a conflict he sees coming? (Jack sees this conflict brewing as well, as evidenced by his telling Kate he needs to know if she's got his back during the scene before they blow the hatch.) And if Locke's motivation is to win people over, are his motivations selfish (ie. he wants to stay on the island), or does he really believe he needs people on his side because he's working for the greater good? And is his idea of the greater good a misguided one or not? Several times Locke has said "Don't tell me what I can't do!" If he truly believes that then he shouldn't tell the other survivors what they can't do (ie. he shouldn't tell them they can't get off the island). If I remember correctly, Jack used that exclamation at least once as well.

The most recent ep (2x12) provides some interesting material on Locke. If he's trying to get people to choose sides it explains why he keeps the Virgin Mary statues: possible bargaining chips if needs Charlie for some reason.

I was watching err..well the episode when Claire gets kidnapped, and Locke declares that there are two paths to follow, and that they should all go his way. Magically, he keeps on going on his path even when the trail disappears, going on "gut", and stumbles upon the hatch.... he even tries to get rid of Boone ... so perhaps it all ties back into the island using Locke... get him to find the hatch, replace Desmond and keep pressing the button... as he seems to be pretty eager to enter that code as well.

I hope lost doesnt turn all apocalyptic ... I expect a much more "normal" story (if we can call it normal!) Not something involving that "conciousness" hehe.

I remember one of the producers saying once "This guys get off the island. If it's an island"

:p

oceanic website has quote "taking you to places you've never imagined" and shows the raft and pillar of smoke. done on purpose?

THEORY: its all an experiment of survival... a reality TV show of 2009? or the 2009 truman show? truman was trapped by boundaries (his boat hit it and he got away), but on lost the others are keeping them in (when walt was captured on the boat, why did they also blow up the raft if they want them to keep off the island?!)

oceanic website has quote "taking you to places you've never imagined" and shows the raft and pillar of smoke. done on purpose?

THEORY: its all an experiment of survival... a reality TV show of 2009? or the 2009 truman show? truman was trapped by boundaries (his boat hit it and he got away), but on lost the others are keeping them in (when walt was captured on the boat, why did they also blow up the raft if they want them to keep off the island?!)

Now that is an interesting theory that I have never thought of.

I thought the Truman Show was a very underrated film.

The amazing thing though is with all of these theories, for some reason I think the one that actually comes true is one that no one thought of...

the others have never stated they want them "off the island" the closest thing to that is.... "this is our island, your here because we allow you to be here", so said our bearded friend.

and as far as them blowing up the raft.... why would they want them to leave? so they could get help and go back for Walt. The others destoryed the ship because they wanted to be sure that they got Walt and nobody else knew they had him or would be looking for him. id assume they didnt expect Michael, Sawyer, and Jin to survive out in the open ocean.

I put a warning in the thread's title to forewarn anyone coming in here that we would be discussing plots that have aired in the US. So if that is all we are talking about I see no need to put those in spoiler tags. Sorry for those non-US fans, but it airs here first so... nyah, nyah... ;)

Now if you want to post something that has not yet aired, then please spoiler tag it.

On topic, I don't think Charlie set those fires at all - doesn't he still have the tape around his fingers? That was the first thing I noticed, the fire starter did not have the tape.

in the shots after... when jack sews up charlies face ... no tape on charlies fingers

yes i did have to go back and check ... definately hooded bejeaned charlie lit them ... he later tells jack he did it

^But he admitted to doing it.

This episode just made me feel sorry for Charlie. Locke's becoming more of an arrogant jack*** than anything else.

this epi came across to myself and several others as a very feminist show. men are bad... men are stealing babies ...men are dropping their own child... men must be smashed by the dirty old man who is obviously moving in on a much younger lady ... happens all the time in real life ... and in lots and lots of cases the lady regrets her actions ... i have a feeling that is where the locke/claire thing is going.

i am quite happy there is no epi this week as i dont think i would be able to bring myself to download it . bad form lost scribblers

i think locke kept the drug for medicinal use, like if somebody gets hurt, jack can ease the pain with it

as far as i remember 6 people knew/know about the heroin..... nobody has told the doctor ... hmmmmm

Top left corner of the gif.

Did anyone hear brief scream when Locke was coming out of the hatch meeting up with Charlie? :blink:

door hinges creak then you hear a chicken doing its thing

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!