"Lost" TV Show - Currently Season 2 (US aired)


Recommended Posts

Yea i don't think Libby's dead either because in the preview Hurley doesn't look as upset as he should do if she was and it had no mention or footage about Libby in the preview. But yea i'm pretty sure Anna Lucia is dead, although i was just starting to like the character of her so it's a shame.

Yea i don't think Libby's dead either because in the preview Hurley doesn't look as upset as he should do if she was and it had no mention or footage about Libby in the preview. But yea i'm pretty sure Anna Lucia is dead, although i was just starting to like the character of her so it's a shame.

It'd be funny if Hurley went all Sayid on Michael.

Dude...why'd you shoot Libby?

Dude...my name is Hugo Reyes...and I am a fat man.

Dude...Don't make me sit on you, dude!!

the others dont want 'henry', if they did, they'd only want him to punish him for his failure...unless he was supposed to get caught! the tents that michael saw were obviously not all there was to see. We've seen the costumes, we know their hiding SOMETHING, but it isnt their numbers, or their lack of strength. Kate knows this, hopefully the next episode has kate putting some things together and suggesting that michael is a nut job.

The issue with michael is that he is extremely selfish and only has walt on the brain, hes not working with the others, but he THINKS he can make a trade with walt and henry. He is so selfish that he makes a decision right when he finds out about henry, he jumps on the opportunity and kills anna and lets henry escape.

I really wish the survivers were a little less selfish and a little more trusting of one-another... I think the stories could benefit drastically if everyone was a little less cliche, and a little more real. charlie...sawyer...claire...etc.... theres too much tension coming from within, locke and jack need to have a serious talk..seriously.

^ Locke and Jack have started to confide in each other more now after the latest episode, because they talk in the hatch about letting each other know things and then when Locke realizes what Anna Lucia was going to do he said "Jack i need to tell you something" I hope it keeps up and that Jack and Locke get on more 'cause they could be a powerful combo.

If the plan crashed on sep 2004, are they ever going to have a new years eve?? How how have they been on the island?

lol never thought about that :D

Thanks for the Peewee210!

And I still thinking that island or that place is a Role Playing Game. Because somehow the characters are 'possessed'. In this case, Michael would be 'possessed' by the man that 'Henry' was talking about. Thats why his face on this ep.

Its true that we dont know (yet) who was killed, based on the preview, could be

ana, because hurly dont have a tear on his face :p and he said "at least you are ok"

.

And Micheal is taking away (using this preview as reference) all the 'bad' guys. Bah. Who knows. They make the show based on the rating, so, its unpredictable.

The issue with michael is that he is extremely selfish

Thats true. But he dont know about 'Henry' until he comes to the hatch. At least thats what we saw. And he seems to be confused at the very end of this ep. Thats why I say about the 'possession'

Edited by ThePitt

the others dont want 'henry', if they did, they'd only want him to punish him for his failure...unless he was supposed to get caught! the tents that michael saw were obviously not all there was to see. We've seen the costumes, we know their hiding SOMETHING, but it isnt their numbers, or their lack of strength. Kate knows this, hopefully the next episode has kate putting some things together and suggesting that michael is a nut job.

The issue with michael is that he is extremely selfish and only has walt on the brain, hes not working with the others, but he THINKS he can make a trade with walt and henry. He is so selfish that he makes a decision right when he finds out about henry, he jumps on the opportunity and kills anna and lets henry escape.

I really wish the survivers were a little less selfish and a little more trusting of one-another... I think the stories could benefit drastically if everyone was a little less cliche, and a little more real. charlie...sawyer...claire...etc.... theres too much tension coming from within, locke and jack need to have a serious talk..seriously.

Well, all their background stories point to them having trust issues. Jack with his father (not to mention Jack has to fix everything himself), Kate with her father, Sawyer lost his parents (due to his father killing his mother and himself) and became a con-artist for revenge, and Locke has issues with his father. Damn...seems a lot of people have parent issues. Then there's the issues with the kids which would be Michael and Claire. Michael doesn't want to lose what he just got back and Claire thinks she has to raise Aaron on her own. Charlie has issues with his brother due to him getting Charlie hooked on drugs. Then there's Hurley who lost family members due to his use of the numbers.

From his story he told Locke, he wasn't supposed to get caught, he was supposed to take Locke back with him before he ran into Rousseau's trap. Although his story does fit, otherwise why would he help Locke? I think all his mind games were meant for Locke to get angry at the other Losties and to get Locke to come with him.

The Losties are living the pretty sweet life though, I mean they get free food like sausage and free wine. Shame all the women seem to be dying one by one though. Then again, Michael said the Other camp is full of women :shifty:

Btw, IMHO the show is deviating from its primary goal. Though the first 55 minutes were watchable there wasn't anything lost-like in it. Except the Jack's Father and Ana Lucia relation there wasn't anything great in it. The last 5 minutes saved me from calling this episode a total bogus. Though I am not losing any interest and will continue to watch Lost with the usual enthusiasm, I do think they need to explicate about Dharma Initiative, Hanso Foundation, The Others and their motives rather than stretching the show on Libby-Hurley romance, etc. I am not saying that I don't enjoy that stuff but hasn't it been continuing a little too long? Aren't they postponing the 'real stuff' a little too much ? This whole season I have been thinking that the next episode is gonna be great , I wait for it with skipping bats and all I get is the same old Henry Gale playing with people's minds and losties busy in their love life instead of working upon escape.

Don't worry, it seems like things will pick up pace a lot now. Especially with Locke and Eko heading out next week. And next week maybe we'll find out why Eko was in Australia since it seems to be Eko-centric.

Edited by kjordan2001

I'll assume that they finally found a way to kill off Anna Lucia, since they've been having IRL problems with her, as well as the actress playing Libby (Both were picked up for DUI a few months back, and Michelle Rodriguez has been noted as being notoriously difficult to work with. ). The way I see the scenario playing out;

Henry states that Locke is one of the "good ones", which would explain why Henry was sent to get him. If you think back to the episodes where they first introduced the Tailies, Mr. Eko killed some Others, and they found the list, with only some select names, which one could speculate was a list of people either to be killed or taken, depending on if it was a list of "good ones" or "bad ones". At any rate, Henry failed, and the Others would probably assume that eventually Henry would talk...especially since the Others seem to know intimate facts about each of the survivors. So they'd definately know that Sayid was a former Iraqi torture specialist. So, Henry must be eliminated, otherwise the game is over. With the Others abducting Walt, whom they wanted anyway, then getting ahold of Michael...what better tool to use than someone whom the survivors all trust, that the Others have a definate control factor over, with the keeping of Walt. So, it was just a matter of instructing Michael what he must do (in order to have access to Walt), giving him some lines to recite to rile up Jack and everyone else, releasing him injured/weakened enough that he'd have to be taken down into the hatch, where they are keeping Henry. Michael tells everyone his lines about the Others being animals, living in tents, having barely any weapons. Jack, who'd already been pumping himself up with his ideas of starting an army, goes on the warpath to get the guns from Sawyer. Now, obviously Jack would want Michael armed and leading the charge to the Others, since he'd know the way, so he'd be given a weapon. At that point, it was just a matter of when he'd get access to Henry in order to do the deed. As it was, it was made even easier because of the actions of Anna Lucia, and Michael had the oppurtunity to take out one of the "bad ones" (I'll asssume Anna Lucia is one of the bad ones, since I don't consider a murderer to be good). So, Michael pops Anna Lucia like it's nothing, since, like I said, she was probably "bad", and goes to set up Henry as being her murderer. Where he screwed up was by popping Libby. Notice how he's calm when he shoots Anna Lucia, but seems to sorta freak out after he shot Libby, leading me to believe that she wasn't mean't to be one of the ones to die. Then he goes in, shoots himself in the shoulder (a non-vital area) and pops Henry, under the false premise that Michael was shot during the scuffle that occurred after Henry had killed both Anna Lucia and Libby.

Just my thoughts, YMMV.

I'll assume that they finally found a way to kill off Anna Lucia, since they've been having IRL problems with her, as well as the actress playing Libby (Both were picked up for DUI a few months back, and Michelle Rodriguez has been noted as being notoriously difficult to work with. ).

Apparently not, apparently MR has known from the beginning her character would be killed and apparently didn't even tell her co-stars. It was just an unfortunate coincidence that things happened the way they did.

http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/stories/T...-05-04-04-57-51

I don't see any point to Michael killing Henry though. If anything Henry is a potential bargaining piece for Michael. Michael probably hoped that by springing him he could get Walt back.

I'll never understand how people can get away with DUIs and yet my wife can't get a license 'cause she's diabetic. What a country!

Rodriguez should be ashamed. Or any well known actor for that matter. Others look up to them and they are not setting a good example by breaking laws.

As far as the diabetes thing, that is unfair, but it also makes sense (somewhat). Your wife being diabetic could faint or lose perception or any number of things at any time, and it is a condition that can't be prevented, and something that most people don't take care of appropriately. Not driving drunk can be prevented by not being an idiot, and for some reason this country would much rather be ok with letting someone be an idiot, than understanding that someone with diabetes usually knows when they can drive, and when they can't (as I am sure that your wife does everything she can to keep her condition stable and is very responsible about it all.)

The thing about famous actors getting DUI's that really gets me, is can't they hire a driver? Even if they had to get a $200 taxi ride or something, would it be THAT big of a deal for someone who makes thousands of dollars an episode? The other thing is that from her pictures, she looked pretty hammered, which makes her DUI a pretty serious one. 0.17 I believe was her BAC, when the limit allowed is 0.08. I'm just glad she didn't hurt anyone.

And I still thinking that island or that place is a Role Playing Game. Because somehow the characters are 'possessed'. In this case, Michael would be 'possessed' by the man that 'Henry' was talking about. Thats why his face on this ep.

I too think that Michael was under hypnosis or something, or control by a Charles Xavier-kind of person. I don't know, it's the way he moved, talked and reacted, seemed weird, and I do not think he'd kill anyone just to get walt back, specially not in a so cold blooded way (she was even crying and everything, c'mon). He's one of the good guys, so, something must have happened to him when hi was away.

I cannot imagine how Libby could live, even with Jack there, she was shot in the gut, and not just once but twice. Even with the blankets, the bullets would just pass on through, maybe slowed down, but nevertheless just as deadly.

Anyway, found this... has a recording of the 1-877-HANSORG phone bank: http://www.tvsquad.com/2006/05/03/hanso-fo...g-whats-it-say/

one thing bothers me, ana lucias death. if someone one YOUR side betrays you like michael and kills you unexpectedly, youd stare them straight into their eyes, and she does not do this, she simply stares away and dies, and they died so quickly? im not sure if im skewed by hollywood or not but people in movies die way longer than that with one shot in the.. stomach area

one thing bothers me, ana lucias death. if someone one YOUR side betrays you like michael and kills you unexpectedly, youd stare them straight into their eyes, and she does not do this, she simply stares away and dies, and they died so quickly? im not sure if im skewed by hollywood or not but people in movies die way longer than that with one shot in the.. stomach area

It appears AL might have been shot in the lung area. But I agree, Libby probably shouldn't die that quickly (who knows, maybe she'll live long enough to tell them Michael did it).

For some reason I don't like this episode at all.

IMO flashbacks are pointless if the character dies right away, hehe. It happened with shannon and then ana lucia (maybe boone too, missed that part). Anyway it's not like jack was ever going to find out, so it doesnt matter anyway.

The way libby was shot right after ana lucia made me think: mm they're firing them because of the DUI thing. And that's makes this episode the less impressive and it even looks "cheap", if you know what I mean.

I hope libby isn't dead though. You don't make an episode showing that libby was in a mental institution and then kill her in the next one... (or 2 episodes after, whatever). I hope she stays longer though.

http://community.tvguide.com/thread.jspa?t...d=1146762008644

That link still doesnt explain Libby's supposed death. Maybe we'll find out next episode.

And the way lost tell things, you end up loosing in the story. They have like many "open" plots... back-stories from flashbacks, and things in the island we don't know the relation (WHY they got there, WHO is dharma, WHO are the others, WHAT the others want). I really don't like michael, but I think for sure that he talked with the others and came back to kill ana lucia (who happened to kill 2 others). Ana lucia killed two others now she's dead. Mr Eko killed other 2, and in the preview you see him falling.

Wasnt Mr Eko going to explore some place with Locke in the last episodes?

I don't like the way this season is ending :(

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • For some reason I suddenly have the urge to go shopping at Sears.
    • So I did a quick test based on 3+ different public instances from the litany at searx.space ... and it spins everything rather differently. It seems that SearXNG is a meta-search engine (queries multiple search indexes rather than only Google's or Bing's or Wikipedia's or Reddit's) that operates in two modes: > public instances ... each instance opens itself to outside users who piggyback on its cached search history; this instance's own identity becomes known/tracked but end-users are hidden similar to an anonymization proxy; this instance's querying of major search indexes may be API based [rated limited, blocked, etc.]). > private instances ... your private install/instance that itself queries multiple (configurable) search indexes of crawled web content; every major Search Engine associates all traffic to your private instance (so your traffic is tracked via network usages) but client-side tracking (your own browser/computer specs) is flushed because it's a "server" doing the querying rather than your browser. My test asked the same 1 question to the 3+ engines and they all returned vastly different results: some had CAPTCHA failures against Google, some had failures against Wikipedia, and the actual results were also different -- some had auto-complete enabled, others returned a wikipedia highlighted excerpt despite the Wikipedia failure (hinting at results being cached from previous keyword matching), and others just gave an Are-You-Human non-CAPTCHA loop before returning random results. So this begs the caveat: Search query results will vary based on which instance is used because every instance queries the other search indexes separate (and thus its results are influenced on that instance's aggregate search history and index-access limitations). The major distinctions for SearXNG versus DDG or Brave: > The search UI is 'untracked' since no UI trackers are baked-in which would phone home or lay cookies into your browser (for DDG/Brave usage stats), > There is no 'crawler' that canvasses the Internet to discover fresh content (it leaves that to the major search indexes), > Queries multiple search indexes ("meta-search engine") based on the configurations and usage history of the server instance, > Privacy-friendly due to its ability to shield user tracking via standing up a non-local server instance connectable to major VPN providers: queries would all appear to come from general VPN/Proxy providers rather than your private instance (whether installed locally or on your own VPS in the cloud). PS: I've previously come across specialized search engines of this nature that indexes searches across media assets like YT, OF, etc. SearXNG seems to be a good backbone...if the rate-limiting/captcha/etc. issues were resolved.
    • For a guy who claims to hate Farage and the ignorant, gullible, rightwing racist skinheads sponsored by Putin that his lies represent, you sure are quoting them time and time and time again, mate. I guess you're conveniently ignoring the fact that your country and commonwealth just happened to work much better when it was still part of the E.U.? Denial isn't just a river in Egypt.
    • Do you live in the U.K? Do any of the people here that are against the UK leaving the E.U, live in the U.K? If not then why are you bothered? If you do live here then it is a different thing . Brexit was a good idea, should have done it years before, it was done badly, but the idea was good. You are saying the same thing as remainers do, oh we did what Putin wanted, we listened to the lies and Farage. I hate Farage and never believed most of what he said, certainly did not believe the £350m a week for the NHS. But we did pay a lot of money to the E.U and yes some of it came back, but what is the point of paying it out for only some of it to come back? Get out of the E.U, no money to them and in theory we can use the money to do things in the country. I said in theory, but our governments are a total and complete waste of space. No matter what colour rosette they wear. You and others say it was a mistake and yet the two main parties in the U.K are not looking at rejoining the EU, I wonder why that is? I was not tricked by anyone. Makes no odds now, we are out and have been for 10 years, what we need is a decent government to run the country. All they do is shout at each other like a load of kids and seems to do nothing and make this country more into a police and nanny state. Getting more like China all the time.
    • 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q, 2TB T-Force G50, and 2TB WD My Passport SSDs drop to great prices by Fiza Ali Prime Day may be over, but there are still worthwhile storage deals available, including discounts on SSDs for shoppers who missed the event or are looking to upgrade their storage solution. Particularly, 2TB Western Digital My Passport, 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50, and 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q SSD are selling at great prices with up to 23% off. The 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 is an M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD with sequential read speeds of up to 5,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 4,500MB/s. The drive has an endurance rating of 1,300 TBW (terabytes written) and features a DRAM-less design. The company specifies a mean time between failures (MTBF) of 3 million hours. The drive includes an "ultra-thin" graphene heat spreader that helps dissipate heat without significantly increasing the drive's thickness. It also supports S.M.A.R.T. monitoring, allowing compatible software to monitor drive health and operating status. The SSD is rated for operating temperatures from 0°C to 70°C, with a storage temperature range of -40°C to 85°C. The drive is backed by a five-year limited warranty as well. 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 SSD: $269.99 (Amazon US) The TEAMGROUP MP44Q is an M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD that delivers sequential read speeds of up to 7,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 5,900MB/s. It uses 3D QLC NAND flash memory to provide 4TB of storage capacity for games, applications, media files, and other data. The drive has an endurance rating of 2,000 TBW and an MTBF of 1.6 million hours. The SSD features a DRAM-less design and supports TEAMGROUP's S.M.A.R.T. monitoring software, allowing users to monitor drive health, temperature, and remaining lifespan. For thermal management, the MP44Q also includes an "ultra-thin" graphene heat spreader. It is designed to operate at temperatures between 0°C and 70°C and can be stored at temperatures ranging from -40°C to 85°C. The SSD is also backed by a five-year limited warranty. 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q SSD: $478.99 (Amazon US) The 2TB WD My Passport SSD connects via a USB-C port using the USB 3.2 Gen 2 interface. It delivers sequential read speeds of up to 1,050MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 1,000MB/s through NVMe technology. In terms of security features, the drive includes password protection with 256-bit AES hardware encryption. The SSD is also designed to resist shock and vibration and is rated to withstand drops from heights of up to 6.5 feet. The recommended operating temperature range is 5°C to 35°C, while the non-operating temperature range is -20°C to 65°C. This drive is also backed by a five-year limited warranty. 2TB Western Digital My Passport SSD: $279.99 (Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      491
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!