"Lost" TV Show - Currently Season 2 (US aired)


Recommended Posts

I was over on Dharma secrets forums and i found this...

[03x01] The Road Less Traveled

4. October 2006:

Flashback: Jack Shephard

Author: Damon Lindelof

Directed by: Jack Bender

[03x02] Somewhere Only We Know

11. October 2006:

Flashback: Kate Austen

Author: Edward Kitsis and Carlton Cuse

Directed by: Stephen Williams

[03x03] Scorched

18. October 2006:

Flashback: James "Sawyer" Ford

Author: Carlton Cuse

Directed by: Paul Edwards

[03x04] Was Blind, But Now I See

25. October 2006:

Flashback: Mr. Eko Tundi

Author: Adam Horowitz

Directed by: Jack Bender

[03x05] Buried Alive

1. November 2006

Flashback: John Locke

Author: Damon Lindelof

Directed by: Dan Attias

[03x06] The Way We Were

8. November 2006

Flashback: Tom "Zeke" Patterson

Author: Carlton Cuse

Directed by: Paul Edwards

http://www.dharmasecrets.com/forum/index.p...pic,5193.0.html

I was over on Dharma secrets forums and i found this...

[03x06] The Way We Were

8. November 2006

Flashback: Tom "Zeke" Patterson

Author: Carlton Cuse

Directed by: Paul Edwards

http://www.dharmasecrets.com/forum/index.p...pic,5193.0.html

Episode 6 should be interesting, a flashback about Zeke.

  • 2 weeks later...

That kind of defeats the point of the game. So you search for the glyphs, when you find them you write them down and then when you have all 70 frags you'll put them into hansoexposed.com and then piece it together?

I'll admit though it's a particularly poorly crafted ARG since you rely so heavily on the work of others and it basically just involves the monitoring of various sites.

Nothing like the old Nokia games used to be.

Part of me didnt want to go do the actual game looking for 70 parts of a video but just the fact im on the net alot and have alot and I mean alot of free time means I will just do it and see what big mysteries will be revealed... :)

I found some very interesting spoilers for Season 3.

Fake HENRY real name is Thomas Radzinsky

In Kates flashback we meet 2 new Characters. Amelia and Karl.

Chris Shephard is both Jacks and Claires Father

Kate chooses Sawyer

In Claires flashback we see 2 characters Mike and Jan

Rose dies this season of Cancer

Sayid manages to rescue Kate & Sawyer but not Jack

There is no Walt/Michael in the mini-series start to the Season

There will be a Danielle flashback this season

Locke leg injury was never a physical injury

Libby's last name is Winchester

Libbys husband was killed in the decking accident that Hurley thought he caused

Libby was after Hurleys money as revenge

Locke was responsible for Shannons Fathers death

Karen DeGroot and DR Marvin will be found in the Flame Station

The Flame station is Partly underwater

Source: http://themisfitishere.blogspot.com/2006/0...-3-massive.html

What you think? :D :woot: :o

Dude you missed the best spoiler on that site!

"This is quite good actually. We have a flashback or so we think to Penny watching the news just after the phone call she recieved from the artic monitoring station. It shows that Flight 815 is still "missing" one week after its disappearence and the previous couple of months have actually taken place in a week. The time on the island runs a lot quicker than the outside world. It's a real wtf moment."

WHAT THE ****!?!?!?!

Where was that?!

Also this i didn't include

E01 "A Tale of Two Cities" - KATE

E02 "Further Instructions" CLAIRE

E03 "Admission" LIBBY

E04 "11-80" LOCKE

E05 "D?sol?" Danielle

E06 "Last Man Standing" DESMOND

E07 "Missing" Penny/Realtime off island

E08 "An Englisgh Rose" EKO

E09 "Remission" Rose/Bernard

E10 "He can never know" Sun

E10 "He can never know" Sun

:laugh: Sounds like it isn't Jin's baby after all?

[EDIT]

Wait, something else a little fishy there.

E03 "Admission" LIBBY -- How is that possible when the executive producers have said already that they won't do flashbacks for dead people. They will cross them over to other people's flashbacks, but a dead person can't have their own flashback.

If you read the whole blog, i does seem fishy with the stories he has, i think he finds anything and posts it so properly most of this information is fake.

Anyone remember that picture of "Season 4 Artwork" with that huge building thing, he claims that was from his "Lost Mole", so i think most of this info is fake

If you read the whole blog, i does seem fishy with the stories he has, i think he finds anything and posts it so properly most of this information is fake.

Anyone remember that picture of "Season 4 Artwork" with that huge building thing, he claims that was from his "Lost Mole", so i think most of this info is fake

Well regardless of whether or not it is fake, I find some of it very interesting. I have a feeling that the executive producers are keeping a lot of stuff close and not letting to many people see what's going on. At Comic Con, Jorge Garcia stated that the actors don't even get a script until two to three days before they start shooting that episode. So you can imagine how how clueless the actors are. I doubt anyone has any information, outside of the writing room, on episodes past 6. But that's just my guess.

I have read this blokes blog before and imo he writes some stuff just to make you all think "wow thats really cool" just my 2 cents on his stories because some stuff he posted last season never happened so take it with a pinch of salt.

Timeline tho if true is a real wtf moment indeed...a week...hmmm

WOW Time is faster on the island? thats awesome.

I really cant wait till Season 3

Either that or we have just been decieved. Is it possible that everything that has happened on the island so far could have taken place in just a week?

Either that or we have just been decieved. Is it possible that everything that has happened on the island so far could have taken place in just a week?

If it has then alot happens in a week...I think thats got to be a bluff it just cant all happen in a week

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
    • In a major surprise there is actually some good deals for the first time in years. At least for me.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      419
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!