iCal vs. Outlook 2003 calendar


which application is more suitable for organizing multiple calendars?  

27 members have voted

  1. 1. which application is more suitable for organizing multiple calendars?

    • Outlook 2003 calendar
      12
    • iCal
      15


Recommended Posts

For me personally its Outlook2003 hands down for my use. I have a windows machine for one. The other is everyone at the military base I work at uses outlook so I can easily connect to all their calendars for scheduling appointments and checking their availability without even having to ask them. I can assign different access levels to different people to allow them what control they have over my calendar and schedule. Plus working in Space Command, Microsoft sells us Office 2003 Professional thru the Home Use Program for under $22.00 to use on our home computers so at that price there is no reason for me to switch to anything else ..

Shouldn't you be comparing iCal to Enterage 2004 ?!?!?

I agree, there's little point comparing Apps that both users cannot run on the same system. Personally i prefer iCal over Entourage, but thats because it's tied in with Key apps i use -

Safari (Few Applescripts)

Address Book (Calender sending etc etc)

iSync (Bluetooth Sync and iPod)

Also, because its based on a standard, so i can easily update my online calender's via dropping the "_.ics" file on my webserver or via WebDAV publishing. :)

I also prefer iCal in terms of interface, its very clean and simple to use, and separated from my other apps for Addresses and Mail etc... I personally prefer it that way...

My guess is most of the people who choose one or the other, do so because it fits in with the people and systems around them. They can't afford or don't want troublesome times trying to share/connect with other Calenders/Users/Devices.

Totally pointless comparing Outlook 2003 to iCal. Most people using 2003 won't have had a chance to use iCal, and vice versa.

Personally, I use iCal because of its integration with other OS X apps (including .Mac), but I would rather use Entourage 2004 if MS didn't always insist on doing everything separately. I mean, would it KILL them to integrate with OS X's address book, iSync, etc?

Anyway, iCal as it is could definitely do with some work. My two main gripes are:

- You can't just set a reminder for a specific time without having to go and make an actual appointment in your calendar. This is unbelievably clunky, and unlike Apple.

- Reminders that do pop up have stupid respawn times. You can either ask to be reminded again in 1 minute, 2 mins, 5 mins, 1 hour, 2 hours and 1 day. I mean WTF? Do we really need the choice between 1 minute and 2? And maybe, just maybe I might want to be reminded in, say, 45 minutes without having to reset the alarm nine times. Sheesh.

There are other little gripes too, but these are the two that annoy me most. Still, I'll keep using it just because it ties in better with OS X and .Mac than Office 2004 does. I really wish the Mac unit over at MS would take that onboard. I suspect that probably would like to, but knowing MS there are probably edicts from on high that it would be a Bad Idea. Typical!

How about "Neither, I can keep track of my life without software?"

The only time I have used iCal is when I am picking classes each quarter. I like to be able to visually see my brakes and amount of time spent in each class. Without iCal I would use a pen and paper or photoshop instead.

I basically put it this way:

Personal Scheduling: iCal

Corporate Scheduling: Outlook

They cover the same topic, but they are both very different in focus. I personally use iCal for tracking assignments and tests, and occasional event here and there. But for the most part, it's just a supplement for what is already in my head.

i love iCal's simplicity. All i have about 6 or 7 different calenders, ie Events, Homework, Deadlines, Work, Birthdays... and it works a charm. It syncs with my Sony Ericsson T630 with iSync, and i can make new events on my phone and send it bak.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • OpenAI is now rolling out Lockdown Mode to more ChatGPT users by Pradeep Viswanathan Back in February, OpenAI first announced Lockdown Mode for users who want the most comprehensive protection from potential attacks. At the time of the announcement, the company mentioned that this feature was available to a small set of highly security-conscious users, including executives or security teams at leading organizations. Today, OpenAI announced that Lockdown Mode is now rolling out to all personal ChatGPT accounts, including Free, Go, Plus, and Pro, and also self-serve ChatGPT Business accounts. Users can enable the feature from ChatGPT Settings > Security when it is available for their account. When Lockdown Mode is enabled, ChatGPT limits or disables several features that connect to the web or external services. These include live web browsing, Deep Research, Agent Mode, and more. Here is the complete list of services that will be disabled in Lockdown Mode: Live web browsing: Web browsing is limited to accessing only cached content. Search results may be limited, unavailable, or stale. Image support: ChatGPT may not display images in regular responses or retrieve images from the web. Users can still upload image files, and image generation remains available where it is otherwise available. Deep research: Deep research is disabled. Agent mode: Agent mode is disabled. Canvas networking: Users cannot approve Canvas-generated code to access the network. File downloads: ChatGPT cannot download files for data analysis. ChatGPT can still operate on your manually uploaded files. It is important to note that Lockdown Mode does not completely block prompt injections from appearing in content that ChatGPT processes. For example, a malicious instruction could still be present in an uploaded file or cached web content. However, the mode is designed to reduce the ways such an attack could send sensitive information outside the conversation. Along with Lockdown Mode, OpenAI today also announced that the Active sessions feature is now available across ChatGPT accounts and workspace types. This feature allows users to review where their account is signed in across devices and end sessions if required. A session will have the following information displayed: Device or browser information. First-party app context, such as ChatGPT, Codex, or API Platform. Approximate location. Sign-in date and time. Whether the device is a trusted device. Whether it is your current session. OpenAI highlighted that the Active sessions feature will not be available for accounts linked to an organization’s single sign-on setup, including SAML or OIDC.
    • with LSTC and ESU, moving to w11 or linux because w10 suddenly will not work when in reality it works and its a better choice, of course there are also developers that only test in 11 or force you to have TPM and Secure boot for the sake of "better security" in games. or most likely people is buying new PC that only ship with 11
    • with LTSC and ESU there are still viable as a stable platform not that they care and let people deal with w11 crashing and burning every month support mean shet if the platform is trash
    • Most boring game ever. Repetitive, empty, predictable, and full of cliches. Total waste of time and money, IMO.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      moog19 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Mentor
      grik went up a rank
      Mentor
    • Dedicated
      JKR earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Year In
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      487
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      68
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!