MS04-035: Vulnerability in SMTP


Recommended Posts

Microsoft Security Bulletin MS04-035

Vulnerability in SMTP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (885881)

Issued: October 12, 2004

Version: 1.0

Summary

Who should read this document: System administrators who use Microsoft Exchange Server 2003, Windows XP 64-Bit Edition Version 2003, or Windows Server 2003

Impact of Vulnerability: Remote Code Execution

Maximum Severity Rating: Critical

Recommendation: Customers should apply the update immediately.

Security Update Replacement: None

Caveats: None

Tested Software and Security Update Download Locations:

Affected Software:

?Microsoft Windows XP 64-Bit Edition Version 2003 ? Download the update (KB885881)

?Microsoft Windows Server 2003 ? Download the update (KB885881)

?Microsoft Windows Server 2003 64-Bit Edition ? Download the update (KB885881)

?Microsoft Exchange Server 2003 and Microsoft Exchange Server 2003 Service Pack 1 when installed on Microsoft Windows Server 2003 (uses the Windows 2003 SMTP component)

?Microsoft Exchange Server 2003 when installed on Microsoft Windows 2000 Service Pack 3 or Microsoft Windows 2000 Service Pack 4 ? Download the update (KB885882)

Non-Affected Software:

?Microsoft Windows NT Server 4.0 Service Pack 6a

?Microsoft Windows NT Server 4.0 Terminal Server Edition Service Pack 6

?Microsoft Windows 2000 Service Pack 3 or Microsoft Windows 2000 Service Pack 4

?Microsoft Windows XP, Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 1, and Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 2

?Microsoft Windows XP 64-Bit Edition Service Pack 1

?Microsoft Windows 98, Microsoft Windows 98 Second Edition (SE), and Microsoft Windows Millennium Edition (ME)

?Microsoft Exchange Server 5.0 Service Pack 2

?Microsoft Exchange Server 5.5 Service Pack 4

?Microsoft Exchange 2000 Server Service Pack 3

?Microsoft Exchange Server 2003 Service Pack 1 when installed on Microsoft Windows 2000 Service Pack 3 or Microsoft Windows 2000 Service Pack 4

Tested Microsoft Windows and Exchange components:

?Microsoft Windows NT Server 4.0 Service Pack 6a SMTP component

?Microsoft Windows NT Server 4.0 Terminal Server Edition Service Pack 6 SMTP component

?Microsoft Windows 2000 Service Pack 3 STMP component and Microsoft Windows 2000 Service Pack 4 SMTP component

?Microsoft Windows XP SMTP component, Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 1 SMTP component, and Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 2 SMTP component

?Microsoft Windows XP 64-Bit Edition Service Pack 1 SMTP component

?Microsoft Windows XP 64-Bit Edition Version 2003 SMTP component

?Microsoft Windows Server 2003 SMTP component

?Microsoft Windows Server 2003 64-Bit Edition SMTP component

?Microsoft Exchange Server 2003 Routing Engine component

Affected components:

?Microsoft Windows XP 64-Bit Edition Version 2003 SMTP component

?Microsoft Windows Server 2003 SMTP component

?Microsoft Windows Server 2003 64-Bit Edition SMTP component

?Microsoft Exchange Server 2003 Routing Engine component

The software in this list has been tested to determine if the versions are affected. Other versions either no longer include security update support or may not be affected. To determine the support lifecycle for your product and version, visit the following Microsoft Support Lifecycle Web site.

Executive Summary:

This update resolves a newly-discovered vulnerability. A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) component that is provided as part of the affected software. The vulnerability is documented in the Vulnerability Details section of this bulletin.

An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could take complete control of an affected system, including installing programs; viewing, changing, or deleting data; or creating new accounts that have full privileges.

We recommend that customers apply the update immediately.

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/...n/MS04-035.mspx

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/229688-ms04-035-vulnerability-in-smtp/
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Been happy with Windows 11 myself even since first release in 2021, sure it hasn't always been perfect, but nothing is per say.. Issues i did have was minor ones, which is normal with any OS really. I still use Windows 10 at times on my unsupported Gaming Laptop, and i find myself using the Windows 11 Desktop more. Eventually replacing Gaming Laptop with a Windows 11 Compatible one somehow, someway this year or possibly next year at the latest, but its gonna happen--(May save all my Bing reward points except the 1000 to have extended support for 10) then work on getting quality Replacement hard)
    • Geez, this is dumb. I use my laptop sometimes in the dark when doing astrophotography to control my astro-PC... this explains why I have to keep entering my PIN when logging back in. So stupid. I can't see the keyboard in the dark, and I can't have lights everywhere to light it up because everything is very light sensitive (including my eyes!).
    • Naturally. I don't care about brand loyalty at all as it's all about price/performance/reliability etc (even what RejZoR said below is a great point to). basically bang-for-the-buck. because at the end of the day... one wants the cheapest possible price to maintain a certain minimum level of performance (or thereabouts). because generally after a certain point with CPU and GPU's the price starts to sky rocket without that much difference in performance where it really matters. p.s. historically I have bought more Intel CPU's and NVIDIA GPU's but I have had some AMD CPU's and one AMD GPU.
    • Both of these companies as well as Qualcomm and Apple need competition. Otherwise, they just coast. I don't prefer macOS, though I like some of Apple's hardware, but if anyone needs competition, it is Apple. Their prices are already outrageous and they need to have a reason to produce good hardware and at least keep prices remotely reasonable. (It is criminal what they charge for RAM upgrades especially.) Qualcomm needs to push AMD and Intel not to be so sloppy with the performance/efficiency aspect. Granted, AMD has been doing quite well in this respect considering they are not an ARM architecture. I personally want to have more options that truly compete with Macbook Air and Macbook Pro's on the Windows side. It is difficult to achieve what Apple does since they control the entire stack and that is fundamentally different for Windows PCs other than maybe Microsoft Surface PCs.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Hartej earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      TsunadeMama earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      shaheen earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Cole Multipass earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Alexander 001 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      569
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      182
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      179
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      111
    5. 5
      Som
      106
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!