Firefox VS Safari


Recommended Posts

i think the only person that understands chad is...  chad.

chad: it's interesting you say apple has crammed "everything" into safari, and that it's behind omniweb and firefox, compared to all the features i'd call "bloat" in omniweb and firefox.  and no, as a keyboard junkie (one finger on the cmd key, four fingers hovering the keyboard, one hand on the mouse), it would save me perhaps a half a second to choose "Copy Image Location" over "open in new window" > cmd-l > cmd-c > cmd-w.

584753508[/snapback]

That's you. If you like keeping tracking of keyboard shortcuts thats on you, but the fact of the matter is that Copy Image Location is a standard browser feature found on every single brownser practically bar text based browsers and Safari.

That's you. If you like keeping tracking of keyboard shortcuts thats on you, but the fact of the matter is that Copy Image Location is a standard browser feature found on every single brownser practically bar text based browsers and Safari.

584753773[/snapback]

and cmd-l is a standard keyboard shortcut in every browser to send me to the address bar.

and cmd-c is a standard keyboard shortcut in every operating system to copy selected text.

and cmd-w is a standard mac os keyboard shortcut that closes the current window.

it's not "keeping track". it's being "computer literate".

and cmd-l is a standard keyboard shortcut in every browser to send me to the address bar.

and cmd-c is a standard keyboard shortcut in every operating system to copy selected text.

and cmd-w is a standard mac os keyboard shortcut that closes the current window.

it's not "keeping track".  it's being "computer literate".

584753854[/snapback]

Right, so you admit that there are across the board keyboard shortcuts that are a standard yet you don't see any reason why a common function should be a standard in everything bar Safari?

:rolleyes:

There's a lot more to being computer literate than remembering a bunch of shortcuts as well.

Right, so you admit that there are across the board keyboard shortcuts that are a standard yet you don't see any reason why a common function should be a standard in everything bar Safari?

:rolleyes:

There's a lot more to being computer literate than remembering a bunch of shortcuts as well.

584753901[/snapback]

i'm very sorry i'm not going to base my preference of browser on something as ridiculously small as one contextual menu item :rolleyes:

either way, no, there is a big difference between what one browser has vs. another and what the os maker has determined appropriate keyboard shortcuts. the closest comparison i can come up with right now is the little kid who has a shiny red tricycle, and one who doesn't. but they both recieve food, shelter, and all that other junk kids need, so what is the real difference?

is having that contextual menu item in firefox making your/chad's/the devs of firefox's e-penis bigger?

i won't get into your level of computer literacy at this point, but consider what you're arguing about right now. i certainly don't feel that one contextual menu item has any urgency in my life, but if that's what's important to you, then you have bigger issues to deal with.

i'm very sorry i'm not going to base my preference of browser on something as ridiculously small as one contextual menu item  :rolleyes:

584753970[/snapback]

No one is asking you to base your preference on anything. There are many reasons not to choose it but if someone actually uses copy image locationt a lot and its not there then arguing about how you would rather use keyboard shortcuts is rather stupid.

i won't get into your level of computer literacy at this point, but consider what you're arguing about right now.  i certainly don't feel that one contextual menu item has any urgency in my life, but if that's what's important to you, then you have bigger issues to deal with.

There you go again arguing on what you use it for and attacking other people for not having the same view. I'm not arguing about the oontexual menu item but I do see why other people would see it as being important and stated the reason why.

There you go again arguing on what you use it for and attacking other people for not having the same view. I'm not arguing about the oontexual menu item but I do see why other people would see it as being important and stated the reason why.

584754075[/snapback]

and imagine... we're back to where we were. whether it's you or the first person who whined about safari not having it, it's a ridiculous thing to base your browser choice on.

and another thing. that is far from "attacking people for not having the same view". :rolleyes:

Okay, so you say Safari is bloated, and then you say you want more functionality. I really don't get you Chad, I really don't. Safari is light, fast and really much better than Firefox on OS X. Firefox on Windows is nice. It's the best Windows has, but in the Mac scene, we have better. I'm sorry, but "Copy Image Location" doesn't make Firefox better than Safari.

584753269[/snapback]

I never said anything about Safari and functionality. I was mocking people who don't use firefox because it doesn't use the osx ui...so they choose looks over functionality...get it?

The difference between Firefox/Omniweb and Safari is HUUUUGE. Safari hasn't been "light, fast and really much better than Firefox on OS X" since 1.0. If you think so, you're just kidding yourself. Each browser has a ton of features, but Firefox and Omniweb are years ahead of Safari in terms of what they have or what you could install (FF with extensions). Sure, Safari has some nice features, but Apple decided they wanted to go with a browser with some stuff in it, and sacrifice the nice, light browser they started out with. Sure, they could have both, but they don't. Safari is a pos browser. They probably COULD make it nice and light again while retaining the features, but they haven't.

If you think Safari is nice and light and fast and cool, or whatever....you haven't tried FF or Omniweb...or tried them long enough.

and no, as a keyboard junkie (one finger on the cmd key, four fingers hovering the keyboard, one hand on the mouse), it would save me perhaps a half a second to choose "Copy Image Location" over "open in new window" > cmd-l > cmd-c > cmd-w.

584753508[/snapback]

Don't forget cmd-v...or are you just going to copy it and not download it? :rolleyes:

I don't care how much you use the keyboard...the contextual menu IS faster than hitting 4 keyboard combos. Let's see right click (or cmd-click), then a left click to dl the image, or 4 keycombos with a couple "enter" hits in there. Tough one.

I've used Safari on campus lab machines, and I have to agree with Chad's comment about Firefox being much more functional and extensible (Firefox is my primary OS on Windows; I'm don't own a Macintosh). Even if the base browser doesn't have some feature that you'd want, there are so many extensions available, most of which are very innovative and really make commonly performed tasks faster and easier.

That's not to say Safari doesn't have some of its own little strong points - the "snapback" feature is one example of a feature that would be nice to have in Firefox.

In the end though, if I had to choose between the two, I'd go with Firefox, no doubt about it. Its strengths far outweigh the minor weaknesses like using non-native UI widgets, in my opinion.

Each browser has a ton of features, but Firefox and Omniweb are years ahead of Safari in terms of what they have or what you could install (FF with extensions).

584756087[/snapback]

So what are you basing this on? I bet if Apple decides to go with extensions in the next version of Safari, it would take only weeks, if not sooner, for developers to come up with extensions that are currently available for FF.

The difference between Firefox/Omniweb and Safari is HUUUUGE.  Safari hasn't been "light, fast and really much better than Firefox on OS X" since 1.0.  If you think so, you're just kidding yourself.  Each browser has a ton of features, but Firefox and Omniweb are years ahead of Safari in terms of what they have or what you could install (FF with extensions).  Sure, Safari has some nice features, but Apple decided they wanted to go with a browser with some stuff in it, and sacrifice the nice, light browser they started out with.  Sure, they could have both, but they don't.  Safari is a pos browser.  They probably COULD make it nice and light again while retaining the features, but they haven't.

584756087[/snapback]

Right, so it's just a coincidence that Safari loads and is faster than Firefox (which I currently have no extensions loaded in). :rolleyes:

I've tried both Firefox and OmniWeb, and while I kinda liked OmniWeb, it was not small-screen friendly. My issue with Firefox is the Gecko engine. While great in comparison to Internet Explorer's, not what I was looking for. I use CSS a lot, and I like being able to use and see attributes like text-shadow.

So I've been reading the Firefox vs Safari thread with interest. I wanted to ask in there how Opera compared to the two since that is what I mainly use, yet I didn't want to send the thread off-topic. It doesn't seem like I see too many people talk about Opera.

How do you think Opera compares to Firefox and Safari?

So I've been reading the Firefox vs Safari thread with interest.  I wanted to ask in there how Opera compared to the two since that is what I mainly use, yet I didn't want to send the thread off-topic.  It doesn't seem like I see too many people talk about Opera.

How do you think Opera compares to Firefox and Safari?

584756355[/snapback]

I don't think you want to get me started on Opera. :x

Right, so it's just a coincidence that Safari loads and is faster than Firefox (which I currently have no extensions loaded in). :rolleyes:

584756307[/snapback]

If we're comparing load times, there's virtually no difference. BUT...Safari, the app, slows down trememdously after some usage. I'm not saying the page loading suffers, but the app as a whole is sluggish.

If we're comparing load times, there's virtually no difference.  BUT...Safari, the app, slows down trememdously after some usage.  I'm not saying the page loading suffers, but the app as a whole is sluggish.

584756375[/snapback]

Sorry, I've never experienced that. The only slowdown I notice is when I'm browsing an animated GIF-heavy page.

So what are you basing this on? I bet if Apple decides to go with extensions in the next version of Safari, it would take only weeks, if not sooner, for developers to come up with extensions that are currently available for FF.

584756198[/snapback]

What am I basing this on? Well it's obvious...current functionality of each app.

Yeah, IF Apple went with extensions. I'm not arguing what if's here. Hell...even without extensions, Firefox still has more to it than Safari, and doesn't suffer from the bloat.

So what are you basing this on? I bet if Apple decides to go with extensions in the next version of Safari, it would take only weeks, if not sooner, for developers to come up with extensions that are currently available for FF.

584756198[/snapback]

It's not a question of what's possible; it's what's already available. We're comparing currently available versions of each product.

If Microsoft decided to support extensions, it would take no time for devs to come up with extensions for that either, considering the fact that it's still the most-used browser even today. Does that make the current version of IE any better than Firefox? Of course not; at least not in my opinion.

If you want to compare the two products taking future plans for each one into account, you should know that the Firefox devs have explicitly stated that Firefox will blend in much better with the native look-and-feel of OS X post-1.0. Apple, on the other hand, has made no claims that they plan to include support for third-party extensions to Safari.

If we're comparing load times, there's virtually no difference.  BUT...Safari, the app, slows down trememdously after some usage.  I'm not saying the page loading suffers, but the app as a whole is sluggish.

584756375[/snapback]

I'll have to agree with that, but it seems as if Mozilla has had a problem with their latest release on Mac. It crashes randomly, yet I still have to see this happen on my pc. :huh:

I don't think you want to get me started on Opera. :x

584756367[/snapback]

Yes I do - I am asking for reasons why I rarely see Opera mentioned. Something must be wrong with it if everyone picks other browsers. Surely it's not just because they don't like the thin ad bar in the free version.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!