Firefox VS Safari


Recommended Posts

Surely it's not just because they don't like the thin ad bar in the free version.

584756422[/snapback]

As far as I can tell, yes it is actually. Well, the rendering engine isn't too hot either, and it's kinda bloated.

And Chad, there is a difference in loading times. In terms of bounces, not really, but to get to an actual window, yea.

It's not a question of what's possible; it's what's already available. We're comparing currently available versions of each product.

If Microsoft decided to support extensions, it would take no time for devs to come up with extensions for that either, considering the fact that it's still the most-used browser even today. Does that make the current version of IE any better than Firefox? Of course not; at least not in my opinion.

If you want to compare the two products taking future plans for each one into account, you should know that the Firefox devs have explicitly stated that Firefox will blend in much better with the native look-and-feel of OS X post-1.0. Apple, on the other hand, has made no claims that they plan to include support for third-party extensions to Safari.

584756404[/snapback]

I was not comparing the future plans of the two browsers. I was simply stating that it's not right to say that Firefox is years ahead of safari.

Don't forget cmd-v...or are you just going to copy it and not download it?  :rolleyes:

I don't care how much you use the keyboard...the contextual menu IS faster than hitting 4 keyboard combos.  Let's see right click (or cmd-click), then a left click to dl the image, or 4 keycombos with a couple "enter" hits in there.  Tough one.

584756087[/snapback]

if all i want to do is download an image, i'll drag it from the window to the desktop. no need to click more than once. it's like magic!

:sleep:

If we're comparing load times, there's virtually no difference.  BUT...Safari, the app, slows down trememdously after some usage.  I'm not saying the page loading suffers, but the app as a whole is sluggish.

584756375[/snapback]

interesting, i've never noticed any lag in safari, and i don't quit safari. after nearly 4 days uptime, safari has been open and still runs at the same speed it did when i first opened it.

oik vs. kitten & chad :sleep:

i've tried omniweb and safari, and don't like either. omniweb is pretty innovative, but the rendering sucks and adblocking isn't as good as firefox (ads are replaced with image placeholders rather than not visible at all).

safari is okay, but there's no easy way to adblock (pithhelmet wtf) and you can't add search engines to the toolbar (where the google search is like omniweb or firefox).

until that stuff is worked out i can handle the non osx widgets and bland looks of firefox since it is far superior than any other browser

danke.

i tried out camino today after reading everyones suggestion, and its awesome! best of both worlds. gecko and osx. also, the adblocking works great and the serachbar lets you add in engines. move over firefox :)

interesting, i've never noticed any lag in safari, and i don't quit safari.  after nearly 4 days uptime, safari has been open and still runs at the same speed it did when i first opened it.

584756991[/snapback]

Thanks oik! You just changed my mind :rolleyes:

Does anyone mind pointing out what FireFox for Mac OS X, has feature wise that makes it better than Safari? I've not used in in a long time, but i don't recall it being anything massively different, unlike say OmniWeb 5...

So, anyone?

For me it was the speed. Firefox is nice a light, while Safari, is, one big bloated browser. FF is faster loading up, browsing with multiple tabs, etc etc. I guess I don't understand why people still use it when there are many better options.

For me it was the speed.? Firefox is nice a light, while Safari, is, one big bloated browser.? FF is faster loading up, browsing with multiple tabs, etc etc.? I guess I don't understand why people still use it when there are many better options.

584762647[/snapback]

Wow, you really must've ****** up Safari. Mine runs faster than Firefox.

And yes, while that screenshot makes it look OS X-ish, out of box it is not (widgets on pages look extremely ugly). It also does not use real Cocoa, and you get this weird extra window when using Expos?.

Hah!? He's improved it, but Safari still doesn't hold a candle to Firefox as far as being complient.? Gecko is ages ahead of khtml

Well if you'd actually try it the other way, you'd realize it's quite a bit faster.? Once you start downloading quite a few images, there's no contest.

Seriously...Safari isn't even close in the browser race anymore.? Apple crammed as much in there as they could, so now it's a bloated piece of a browser.? WELL behind firefox and Omniweb.? And seriously...why even bother with Camino?? Who cares if it uses the native OS X gui and Firefox doesn't?? Since when does your browser looking good come before function:rolleyes:rolleyes:

584752607[/snapback]

Can you please expand on the compliancy that Safari is still missing? Every browser, no matter how good at rendering according to the W3C still has some issues, and I highly doubt that you have taken the time to sit down and compare the way Safari handles an element vs. the way that Firefox handles and element and then take that to compare with the W3C spec, mainly because the spec is so confusing hardly a human can read/understand it. Even if KHTML is behind Gecko, Safari isn't using straight KHTML, it is using WebKit, which is modified KHTML. I have not heard of or experienced any significant rendering issues in regards to standards on Safari. As far as I know, the browser follows the spec line by line. If you want to talk about backward compatibility, that's an entirely separate issue.

I never said anything about Safari and functionality.? I was mocking people who don't use firefox because it doesn't use the osx ui...so they choose looks over functionality...get it?

The difference between Firefox/Omniweb and Safari is HUUUUGE.? Safari hasn't been "light, fast and really much better than Firefox on OS X" since 1.0.? If you think so, you're just kidding yourself.? Each browser has a ton of features, but Firefox and Omniweb are years ahead of Safari in terms of what they have or what you could install (FF with extensions).? Sure, Safari has some nice features, but Apple decided they wanted to go with a browser with some stuff in it, and sacrifice the nice, light browser they started out with.? Sure, they could have both, but they don't.? Safari is a pos browser.? They probably COULD make it nice and light again while retaining the features, but they haven't.

If you think Safari is nice and light and fast and cool, or whatever....you haven't tried FF or Omniweb...or tried them long enough.

Don't forget cmd-v...or are you just going to copy it and no:rolleyes: it?? :rolleyes:

I don't care how much you use the keyboard...the contextual menu IS faster than hitting 4 keyboard combos.? Let's see right click (or cmd-click), then a left click to dl the image, or 4 keycombos with a couple "enter" hits in there.? Tough one.

584756087[/snapback]

I don't see how the way you choose which software to use is any better than someone else's. I especially don't see how it gives you the right to mock them. Just because some choose looks over functionality doesn't mean that its wrong or right, its just the way they do it. How can you be so pompous to assume that everyone should be just like you and require the exact same functionality out of their software?

The difference is surely not as HUUUUUGE as you make it out to be. I, and obviously many others, still find Safari "light, fast and really much better than Firefox on OS X." And no, I am really not kidding myself. Safari is not a POS browser. It still is light and fast (for me). I don't see how you can say that Firefox and Omniweb offer more than Safari in what can be installed and comes bundled with it. Omniweb has no plugin architecture that I know of and both Firefox (extensions) and Safari (SIMBL) do. While Firefox is the winner on the sheer amount of extensions that are available, I have certainly found that the ones available for Safari are sufficient in my needs. I have never felt like Safari feels bloated and it has only gotten faster and snappier for me since I first used it (b v.67).

If we're comparing load times, there's virtually no difference.? BUT...Safari, the app, slows down trememdously after some usage.? I'm not saying the page loading suffers, but the app as a whole is sluggish.

584756375[/snapback]

What data sets are you basing this on? Have you done sufficient research to back this up or are you just coming from your own experience on your own computer. Surely anyone knows enough about computers to know that there are thousands of variables that can effect the speed and performance of software that are all system-independent.

What am I basing this on?? Well it's obvious...current functionality of each app.

Yeah, IF Apple went with extensions.? I'm not arguing what if's here.? Hell...even without extensions, Firefox still has more to it than Safari, and doesn't suffer from the bloat.

584756394[/snapback]

Safari did go with extensions and they are readily available to anyone who wants them. There just aren't as many developers coding extensions for Safari as there are for Firefox. What extension would you like that Safari is missing? I would agree that Firefox out of the box does not suffer from bloat, but I still hold that Safari does not either.

Oh it does.? People will make excuses for anything

584762636[/snapback]

No-one is making excuses. The person that claimed it looks OS X-ish has obviously no experience with the OS itself. Everything in the app is completely non-native, down to the framework of the GUI. Look at the form controls on that page! That is the most disgusting thing I have ever seen on a mac app, it is drawn from a windows button. Combine that with the cursors, text behavior, etc... it does feel very non OS X-ish. I am not going to turn this into a petty argument on the GUI of each browser, since even Safari's interface breaks Apple's HIG, but suffice it to say that many people do not appreciate the general feeling that Firefox has on OS X. Whether or not that is a choice factor in someone's decision on which browser they use is up to them. I am with you and tend to find it silly for someone to choose looks over functionality, but history has shown that people will, and that is their prerogative.

Thanks oik!? :rolleyes:hanged my mind? :rolleyes:

For me it was the speed.? Firefox is nice a light, while Safari, is, one big bloated browser.? FF is faster loading up, browsing with multiple tabs, etc etc.? I guess I don't understand why people still use it when there are many better options.

584762647[/snapback]

Because for those people that you are referring to, there aren't better options. Just because you have convinced yourself that Safari is a POS, doesn't mean it is true, or that anyone should agree with you. Here is why I use Safari over Firefox/Omniweb/Camino/Shiira/IE.

I am a web designer for my university. My main job includes CSS standards design, with some small time PHP involved (the heavy stuff is left to the development team). I require a browser that will fit into my work style and work for me as well. I also use the internet for personal things, such as checking bank accounts, visiting forums and browsing weblogs, university research, etc... Because of this, I also require a browser that will work well with my system and the way I work on personal items.

Safari has never been slow for me, save a small bug I had with it around v1.1. I have tried every browser out there and their moms and Safari has consistently come up faster on page load times as well as snappier as software on my system. Window draw times, launch times, performance and behavior has always been quicker on Safari.

Omniweb was never an option for me when I worked on a 12" powerbook because of the tight display, but after moving to a 20" cinema display and 15" powerbook, the tab drawer was very attractive to me. However, after opening say 20 blogs, in tabs at once, I bring the app to its knees. It just cannot handle what I throw at it. This is a highly personal thing, considering the way I browse the internet is 90 percent personal style, so I don't expect everyone to share my experience with it, but for me, it was just too sluggish. As well, until the recent betas, it was using the old version of WebKit, which still had some standards rendering issues that I just could not have in my browser.

Firefox is a really great step towards a good Gecko OS X browser, and the rendering functionality is all there. It does lack functionality that I really need out of my browser though. For starters, it does not use Keychain. I keep all my passwords managed through Keychain and I really need (or appreciate) a browser that interacts with it. This is a huge feature for me. As well, because Firefox is not built in Cocoa, it can not use the native OS X spell check. I am posting on forums, posting on our University Intranet and filling out forms in general all the time through my browser. Spell checker integrated with my browser has been one of those things I have come to love and has saved me from looking like a complete idiot more that a few times. Although I could take the windows route and copy+paste everything into MS Word to check it before posting, the technology is available, why not take advantage of it? I really appreciate this about Safari.

Safari was missing some functionality that I really wanted in a browser such as searchable bookmarks and history, opening new-window instance links in tabs, saving a set of tabs as a window set to be opened whenever, color-coded soBut Ad-blocking, etc... But, I have found plugins for every single one of these and now Safari is just one kick-ass browser for what I do. I couldn't ask for anything better.

Chad, its one of two ways, either you have a version of Firefox that is just amazingly faster than everyone else's or you have a version of Safari that is far slower compared to everyone else's. I tend to lean on the latter. There might be something wrong with your system, or maybe you have a different definition of speemostrs, but either way, most people do not experience the same sluggishness that you do with Safari. You are forgetting the personal variable, that everyone is different and that implies that everyone's browsing needs vary. Firefox may match up with the speed and functionality you require, and that is awesome that you have found something you love and works for you, but that does not make it the same for everyone else (this reminds me of a similar debate). No one is asking you to claim Safari is better, but we are asking you to recognize that it could besomeusly is, better for some people.

Thanks oik!  You just changed my mind  :rolleyes:

584762647[/snapback]

better than letting you spread random junk around. as jagededge says, you must have screwed safari up pretty bad. that's like a pc user putting thermal grease in the ram slot and then coming to tell all the pc users how horrible pc's are.

Oh it does.  People will make excuses for anything

584762636[/snapback]

Were not making excuses, because Firefox is written in XUL it lacks native widgets found in Safari/Camino. The windows version suffers from the same problem too. If you really want nativeness on windows use K-Meleon

Wow, you really must've ****** up Safari. Mine runs faster than Firefox.

And yes, while that screenshot makes it look OS X-ish, out of box it is not (widgets on pages look extremely ugly). It also does not use real Cocoa, and you get this weird extra window when using Expos?.

584763521[/snapback]

The "hidden Expos? window" what fixed several weeks ago!;);)
my main reasions for using firefox were

gecko rendering engine

adblocking and countless other extensions

integrated searchbar

since the last two can be implemented with safari, my only main beef with safari is that it doesn't render some websites properly

584761492[/snapback]

That's because Safari does not support CSS 100%.

does anyone elses firefox lag when u scroll up or down? and can anyone else open up a link in a tab using the middle mouse button?

after doing some testing,both of those work perfect in safari, the lag is a bit better in mozilla, nothing major, EVEN WORSE in Internet Explorer and in Camino its better, but i dont like camino, watered down version of a mozzila browser

Edited by rajputwarrior
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!