578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

Opera is smaller than FireFox... explain how accomplishing more functionality in a smaller space is bloated?  It is options.  If you don't want them, don't use it.  No harm.

Yes, it can be discussed because Opera is also free.  It just displays a small Google Ad banner at the top.  Opera is not open source, but that isn't necessarily a bad thing and it isn't a necessarily good thing that FireFox is open source.  Its a preference... and it can certainly be discussed.

585059735[/snapback]

Wow. The license agreement for the product and the ability for every n00b to read it's source code really is a deciding factor in the quality of a product[/sarcasm]

:sleep:

Opensource may be handy if you're a programmer, but I'm willing to wager my left testicle that the majority of people who surf the internet are NOT programmers.

Case in point, "The Gimp". Free, open source, etc... but it does not hold anything on the functionality of Photoshop.

The very fact that the majority of Firefox users use Windows is also an interesting point, as windows is neither free nor open source.

You pay money for your internet....wow, it obviously is a rip off :rolleyes:

As has Opera.Not in my experience.

585057415[/snapback]

Opera's in second/third place. I believe KHTML and Gecko pretty much are on par now. Dave Hyatt has been working extremely hard on Safari these past few months, getting it ready for Tiger, and I can say Safari 1.3/2.0 definitely has a lot of improvements. Safari has also been adopting new CSS3 standards before other browsers. For instance, the shadow attribute.

Urrrrr , just for your information.

Opera --> 7.54

Firefox --> 1.0 Preview Release

I think (and hope) the message is obvious enough

EDIT: lol the same thing was posted while i'm typing up this reply :-P

584793599[/snapback]

People, Firefox is no longer a PR. If you are using the PR, time to update. Opera could be version 25.54 and it would still suck. Pages don't render correctly, half the time none of the media players work with it. Security wise, it ranks up there with IE, ****ty! But, let me thank you in advance because you'll be bringing your computer to my shop to fix it when it gets overloaded with viruses, spybots etc. So, go ahead, pay for the download. When you run into compatability problems, don't call me, you won't like the answer that I will have for you.

People, Firefox is no longer a PR.  If you are using the PR, time to update.  Opera could be version 25.54 and it would still suck.  Pages don't render correctly, half the time none of the media players work with it.  Security wise, it ranks up there with IE, ****ty!  But, let me thank you in advance because you'll be bringing your computer to my shop to fix it when it gets overloaded with viruses, spybots etc.  So, go ahead, pay for the download.  When you run into compatability problems, don't call me, you won't like the answer that I will have for you.

585060305[/snapback]

Ahem, at the time he wrote that, November 9th hadn't quite happened yet. :p

Opera could be version 25.54 and it would still suck.  Pages don't render correctly, half the time none of the media players work with it.  Security wise, it ranks up there with IE, ****ty!  But, let me thank you in advance because you'll be bringing your computer to my shop to fix it when it gets overloaded with viruses, spybots etc.  So, go ahead, pay for the download.  When you run into compatability problems, don't call me, you won't like the answer that I will have for you.

585060305[/snapback]

Do you want to explain at all what you're talking about? I've been using Opera almost exclusively since 7.0something, and pages render fine for me, media players always work, and the notion that it 'ranks up there with IE' security-wise seems pretty fallacious to me.

Furthermore, i have never ONCE had a virus or a 'spybot' on any of my computers. Not once. That isn't because i use Opera -- it's because i'm not an idiot.

And what compatibility problems would there be? Considering that Opera is designed to be 'compatible' with Internet Explorer while Firetruck is designed specifically to ignore the browser that 90% of the world uses in favour of following a bunch of recommendations that nobody uses, i should think Mozilla people would be the ones with compatibility problems.

Pages don't render correctly, half the time none of the media players work with it.  Security wise, it ranks up there with IE, ****ty!  But, let me thank you in advance because you'll be bringing your computer to my shop to fix it when it gets overloaded with viruses, spybots etc.

585060305[/snapback]

... :pc:

Opera all the way. Although i do agree with people saying Opera is a bit bloated. It would be better if the mail/news client/mouse gestures weren't included and were plugins but never mind.

Btw, I have tried firefox, and it is a good browser.......I just like Opera better ;) Dunno why, feels more complete for some reason... :pinch:

Oh, and for people who say it takes long to customize opera, or it's interface is bloated.... well it took my under 2 minutes to get it like this:

post-58442-1102456491_thumb.jpg

And what compatibility problems would there be? Considering that Opera is designed to be 'compatible' with Internet Explorer while Firetruck is designed specifically to ignore the browser that 90% of the world uses in favour of following a bunch of recommendations that nobody uses, i should think Mozilla people would be the ones with compatibility problems.

585060429[/snapback]

Wow, that nobody uses? That's a stretch considering many companies are trying to write cleaner sites with better W3C compatibility. Reasons? It's cleaner to look at and it's the future. The popularity of CSS has forced people to use stricter standards. Definitely a step in the right direction.

Oh, and sure, I've had compatibility problems with Safari and Firefox, but I don't complain. I just don't give the site the time of day if it wasn't coded by competent web developers.

It takes me around 5-15 minutes to customise opera, but I have a LOT of in-depth modifications to the browser that take a little bit to set up. Of course, my custom modifications aren't anything important to the average Joe.

It has to be Opera for me, because I like things been done right.

I've tried out Opera 7.45, Opera 7.60 Preview 4 & Firefox, but Firefox wins my vote because it has built-in selective image blocking software, a better cookie manager, a better pop-up manager, slightly better tabbed browsing + Extensions.

Also, Firefox is compleately free with no ads.

Wow, that nobody uses? That's a stretch considering many companies are trying to write cleaner sites with better W3C compatibility.

585061751[/snapback]

You guys really like doing that, don't you? Have you heard of exaggeration? Jesus Christ.

Reasons? It's cleaner to look at and it's the future. The popularity of CSS has forced people to use stricter standards. Definitely a step in the right direction.

585061751[/snapback]

CSS doesn't force anybody to use stricter standards. Most of the big sites (MSN, for example) make use of both CSS and crappy HTML. Big sites like MSN had been using CSS for a long time before it was the trendy new thing to do. What's increasing in popularity isn't the use of CSS, it's the use of standards-compliant (X)HTML (which generally requires CSS if you want your page to look good).

In any case, what companies? I can think of, um, three or four, off the top of my head. Mozilla (more or less -- their front page doesn't validate, but i guess it's close enough), Opera, IBM.... Not many others do. Not Microsoft, not Apple, not Adobe, not Dell, not HP, not Macromedia, not even Google. (The front page of Adobe's site has fewer errors than the front page of Google, and Adobe's site is like 8 times bigger.)

But that's not even what i'm talking about. The 'recommendations that nobody uses' that i was referring to are the things like the float elements that were mentioned earlier in the thread. The recommendations say that floats should work one way, but Internet Explorer and Opera (an EXTREMELY huge majority) treat them a different way. Thus my saying that nobody uses them. Or the Mozilla people's insistence on using MIME types exclusively. If everybody followed the standards, there wouldn't be any problems with that. Unfortunately, because a lot of people don't set correct MIME types for their files (particularly PNG images on older IIS servers, in addition to other things like BitTorrent files), being a standards Nazi doesn't work. Which is why Opera lets you use the file extension if you want. Speaking of MIME types, i can't serve my Web pages as application/xhtml+xml, because that would make it impossible for 45% of my audience (the people who use Internet Explorer) to see my site. So, again, that's a recommendation that i don't use. Cool beans that Mozilla supports it, but considering i kind of want that 45% of my audience to be able to see my site without being a jerk and forcing them to switch browsers, it doesn't really matter whether it supports it or not.

who the hell pays to use a browser? it's like paying for p2p when you can use it for free. Firefox & IE all the way.

585063515[/snapback]

Uh, guy. Internet Explorer costs money. You kind of had to buy Windows in order to use it.

People, Firefox is no longer a PR.  If you are using the PR, time to update.  Opera could be version 25.54 and it would still suck.  Pages don't render correctly, half the time none of the media players work with it.  Security wise, it ranks up there with IE, ****ty!  But, let me thank you in advance because you'll be bringing your computer to my shop to fix it when it gets overloaded with viruses, spybots etc.  So, go ahead, pay for the download.  When you run into compatability problems, don't call me, you won't like the answer that I will have for you.

585060305[/snapback]

Seriously, you fix computers? :blink:

Wow. Just wow.

People, Firefox is no longer a PR.  If you are using the PR, time to update.  Opera could be version 25.54 and it would still suck.  Pages don't render correctly, half the time none of the media players work with it.  Security wise, it ranks up there with IE, ****ty!  But, let me thank you in advance because you'll be bringing your computer to my shop to fix it when it gets overloaded with viruses, spybots etc.  So, go ahead, pay for the download.  When you run into compatability problems, don't call me, you won't like the answer that I will have for you.

585060305[/snapback]

You're making me laugh.

I barely had any problem with Opera rendering pages whereas I get so many ugly and weird looking websites with Firefox.

I know it's designer's fault, but Opera seems more compatible with IE.

Opera's in second/third place. I believe KHTML and Gecko pretty much are on par now. Dave Hyatt has been working extremely hard on Safari these past few months, getting it ready for Tiger, and I can say Safari 1.3/2.0 definitely has a lot of improvements. Safari has also been adopting new CSS3 standards before other browsers. For instance, the shadow attribute

First, "Opera's in second/third place" is a blanket statement which does not reflect the fact that different browsers have different strengths. There are several standards/recommendations, you know, such as HTML, CSS, XHTML, XML, ECMAScript, and so on.

Regarding "working extremely hard", I'd be willing to bet that Hyatt is not the only one... :blink:

As for CSS3, it isn't even an official recommendation yet.

Depends on the user. I don't use any special things like "mouse gestures" which I had to look up on google to find out what they are. I use FF it works for me and I'm used to it. I may give Opera a try though, to see what people are fighting about.

585059788[/snapback]

Uh, that screenshot doesn't mean anything. It depends on what you have open, what plugins are loaded, what you have done this session, etc. Remember, Opera fits on mobile phones. Firefox doesn't.

People, Firefox is no longer a PR.  If you are using the PR, time to update.  Opera could be version 25.54 and it would still suck.  Pages don't render correctly, half the time none of the media players work with it.  Security wise, it ranks up there with IE, ****ty!  But, let me thank you in advance because you'll be bringing your computer to my shop to fix it when it gets overloaded with viruses, spybots etc.  So, go ahead, pay for the download.  When you run into compatability problems, don't call me, you won't like the answer that I will have for you.

Is it really necessary to lie and troll like this? :x

People like you give Firefox a bad name.

People, Firefox is no longer a PR.  If you are using the PR, time to update.  Opera could be version 25.54 and it would still suck.  Pages don't render correctly, half the time none of the media players work with it.  Security wise, it ranks up there with IE, ****ty!  But, let me thank you in advance because you'll be bringing your computer to my shop to fix it when it gets overloaded with viruses, spybots etc.  So, go ahead, pay for the download.  When you run into compatability problems, don't call me, you won't like the answer that I will have for you.

585060305[/snapback]

I would be interested in reading how operas security is ****ty? Care to elaborate?

You will find most of the pages which don't render correctly are either badly coded or check for opera and send different code to it.

Oh, and for people who say it takes long to customize opera, or it's interface is bloated.... well it took my under 2 minutes to get it like this:

585060444[/snapback]

That's basically the default preview setup without the sidebar?

Wow :blink:

It feels like I learn a new thing in Opera everyday.

584867939[/snapback]

OMG, nice! I even get some tips in using Opera from that page lol

585054708[/snapback]

w00t right click and drag is 1337.. didn't even know you could do that and i've used opera for years

You guys really like doing that, don't you? Have you heard of exaggeration? Jesus Christ.

CSS doesn't force anybody to use stricter standards. Most of the big sites (MSN, for example) make use of both CSS and crappy HTML. Big sites like MSN had been using CSS for a long time before it was the trendy new thing to do. What's increasing in popularity isn't the use of CSS, it's the use of standards-compliant (X)HTML (which generally requires CSS if you want your page to look good).

585063817[/snapback]

You're right, and it's generally because they have to make it look good in IE. I'm just glad a few sites (small sites, but it's a start) are beginning to just say no to IE.

I would be interested in reading how operas security is ****ty? Care to elaborate?

585064580[/snapback]

Well, not that bad. But compared to Firefox 1.x, pretty bad looking.

Opera 7.x: http://secunia.com/product/761/

Firefox 1.x http://secunia.com/product/4227/

Yes, I know, Firefox hasn't been out as long as Opera 7.x, but also look at the number of vulnerabilities found in the time span of Firefox's release to now. Also, Opera isn't as popular of a browser. Usually, you find more exploits in popular products.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • You're absolutely right! No reason in hell these should be on the road!
    • They aren't going to want to. Most would just go with the 17 Pro and save money. Why would they want to spend $300 for basically the same thing? It's not worth it if there are hardly any changes from year to year.
    • 24H2 rolled out to the Release Preview Channel in early June 2024, so this coming a bit later in the Experimental Channel (formerly Dev) doesn't really say much more than earlier H2 releases that came out in October. I am not sure what the thinking is here by putting it in Experimental, one would think that the 26H2 stamp means features are locked down and it's now bug tested until October? I don't even pretend to understand Microsoft's strategy for Windows Insider Program though
    • Nothing Ear (a) and CMF Buds Pro 2 with active noise cancellation drop to lowest price ever by Fiza Ali With Prime Day 2026 scheduled to run from Tuesday 23 to Friday 26 June, Amazon has already begun rolling out early access offers ahead of the main event. Particularly, Nothing Ear (a) and CMF Buds Pro 2 wireless earbuds have dropped to their lowest price ever with limited Prime deal offering 33% and 24% discounts, respectively. Nothing Ear (a) are equipped with 11mm dynamic drivers featuring a PM1 + TPU diaphragm. For noise control, the earbuds offer active noise cancellation (ANC) of up to 45dB across frequencies reaching 5,000Hz. The smart ANC algorithm adapts to surrounding noise levels, while a Transparency Mode allows users to remain aware of their environment when needed. Connectivity is handled via Bluetooth 5.3, with support for AAC, SBC, and LDAC audio codecs. Additional features include IP54-rated earbuds for dust and splash resistance, paired with an IPX2-rated charging case. Furthermore, users also benefit from pinch controls, in-ear detection, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, dual-device connectivity, and a low-latency mode designed for gaming and video playback. The Nothing X app unlocks a range of customisation options, including a personalised equaliser, bass enhancement, control remapping, ear tip fit testing, firmware updates, dual-device management, a Find My Earbuds feature, and low-latency mode settings. When it comes to the battery, the earbuds house a 46mAh lithium-ion battery, while the charging case contains a 500mAh cell. With ANC disabled, users can expect up to 9.5 hours of playback from the earbuds and up to 42.5 hours in total with the charging case. With ANC enabled, battery life is rated at up to 5.5 hours per charge and up to 24.5 hours combined with the case. Finally, fast charging is also supported that should provide up to 10 hours of playback from a 10-minute charge with ANC turned off. Nothing Ear (a) Wireless Earbuds (Black): $53.20 (Amazon US) - 33% The CMF Buds Pro 2 feature a dual-driver audio system consisting of an 11mm bass driver and a 6mm micro-planar tweeter. The earbuds use PU (polyurethane) and PET (polyethylene terephthalate) titanium-coated diaphragms and are tuned by Nothing to deliver balanced audio performance. They further support active noise cancellation of up to 50dB across a frequency range of up to 5,000Hz, and noise control features include a Smart ANC algorithm, Adaptive ANC, Transparency Mode, and Clear Voice Technology 2.0. For calls, the CMF Buds Pro 2 use a total of six microphones and feature an environmental noise-cancelling algorithm, Clear Voice Technology 3.0, and Wind Noise Reduction 3.0 that should improve voice clarity during conversations. Furthermore, when it comes to the connectivity, it is provided through Bluetooth 5.4. Additional features include an IP55 rating for dust and water resistance, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, in-ear detection, a low-latency mode, and a Find My Earbuds function. Moreover, through the Nothing X app for Android and iOS, users can access custom EQ settings, a bass enhancement algorithm, customisable controls, Find My Earbuds, low-latency mode, dual-device connectivity, an ear tip fit test, and firmware updates. The earbuds contain a 60mAh rechargeable lithium-ion battery, while the charging case houses a 460mAh battery. A full charge of the earbuds and case via USB-C should take approximately 85 minutes, while the earbuds alone should be fully recharged in the case in around 60 minutes. Battery life is rated at up to 11 hours of playback on a single charge and up to 43 hours with the charging case when ANC is turned off. With ANC enabled, playback time is reduced to up to 6.5 hours on the earbuds and up to 26 hours with the charging case. Talk time is rated at up to 6 hours on the earbuds and 25 hours with the case with ANC disabled, or up to 4.8 hours and 18.6 hours, respectively, with ANC enabled. CMF Buds Pro 2 Wireless Earbuds (Dark Grey): $37.05 (Amazon US) - 24% Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      542
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!