578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

For those who needs more reasons

http://www.gungfu.de/facts/archives/2004/1...y-i-love-opera/

585050462[/snapback]

With quotes like "I?ve never run a comparison between Opera and some other browser myself, I have to admit." its so easy to tell that the site author is such an unbiased and informed person. :rolleyes:s:

I think Operas interface is very userfriendly, also you can layout the browser as you wish.. Firefox is so easy that it's booring.. and the skins.. the HORROR!!

Opera is also free  :rolleyes: people seem to forget that after a few minutes each time it's posted..

585066610[/snapback]

No I didn't forget about the free version with the ad banner. Don't want an ad banner, people seem to forget about mentionting that when they talk about the free version. :rolleyes:

No I didn't forget about the free version with the ad banner.  Don't want an ad banner, people seem to forget about mentionting that when they talk about the free version.  :rolleyes:

585070680[/snapback]

Their ad-banner is made up of Google ads. Guess what, this forum uses Google ads.

If you disable them (the ads on this forum, that is) then it is the same as inviting a random person to dig up the bodies of your ancestors and violate their corpses through the act of sodomy.

Supporting Neowin, Supporting Opera....their both compatible with each other ;)

Oh come on.? Now you're just grasping at straws here.? 3 to 2, oh no!? 7.x was a complete rewrite, which means a lot of bugs to be worked out.? It's really not much different from Being at 1.0.? Maybe you should learn how software development works.

585070648[/snapback]

Fact is, Opera decided to call it 7. That indicates, "Final product, so let the comparisons begin." And I do know how software development works, and I can tell you that many developers don't just completely rewrite the software (unless it was extremely messy before). Either way, I'm still not even comparing the early versions of Opera 7 to Firefox. I'm comparing versions from Firefox's pre-release to now. You seem to be the one trying to grasp straws. Firefox beat it in security, even if by one vulnerability.

Chode, I fail to see any connection to sodomizing a dead body and not wanting to see a Google ad in my browser. Besides, this is a website. It has good reason to have Google ads. The ads aren't even intrusive. Can't say the same about Opera.

Fact is, Opera decided to call it 7. That indicates, "Final product, so let the comparisons begin." And I do know how software development works, and I can tell you that many developers don't just completely rewrite the software (unless it was extremely messy before). Either way, I'm still not even comparing the early versions of Opera 7 to Firefox. I'm comparing versions from Firefox's pre-release to now. You seem to be the one trying to grasp straws. Firefox beat it in security, even if by one vulnerability.

Chode, I fail to see any connection to sodomizing a dead body and not wanting to see a Google ad in my browser. Besides, this is a website. It has good reason to have Google ads. The ads aren't even intrusive. Can't say the same about Opera.

585071424[/snapback]

What version of Opera specifically are those vulnerabilities from? Maybe I missed it, but i don't see anywhere being mentioned on their site which version it was, 7x could be 7.54. And I think they are all already patched in 7.6 preview releases.

You say google ads aren't intrusive here, then how come they become intrusive in Opera? It uses negligible bandwidth, really.

I Prefer Opera...

Tried every version of FX or FF whatever u call it since 0.8

just found myself coming back to opera...

i find it easier to turn off options then to hunt for them and then install them hoping that they work wid the other extensions.

Also for the people complaining that opera is at 7.54 (Stable version) and FF\FX is only at 1.0,

doesnt FF\FX use the mozilla core .. which was out much b4 opera was... so didnt they have more development time...

I mean come on ppl.. opera can change its name and its version to 0.00000001

would it change ur opinion then ?. No you just need a reason to bash opera.

Edited by Rapier
What version of Opera specifically are those vulnerabilities from? Maybe I missed it, but i don't see anywhere being mentioned on their site which version it was, 7x could be 7.54. And I think they are all already patched in 7.6 preview releases.

You say google ads aren't intrusive here, then how come they become intrusive in Opera? It uses negligible bandwidth, really.

585071472[/snapback]

Thank you, at least someone gets it.

jaded: They rewrote it to add better support for CSS2/DOM/HTML4/XHTML. Opera has been around for something like 10 years, and their rendering engine was starting to show it's age with not being able to keep up with the new machines and new standards. 6.x was quite good, but sometimes a complete rewrite is better, even if your previous code is good. They redid the GUI to bring unprecedented customizability, and it was a good move, on both counts. Rewriting code does NOT mean it was messy/bad code.

There are things I like about each.

FF Pros

Free

Open Source

Many useful plugins

FF Cons

Can't use the native windows theme at all

Memory hog (Often uses 100+ megs, its used 300 megs before for me)

Sluggish as hell at times (I'll have it freeze when opening a page for 10-20 seconds quite often)

Can't drag and drop bookmark folders, you have to use the manager

Engine renders pages in annoying ways (Things shift across the page while loading, etc)

Anytime I open more than 15 tabs I'm prone to FF deciding to crash

Opera Pros

Very sleek and refined feel compared to FF

Extensive functionality (Page zooming, PDA preview,

Can use windows native theming!

Resize, minimize and maximize tabs

Good keyboard shortcuts that are also easy to change

After you're used to it, it feels very natural and efficient to use, levels above my FF experience

Opera Cons

$$ or ads

Learning curve is a bit higher imo

Nothing as convenient as adblock for it to my knowledge

wow, i never would have thought that people felt so strongly about browsers.

I like Firefox much better.

I used to use only IE. But after hearing of Opera and Firefox i decided to give them both a shot.

i tried Opera for a week and never really felt comfortable with it. It's a kind of an intangable reason, but the Opera interface didn't do much for me. I uninstalled it and tried Firefox. It's been 3 months since i migrated to Firefox, and i aboslutley love it. The interface, tabs, and entire package were all completley intuitive to me, almost instantly.

I'll probably give Opera another shot sometime. But for now Firefox has become my browser of choice.

I'm going to step through your list of cons for firefox....

1. I think I know what you mean here...firefox doesn't work with some of the skins I've had for windows. Their xul rendering system looks different, but that is a very minor con if the interface doesn't bother you that much. It would be a good feature though...maybe an extention or a modification of some kind....

2. I've had this occur as well. Actually, firefox tends to stay under 100mb by a good margin unless I open a lot of tabs. Minimizing the window fixes it, but less memory usage would be something I'd like to see in future versions.

3. Sluggish? Sorry, I can't back that one with my experiences.

4. What? Maybe I misunderstood. You can drag and drop and organize in that window without using the bookmarks manager. I have encountered this before though, I had to create a new profile to fix it. Some bug that occured when I upgraded I guess.

5. Page display is annoying....Did I mention that you sound biased towards firefox?

6.This last one is due to the fact that it's taking up so much memory (on your system) I've had 15 tabs open plenty of times with no problems.

I've tried opera before, it wasn't for me. Plus I spent a lot of time figuring out how to use firefox--I'd be starting all over with Opera. Firefox works for me, it obviously doesn't work for you.

:sleep:  :sleep:  :sleep:  :sleep:  :sleep:  :sleep:  :sleep:  :sleep:  :sleep:  :sleep:

F-i-r-e-F-o-x  !! End of !!

585073830[/snapback]

wow your reasons are so compelling..not! you could have at least explained like many of the other people have been doing.

I prefer Opera, i used opera for ages, and then i tried to switch to Firefox, but just couldn't get used to, Opera and Firefox have their own ways of doing things, and I guess its whatever suits you best.

When i switched to Firefox, there were just tiny tiny things that i missed which made me switch back

You say google ads aren't intrusive here, then how come they become intrusive in Opera? It uses negligible bandwidth, really.

585071472[/snapback]

The ads aren't intrusive in Neowin. They fit into the design nicely. On the other hand, it's a whole toolbar in Opera.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. My Windows11 device on the Preview Channel just got 26220.8728. My guess is this build is a nightly update from 26220.8690.
    • Traffic has a surprisingly unexpected impact on your surroundings by Sayan Sen Image by Radik 2707 via Pexels A collaborative study by researchers from several Israeli institutions found that everyday pollution from traffic and industrial activity measurably changed the atmospheric electric field over the Tel Aviv metropolitan area, providing new evidence of how human activity can influence the lower atmosphere. The research was led by Dr. Roy Yaniv of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Gertner Institute at Sheba Medical Center, Dr. Assaf Hochman of the Fredy & Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences at the Hebrew University, and Prof. Yoav Yair of Reichman University. The study also involved Itay Froomer, a student from Hadera High School and the Israeli Museum of Medicine and Science (Technoda), who carried out the work as part of the Ministry of Education's 5-unit physics research track. The researchers focused on the atmospheric electric field under fair-weather conditions. Even in the absence of storms, a weak electric field naturally exists between Earth's surface and the atmosphere. One of the main ways scientists measure this field is through the Potential Gradient (PG), which is the inverse of the vertical component of the electric field. PG is a key part of the global electric circuit, a planet-wide system of electrical currents maintained by thunderstorms and electrified clouds around the world. Scientists have long known that the atmospheric electric field can be influenced by factors ranging from large-scale atmospheric processes to local weather conditions such as dust, fog and clouds. Human-made pollution is also known to play a role, but understanding exactly how urban emissions affect the electric field close to the ground has remained an area of ongoing research. To investigate this relationship, the team analyzed measurements from a newly installed electric field mill, an instrument used to continuously monitor the strength of the atmospheric electric field. The instrument was installed at the Center for Technological Education (Roter House) in Holon and became operational in August 2024. It was funded by Israel's Ministry of Education and the Holon municipality. The electric field mill forms part of a broader monitoring network that includes nearby meteorological stations and air-quality monitoring sites. This allowed researchers to compare electric field measurements with detailed weather data and pollution records to better understand what was driving changes in the Potential Gradient. The study focused on two major urban pollutants: fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), both commonly produced by vehicle traffic and industrial activity. PM2.5 refers to microscopic airborne particles small enough to remain suspended in the atmosphere for extended periods, while NOx is a group of gases released during fuel combustion. Researchers examined daily, weekly and seasonal patterns in the atmospheric electric field and compared them with changes in pollutant concentrations. Their analysis revealed a clear relationship between NOx levels and changes in the Potential Gradient, particularly during morning and evening rush hours when traffic emissions were at their highest. “What we observe is a direct physical link between emission peaks and electrical variability,” explained Dr. Roy Yaniv. “NOx reduces atmospheric conductivity very quickly, so the electric field responds almost instantaneously during traffic rush hours.” Atmospheric conductivity describes how easily electrical charges move through the air. According to the researchers, nitrogen oxides rapidly alter this conductivity, causing a near-immediate response in the electric field. PM2.5, however, was associated with a delayed response. The researchers attributed this difference to the particles' longer atmospheric residence time, meaning they remain in the atmosphere for longer periods, as well as their different microphysical interactions with surrounding air and atmospheric components. The study also identified a pronounced "weekend effect." In Israel, traffic volumes and some industrial activity decline significantly on Fridays and Saturdays. During these periods, concentrations of both NOx and PM2.5 dropped, and corresponding changes were observed in the atmospheric electric field. “The weekend signal demonstrates just how sensitive the electric field is to changes in human activity,” the researchers noted. “When emissions decline, the electrical environment adjusts at once, providing a high-resolution indicator of urban atmospheric conditions.” The findings showed that pollution levels can influence not only the chemical composition of the atmosphere but also its electrical properties. Researchers said the results strengthened the case for using atmospheric electricity as an additional tool for environmental monitoring, particularly in densely populated urban areas where anthropogenic, or human-caused, influences are most pronounced. The study also pointed to potential public health applications. By combining air-quality measurements with observations of atmospheric electricity, researchers said they could gain a more complete picture of how urban atmospheric conditions change over time. “Integrating air-quality data with electric-field measurements gives us a clearer picture of how the lower atmosphere evolves moment by moment,” the researchers added. “It’s a framework that can support both scientific insight and practical environmental decision-making.” Beyond the scientific findings, the project highlighted a collaboration between universities, public institutions and secondary education. Researchers said the work demonstrated how students could take part in real-world environmental research while contributing to studies of air quality, atmospheric processes and their potential effects on society. Source: Hebrew University, ScienceDirect This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • We aren't even at the all-star game and Microsoft is talking about an update that will most likely be released during the World Series if not after. A lot can happen in the world between now and the 2026 World Series, including the 2026 FIFA Cup. Tell me about it again after the FIFA Cup is concluded. That should allow plenty of time to prepare for it.
    • Great, tell me when I have a "Bad Pool Caller" elsewhere not in Windoze.
    • The first improvement they need to make to audio in W11 is to add an equalizer that actually works.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      542
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!