578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

For those who needs more reasons

http://www.gungfu.de/facts/archives/2004/1...y-i-love-opera/

585050462[/snapback]

With quotes like "I?ve never run a comparison between Opera and some other browser myself, I have to admit." its so easy to tell that the site author is such an unbiased and informed person. :rolleyes:s:

I think Operas interface is very userfriendly, also you can layout the browser as you wish.. Firefox is so easy that it's booring.. and the skins.. the HORROR!!

Opera is also free  :rolleyes: people seem to forget that after a few minutes each time it's posted..

585066610[/snapback]

No I didn't forget about the free version with the ad banner. Don't want an ad banner, people seem to forget about mentionting that when they talk about the free version. :rolleyes:

No I didn't forget about the free version with the ad banner.  Don't want an ad banner, people seem to forget about mentionting that when they talk about the free version.  :rolleyes:

585070680[/snapback]

Their ad-banner is made up of Google ads. Guess what, this forum uses Google ads.

If you disable them (the ads on this forum, that is) then it is the same as inviting a random person to dig up the bodies of your ancestors and violate their corpses through the act of sodomy.

Supporting Neowin, Supporting Opera....their both compatible with each other ;)

Oh come on.? Now you're just grasping at straws here.? 3 to 2, oh no!? 7.x was a complete rewrite, which means a lot of bugs to be worked out.? It's really not much different from Being at 1.0.? Maybe you should learn how software development works.

585070648[/snapback]

Fact is, Opera decided to call it 7. That indicates, "Final product, so let the comparisons begin." And I do know how software development works, and I can tell you that many developers don't just completely rewrite the software (unless it was extremely messy before). Either way, I'm still not even comparing the early versions of Opera 7 to Firefox. I'm comparing versions from Firefox's pre-release to now. You seem to be the one trying to grasp straws. Firefox beat it in security, even if by one vulnerability.

Chode, I fail to see any connection to sodomizing a dead body and not wanting to see a Google ad in my browser. Besides, this is a website. It has good reason to have Google ads. The ads aren't even intrusive. Can't say the same about Opera.

Fact is, Opera decided to call it 7. That indicates, "Final product, so let the comparisons begin." And I do know how software development works, and I can tell you that many developers don't just completely rewrite the software (unless it was extremely messy before). Either way, I'm still not even comparing the early versions of Opera 7 to Firefox. I'm comparing versions from Firefox's pre-release to now. You seem to be the one trying to grasp straws. Firefox beat it in security, even if by one vulnerability.

Chode, I fail to see any connection to sodomizing a dead body and not wanting to see a Google ad in my browser. Besides, this is a website. It has good reason to have Google ads. The ads aren't even intrusive. Can't say the same about Opera.

585071424[/snapback]

What version of Opera specifically are those vulnerabilities from? Maybe I missed it, but i don't see anywhere being mentioned on their site which version it was, 7x could be 7.54. And I think they are all already patched in 7.6 preview releases.

You say google ads aren't intrusive here, then how come they become intrusive in Opera? It uses negligible bandwidth, really.

I Prefer Opera...

Tried every version of FX or FF whatever u call it since 0.8

just found myself coming back to opera...

i find it easier to turn off options then to hunt for them and then install them hoping that they work wid the other extensions.

Also for the people complaining that opera is at 7.54 (Stable version) and FF\FX is only at 1.0,

doesnt FF\FX use the mozilla core .. which was out much b4 opera was... so didnt they have more development time...

I mean come on ppl.. opera can change its name and its version to 0.00000001

would it change ur opinion then ?. No you just need a reason to bash opera.

Edited by Rapier
What version of Opera specifically are those vulnerabilities from? Maybe I missed it, but i don't see anywhere being mentioned on their site which version it was, 7x could be 7.54. And I think they are all already patched in 7.6 preview releases.

You say google ads aren't intrusive here, then how come they become intrusive in Opera? It uses negligible bandwidth, really.

585071472[/snapback]

Thank you, at least someone gets it.

jaded: They rewrote it to add better support for CSS2/DOM/HTML4/XHTML. Opera has been around for something like 10 years, and their rendering engine was starting to show it's age with not being able to keep up with the new machines and new standards. 6.x was quite good, but sometimes a complete rewrite is better, even if your previous code is good. They redid the GUI to bring unprecedented customizability, and it was a good move, on both counts. Rewriting code does NOT mean it was messy/bad code.

There are things I like about each.

FF Pros

Free

Open Source

Many useful plugins

FF Cons

Can't use the native windows theme at all

Memory hog (Often uses 100+ megs, its used 300 megs before for me)

Sluggish as hell at times (I'll have it freeze when opening a page for 10-20 seconds quite often)

Can't drag and drop bookmark folders, you have to use the manager

Engine renders pages in annoying ways (Things shift across the page while loading, etc)

Anytime I open more than 15 tabs I'm prone to FF deciding to crash

Opera Pros

Very sleek and refined feel compared to FF

Extensive functionality (Page zooming, PDA preview,

Can use windows native theming!

Resize, minimize and maximize tabs

Good keyboard shortcuts that are also easy to change

After you're used to it, it feels very natural and efficient to use, levels above my FF experience

Opera Cons

$$ or ads

Learning curve is a bit higher imo

Nothing as convenient as adblock for it to my knowledge

wow, i never would have thought that people felt so strongly about browsers.

I like Firefox much better.

I used to use only IE. But after hearing of Opera and Firefox i decided to give them both a shot.

i tried Opera for a week and never really felt comfortable with it. It's a kind of an intangable reason, but the Opera interface didn't do much for me. I uninstalled it and tried Firefox. It's been 3 months since i migrated to Firefox, and i aboslutley love it. The interface, tabs, and entire package were all completley intuitive to me, almost instantly.

I'll probably give Opera another shot sometime. But for now Firefox has become my browser of choice.

I'm going to step through your list of cons for firefox....

1. I think I know what you mean here...firefox doesn't work with some of the skins I've had for windows. Their xul rendering system looks different, but that is a very minor con if the interface doesn't bother you that much. It would be a good feature though...maybe an extention or a modification of some kind....

2. I've had this occur as well. Actually, firefox tends to stay under 100mb by a good margin unless I open a lot of tabs. Minimizing the window fixes it, but less memory usage would be something I'd like to see in future versions.

3. Sluggish? Sorry, I can't back that one with my experiences.

4. What? Maybe I misunderstood. You can drag and drop and organize in that window without using the bookmarks manager. I have encountered this before though, I had to create a new profile to fix it. Some bug that occured when I upgraded I guess.

5. Page display is annoying....Did I mention that you sound biased towards firefox?

6.This last one is due to the fact that it's taking up so much memory (on your system) I've had 15 tabs open plenty of times with no problems.

I've tried opera before, it wasn't for me. Plus I spent a lot of time figuring out how to use firefox--I'd be starting all over with Opera. Firefox works for me, it obviously doesn't work for you.

:sleep:  :sleep:  :sleep:  :sleep:  :sleep:  :sleep:  :sleep:  :sleep:  :sleep:  :sleep:

F-i-r-e-F-o-x  !! End of !!

585073830[/snapback]

wow your reasons are so compelling..not! you could have at least explained like many of the other people have been doing.

I prefer Opera, i used opera for ages, and then i tried to switch to Firefox, but just couldn't get used to, Opera and Firefox have their own ways of doing things, and I guess its whatever suits you best.

When i switched to Firefox, there were just tiny tiny things that i missed which made me switch back

You say google ads aren't intrusive here, then how come they become intrusive in Opera? It uses negligible bandwidth, really.

585071472[/snapback]

The ads aren't intrusive in Neowin. They fit into the design nicely. On the other hand, it's a whole toolbar in Opera.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Firefox 152.0.1 by Razvan Serea Firefox is a fast, full-featured Web browser. It offers great security, privacy, and protection against viruses, spyware, malware, and it can also easily block pop-up windows. The key features that have made Firefox so popular are the simple and effective UI, browser speed and strong security capabilities. Firefox has complete features for browsing the Internet. It is very reliable and flexible due to its implemented security features, along with customization options. Firefox includes pop-up blocking, tab-browsing, integrated Google search, simplified privacy controls, a streamlined browser window that shows you more of the page than any other browser and a number of additional features that work with you to help you get the most out of your time online. Firefox key features Enhanced Tracking Protection (ETP) – Blocks trackers, cookies, cryptominers, and fingerprinters by default. Private Browsing Mode – Deletes history, cookies, and temporary files when closed. Lightweight & Fast Performance – Optimized memory usage with efficient page loading. Cross-Platform Sync – Sync bookmarks, passwords, history, and open tabs across devices. Customizable Interface – Toolbars, themes, and extensions can be tailored to user needs. Strong Privacy Controls – Options to manage cookies, permissions, and site data easily. Reader Mode – Strips away clutter for distraction-free reading. Pocket Integration – Save and read articles offline with Pocket built into Firefox. Picture-in-Picture (PiP) – Watch videos in a floating window while multitasking. Extensions & Add-ons – Vast library for productivity, security, and personalization. Built-in PDF Viewer – No need for external software to view PDFs. Firefox Monitor – Alerts users if their email is part of a known data breach. Multi-Account Containers – Isolate browsing sessions (e.g., work, personal, shopping). Performance & Resource Efficiency – Uses fewer system resources than some competitors. Open Source & Community-Driven – Transparent development with global contributions. Firefox 152.0.1 fixes: Fixed frequent crashes affecting users with Intel Raptor Lake processors. (Bug 2039575) Fixed an issue on macOS where choosing a PDF option, such as "Save as PDF", from the system print dialog would send the job to your printer instead of saving a file. (Bug 2047850) Download: Firefox 64-bit | Firefox 32-bit | ARM64 | ~70.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Firefox for MacOS | 146.0 MB View: Firefox Home Page | Release Notes Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Zed 1.7.2 has landed with updated OpenCode models, bug fixes and other improvements by David Uzondu Zed 1.7.2 recently landed on the stable release channel, bringing a host of AI-related features including automatic context compaction and settings-based skill management, along with other things like better Markdown preview rendering and custom git commands in the graph view. Starting with the AI stuff, the developers introduced "/compact", a command that basically summarizes your conversation history on demand. This tool prevents your active chat window from hitting token limits by compressing older parts of the dialogue into a brief overview. In addition to that, the team relocated skill management to the settings UI, improving how the application communicates errors regarding those skills, and updated the OpenCode model roster to support DeepSeek V4 Flash, MiniMax M3, Qwen 3.7 Plus, and Nemotron 3 Ultra Free. External agent users can also monitor context window cost metrics and delete individual sessions directly from their history. Right-clicking ref labels in the git graph now opens a context menu that runs different actions against selected targets, kind of how VS Code does it. Here are some of the bug fixes this new release brings: The active agent fails to auto-select when creating a new git worktree. A scrollbar unexpectedly appears on wrapped code blocks in the agent chat. Collapse indicators for project headers appear when performing sidebar searches. Bracketed ellipsis title prefixes fail to show the ellipsis icon properly. Project icons render incorrectly in the recent projects picker. Diff hunk controls appear inside non-editable commit view multibuffers. The software update button hangs indefinitely on the downloading stage. Restoring an agent terminal in a remote project triggers a sudden crash. Splitting a pane that contains an active commit view causes a crash. Linux Wayland freezes when trying to read the clipboard from laggy external apps. Zed is a "newish" code editor trying to break the massive stronghold VS Code has on the developer community. Funny enough, the editor was created by former GitHub employees who worked on the Atom text editor (which Microsoft killed in 2022, several years after it bought GitHub). The project officially hit version 1.0 back in April, introducing platform parity for Windows and Linux alongside deep support for DeepSeek-V4-Pro.
    • 26H2 absolutely will support ARM Windows just not on devices that came with 26H1. This is evident by the fact I am running 26H2, which on my MacBook Neo and Surface Pro 12 (inch), within a VM.
    • Mp3tag 3.35 by Razvan Serea Mp3tag is a powerful and yet easy-to-use tool to edit metadata (ID3, Vorbis Comments and APE) of common audio formats. It can rename files based on the tag information, replace characters or words from tags and filenames, import/export tag information, create playlists and more. The program supports online freedb database lookups for selected files, allowing you to automatically gather proper tag information for select files or CDs. Mp3tag supports the following audio formats: Advanced Audio Coding (aac) Free Lossless Audio Codec (flac) Monkeys Audio (ape) Mpeg Layer 3 (mp3) MPEG-4 (mp4 / m4a / m4b / iTunes compatible) Musepack (mpc) Ogg Vorbis (ogg) OptimFROG (ofr) OptimFROG DualStream (ofs) Speex (spx) Toms Audio Kompressor (tak) True Audio (tta) Windows Media Audio (wma) WavPack (wv) Mp3tag 3.35 changelog: This version introduces a new Files options page, enhanced toolbar customization, support for RF64 WAV files, improved Discogs and MusicBrainz tag sources, and many other improvements and fixes. See the Release Notes for more details. Download: Mp3tag 64-bit | 5.7 MB (Freeware) Download: Mp3tag 32-bit | 5.2 MB Link: Mp3tag Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • The FIFA World Cup is not US centric.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      523
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!