578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

Ok, here is the final answer for those who try to say that Opera:

a) is cluttered

b) has annoying ads

Here is a default installation of Opera 7.6 Preview 4b, set to display Google ads. Take not that the interface is clean (in my opinon, it is TOO clean actually...and normally I add in a lot of new toolbars and buttons). Also notice the ads are not intrusive, and are away from the main web-page area of the browser.

And here is the other option for ads....relevant graphical ads if memory serves me.

For this I used a clean installation of Opera 7.6 Preview 4b. I have not modified anything. All I did was browse to www.neowin.net/forum, scroll down to the bottom. Then print-screened for each ad-type.

The interface has been improved extensively during the 7.6 beta stage, as has the way ads are displayed (I am glad that giant....BLOCK of ads that used to occupy the far right are gone.

Mozilla was the first alternative browser I used. Loved the skin (was the modern silver one at the time) loved the new features and basically liked the fact I wasnt using IE.

This was way before Firefox and way before Mozilla 1.0.

Tried Opera at the same time and just didnt like it.

Few months later I tried out Opera. Mozilla was quite crash happy at the time mainly because I was using nightly builds and found Opera to be my new favorite. Been using it since.

Only tried Firefox once or twice since its release, I'm just so used to Opera now and the way it works that I dont want to bother trying anything else.

If I downloaded and used firefox for the next couple of weeks I'm sure I would get used to it and see no reason to change back but as things stand I use Opera and thats about that. I will use anything though, not going to be some kind of fan or follower just because thats what I choose to use that day...

I think many opera users would back me up on this, when I say it's the little things that keep me using Opera. All the little things you take for granted, and probably couldn't even list all of them. They make the browsing experience easier and better, and you just miss them using anything else.

Sure, firefox tries to emulate a lot of things with extensions and what-not, but it simply cannot capture the magic of opera when you know the ins and outs of it,

Chode, those ads still seem intrusive to me. Especially when I'm on a little 1024x768 screen and want the most of my page open that I can get. Those ads also are distracting. The colors try to be subtle, but look out of place.

Chode, those ads still seem intrusive to me. Especially when I'm on a little 1024x768 screen and want the most of my page open that I can get. Those ads also are distracting. The colors try to be subtle, but look out of place.

585074942[/snapback]

1024x768 is considered small :blink: That's what I'm running.

When I'm forced to use an unregistered copy of Opera, there is a little trick to make the ads go away (legal too, not cracking or nothing)....

opera:/button/Leave%20Fullscreen,,,,Enter%20Fullscreen%20%3E%20Enter%20Fullscreen%20&%20View%20main%20bar,6%20&%20Enable%20scroll%20bars%20&%20View%20page%20bar,6

When using Opera, copy the above link into your address bar and hit enter. It will add a button under "my buttons" called Fullscreen, which you can drag anywhere in your interface. It's a custom version of the Fullscreen display which displays the address bar, page bar, scroll bar and main bar. Viola, Opera with near maximum screen real estate.

What the Hell is the point of saying anything at all if your post consists entirely of 'I LIEK OPRA!!!1' or 'FIREOFX 4 ME GUYZ LOL'? This amounts to more or less you saying 'there are people who like <x browser>'. It says absolutely nothing at all WHY there are people who like <x browser> or why <x browser> is better than <y browser> or anything. It's just some anonymous 'me too!' post. Thanks for wasting everybody's time and looking smart while you do it.

open source (this is very important for me)

585075904[/snapback]

Why's that?

i hate how some people talk (not referring to any person in particular) about firefox being open source but they don't actually use or look at the source code. those people shouldn't use that as a reason.

585077016[/snapback]

I know, people use the open source line far too often. Being open source doesn't instantly make something better than a closed source equivalent. :rolleyes:

I don't look at the source code, but I like open source because it gives others a chance to look at the code, find mistakes, bugs, security risks etc and have them fixed....or exploited. Double-edged sword. I'd imagine it makes custom and optimized builds much easier as well.

Opera by far.

The reason i converted from FF to Opera, was because FF had so many problems.

For some reason, my back/ forward buttons disappeared. Even after trying the way your supposed to get them back, they still didnt come back. I then downloaded Opera and it was great, alot better than FF.

Even once the new build of FF was out, i still kept with Opera. It has a nice GUI, many skins for it, tonnes of features, and many other useful tools.

Some people may say its bloated, but you can easily turn any of the offending "bloating features" off.

It comes with a build in IRC client, mail client as well and other cool stuff. Plus, with Opera, you dont need to download a hundred plugins to be able to have it with your own settings.

All in all, Opera is the way to go and i dont like FF.

I would like to reiterate a point that is overlooked a lot.

Opera is not bloated.

Yes folks, it's true. Opera is not bloated. They have many many more features than firefox out of the box, with a smaller download size. How? Well written code. Non-bloated code. Just because in previous versions the default interface was a bit cluttered, THAT DOES NOT MAKE IT BLOATED. Bloated has to do more with speed, file size, etc. Ask any professional programmer, and they will tell you that Opera is not bloated. I am a professional programmer, and I have told you. Take my word.

The IRC client and Mail client are plug-ins. They do not slow down opera when not in use. They are less than 100kb in size. This folks, is not bloat.

Cluttered ? Opera ?

I don't think so. This is how my Opera looks.

585080833[/snapback]

Flashing a picture of your customised Opera doesn't make it not cluttered.

http://www.opera.com/graphics/docs/screens...3a02eae4f104798

That's a screen shot of the default Opera configuration for 7.50. It's better in 7.60 now, which is awesome, but up until very recently that's what grandma would see when she opened up Opera for the first time, and that's what i would have to remove every time i installed it. It doesn't detract from Opera's usefulness or customisability or stability or speed or feature set or anything, it's just annoying for 'power users' and a really bad idea for people who've been using Internet Explorer for the last x years of their computing lives.

So... you know, you can be a fanatic either way. Opera does have some flaws, cool as it is.

By the way, you people keep ignoring me. I continue to point out that you don't mind using non-free software EXCEPT when it comes to browsers. However, mysteriously, when it comes to Web browsers you're all about the free.

mufdvr3669, i notice that you use Windows. Were you aware that Windows is not free? Why aren't you using Linux? I also hope America's Army is the only FPS you play, because almost all of the rest cost money. And i'll trust that you don't use Photoshop or Word or Nero.

How many times do you install a browser and customize it? once? twice?? That doesn't sound to be a lot many times to me.

Flashing a picture of your customised Opera doesn't make it not cluttered.

....... but up until very recently that's what grandma would see when she opened up Opera for the first time, and that's what i would have to remove every time i installed it.

585081777[/snapback]

Opera is by far the best browser of all time.  God STFU you firefox fanboys, go get an iPod and drink coffee.  You Trend masters **** me off. GOD.

585081495[/snapback]

I can guarantee to you I did not choose Safari or Firefox because I wanted to be "trendy". I looked into the feature set I need, customizability, rendering engine, etc. and found that Safari and Firefox were the two best browsers on the market (for me). Oh, and about drinking coffee and getting an iPod: Now you're just trying to set a stereotype, big time. I do own an iPod, but only because I prefer the iPod to the competition. I tried the iRiver and Creative products, and could not get used to them. And don't even get my started on that Dell DJ :x . And since when was coffee really trendy?

Well, Firefox is FREE.

Can Opera beat that?

Hahahaha!!?:laugh::

585084541[/snapback]

FFS!

For the 50th time in this thread,OPERA IS FREE>.

It's just ad-enabled, which I provided a full screen viewing button either on this page or the last one to get around

:angry::

Really...if you want to reply in a thread you really should read back at all the points that have been raised and answered :rolleyes::

For the 50th time in this thread, OPERA IS FREE.

585085093[/snapback]

Stop fooling yourself into thinking that Opera is free. Opera annoys people with the ads in an attempt to make them pay to get them off their screens. A full screen "hack" doesn't cut it for most people, including me.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. My Windows11 device on the Preview Channel just got 26220.8728. My guess is this build is a nightly update from 26220.8690.
    • Traffic has a surprisingly unexpected impact on your surroundings by Sayan Sen Image by Radik 2707 via Pexels A collaborative study by researchers from several Israeli institutions found that everyday pollution from traffic and industrial activity measurably changed the atmospheric electric field over the Tel Aviv metropolitan area, providing new evidence of how human activity can influence the lower atmosphere. The research was led by Dr. Roy Yaniv of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Gertner Institute at Sheba Medical Center, Dr. Assaf Hochman of the Fredy & Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences at the Hebrew University, and Prof. Yoav Yair of Reichman University. The study also involved Itay Froomer, a student from Hadera High School and the Israeli Museum of Medicine and Science (Technoda), who carried out the work as part of the Ministry of Education's 5-unit physics research track. The researchers focused on the atmospheric electric field under fair-weather conditions. Even in the absence of storms, a weak electric field naturally exists between Earth's surface and the atmosphere. One of the main ways scientists measure this field is through the Potential Gradient (PG), which is the inverse of the vertical component of the electric field. PG is a key part of the global electric circuit, a planet-wide system of electrical currents maintained by thunderstorms and electrified clouds around the world. Scientists have long known that the atmospheric electric field can be influenced by factors ranging from large-scale atmospheric processes to local weather conditions such as dust, fog and clouds. Human-made pollution is also known to play a role, but understanding exactly how urban emissions affect the electric field close to the ground has remained an area of ongoing research. To investigate this relationship, the team analyzed measurements from a newly installed electric field mill, an instrument used to continuously monitor the strength of the atmospheric electric field. The instrument was installed at the Center for Technological Education (Roter House) in Holon and became operational in August 2024. It was funded by Israel's Ministry of Education and the Holon municipality. The electric field mill forms part of a broader monitoring network that includes nearby meteorological stations and air-quality monitoring sites. This allowed researchers to compare electric field measurements with detailed weather data and pollution records to better understand what was driving changes in the Potential Gradient. The study focused on two major urban pollutants: fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), both commonly produced by vehicle traffic and industrial activity. PM2.5 refers to microscopic airborne particles small enough to remain suspended in the atmosphere for extended periods, while NOx is a group of gases released during fuel combustion. Researchers examined daily, weekly and seasonal patterns in the atmospheric electric field and compared them with changes in pollutant concentrations. Their analysis revealed a clear relationship between NOx levels and changes in the Potential Gradient, particularly during morning and evening rush hours when traffic emissions were at their highest. “What we observe is a direct physical link between emission peaks and electrical variability,” explained Dr. Roy Yaniv. “NOx reduces atmospheric conductivity very quickly, so the electric field responds almost instantaneously during traffic rush hours.” Atmospheric conductivity describes how easily electrical charges move through the air. According to the researchers, nitrogen oxides rapidly alter this conductivity, causing a near-immediate response in the electric field. PM2.5, however, was associated with a delayed response. The researchers attributed this difference to the particles' longer atmospheric residence time, meaning they remain in the atmosphere for longer periods, as well as their different microphysical interactions with surrounding air and atmospheric components. The study also identified a pronounced "weekend effect." In Israel, traffic volumes and some industrial activity decline significantly on Fridays and Saturdays. During these periods, concentrations of both NOx and PM2.5 dropped, and corresponding changes were observed in the atmospheric electric field. “The weekend signal demonstrates just how sensitive the electric field is to changes in human activity,” the researchers noted. “When emissions decline, the electrical environment adjusts at once, providing a high-resolution indicator of urban atmospheric conditions.” The findings showed that pollution levels can influence not only the chemical composition of the atmosphere but also its electrical properties. Researchers said the results strengthened the case for using atmospheric electricity as an additional tool for environmental monitoring, particularly in densely populated urban areas where anthropogenic, or human-caused, influences are most pronounced. The study also pointed to potential public health applications. By combining air-quality measurements with observations of atmospheric electricity, researchers said they could gain a more complete picture of how urban atmospheric conditions change over time. “Integrating air-quality data with electric-field measurements gives us a clearer picture of how the lower atmosphere evolves moment by moment,” the researchers added. “It’s a framework that can support both scientific insight and practical environmental decision-making.” Beyond the scientific findings, the project highlighted a collaboration between universities, public institutions and secondary education. Researchers said the work demonstrated how students could take part in real-world environmental research while contributing to studies of air quality, atmospheric processes and their potential effects on society. Source: Hebrew University, ScienceDirect This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • We aren't even at the all-star game and Microsoft is talking about an update that will most likely be released during the World Series if not after. A lot can happen in the world between now and the 2026 World Series, including the 2026 FIFA Cup. Tell me about it again after the FIFA Cup is concluded. That should allow plenty of time to prepare for it.
    • Great, tell me when I have a "Bad Pool Caller" elsewhere not in Windoze.
    • The first improvement they need to make to audio in W11 is to add an equalizer that actually works.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      542
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!