578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

Stop fooling yourself into thinking that Opera is free. Opera annoys people with the ads in an attempt to make them pay to get them off their screens. A full screen "hack" doesn't cut it for most people, including me.

585085491[/snapback]

Did you pay for it when you downloaded it? NO! So then it's free.. *geeez*

Stop fooling yourself into thinking that Opera is free. Opera annoys people with the ads in an attempt to make them pay to get them off their screens. A full screen "hack" doesn't cut it for most people, including me.

585085491[/snapback]

Is Neowin free to register and to post on? Why, yes it is.

But wait, there is an ad at the top of the page. Oh noes, the admins have lied to us as Neowin is obviously not free as there is an annoying ad in an attempt to make us pay so that they can actually operate their servers!!!!11111eleven :rolleyes:

And don't try tell me there's no difference, they are both Google ads. There is no difference between the two at all.

Firefox represents an important intersection of features, speed and compatability. I can use it as my only browser, it is fast and secure, and it has all the features that are important to me. In fact it introduced me to new features it would be hard to live without now. Even open source aspect is turning out to be more of an advantage than I imagined. :cool:

Oh, BTW, Firefox and Opera both have the "cute" and annoying (or modern, as they put it) user interface. Mozilla's is much better, more usable, less distracting... Though, it would be nice if the Modern theme were the default. Another plus with Mozilla/Firefox is that those annoying mouse gestures are an add-on rather than a compulsory "feature". Opera is smaller and starts faster, though the page rendering isn't as good. Mozilla and Firefox are open products, and so are more likely to get features more quickly and to survive, in some form, longer.

Is Neowin free to register and to post on? Why, yes it is.

But wait, there is an ad at the top of the page. Oh noes, the admins have lied to us as Neowin is obviously not free as there is an annoying ad in an attempt to make us pay so that they can actually operate their servers!!!!11111eleven :rolleyes:

And don't try tell me there's no difference, they are both Google ads. There is no difference between the two at all.

585085691[/snapback]

Ah, but they are different. I don't even notice the Google Ads in Neowin because they fit into the design. On the other hand, the Opera Google Ads are definitely in your face. It's a whole toolbar of ads, just there. There's no real intregration with the design. The colors don't match, and it's almost like a web page sitting there in the toolbar.

And the other fact people forget in the end is that OPERA is worth buying.

USD 39 isn't a bad price, nor is USD 20.

585085720[/snapback]

That's your opinion. Personally, I think it's way overpriced. If it was $5, I might consider it, but probably still wouldn't buy it.

Even though I think Opera is thousand times better than Firefox, I don't agree with people saying Opera is free.

Yes, it's free to download, but it's adware, and nobody would want adware if there's ad-free alternatives.

And it seems it's possible to remove them without buying, but it's illegal.

Opera is free. Ads or not, it is FREE. You do NOT have to pay for it, and you can use it for as long as you like legally. That makes it free.

$20 is NOT too expensive. We're talking about software you probably use EVERY DAY. I would venture to say that a web browser is the most commonly used software by most people. How is $20 too much?! Sure, there are free alternatives. But I think a measly $20 is well worth it for a browser some enjoy using more.

If Opera was ad-FREE (ha!) and, well, had much more extensions to customize it better for my own needs, I would've went that way.

But it doesn't so I use Firefox.

Both are excellent web browser of course and I understand people preferring Opera to 100%. Heck, I've used Opera in the past too for a bunch of reasons. They should also have a big thanks sent their way for all their innovations in the browser business.

Oh, and if you miss the ad bar in Opera when you're trying out Firefox, there's an extension available for that one. :D

Oh, BTW, Firefox and Opera both have the "cute" and annoying (or modern, as they put it) user interface.  Mozilla's is much better, more usable, less distracting...

585085727[/snapback]

A good way to fix problems with 'cute' user interfaces is to use programs that share a user interface with every other program on your computer instead of inventing their own that doesn't work like anything else. Opera allows you to use the native Windows interface, which will make it only as cute and annoying as your visual style for Windows is. (Why the native 'skin' isn't enabled by default with Opera, i'll never know. I can't imagine what goes through people's heads when they think that making their program look completely different from every other program ever is a good idea.) Mozilla (and every single program ever produced by the Mozilla Foundation) has its own user interface that is completely independent and different from Windows's, which is not only annoying, but it's poor interface design as well.

Though, it would be nice if the Modern theme were the default. Another plus with Mozilla/Firefox is that those annoying mouse gestures are an add-on rather than a compulsory "feature".

585085727[/snapback]

... How is it 'compulsory'? When you first perform a mouse gesture, it asks if you want to use mouse gestures. If you click no, the box goes away and it never asks you again. You admit that Opera is smaller and starts faster, so i fail to see why clicking this box once makes the mouse-gestures feature anywhere near 'compulsory'.

If Opera was ad-FREE (ha!) and, well, had much more extensions to customize it better for my own needs, I would've went that way.

585086241[/snapback]

I know there are extensions out there for Firetruck that might be better suited for your needs than Opera is, but i'm curious. What things, specifically, doesn't Opera let you customise that Firetruck does? The name? <_<

A good way to fix problems with 'cute' user interfaces is to use programs that share a user interface with every other program on your computer instead of inventing their own that doesn't work like anything else. Opera allows you to use the native Windows interface, which will make it only as cute and annoying as your visual style for Windows is. (Why the native 'skin' isn't enabled by default with Opera, i'll never know. I can't imagine what goes through people's heads when they think that making their program look completely different from every other program ever is a good idea.) Mozilla (and every single program ever produced by the Mozilla Foundation) has its own user interface that is completely independent and different from Windows's, which is not only annoying, but it's poor interface design as well.

585087198[/snapback]

Opera does a horrible job trying to use the actual UI of the OS it's on. You're better off leaving it skinned. Mozilla products use a skinning engine because Mozilla wanted their products to be easily ported to other OSes. Mozilla did a very good job with Firefox in getting it to look like Windows, and it's working on its OS X GUI.

Opera is, but i'm curious. What things, specifically, doesn't Opera let you customise that Firetruck does? The name? <_<

585087198[/snapback]

Everything. Firefox being built on XUL and being open source allows you to customize all you want. Your imagination is the limit.

Edited by jagedEdge
Opera does a horrible job trying to use the actual UI of the OS it's on. You're better off leaving it skinned.

585089217[/snapback]

What are you talking about? I don't know about other operating systems (don't really care about Linux, every program written for Linux works completely differently anyway; and last i heard the OS X version of Opera was admittedly a little lame), but it works just fine on Windows. With the exception of, i think, the progress bars, Opera uses native Windows widgets 100%.

I just downloaded the latest version of Firetruck, and, while they did fix a lot of things (like the scroll bars, which finally look exactly like they're supposed to), there are still a few problems with it. Menus, for example, look different from how they're suppposed to. And of course, aesthetics aside, the preferences panel for Firetruck is pretty weird. I don't know if anyone would find it confusing, but it's different.

Everything. Firefox being built on XUL and being open source allows you to customize all you want. Your imagination is the limit.

585089217[/snapback]

I'm kind of talking about while the program is, you know, in binary format. If you had Internet Explorer's source code, would you use it as your browser and tell everybody else to use it because they can customise it all they want? Or maybe would it still suck after all?

I'm kind of talking about while the program is, you know, in binary format. If you had Internet Explorer's source code, would you use it as your browser and tell everybody else to use it because they can customise it all they want? Or maybe would it still suck after all?

585090087[/snapback]

Well, Internet Explorer wouldn't suck if it were open source. They'd actually have some competent developers who care about the development of the software if it were open source.

Anyway, Firefox in binary mode is very customizable. Once again, you can customize parts of the XUL. You can also change the way it looks by using CSS.

Well, Internet Explorer wouldn't suck if it were open source. They'd actually have some competent developers who care about the development of the software if it were open source.

585090457[/snapback]

If that's the case, why don't you use the Mozilla suite itself? Or K-Meleon? Or Amaya? Just because two things are both open-source doesn't mean that one of them doesn't suck. (And i use 'suck' loosely, obviously, in the sense of 'i don't like it' rather than 'it's a complete piece of garbage that nobody should ever use'.)

Anyway, Firefox in binary mode is very customizable. Once again, you can customize parts of the XUL. You can also change the way it looks by using CSS.

585090457[/snapback]

Right. And there are things that you can do 'in binary mode' in Opera that you can't do in Firetruck as well. But i was asking specifically what that guy couldn't customise that was such a big deal that he had to use Firetruck.

If that's the case, why don't you use the Mozilla suite itself? Or K-Meleon? Or Amaya? Just because two things are both open-source doesn't mean that one of them doesn't suck. (And i use 'suck' loosely, obviously, in the sense of 'i don't like it' rather than 'it's a complete piece of garbage that nobody should ever use'.)

585090739[/snapback]

They don't get as much attention (mainly because of Firefox's success). Internet Explorer has the attention.

Do you want to explain at all what you're talking about? I've been using Opera almost exclusively since 7.0something, and pages render fine for me, media players always work, and the notion that it 'ranks up there with IE' security-wise seems pretty fallacious to me.

Furthermore, i have never ONCE had a virus or a 'spybot' on any of my computers. Not once. That isn't because i use Opera -- it's because i'm not an idiot.

And what compatibility problems would there be? Considering that Opera is designed to be 'compatible' with Internet Explorer while Firetruck is designed specifically to ignore the browser that 90% of the world uses in favour of following a bunch of recommendations that nobody uses, i should think Mozilla people would be the ones with compatibility problems.

585060429[/snapback]

"Furthermore, i have never ONCE had a virus or a 'spybot' on any of my computers. Not once. That isn't because i use Opera -- it's because i'm not an idiot." Son, I was fixing computer when you started kindergarden. I could find viruses and spybots and a hundred other things on your computer right now. You also are calling alot of people here "idiots" that have more knowlege about computers in their pinky fingers than you will ever have. You better choose your words more wisely the next time because you are truly at the bottom here when it comes to computer knowlege.

Son, I was fixing computer when you started kindergarden.  I could find viruses and spybots and a hundred other things on your computer right now.

585090849[/snapback]

Excuse me, Dad, i'm not a 'son', and you spelt Kindergarten wrong.

You also are calling alot of people here "idiots" that have more knowlege about computers in their pinky fingers than you will ever have. You better choose your words more wisely the next time because you are truly at the bottom here when it comes to computer knowlege.

585090849[/snapback]

I didn't actually call anyone an idiot, i just said that i wasn't an idiot. And, although i certainly don't consider myself a computer scientist or anything, i think you're heavily under-estimating my computer 'knowlege' and heavily over-estimating the 'knowlege' of a lot of people on Neowin.

Way to prove me wrong though. 'I'm older than you and smarter than you, that's why you're wrong.' Thanks for setting me straight, Dad.

Yes I have installed opera.....but dumped it when firefox became available. 99% of the time I install with the defaults, which will install the mail/voice.

Also, unless you personally know me, quit assuming I have or have not installed any software. I've probably forgotten more about computers than you know.

:alien:

I doubt you ever installed Opera since it asks you to disable M2/Voice at installation and use it as browser only. I think people missunderstand this, unless the features aren't used, they don't take any resources. And I doubt you would lower yourself at the level where you complain about HD useage of the program.

585059379[/snapback]

Excuse me, Dad, i'm not a 'son', and you spelt Kindergarten wrong.

I didn't actually call anyone an idiot, i just said that i wasn't an idiot. And, although i certainly don't consider myself a computer scientist or anything, i think you're heavily under-estimating my computer 'knowlege' and heavily over-estimating the 'knowlege' of a lot of people on Neowin.

Way to prove me wrong though. 'I'm older than you and smarter than you, that's why you're wrong.' Thanks for setting me straight, Dad.

585090905[/snapback]

No, you didn't call everyone an idiot, but the assumption was there. What formal computer training do you have? If you count your high school computer class, I guess you don't have much. Yes I am older and smarter, thank you. I also believe that quite a few Neowin members are very smart. Most are more respectful and smarter than you. Sorry about the Kindergarten thing, my typing sometimes gets faster than my brain goes. Can I ask you something? Is "spelt" a word? :whistle: Loser!! :D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If I ever get that issue I will let you know how I fix it
    • As I've been usually saying lately - we all can thank "AI" for this.
    • Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. My Windows11 device on the Preview Channel just got 26220.8728. My guess is this build is a nightly update from 26220.8690.
    • Traffic has a surprisingly unexpected impact on your surroundings by Sayan Sen Image by Radik 2707 via Pexels A collaborative study by researchers from several Israeli institutions found that everyday pollution from traffic and industrial activity measurably changed the atmospheric electric field over the Tel Aviv metropolitan area, providing new evidence of how human activity can influence the lower atmosphere. The research was led by Dr. Roy Yaniv of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Gertner Institute at Sheba Medical Center, Dr. Assaf Hochman of the Fredy & Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences at the Hebrew University, and Prof. Yoav Yair of Reichman University. The study also involved Itay Froomer, a student from Hadera High School and the Israeli Museum of Medicine and Science (Technoda), who carried out the work as part of the Ministry of Education's 5-unit physics research track. The researchers focused on the atmospheric electric field under fair-weather conditions. Even in the absence of storms, a weak electric field naturally exists between Earth's surface and the atmosphere. One of the main ways scientists measure this field is through the Potential Gradient (PG), which is the inverse of the vertical component of the electric field. PG is a key part of the global electric circuit, a planet-wide system of electrical currents maintained by thunderstorms and electrified clouds around the world. Scientists have long known that the atmospheric electric field can be influenced by factors ranging from large-scale atmospheric processes to local weather conditions such as dust, fog and clouds. Human-made pollution is also known to play a role, but understanding exactly how urban emissions affect the electric field close to the ground has remained an area of ongoing research. To investigate this relationship, the team analyzed measurements from a newly installed electric field mill, an instrument used to continuously monitor the strength of the atmospheric electric field. The instrument was installed at the Center for Technological Education (Roter House) in Holon and became operational in August 2024. It was funded by Israel's Ministry of Education and the Holon municipality. The electric field mill forms part of a broader monitoring network that includes nearby meteorological stations and air-quality monitoring sites. This allowed researchers to compare electric field measurements with detailed weather data and pollution records to better understand what was driving changes in the Potential Gradient. The study focused on two major urban pollutants: fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), both commonly produced by vehicle traffic and industrial activity. PM2.5 refers to microscopic airborne particles small enough to remain suspended in the atmosphere for extended periods, while NOx is a group of gases released during fuel combustion. Researchers examined daily, weekly and seasonal patterns in the atmospheric electric field and compared them with changes in pollutant concentrations. Their analysis revealed a clear relationship between NOx levels and changes in the Potential Gradient, particularly during morning and evening rush hours when traffic emissions were at their highest. “What we observe is a direct physical link between emission peaks and electrical variability,” explained Dr. Roy Yaniv. “NOx reduces atmospheric conductivity very quickly, so the electric field responds almost instantaneously during traffic rush hours.” Atmospheric conductivity describes how easily electrical charges move through the air. According to the researchers, nitrogen oxides rapidly alter this conductivity, causing a near-immediate response in the electric field. PM2.5, however, was associated with a delayed response. The researchers attributed this difference to the particles' longer atmospheric residence time, meaning they remain in the atmosphere for longer periods, as well as their different microphysical interactions with surrounding air and atmospheric components. The study also identified a pronounced "weekend effect." In Israel, traffic volumes and some industrial activity decline significantly on Fridays and Saturdays. During these periods, concentrations of both NOx and PM2.5 dropped, and corresponding changes were observed in the atmospheric electric field. “The weekend signal demonstrates just how sensitive the electric field is to changes in human activity,” the researchers noted. “When emissions decline, the electrical environment adjusts at once, providing a high-resolution indicator of urban atmospheric conditions.” The findings showed that pollution levels can influence not only the chemical composition of the atmosphere but also its electrical properties. Researchers said the results strengthened the case for using atmospheric electricity as an additional tool for environmental monitoring, particularly in densely populated urban areas where anthropogenic, or human-caused, influences are most pronounced. The study also pointed to potential public health applications. By combining air-quality measurements with observations of atmospheric electricity, researchers said they could gain a more complete picture of how urban atmospheric conditions change over time. “Integrating air-quality data with electric-field measurements gives us a clearer picture of how the lower atmosphere evolves moment by moment,” the researchers added. “It’s a framework that can support both scientific insight and practical environmental decision-making.” Beyond the scientific findings, the project highlighted a collaboration between universities, public institutions and secondary education. Researchers said the work demonstrated how students could take part in real-world environmental research while contributing to studies of air quality, atmospheric processes and their potential effects on society. Source: Hebrew University, ScienceDirect This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      540
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      80
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!