578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

No, you didn't call everyone an idiot, but the assumption was there.

585091016[/snapback]

Oh well. What i think is idiotic is visiting untrust-worthy sites and then blaming your software for getting spyware.

What formal computer training do you have?  If you count your high school computer class, I guess you don't have much.

585091016[/snapback]

To suggest that intelligence or knowledge is measured by whether or not you've paid thousands of dollars to be instructed by self-important people like yourself is pretty ridiculous. I don't have formal training in anything. If i'm interested in learning about something (whether it's HTML or electrical engineering), i'll learn about it. I'm not particularly interested in learning about CPU registers and FORTRAN, though, which is why i haven't enrolled in any 'formal training' regarding those subjects.

As far as my high-school computer classes, they were all a joke, and for the most part (with the notable exception of Cisco) i knew more about the subjects than my teachers did. I don't think that makes me a computer genius, of course, but it does make me wonder how useful your 'formal training' is, considering those teachers probably had to have it to get jobs teaching others.

I also believe that quite a few Neowin members are very smart.

585091016[/snapback]

Quite a few are, i have no doubt. Neowin has the distinction of encouraging idiocy, however, which sometimes is unfortunate for those smart people.

Most are more respectful and smarter than you.

585091016[/snapback]

Most people as a whole on Neowin are 'respectful', primarily because you'll get banned if you're not. The fact that people aren't allowed to call idiots idiots on Neowin is the primary reason they thrive here. But that's an entirely separate discussion and i realise that it isn't really my place to jump into a community and start dictating how it should be run.

Can I ask you something?  Is "spelt" a word?  :whistle:  Loser!!  :D

585091016[/snapback]

Uh, yeah, it is. http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=spelt

Primarily a non-American form of the word, but since i use British convention in my writing that's understandable. If you really wanted to criticise my own writing, you should have gone for my uncapitalised 'i's... but of course i do that intentionally, and i know it's wrong, so i'm not sure how far that would have got you either.

What I would like to know, is why so many firefox supports are so rabid about people using FIREFOX specifically, and not just an alternative to IE. Why do you care if someone is using a different browser than you, as long as it is secure? WHY? I still can't comprehend it. Firefox fanboys are some of the worst in my recent memory, and it baffles me to this day.

Opera supports are RARELY rabid about people using Opera like the firefox fans tend to be. At least, in my experience. I'm not saying this because I'm a fan of Opera. I use both. I'm saying this because it is becoming disgusting. Both browsers are great choices, and anyone should be happy that someone is using something besides Internet Explorer. This divide is bad for both browsers. Both browsers have millions of supporters, and neither will be going under any time soon.

It's time to stop spreading hate and lies about the competition and promoting use of an alternate, no matter what it may be. What do I recommend to people having problems with Internet Explorer? More times than not, Firefox. I will recommend Firefox to novice users and Opera to geeks who like to tinker with their apps. Usually, this works out great. I mention the other in both cases, in case they want to try another alternative, but usually it works out.

What I would like to know, is why so many firefox supports are so rabid about people using FIREFOX specifically, and not just an alternative to IE.  Why do you care if someone is using a different browser than you, as long as it is secure?  WHY?  I still can't comprehend it.  Firefox fanboys are some of the worst in my recent memory, and it baffles me to this day. 

Opera supports are RARELY rabid about people using Opera like the firefox fans tend to be.  At least, in my experience.  I'm not saying this because I'm a fan of Opera.  I use both.  I'm saying this because it is becoming disgusting.  Both browsers are great choices, and anyone should be happy that someone is using something besides Internet Explorer.  This divide is bad for both browsers.  Both browsers have millions of supporters, and neither will be going under any time soon. 

It's time to stop spreading hate and lies about the competition and promoting use of an alternate, no matter what it may be.  What do I recommend to people having problems with Internet Explorer?  More times than not, Firefox.  I  will recommend Firefox to novice users and Opera to geeks who like to tinker with their apps.  Usually, this works out great.  I mention the other in both cases, in case they want to try another alternative, but usually it works out.

585091748[/snapback]

Totally agree. Firefox fanboys are really annoying.. it's like they think they use the best browser in the world and the other browsers are crap. Also giving no real reason why they choose it.. they just ride the wave blindly.

Totally agree. Firefox fanboys are really annoying.. it's like they think they use the best browser in the world and the other browsers are crap. Also giving no real reason why they choose it.. they just ride the wave blindly.

585091931[/snapback]

that's why you should never answer to these kids

I'm fan of both FX and opera but right now I'm using FX untill Opera gets a way to collapse the ads blocked with filter.ini

My view..use what want and respect other opinion...

Nothing in this world is "The Best". If there were such a thing, then anything else beside that will diminished. In fact I really like this two browsers. I like Opera 'cause it's stability and Firefox for the extensions and being freeware. Both are fast and provide more security than IE.

I'm comparing versions from Firefox's pre-release to now. You seem to be the one trying to grasp straws. Firefox beat it in security, even if by one vulnerability.

Aside from the fact that one vulnerability in a short period of time does not say anything about the general security, Firefox is based on several years old code, namely Gecko, so you'd have to include all general Gecko vulnerabilities too.

Opera does a horrible job trying to use the actual UI of the OS it's on.

If you enable the native skin, it actually uses native calls to draw the UI.

Yes I have installed opera.....but dumped it when firefox became available. 99% of the time I install with the defaults, which will install the mail/voice.

Voice is not installed by default. Mail is a tiny part of Opera. Even with mail included, Opera is still a smaller download than Firefox.

Aside from the fact that one vulnerability in a short period of time does not say anything about the general security, Firefox is based on several years old code, namely Gecko, so you'd have to include all general Gecko vulnerabilities too.

585097859[/snapback]

Secunia includes Gecko vulnerabilities on the Firefox vulnerability page.

If you enable the native skin, it actually uses native calls to draw the UI.

585097859[/snapback]

I know it does, but it does a bad job doing it. I've used it on OS X before and set it to use OS X elements. It did a horrible job.

Secunia includes Gecko vulnerabilities on the Firefox vulnerability page.

Yes, and the point is that Firefox 1.0 has gotten all its previous vulnerabilities wiped from Secunia's site.

I know it does, but it does a bad job doing it. I've used it on OS X before and set it to use OS X elements. It did a horrible job.

I don't know about Mac. It looks like any other Windows program on Windows.

I don't see why people think Opera is "bloated".. I've never had any problems with that.. no even when I first testet it with 7.0. It's VERY userfriendly and easy to use. I've converted some of my friends into using Opera to and they didn't ask for any help what so ever. I'm a bit frustrated because they don't use mousegestures though :)

opera is one of the most bloated thingys i've ever seen,and i will never pay for taking off that ****ty ad that brings in the free version.

opera sucks really

firefox all the way between these 2

585099785[/snapback]

What's your criteria on 'bloatware'?

Firefox and Opera takes almost equal system resources.

Offering much more features without being heavy is 'bloated'????

opera is one of the most bloated thingys i've ever seen,and i will never pay for taking off that ****ty ad that brings in the free version.

opera sucks really

firefox all the way between these 2

585099785[/snapback]

I'm also curious as to why you call opera bloated? Care to explain?

this Opera versus Firefox thread is lasting months...

Lets cut to the meat. Although the many many firefox fanboys think they hit gold with their browser, opera essentially does the same thing if not more. Depends on taste. But i think opera is for more mature users who just want to get the job done, without the bells and whistles.

I am a firefox user and recently I went back to try Opera again. It had been about a year since I tried it and I didn't notice a huge difference. It still looked amazing and has lots of bells and whistles. The only problems I had were downloads and using certain sites. As far as downloads are concerned, I like how firefox automatically downloads things to whichever folder you choose. If I want to download a zip file to a certain folder then I have it set to automatically download it without a dialog box coming up to ask me where to put it and the download completes tooltip pops up when its done. I love that feature and could not figure out how to get Opera to do just that. As for sites not loading, I realize it is a site issue and not a browser issue, but I had far more sites that didn't load in Opera that have no trouble with Firefox. A couple of these sites I frequent so I really couldn't be bothered to figure out what I was doing wrong. I guess I'm a Firefox fanboy. I don't think Opera sucks though, it's just not for me.

As far as downloads are concerned, I like how firefox automatically downloads things to whichever folder you choose. If I want to download a zip file to a certain folder then I have it set to automatically download it without a dialog box coming up to ask me where to put it and the download completes tooltip pops up when its done.  I love that feature and could not figure out how to get Opera to do just that.

585106279[/snapback]

It's in 'File types' in the preferences. Click 'Edit...' on an existing file type, or create a new one, and there's a box that says 'Do not ask for folder, but save directly to'. Opera has lots of other rad file-type settings that you can play with, too, although i don't know how many of them are common to Firetruck as well.

No idea about the sites not loading though.

this Opera versus Firefox thread is lasting months...

Lets cut to the meat.  Although the many many firefox fanboys think they hit gold with their browser, opera essentially does the same thing if not more.  Depends on taste.  But i think opera is for more mature users who just want to get the job done, without the bells and whistles.

585106255[/snapback]

...wait a second. You said Opera was for the ones you want to get the job done without all the bells and whistles? Heh, Opera has way more bells and whistles out of the box than Firefox. Firefox is the one that gets the browsing job done, and does it extremely well.

Lav, why do you insist on calling it Firetruck? That's like me calling Opera "Screaming Fat Lady with a strange hat".

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • You're absolutely right! No reason in hell these should be on the road!
    • They aren't going to want to. Most would just go with the 17 Pro and save money. Why would they want to spend $300 for basically the same thing? It's not worth it if there are hardly any changes from year to year.
    • 24H2 rolled out to the Release Preview Channel in early June 2024, so this coming a bit later in the Experimental Channel (formerly Dev) doesn't really say much more than earlier H2 releases that came out in October. I am not sure what the thinking is here by putting it in Experimental, one would think that the 26H2 stamp means features are locked down and it's now bug tested until October? I don't even pretend to understand Microsoft's strategy for Windows Insider Program though
    • Nothing Ear (a) and CMF Buds Pro 2 with active noise cancellation drop to lowest price ever by Fiza Ali With Prime Day 2026 scheduled to run from Tuesday 23 to Friday 26 June, Amazon has already begun rolling out early access offers ahead of the main event. Particularly, Nothing Ear (a) and CMF Buds Pro 2 wireless earbuds have dropped to their lowest price ever with limited Prime deal offering 33% and 24% discounts, respectively. Nothing Ear (a) are equipped with 11mm dynamic drivers featuring a PM1 + TPU diaphragm. For noise control, the earbuds offer active noise cancellation (ANC) of up to 45dB across frequencies reaching 5,000Hz. The smart ANC algorithm adapts to surrounding noise levels, while a Transparency Mode allows users to remain aware of their environment when needed. Connectivity is handled via Bluetooth 5.3, with support for AAC, SBC, and LDAC audio codecs. Additional features include IP54-rated earbuds for dust and splash resistance, paired with an IPX2-rated charging case. Furthermore, users also benefit from pinch controls, in-ear detection, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, dual-device connectivity, and a low-latency mode designed for gaming and video playback. The Nothing X app unlocks a range of customisation options, including a personalised equaliser, bass enhancement, control remapping, ear tip fit testing, firmware updates, dual-device management, a Find My Earbuds feature, and low-latency mode settings. When it comes to the battery, the earbuds house a 46mAh lithium-ion battery, while the charging case contains a 500mAh cell. With ANC disabled, users can expect up to 9.5 hours of playback from the earbuds and up to 42.5 hours in total with the charging case. With ANC enabled, battery life is rated at up to 5.5 hours per charge and up to 24.5 hours combined with the case. Finally, fast charging is also supported that should provide up to 10 hours of playback from a 10-minute charge with ANC turned off. Nothing Ear (a) Wireless Earbuds (Black): $53.20 (Amazon US) - 33% The CMF Buds Pro 2 feature a dual-driver audio system consisting of an 11mm bass driver and a 6mm micro-planar tweeter. The earbuds use PU (polyurethane) and PET (polyethylene terephthalate) titanium-coated diaphragms and are tuned by Nothing to deliver balanced audio performance. They further support active noise cancellation of up to 50dB across a frequency range of up to 5,000Hz, and noise control features include a Smart ANC algorithm, Adaptive ANC, Transparency Mode, and Clear Voice Technology 2.0. For calls, the CMF Buds Pro 2 use a total of six microphones and feature an environmental noise-cancelling algorithm, Clear Voice Technology 3.0, and Wind Noise Reduction 3.0 that should improve voice clarity during conversations. Furthermore, when it comes to the connectivity, it is provided through Bluetooth 5.4. Additional features include an IP55 rating for dust and water resistance, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, in-ear detection, a low-latency mode, and a Find My Earbuds function. Moreover, through the Nothing X app for Android and iOS, users can access custom EQ settings, a bass enhancement algorithm, customisable controls, Find My Earbuds, low-latency mode, dual-device connectivity, an ear tip fit test, and firmware updates. The earbuds contain a 60mAh rechargeable lithium-ion battery, while the charging case houses a 460mAh battery. A full charge of the earbuds and case via USB-C should take approximately 85 minutes, while the earbuds alone should be fully recharged in the case in around 60 minutes. Battery life is rated at up to 11 hours of playback on a single charge and up to 43 hours with the charging case when ANC is turned off. With ANC enabled, playback time is reduced to up to 6.5 hours on the earbuds and up to 26 hours with the charging case. Talk time is rated at up to 6 hours on the earbuds and 25 hours with the case with ANC disabled, or up to 4.8 hours and 18.6 hours, respectively, with ANC enabled. CMF Buds Pro 2 Wireless Earbuds (Dark Grey): $37.05 (Amazon US) - 24% Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      542
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!