578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

...wait a second.  You said Opera was for the ones you want to get the job done without all the bells and whistles? Heh, Opera has way more bells and whistles out of the box than Firefox. Firefox is the one that gets the browsing job done, and does it extremely well...

585108377[/snapback]

Way more bells and whistles? Maybe in your view, but I think it contains just the right items you need(don't forget this browser is actually a suite)..but does that mean it cannot get the job done? right after installation does the user have to first go and configure options? absolutely not, he can begin surfing right away, with just the right set of tools needed.

Lav, why do you insist on calling it Firetruck? That's like me calling Opera "Screaming Fat Lady with a strange hat".

585108377[/snapback]

Doesn't have such a nice ring to it. :/

Originally it was just my way of making fun of how they changed the name 18'000 different times (give or take 17'998), but i guess it kind of stuck for me. Also when i heard about that one extension that lets you change the name of the browser i had to play with it some and i kind of thought that was funny.

firetruck.png

/me shrug

Re: Trolls.

For those who illegally obtained Opera, it's a tossup b/w Opera & Firefox.

For the paying customer, however, in their minds, Opera would be the better choice. There's no way that they're going to admit that Opera was the inferior product (it's not, btw.) They're not going to admit to making a pointless purchase.

That's the way of the world. If you choose to put your hard-earned dollars towards a product that you believe suits you best, it'd be very hard for a troll to sway you the other way.

By the same token, Opera users who troll on a Firefox-oriented thread (there are quite a few, actually) should find something better to do. Keep in mind that fx-users paid next to nothing for a product that has a great following.

Firefox-fanboys, and Anti-firefox-fanboys are one in the same. You can't differentiate b/w the two, no matter how hard you try. Neowin seems to engender this almost-zealous behavior, quite understandably, as it's a public forum of ideas.

Neowin isn't at fault. Nobody is. At the end of the day, the database is nothing more than a glob of opinions: some good, some bad, some useful, some useless. Infer what you will from the series of arguments presented. You have the right to decide how much time you'd like to waste on a project that has no impact on your life whatsoever.

There's no need for you to be irritated by the member of the opposite party, nor is it neccessary for you to rebuke or act callously in return.

Just my 1.99 cents.

Re: Trolls.

For those who illegally obtained Opera, it's a tossup b/w Opera & Firefox.

For the paying customer, however, in their minds, Opera would be the better choice. There's no way that they're going to admit that Opera was the inferior product (it's not, btw.) They're not going to admit to making a pointless purchase.

That's the way of the world. If you choose to put your hard-earned dollars towards a product that you believe suits you best, it'd be very hard for a troll to sway you the other way.

By the same token, Opera users who troll on a Firefox-oriented thread (there are quite a few, actually) should find something better to do. Keep in mind that fx-users paid next to nothing for a product that has a great following.

Firefox-fanboys, and Anti-firefox-fanboys are one in the same. You can't differentiate b/w the two, no matter how hard you try. Neowin seems to engender this almost-zealous behavior, quite understandably, as it's a public forum of ideas.

Neowin isn't at fault. Nobody is. At the end of the day, the database is nothing more than a glob of opinions: some good, some bad, some useful, some useless. Infer what you will from the series of arguments presented. You have the right to decide how much time you'd like to waste on a project that has no impact on your life whatsoever.

There's no need for you to be irritated by the member of the opposite party, nor is it neccessary for you to rebuke or act callously in return.

Just my 1.99 cents.

585109924[/snapback]

NO FIREFOX IS BETTER ! ! ! !

lol j/k. i agree completely and there isnt' really a point to asking this question in a thread. just like the thread above states, the base of neowin people like firefox.

The only way to tell which one to use, is to use both of em and see for yourself

i notice that you use Windows. Were you aware that Windows is not free? Why aren't you using Linux? I also hope America's Army is the only FPS you play, because almost all of the rest cost money. And i'll trust that you don't use Photoshop or Word or Nero.

585081777[/snapback]

And I assume when you try two products you equally like you go for the one you have to pay more for. One for $30, one for free. Here, take my money. I like both equally, just prefer to use the free one, and no i don't want an adbar at the top of the screen. Here's what I want out of a browser, display webpages, be unobtrousive, block popups and spyware. I could care less about which one uses 15kb less memory or loads up pages .1 seconds quicker. It's just a browser.

Edited by mufdvr3669
Because it's free of course. Most people don't want to pay for anything, so they somehow manage to convince themselves that inferior free alternatives are better than professional, commercial ones ;)

585110024[/snapback]

You can use Opera for free as long as you like so thats not even a valid arguement. And there are many cases where free alternatives are better than commercial ones too.

And I assume when you try two products you equally like you go for the one you have to pay more for.  One for $30, one for free.  Here, take my money.  I like both equally, just prefer to use the free one, and no i don't want an adbar at the top of the screen.  Here's what I want out of a browser, display webpages, be unobtrousive, block popups and spyware.  I could care less about which one uses 15kb less memory or loads up pages .1 seconds quicker.  It's just a browser.

585110029[/snapback]

Hmm, you know, i may have been a little more rabid than necessary. What i had assumed (mistakenly, i guess) was that your entire basis for using Firetruck was the freeness. But i guess if it's like that i probably can see your logic. Sorry. :p

Because it's free of course. Most people don't want to pay for anything, so they somehow manage to convince themselves that inferior free alternatives are better than professional, commercial ones ;)

585110024[/snapback]

Heh, so why not stick with IE then? :p

Also, Opera don't have to cost you anything besides an ad bar.

I personally think there are more to it than that...

Maybe better advertising job on Mozilla's part, maybe more features, maybe both.

There's definitely something else than money involved though, since I don't recall myself coughing up money to try out Opera.

Lav, why do you insist on calling it Firetruck? That's like me calling Opera "Screaming Fat Lady with a strange hat".

585108377[/snapback]

I like it...

(not a photoshop, my browser's title is now set to this)

Re: Trolls.

For those who illegally obtained Opera, it's a tossup b/w Opera & Firefox.

...

Just my 1.99 cents.

585109924[/snapback]

And since they're likely to be knowledgeable on tech stuff doesn't that tell you something?

585109936[/snapback]

A mob is only as smart as it's stupidest member. This especially proves true when you read posts by half of our members here. This thread is a shining example of the caliber of member you will find here on Neowin.

Oh yeah, Use Opera. :cool:

A mob is only as smart as it's stupidest member. This especially proves true when you read posts by half of our members here. This thread is a shining example of the caliber of member you will find here on Neowin.

Oh yeah, Use Opera.  :cool:

585110505[/snapback]

As rude as that sounds, I agree for the most part. Neowin has both extremes. Just because it prefers firefox as a community, does not make it better. This argument will fail over and over again. It is a logical fallacy.

I consider myself to be very very tech saavy. I work as a Software Engineer for a living, earning very good (and potentially excessive) money. I have used Opera since 3.x and Firefox since somewhere around 0.40. Now, since I prefer Opera.. does that make my opinion weigh more than another persons who is not as tech saavy? Absolutely not.

Opera is something that grows on you. The more you use it, the more little things you find, the more you like it. Firefox grabs you from the start. It's all about target audience.

Firefox tends to target newbies and people that want to migrate over from IE. They also target those who always want something new, and want control.

Not to say Opera doesn't do the same, but it's to a lesser degree.

Heh, so why not stick with IE then? :p

Because it's crap.

Also, Opera don't have to cost you anything besides an ad bar.

I personally think there are more to it than that...

Yes, Firefox is completely free. No ads or anything.

There's definitely something else than money involved though

Doubtful.

I've tried them both - I don't like either of them - but opera was better then firefox. Why? Yes opera has ads and yes it's a huge download if you want java; but opera loaded faster then firefox, opera had a better design and layout, and you can bearly see the text ads.

if you want a great browser, go with IE. but if you insist on not using IE, I'd say use opera :)

All the drive-by posters in this thread going 'lol ffox is betta cos oepra sux!11' and 'duh use opera :rolleyes:' lack common sense, not tech knowledge.

585110524[/snapback]

I second that.

'OK, here's what i'm going to do, everybody. I'm going to sign up for a forum and then i'm going to accumulate 1258 posts by just reading the thread titles and replying to them without thinking about or expounding my reply.'

CHECK

I'm going to end up getting banned because i can't stop pointing out idiocy. :(

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • You can't, if you didn't notice, it doesn't support surround at all, it's right in the spec list.
    • Hi — I’m always interested in soundcards. Like displays, I just want to know I’m getting as much clean “sonic juice” into my brain as possible as the years take their toll. I’m not entirely sure what to take away from this review, though. It doesn’t really tell me whether the AE‑X is a good product or who it’s actually for. Most of what I’m getting is: there’s a driver to install, here’s what it looks like, and here’s what’s in the box. There’s a lot of emphasis on the SPDIF input. When you mention not needing to switch headphones between console and PC — does that mean the PC has to be powered on just to pass audio through? That seems like a fairly big waste of energy. Is this more something a streamer would use alongside a capture card? How are you testing the sound? (Also, you might want to clarify that you’re using the headphones in wired mode when you mention they’re wireless.) You mention the lack of EMI shielding — how much real‑world difference does that make compared with typical motherboard audio? On multi‑channel: what exactly isn’t supported? Does this mean Windows spatial audio (Dolby Atmos for Headphones, DTS Headphone:X, etc.) won’t work, or just that the card itself doesn’t decode surround formats? And are there any true multi‑driver “surround” headphones left that would even use that? You also highlight support for high‑impedance headphones — but what does that translate to in practice? How does it compare to driving the same headphones from a normal device, and does it make any difference for everyday, lower‑impedance models? In short, who is this card actually targeted at?
    • Yes, THIS is wordart, not the styling that can now be done. Wordart was all about those curvy words, that you could change the path of, like making words go around a circle. I don't think it can be done now, right?
    • Just saw a news report of a Waymo driving into a flooded road.
    • Password Safe 3.72.0 by Razvan Serea Password Safe is a password database utility. Like many other such products, commercial and otherwise, it stores your passwords in an encrypted file, allowing you to remember only one password (the "safe combination"), instead of all the username/password combinations that you use. Once stored, your user names and passwords are just a few clicks away. Using Password Safe you can organize your passwords using your own customizable references—for example, by user ID, category, web site, or location. You can choose to store all your passwords in a single encrypted master password list (an encrypted password database), or use multiple databases to further organize your passwords (work and home, for example). And with its intuitive interface you will be up and running in minutes. PasswordSafe was originally designed by the renowned security technologist Bruce Schneier and released as a free utility application. Password Safe 3.72.0 changelog: Fixed bugs Improved font scale handling - should resolve font size issues on high resolution displays. GH1749 In the Master Password Setup window, "Show Master Password" is no longer truncated on some displays. GH1092, SF1595 Size and position of main window is now correctly restored on scaled displays. SF1630 Keep password expiry date when both password and password expiry are changed; don't clear a non-recurring expiry when the password's changed. SF1628 Custom values can now be copied to the clipboard in read-only mode via Ctrl-C and right-click->Copy Value. New features GH1196 Dark display mode support: Password Safe now supports the system display mode, as well as setting the mode directly via Manage->Options->Display->Display Mode. This change also updates the general "look & feel" of the app to the current Windows theme. Known limitations: The Date picker and keyboard shortcut controls do not switch to dark theme The Customize Toolbar dialog does not switch to dark theme Custom Field support has been added to the more advanced features: Filters XML and Text import and export Comparison, Sync and Merge databases SF938 Custom field values may now be selected by name and copied via a "Copy Custom Field Value..." submenu in the entry context popup menu. SF936 Notes and Custom fields layout now overlap, selectable by tabs, resulting in a more compact and less cluttered layout. SF935 Autotype: Specifying '\v{name}' in the autotype text will cause the corresponding value to be autotyped. Download: PasswordSafe 64-bit | Portable 64-bit | ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: PasswordSafe 32-bit | Portable 32-bit View: PasswordSafe Website | Quickstart Guide | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!