578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

10 million downloads of firefox in a very short period of time.

Can opera boast of such milestones?

585268395[/snapback]

No, not at the same time. But Opera have been downloaded by many million users througout the time. I remember vagaly something about 20 million downloads or something. But I'm not sure.. Long time ago, mabye 2-3 years ago. And that was from a few sites only.

Have? these 10 mn ppl made the right choice?

585268395[/snapback]

Many did, many didn't. Do you think everyone who download use what they download? Many just tries it and throw it away.

EDIT:

I did some checking through Opera's pressreleases and found this:

Since it's launch on 28th of January and August, Opera 7.00 was downloaded over 10 millions times only from Opera.com.

Already in August, Opera 7 passed a new milestone with over 10 million copies downloaded just from www.opera.com.

After that I haven't found any figures...

Edited by [X]-bYtE
Well then download any of the recent trunk builds of Firefox and you'll notice a huge speed increase over 1.0

585268387[/snapback]

But the nightlies are barely even usable. I've tried 10 different nightlies over the past month, and each one had MAJOR usabilities issues. Crashes, pages rendering odd, and other misc bugs. The opera beta does NOT have these types of major issues. It has minor bugs, but nothing that really affects usabilities.
One more thing to ponder upon....

10 million downloads of firefox in a very short period of time.

Can opera boast of such milestones?

Have  these 10 mn ppl made the right choice?

585268395[/snapback]

Popularity has NEVER been a measure of quality, nor should it ever be.

Ah, but those were Firefox's development stages. It's first steps. Opera had been out for a quite a while and was 6-7 versions in. Anyway, I'm not going to compare Firefox 1.1 PR to Opera 7.54, or tell you to use version 1.1. I also didn't push that hard into getting people to use Firefox's pre-1.0 releases. I knew they were beta, and I knew lots of people didn't like betas.

Opera 7 was a complete rewrite of practically everything in the browser. The interface backend was rewritten (if I recall correctly,) the rendering engine was rewritten from scratch, they've recently changed the plugin engine (switch from the legacy nn4 plugin architecture to the new cross-browser architecture that was being made by Opera/Mozilla/Sun/Macromedia/whoever,) the javascript engine was rewritten from scratch because javascript performance and compliance used to suck [majorly], etc. If Opera 7 had recieved a new name then it would've been treated like a new product (which it basically is.) It's not really 6-7 versions in, it was totally recreated but branded with the same name.

First steps? Well, mozilla didnt really have to do much to the Mozilla code to turn it into firefox, remove mail/chat, tweak it around a little, the engines the same.

Yeah, it's not much different, which is why Mozilla can take the newest Mozilla code and transplant it into Firefox. It's basically the same browser, just a different setup.

Isnt that just like the aol thing? My friend uses it, makes images look pretty ****ty :\

I've heard that the end user will have the option of setting how much images and stuff should be compressed. I cannot state this as fact as I haven't had personal experience with SlipStream, that's just what I've heard. If it's true then you'll be able to perform less compression in exchange for higher quality images. SlipStream also compresses HTML/CSS/JS/XML/etc., does the "AOL thing" do that too? Just curious.

Uh.. Opera has gone through a few rewrites with both the rendering engine and the core UI. When you do that, it's almost like starting from scratch. Performance issues have to be readdressed. So don't try to feed me that BS. And the Gecko rendering engine has been around for a LONG time anyways.

Performance issues do have to be readdressed, and there's almost always a performance issue fixed with each release, sometimes they aren't even issues but are made faster anyways (like the email database searching which can now search about 10x as many emails as before with the same amount of time.) I would also have to agree with you about Gecko, it has been around much longer than Presto (Opera 7/8's rendering engine.)

When Opera has the beta on their front-page for download and many many people recommending it.. I think it's pretty safe to use and compare.

I do too.

Well then download any of the recent trunk builds of Firefox and you'll notice a huge speed increase over 1.0

I'm using a recent nightly from Firefox (I compiled it myself for my own processor) and there are some speed improvements, I'll grant you that much. However, my earlier speed comparison was done between my custom-compiled and tweaked Firefox to a stock Opera installation, so Firefox still hasn't taken the lead and with Opera 8.0 coming they will likely eat dust.

One more thing to ponder upon....

10 million downloads of firefox in a very short period of time.

Can opera boast of such milestones?

Have these 10 mn ppl made the right choice?

Opera can brag about such milestones, but it's all irrelevant. The amount of downloads has nothing to do with the quality of the software, it's all about marketing (and you can't say that Firefox hasn't been marketed excessively.) How many downloads there were makes no difference as to what the right choice is (do a google search for "argumentum ad populum" which is a logical fallacy.) If the end user is happy then they couldn't have possibly made the wrong choice (though I do wish the right choice was wrong sometimes, IE is a pain in the butt for web designers/developers.) If they choose to use IE over Firefox or Opera then they haven't necessarily made the wrong choice.

Ah, but those were Firefox's development stages. It's first steps. Opera had been out for a quite a while and was 6-7 versions in. Anyway, I'm not going to compare Firefox 1.1 PR to Opera 7.54, or tell you to use version 1.1. I also didn't push that hard into getting people to use Firefox's pre-1.0 releases. I knew they were beta, and I knew lots of people didn't like betas.

585266736[/snapback]

Opera 7 was a rewrite, so Opera 8 is really Opera 2.

Or Mozilla is Netscape 5, while Firefox is Netscape 6.

Or, to make the comparison better:

Mozilla is v1, as it was a complete rewrite. Opera 7 was also v1.

Now, Firefox is not a complete rewrite, but uses the existing Mozilla base, so it is v2. Opera 8, similarly, is not a complete rewrite, but it uses the base from v1 (Opera 7), so it is v2 as well.

So strictly speaking, Mozilla v2 is out now, and has been out since November. Opera v2 is still being beta tested.

One more thing to ponder upon....

10 million downloads of firefox in a very short period of time.

Can opera boast of such milestones?

Have  these 10 mn ppl made the right choice?

585268395[/snapback]

If you think ten million downloads equals ten million people, and you think that everyone who downloads Firefox starts using it, you are rather naive. Download number are largely irrelevant, especially when the Firefox download numbers were artificially inflated by a sense of "competition". Everyone was downloading Firefox like mad to reach a certain number.

So trying to use this marketing trick as a "milestone" or measure of actual usage is silly.

If you think ten million downloads equals ten million people, and you think that everyone who downloads Firefox starts using it, you are rather naive. Download number are largely irrelevant, especially when the Firefox download numbers were artificially inflated by a sense of "competition". Everyone was downloading Firefox like mad to reach a certain number.

So trying to use this marketing trick as a "milestone" or measure of actual usage is silly.

585272410[/snapback]

Is firefox team a fool by downloading the program themselves? Anyway people who have laptop and PC must have downloaded twice.

No one was mad to download when it was realeased.... , and the numbers were not

artificially inflated as well. By now even more people would have downloaded.

If a person is satisfied with the product only he will want to download and use the same, not otherwise or for creating records. :angry:

Is firefox team a fool by downloading the program  themselves? Anyway people who have laptop and PC must have downloaded twice.

I know several people who have downloaded Firefox several times in several different locations. If you read Slashdot, there are loads of comment saying the same thing. Do the math.

If a person is satisfied with the product only he will want to download and use the same, not otherwise or for creating records. :angry:

Huh?

The point is, the 10 million downloads thing was a hype, and people were trying to get as many downloads as possible to reach that goal. It says nothing about the number of people who actually downloaded it, or how many actually stuck with Firefox.

Is firefox team a fool by downloading the program  themselves? Anyway people who have laptop and PC must have downloaded twice.

No one was mad to download when it was realeased.... , and the numbers were not

artificially inflated as well. By now even more people would have downloaded.

If a person is satisfied with the product only he will want to download and use the same, not otherwise or for creating records. :angry:

585272482[/snapback]

I've downloaded Firefox 1.0 15 times since it was released. 3 were for other people, only 1 of which uses it, because I forced them to. I don't even use it as my main browser.

Is firefox team a fool by downloading the program themselves?

Almost all programmers use their own software, otherwise it wouldn't be worth the effort to program it. So, what was your point?

Anyway people who have laptop and PC must have downloaded twice.

Not necessarily. It only takes 1 download to install a program on 100+ computers, so it could definately be done for just two computers, assuming that they are on the same network (which is probably true considering that most laptops use wireless connections.) Not to mention that people have things like Jump Drives on them at all times (I have mine on my key ring.) You must also take into account that some people might've downloaded the program several times just for the sake of updating (the copy they're running and/or update their stored installers in case they need to reinstall later. I always download fresh copies of the software I use so that I have the updated installers for those "encase **** happens" scenarios.)

No one was mad to download when it was realeased.... , and the numbers were not

artificially inflated as well. By now even more people would have downloaded.

Technically, the numbers were artificially inflated. There were large crowds of firefox fanboys going around spamming download sites and giving fake reviews and comments which of course influenced people to download the software moreso than honest reviews would've (I'm not saying that it would've gotten bad reviews, but it would've likely came out to 4/5 on most comments rather than 5/5 which greatly influences someone's choice on downloading the software.) If they didn't flood download sites with fake reviews and comments then they probably wouldn't have had nearly as many downloads. Therefore, the download number was artificially inflated (the firefox fanboys basically lied to potential users just so they'd download it.)

I think Slipstream will be a flop. Won't be big until quite some time.

Why do you think so?

I've downloaded Firefox 1.0 15 times since it was released. 3 were for other people, only 1 of which uses it, because I forced them to. I don't even use it as my main browser.

I've downloaded it about 10 times since 0.6, and I also don't use it as my main browser (I use it for testing websites mostly.)

dont know why you argue vcv .. you know its no good :p fanbois are fanbois ... i used to be an avid fx user, but since Opera 7.54 I switched and am a lot happier ....

585268707[/snapback]

It's funny how rabit IE/Opera fans diss rabit Firefox fans for being fanboys... while failing to realise that they are nothing more than fanboys of a different product themselves.

I've used both Opera and Firefox for some time, started using Opera just before it hit 7.0 and Firefox when it was around .6. I used them both until Firefox got around .9, at that point I realised that I barely used Opera anymore. Couple weeks ago after I reformated I didn't even bother installing Opera anymore, eventhough I paid for it years back. Firefox just does everything better for me.

It's funny how rabit IE/Opera fans diss rabit Firefox fans for being fanboys... while failing to realise that they are nothing more than fanboys of a different product themselves.

I've used both Opera and Firefox for some time, started using Opera just before it hit 7.0 and Firefox when it was around .6. I used them both until Firefox got around .9, at that point I realised that I barely used Opera anymore. Couple weeks ago after I reformated I didn't even bother installing Opera anymore, eventhough I paid for it years back. Firefox just does everything better for me.

585275414[/snapback]

Years back? How many years? Your license wouldnt cover Opera 7 if it was a while ago :unsure:

It's funny how rabit IE/Opera fans diss rabit Firefox fans for being fanboys... while failing to realise that they are nothing more than fanboys of a different product themselves.

I've used both Opera and Firefox for some time, started using Opera just before it hit 7.0 and Firefox when it was around .6. I used them both until Firefox got around .9, at that point I realised that I barely used Opera anymore. Couple weeks ago after I reformated I didn't even bother installing Opera anymore, eventhough I paid for it years back. Firefox just does everything better for me.

585275414[/snapback]

There is a reason why Firefox Fanboys are considered the worst. They tend to be misinformed about Opera. A lot like it beacuse it's open-source.. even though that has no bearing on them.

I'm not saying all Firefox users are like that, or that none of Opera users are. But the ratio for Firefox is greater.

I'll admit that I'm a fanboy for Opera, but I'm not rabid.

I'd normally leave people to decide what browser they want to use, but I insist that if they're going to diss Opera/IE/The Rest Of The World that they diss it for the right reasons.

"Firefox!!111 is more secure and its fastre theanh Internet esxplorer and Opera licks docnkey tsticles!!!!!11111111usefirefox!" - is not a valid, nor grammatically correct reason.

"I like Firefox" - Good reason (Y). It's a personal preference.

It's funny how rabit IE/Opera fans diss rabit Firefox fans for being fanboys... while failing to realise that they are nothing more than fanboys of a different product themselves.

firefox fanboys and pushers are rightfully becoming more and more hated across the web. it is not that they love firefox. it's they way they are completely ignorant about other browsers, and just spew out what they've been brainwashed into thinking about these other browsers, without even trying it out themselves.

at least the opera fanboys have usually tried firefox before forming an opinion. you see, you have to pay for opera, but people prefer something if it's free. so they hear about the free firefox and obviously try it out.

on the other hand, firefox fanbois often don't bother to try out opera, so they just spew out the tired old lies they've heard from someone else who didn't try opera either, but who heard it from someone else who didn't try opera either, who... etc.

firefox fanboys are completely different from opera fanboys. while opera fanboys, rabid as they may be, are usually well informed, especially about the over-hyped firefox, firefox fanboys are usually completely ignorant about other browsers, but that has never stopped them from spreading fud about them...

killthefox4zr.gif

Firefox is downloaded 200 000 - 300 000 times every day, you can't be seriously saying that it's the same 20 000-30 000 people downloading it over and over again. Firefox is immensively more popular than Opera, denial won't change it.

From reading Firefox vs. Opera threads on various boards (this, mozillazine, opera forums) I fail to see any difference between the fans. Firefox and Opera both have their 'bad apples' and since Firefox is more popular, it's statistically bound to have more this kind of fans. It's the human nature, not the browser.

Edit: d_ralphie: Never have I seen so much FUD and bull**** concentrated in one post, congrats.

Firefox is downloaded 200 000 - 300 000 times every day, you can't be seriously saying that it's the same 20 000-30 000 people downloading it over and over again. Firefox is immensively more popular than Opera, denial won't change it.

a billion flies can't be wrong. eat ****!

and by the way, do you even know opera's download numbers?

From reading Firefox vs. Opera threads on various boards (this, mozillazine, opera forums) I fail to see any difference between the fans. Firefox and Opera both have their 'bad apples' and since Firefox is more popular, it's statistically bound to have more this kind of fans. It's the human nature, not the browser.

opera fanboys are infinitely more informed than the disgusting firefox fanboys.

Edit: d_ralphie: Never have I seen so much FUD and bull**** concentrated in one post, congrats.

585276110[/snapback]

oh please. i see more and more people not using firefox just because of the rabid fanboys that pollute the web. you won't see that with any other browser.

I like Firefox. I use Firefox. And I will keep using it. My Firefox is custom. I made it the way I want. The open source community has always been good to me, but you need the knowledge to fully "exploit" it to it's best. Internet Explorer is nothing close to a bad browser, it's just more "user friendly" out of the box.

Firefox is downloaded 200 000 - 300 000 times every day, you can't be seriously saying that it's the same 20 000-30 000 people downloading it over and over again. Firefox is immensively more popular than Opera, denial won't change it.

From reading Firefox vs. Opera threads on various boards (this, mozillazine, opera forums) I fail to see any difference between the fans. Firefox and Opera both have their 'bad apples' and since Firefox is more popular, it's statistically bound to have more this kind of fans. It's the human nature, not the browser.

Edit: d_ralphie: Never have I seen so much FUD and bull**** concentrated in one post, congrats.

585276110[/snapback]

Oh, well in that case I'll change back to IE since it's more popular than Firefox or Opera :rolleyes:

Lol, I've used Firefox for forever, but saying it's downloaded more is no reason to get it. Porn's downloaded more than either, why don't we "surf" with it. :rofl:

I've just now tried out Opera, and to tell you the truth, I use both just about the same amount. In fact, both are great, but all of you have your minds set on one view and won't look at the greatness of both.

Have we become so entangled in this world as to forget what they were both made for? To get away from IE (If it's really all that bad). If I was an IE user and I read this I wouldn't switch to either because of the way you two are acting.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Damn, I loved this show back in the day.  
    • Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 by Razvan Serea Rufus is a small utility that helps format and create bootable USB flash drives, such as USB keys/pendrives, memory sticks, etc. Despite its small size, Rufus provides everything you need! Oh, and Rufus is fast. For instance it's about twice as fast as UNetbootin, Universal USB Installer or Windows 7 USB download tool, on the creation of a Windows 7 USB installation drive from an ISO (with honorable mention to WiNToBootic for managing to keep up). It is also marginally faster on the creation of Linux bootable USBs from ISOs. A non-exhaustive list of Rufus supported ISOs is available here. It can be especially useful for cases where: you need to create USB installation media from bootable ISOs (Windows, Linux, UEFI, etc.) you need to work on a system that doesn't have an OS installed you need to flash a BIOS or other firmware from DOS you want to run a low-level utility Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 changelog: Add RISC-V 64 support to UEFI:NTFS Improve the guards for using the "silent" option Improve the ability to cancel during write retries Improve progress reporting for compressed image extraction Fix unrestricted XML entity expansion and integer overflow in ezxml parser (courtesy of @esadowski4) [GHSA-55r2-34wg-8mv9] Fix "silent" Windows installation failing at 75% in most cases [#2960] Fix a crash during boot when using UEFI:NTFS on Snapdragon X based ARM64 platforms [#2934] Fix the first WUE option always being checked by default [#2965] Fix an infinite loop when using Windows ISOs that contain multiple WIMs Fix "Enable runtime UEFI media validation" checkbox not always being properly enabled Other WUE improvements/fixes for OneDrive removal and username validation (with thanks to @christian8641) [#2984, #2991] Download: Rufus 4.15 Beta 2 | 1.9 MB (Open Source) Links: Rufus Home Page | Project Page @GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Tixati 3.43 by Razvan Serea Tixati is a free and easy to use BitTorrent client featuring detailed views of all seed, peer, and file transfer properties. Also included are powerful bandwidth charting and throttling capabilities, and a full DHT implementation. Tixati is one of the most advanced and flexible BitTorrent clients available. And unlike many other clients, Tixati contains NO SPYWARE, NO ADS, and NO GIMMICKS. Tixati portable version is meant to run on a USB flash drive or other portable media. It stores all its configuration files in the same folder as the executable binary files, and all file paths are stored in a format relative to the program executable folder. It is important you do not delete the "tixati_portable_mode.txt" file within the executables folder. This file is what triggers Tixati to run in portable mode. (The executable binaries are actually the same as the standard edition binaries.) When running the portable edition from a USB flash drive, especially one that is formatted in FAT16/FAT32, you may experience some lag when initially loading a new transfer. This is because initializing and allocating large files on flash-based media consumes a greater amount of time and resources compared to a conventional hard-drive. Tixati has the following features: detailed views of all aspects of the swarm, including peers, pieces, files, and trackers support for magnet links, so no need to download .torrent files if a simple magnet-link is available super-efficient peer choking/unchoking algorithms ensure the fastest downloads peer connection encryption for added security full DHT (Distributed Hash Table) implementation for trackerless torrents, including detailed message traffic graphs and customizable event logging advanced bandwidth charting of overall traffic and per-transfer traffic, with separate classification of protocol and file bytes, and with separate classification of outbound traffic for trading and seeding highly flexible bandwidth throttling, including trading/seeding proportion adjustment and adjustable priority for individual transfers and peers bitfield graphs that show the completeness of all downloaded files, what pieces other peers have available, and the health of the overall swarm customizable event logging for each download, and individual event logs for all peers within the swarm expert local file management functions which allow you to move files to a different partition even while downloading is still in progress 100% compatible with the BitTorrent protocol Windows and Linux-GTK native versions available Tixati 3.43 changelog: Several major DHT improvements Added several screening heuristics to filter malicious DHT nodes, prevent Sybil floods Rewrote DHT search algorithms to add support for multi-path lookups Improved DHT logging, more details in several error messages Extended timeout lengths for outgoing queries over I2P Added incoming query / response per second to DHT table status display Updated Regex engine to PCRE2 Faster Search function, scans channel user profiles in much less time Fixed problems with file name parsing and date handling in RSS Faster and more accurate RSS filtering and episode number detection Several optimizations to global text processing functions, such as UTF-8 cleaning, line splitting, and token parsing Complete update of port-mapping UPNP/NAT-PMP engine, added PCP support, mapping over VPN support, and more Several refinements to default gateway detection on Windows / Android, which is used for port-mapping Support for IPv6 interface-scoped addresses, which is sometimes needed for IPv6 gateway detection and port mapping Full support for PCP port remapping, added backup zero-port query in case requested port is rejected New UPNP/NAT-PMP Monitor in Help > Diagnostics New reflected local port/location tracker that analyzes DHT replies to detect true port/location and NAT mapping type New TCP/UDP Ports monitor in Help > Diagnostics, with several statistic and information tabs, and a detailed event log Calculated/reflected local port is now used for port parameter in tracker queries and peer handshake Fixed several problems with Linux Wayland compatibility Completely replaced tray icon functions in Linux, new SNI implementation is now the default with GSI backup Implemented full DBus-Menu server to be used by new SNI tray icon implementation Replaced Linux tray balloon notification DBus client Rewrote auto-shutdown DBus interface for Linux Rewrote sleep inhibit DBus interface for Linux Dropped deprecated Linux dbus-glib dependencies Completely new Windows asynchronous file handling, now using IOCP model with several block-alignment optimizations Better handling of system network resets and interface down/up cycles Added option to fully clear configuration in Settings > Import/Export Remember last option checkboxes when using Import/Export Fixed minor I2P incoming connection routing problems Much faster I2P vanity host name finder Much faster channel user vanity key finder Raised length limit for torrent tracker remote failure messages to 120 from 64 Fixed problems setting download location on a torrent before the meta info is resolved Added location/MOC paths to category pane tooltips Several minor Web Interface fixes Refinements to static and scrolling ellipsizing layout routines Several fixes and improvements to single and multi-line text edit controls Many other minor fixes throughout the user interface A major overhaul of the Android framework has also been done: API target raised to 35, page alignment set to 16K Rewrote all inset processing routines Full rewrite of foreground service, application, and main activity objects New permission request routines Added multi-cast lock request before UPNP/LPDP discovery operations Fixed file permission and locking problems when loading .torrent from web browsers Fixed problems with Z-ordering of modal / non-modal and popup windows Fixed handling of back gesture on newer OS Added status bar icon adjustment based on status bar background color Added option in Settings > UI > Behavior to continue running in tray when task removed from recents App can be closed by swiping away notification Rewrote IME interface, fixed several problems with auto-correct, on-screen keyboard visibility, and cursor positioning Added full support for Android hardware mouse and keyboard function Added full tooltip implementation for Android hovering via mouse or other cursor device Full rewrite of popup menu widgets to better support hardware pointers and keyboard Added mouse cursor updating framework for Android hovering Added Settings > Import/Export to Android builds Added language file support to Android builds Download: Tixati 64-bit | Tixati 32-bit ~20.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Portable Tixati 3.43 | 114.0 MB Download: Tixati 3.43 for Linux | Android View: Tixati Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Firefox 152.0.1 by Razvan Serea Firefox is a fast, full-featured Web browser. It offers great security, privacy, and protection against viruses, spyware, malware, and it can also easily block pop-up windows. The key features that have made Firefox so popular are the simple and effective UI, browser speed and strong security capabilities. Firefox has complete features for browsing the Internet. It is very reliable and flexible due to its implemented security features, along with customization options. Firefox includes pop-up blocking, tab-browsing, integrated Google search, simplified privacy controls, a streamlined browser window that shows you more of the page than any other browser and a number of additional features that work with you to help you get the most out of your time online. Firefox key features Enhanced Tracking Protection (ETP) – Blocks trackers, cookies, cryptominers, and fingerprinters by default. Private Browsing Mode – Deletes history, cookies, and temporary files when closed. Lightweight & Fast Performance – Optimized memory usage with efficient page loading. Cross-Platform Sync – Sync bookmarks, passwords, history, and open tabs across devices. Customizable Interface – Toolbars, themes, and extensions can be tailored to user needs. Strong Privacy Controls – Options to manage cookies, permissions, and site data easily. Reader Mode – Strips away clutter for distraction-free reading. Pocket Integration – Save and read articles offline with Pocket built into Firefox. Picture-in-Picture (PiP) – Watch videos in a floating window while multitasking. Extensions & Add-ons – Vast library for productivity, security, and personalization. Built-in PDF Viewer – No need for external software to view PDFs. Firefox Monitor – Alerts users if their email is part of a known data breach. Multi-Account Containers – Isolate browsing sessions (e.g., work, personal, shopping). Performance & Resource Efficiency – Uses fewer system resources than some competitors. Open Source & Community-Driven – Transparent development with global contributions. Firefox 152.0.1 fixes: Fixed frequent crashes affecting users with Intel Raptor Lake processors. (Bug 2039575) Fixed an issue on macOS where choosing a PDF option, such as "Save as PDF", from the system print dialog would send the job to your printer instead of saving a file. (Bug 2047850) Download: Firefox 64-bit | Firefox 32-bit | ARM64 | ~70.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Firefox for MacOS | 146.0 MB View: Firefox Home Page | Release Notes Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!