578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

10 million downloads of firefox in a very short period of time.

Can opera boast of such milestones?

585268395[/snapback]

No, not at the same time. But Opera have been downloaded by many million users througout the time. I remember vagaly something about 20 million downloads or something. But I'm not sure.. Long time ago, mabye 2-3 years ago. And that was from a few sites only.

Have? these 10 mn ppl made the right choice?

585268395[/snapback]

Many did, many didn't. Do you think everyone who download use what they download? Many just tries it and throw it away.

EDIT:

I did some checking through Opera's pressreleases and found this:

Since it's launch on 28th of January and August, Opera 7.00 was downloaded over 10 millions times only from Opera.com.

Already in August, Opera 7 passed a new milestone with over 10 million copies downloaded just from www.opera.com.

After that I haven't found any figures...

Edited by [X]-bYtE
Well then download any of the recent trunk builds of Firefox and you'll notice a huge speed increase over 1.0

585268387[/snapback]

But the nightlies are barely even usable. I've tried 10 different nightlies over the past month, and each one had MAJOR usabilities issues. Crashes, pages rendering odd, and other misc bugs. The opera beta does NOT have these types of major issues. It has minor bugs, but nothing that really affects usabilities.
One more thing to ponder upon....

10 million downloads of firefox in a very short period of time.

Can opera boast of such milestones?

Have  these 10 mn ppl made the right choice?

585268395[/snapback]

Popularity has NEVER been a measure of quality, nor should it ever be.

Ah, but those were Firefox's development stages. It's first steps. Opera had been out for a quite a while and was 6-7 versions in. Anyway, I'm not going to compare Firefox 1.1 PR to Opera 7.54, or tell you to use version 1.1. I also didn't push that hard into getting people to use Firefox's pre-1.0 releases. I knew they were beta, and I knew lots of people didn't like betas.

Opera 7 was a complete rewrite of practically everything in the browser. The interface backend was rewritten (if I recall correctly,) the rendering engine was rewritten from scratch, they've recently changed the plugin engine (switch from the legacy nn4 plugin architecture to the new cross-browser architecture that was being made by Opera/Mozilla/Sun/Macromedia/whoever,) the javascript engine was rewritten from scratch because javascript performance and compliance used to suck [majorly], etc. If Opera 7 had recieved a new name then it would've been treated like a new product (which it basically is.) It's not really 6-7 versions in, it was totally recreated but branded with the same name.

First steps? Well, mozilla didnt really have to do much to the Mozilla code to turn it into firefox, remove mail/chat, tweak it around a little, the engines the same.

Yeah, it's not much different, which is why Mozilla can take the newest Mozilla code and transplant it into Firefox. It's basically the same browser, just a different setup.

Isnt that just like the aol thing? My friend uses it, makes images look pretty ****ty :\

I've heard that the end user will have the option of setting how much images and stuff should be compressed. I cannot state this as fact as I haven't had personal experience with SlipStream, that's just what I've heard. If it's true then you'll be able to perform less compression in exchange for higher quality images. SlipStream also compresses HTML/CSS/JS/XML/etc., does the "AOL thing" do that too? Just curious.

Uh.. Opera has gone through a few rewrites with both the rendering engine and the core UI. When you do that, it's almost like starting from scratch. Performance issues have to be readdressed. So don't try to feed me that BS. And the Gecko rendering engine has been around for a LONG time anyways.

Performance issues do have to be readdressed, and there's almost always a performance issue fixed with each release, sometimes they aren't even issues but are made faster anyways (like the email database searching which can now search about 10x as many emails as before with the same amount of time.) I would also have to agree with you about Gecko, it has been around much longer than Presto (Opera 7/8's rendering engine.)

When Opera has the beta on their front-page for download and many many people recommending it.. I think it's pretty safe to use and compare.

I do too.

Well then download any of the recent trunk builds of Firefox and you'll notice a huge speed increase over 1.0

I'm using a recent nightly from Firefox (I compiled it myself for my own processor) and there are some speed improvements, I'll grant you that much. However, my earlier speed comparison was done between my custom-compiled and tweaked Firefox to a stock Opera installation, so Firefox still hasn't taken the lead and with Opera 8.0 coming they will likely eat dust.

One more thing to ponder upon....

10 million downloads of firefox in a very short period of time.

Can opera boast of such milestones?

Have these 10 mn ppl made the right choice?

Opera can brag about such milestones, but it's all irrelevant. The amount of downloads has nothing to do with the quality of the software, it's all about marketing (and you can't say that Firefox hasn't been marketed excessively.) How many downloads there were makes no difference as to what the right choice is (do a google search for "argumentum ad populum" which is a logical fallacy.) If the end user is happy then they couldn't have possibly made the wrong choice (though I do wish the right choice was wrong sometimes, IE is a pain in the butt for web designers/developers.) If they choose to use IE over Firefox or Opera then they haven't necessarily made the wrong choice.

Ah, but those were Firefox's development stages. It's first steps. Opera had been out for a quite a while and was 6-7 versions in. Anyway, I'm not going to compare Firefox 1.1 PR to Opera 7.54, or tell you to use version 1.1. I also didn't push that hard into getting people to use Firefox's pre-1.0 releases. I knew they were beta, and I knew lots of people didn't like betas.

585266736[/snapback]

Opera 7 was a rewrite, so Opera 8 is really Opera 2.

Or Mozilla is Netscape 5, while Firefox is Netscape 6.

Or, to make the comparison better:

Mozilla is v1, as it was a complete rewrite. Opera 7 was also v1.

Now, Firefox is not a complete rewrite, but uses the existing Mozilla base, so it is v2. Opera 8, similarly, is not a complete rewrite, but it uses the base from v1 (Opera 7), so it is v2 as well.

So strictly speaking, Mozilla v2 is out now, and has been out since November. Opera v2 is still being beta tested.

One more thing to ponder upon....

10 million downloads of firefox in a very short period of time.

Can opera boast of such milestones?

Have  these 10 mn ppl made the right choice?

585268395[/snapback]

If you think ten million downloads equals ten million people, and you think that everyone who downloads Firefox starts using it, you are rather naive. Download number are largely irrelevant, especially when the Firefox download numbers were artificially inflated by a sense of "competition". Everyone was downloading Firefox like mad to reach a certain number.

So trying to use this marketing trick as a "milestone" or measure of actual usage is silly.

If you think ten million downloads equals ten million people, and you think that everyone who downloads Firefox starts using it, you are rather naive. Download number are largely irrelevant, especially when the Firefox download numbers were artificially inflated by a sense of "competition". Everyone was downloading Firefox like mad to reach a certain number.

So trying to use this marketing trick as a "milestone" or measure of actual usage is silly.

585272410[/snapback]

Is firefox team a fool by downloading the program themselves? Anyway people who have laptop and PC must have downloaded twice.

No one was mad to download when it was realeased.... , and the numbers were not

artificially inflated as well. By now even more people would have downloaded.

If a person is satisfied with the product only he will want to download and use the same, not otherwise or for creating records. :angry:

Is firefox team a fool by downloading the program  themselves? Anyway people who have laptop and PC must have downloaded twice.

I know several people who have downloaded Firefox several times in several different locations. If you read Slashdot, there are loads of comment saying the same thing. Do the math.

If a person is satisfied with the product only he will want to download and use the same, not otherwise or for creating records. :angry:

Huh?

The point is, the 10 million downloads thing was a hype, and people were trying to get as many downloads as possible to reach that goal. It says nothing about the number of people who actually downloaded it, or how many actually stuck with Firefox.

Is firefox team a fool by downloading the program  themselves? Anyway people who have laptop and PC must have downloaded twice.

No one was mad to download when it was realeased.... , and the numbers were not

artificially inflated as well. By now even more people would have downloaded.

If a person is satisfied with the product only he will want to download and use the same, not otherwise or for creating records. :angry:

585272482[/snapback]

I've downloaded Firefox 1.0 15 times since it was released. 3 were for other people, only 1 of which uses it, because I forced them to. I don't even use it as my main browser.

Is firefox team a fool by downloading the program themselves?

Almost all programmers use their own software, otherwise it wouldn't be worth the effort to program it. So, what was your point?

Anyway people who have laptop and PC must have downloaded twice.

Not necessarily. It only takes 1 download to install a program on 100+ computers, so it could definately be done for just two computers, assuming that they are on the same network (which is probably true considering that most laptops use wireless connections.) Not to mention that people have things like Jump Drives on them at all times (I have mine on my key ring.) You must also take into account that some people might've downloaded the program several times just for the sake of updating (the copy they're running and/or update their stored installers in case they need to reinstall later. I always download fresh copies of the software I use so that I have the updated installers for those "encase **** happens" scenarios.)

No one was mad to download when it was realeased.... , and the numbers were not

artificially inflated as well. By now even more people would have downloaded.

Technically, the numbers were artificially inflated. There were large crowds of firefox fanboys going around spamming download sites and giving fake reviews and comments which of course influenced people to download the software moreso than honest reviews would've (I'm not saying that it would've gotten bad reviews, but it would've likely came out to 4/5 on most comments rather than 5/5 which greatly influences someone's choice on downloading the software.) If they didn't flood download sites with fake reviews and comments then they probably wouldn't have had nearly as many downloads. Therefore, the download number was artificially inflated (the firefox fanboys basically lied to potential users just so they'd download it.)

I think Slipstream will be a flop. Won't be big until quite some time.

Why do you think so?

I've downloaded Firefox 1.0 15 times since it was released. 3 were for other people, only 1 of which uses it, because I forced them to. I don't even use it as my main browser.

I've downloaded it about 10 times since 0.6, and I also don't use it as my main browser (I use it for testing websites mostly.)

dont know why you argue vcv .. you know its no good :p fanbois are fanbois ... i used to be an avid fx user, but since Opera 7.54 I switched and am a lot happier ....

585268707[/snapback]

It's funny how rabit IE/Opera fans diss rabit Firefox fans for being fanboys... while failing to realise that they are nothing more than fanboys of a different product themselves.

I've used both Opera and Firefox for some time, started using Opera just before it hit 7.0 and Firefox when it was around .6. I used them both until Firefox got around .9, at that point I realised that I barely used Opera anymore. Couple weeks ago after I reformated I didn't even bother installing Opera anymore, eventhough I paid for it years back. Firefox just does everything better for me.

It's funny how rabit IE/Opera fans diss rabit Firefox fans for being fanboys... while failing to realise that they are nothing more than fanboys of a different product themselves.

I've used both Opera and Firefox for some time, started using Opera just before it hit 7.0 and Firefox when it was around .6. I used them both until Firefox got around .9, at that point I realised that I barely used Opera anymore. Couple weeks ago after I reformated I didn't even bother installing Opera anymore, eventhough I paid for it years back. Firefox just does everything better for me.

585275414[/snapback]

Years back? How many years? Your license wouldnt cover Opera 7 if it was a while ago :unsure:

It's funny how rabit IE/Opera fans diss rabit Firefox fans for being fanboys... while failing to realise that they are nothing more than fanboys of a different product themselves.

I've used both Opera and Firefox for some time, started using Opera just before it hit 7.0 and Firefox when it was around .6. I used them both until Firefox got around .9, at that point I realised that I barely used Opera anymore. Couple weeks ago after I reformated I didn't even bother installing Opera anymore, eventhough I paid for it years back. Firefox just does everything better for me.

585275414[/snapback]

There is a reason why Firefox Fanboys are considered the worst. They tend to be misinformed about Opera. A lot like it beacuse it's open-source.. even though that has no bearing on them.

I'm not saying all Firefox users are like that, or that none of Opera users are. But the ratio for Firefox is greater.

I'll admit that I'm a fanboy for Opera, but I'm not rabid.

I'd normally leave people to decide what browser they want to use, but I insist that if they're going to diss Opera/IE/The Rest Of The World that they diss it for the right reasons.

"Firefox!!111 is more secure and its fastre theanh Internet esxplorer and Opera licks docnkey tsticles!!!!!11111111usefirefox!" - is not a valid, nor grammatically correct reason.

"I like Firefox" - Good reason (Y). It's a personal preference.

It's funny how rabit IE/Opera fans diss rabit Firefox fans for being fanboys... while failing to realise that they are nothing more than fanboys of a different product themselves.

firefox fanboys and pushers are rightfully becoming more and more hated across the web. it is not that they love firefox. it's they way they are completely ignorant about other browsers, and just spew out what they've been brainwashed into thinking about these other browsers, without even trying it out themselves.

at least the opera fanboys have usually tried firefox before forming an opinion. you see, you have to pay for opera, but people prefer something if it's free. so they hear about the free firefox and obviously try it out.

on the other hand, firefox fanbois often don't bother to try out opera, so they just spew out the tired old lies they've heard from someone else who didn't try opera either, but who heard it from someone else who didn't try opera either, who... etc.

firefox fanboys are completely different from opera fanboys. while opera fanboys, rabid as they may be, are usually well informed, especially about the over-hyped firefox, firefox fanboys are usually completely ignorant about other browsers, but that has never stopped them from spreading fud about them...

killthefox4zr.gif

Firefox is downloaded 200 000 - 300 000 times every day, you can't be seriously saying that it's the same 20 000-30 000 people downloading it over and over again. Firefox is immensively more popular than Opera, denial won't change it.

From reading Firefox vs. Opera threads on various boards (this, mozillazine, opera forums) I fail to see any difference between the fans. Firefox and Opera both have their 'bad apples' and since Firefox is more popular, it's statistically bound to have more this kind of fans. It's the human nature, not the browser.

Edit: d_ralphie: Never have I seen so much FUD and bull**** concentrated in one post, congrats.

Firefox is downloaded 200 000 - 300 000 times every day, you can't be seriously saying that it's the same 20 000-30 000 people downloading it over and over again. Firefox is immensively more popular than Opera, denial won't change it.

a billion flies can't be wrong. eat ****!

and by the way, do you even know opera's download numbers?

From reading Firefox vs. Opera threads on various boards (this, mozillazine, opera forums) I fail to see any difference between the fans. Firefox and Opera both have their 'bad apples' and since Firefox is more popular, it's statistically bound to have more this kind of fans. It's the human nature, not the browser.

opera fanboys are infinitely more informed than the disgusting firefox fanboys.

Edit: d_ralphie: Never have I seen so much FUD and bull**** concentrated in one post, congrats.

585276110[/snapback]

oh please. i see more and more people not using firefox just because of the rabid fanboys that pollute the web. you won't see that with any other browser.

I like Firefox. I use Firefox. And I will keep using it. My Firefox is custom. I made it the way I want. The open source community has always been good to me, but you need the knowledge to fully "exploit" it to it's best. Internet Explorer is nothing close to a bad browser, it's just more "user friendly" out of the box.

Firefox is downloaded 200 000 - 300 000 times every day, you can't be seriously saying that it's the same 20 000-30 000 people downloading it over and over again. Firefox is immensively more popular than Opera, denial won't change it.

From reading Firefox vs. Opera threads on various boards (this, mozillazine, opera forums) I fail to see any difference between the fans. Firefox and Opera both have their 'bad apples' and since Firefox is more popular, it's statistically bound to have more this kind of fans. It's the human nature, not the browser.

Edit: d_ralphie: Never have I seen so much FUD and bull**** concentrated in one post, congrats.

585276110[/snapback]

Oh, well in that case I'll change back to IE since it's more popular than Firefox or Opera :rolleyes:

Lol, I've used Firefox for forever, but saying it's downloaded more is no reason to get it. Porn's downloaded more than either, why don't we "surf" with it. :rofl:

I've just now tried out Opera, and to tell you the truth, I use both just about the same amount. In fact, both are great, but all of you have your minds set on one view and won't look at the greatness of both.

Have we become so entangled in this world as to forget what they were both made for? To get away from IE (If it's really all that bad). If I was an IE user and I read this I wouldn't switch to either because of the way you two are acting.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • You still can, its just under the Transform flyout for WordArt now
    • Likely nothing will be done in corporate America, there have been countless Tesla self-driving incidents. Then again, there have also been countless human operated incidents. It's literally daily news here in Canada, to the extent that it's now odd if we get a day where a collision doesn't get announced on the radio throughout the day...
    • SKG Hand Massager with Heat OS500 hands on by Steven Parker I was offered the chance to test out the SKG Hand Massager with Heat OS500, and full disclosure, they let me keep it regardless of my findings. Anyway, I jumped at the chance due to my long hours sitting at my desk, mousing around. Apologies for the knife cut across the top of the box; that was my doing, being a bit too heavy-handed with opening up the outer packaging. First up, what's in the box: SKG Hand Massager with Heat OS500 1x Type-C charging cable User Manual 1-Year Warranty (card) In short, everything you need to get started. According to the official Amazon listing, here are the key features: Full-Hand Air Compression: OS500 wraps your fingers, palm, and wrist with multi-chamber air compression for a complete hand relaxation experience. The extended massage chamber helps cover more of the hand and wrist area than standard palm-only hand massagers Palm Kneading with 6 Modes & 6 Intensities: Built-in palm kneading rollers add a hands-on massage feel, while 6 preset modes and 6 pressure levels let you choose the comfort level that fits your day—from gentle relaxation to a firmer full-hand massage 3 Heat Levels with Cooling Fan: Choose from 104°F, 113°F or 122°F warmth to suit different seasons and comfort preferences. The built-in cooling fan helps reduce stuffiness during heated sessions, keeping your hand feeling fresh and comfortable Easy Visual Display & Smart Timer: The digital image display clearly shows massage area, mode, intensity, heat level, and remaining time at a glance. Select 10, 15, or 20-minute sessions for quick office breaks, evening relaxation, or everyday hand care Rechargeable, Cordless & Comfortable: A 3000mAh battery supports over 90 minutes of full-function use on a full charge, with convenient USB-C charging. The soft inner lining, smooth ABS/PU finish, and premium black-gold design make OS500 ideal for home, office, or gifting With all that out of the way, here are my own findings. I gave it a try on both left and right hands, and as you can maybe see from the above YouTube Short, (sorry for the shaky video), my whole hand fits in, but my wrist barely enters the Hand Massager. I was able to push through a bit more with my fingertips extending out the other end to get a bit of massaging on the start of my wrist. Usage For some reason, there is a strap that is very difficult to fasten to my wrist with one hand. I am not sure what function it has, and it isn't mentioned in the user manual. The only thing I could find was in the product images that claimed "wrist precision". Unlike the Bob and Brad Hand Massager, this device does not massage the wrist anyway, even though a "wrist mode" is mentioned, which must be for smaller hands than I have, as it is mainly intended for the hand and fingers. In addition, for its steeper price, there are no disposable gloves provided in the box, which is a bit of an issue considering the internal cover (which appears to be elasticated nylon) cannot be removed for washing; so you are left with only one choice: always thoroughly wash your hands before using it. I can imagine this thing getting a bit grimy after a period of use, and that is a bit of a shame. With that said, the buttons on the device, from left to right, do the following: Heat button: 3-level heat control at 104°F, 113°F, or 122°F Mode button: Auto mode Circular mode Soothing mode Relax mode Palm and fingers mode Palm and wrist mode Intensity button: from (First-time users) 15Ka, 25Ka, 35Ka, 45Ka, 55Ka, 60Ka (Intensive relief) Knead button: on or off (6 pressure levels) Power button: Long-press to turn on or off Cooling button: turn on or off the cooling fan Also, in the product imagery, it states there are 36 "custom modes," but nowhere is it listed what these modes are. I can only imagine that they mean a combination of all of the above settings in different intensity levels. The device itself seems to rely on a single "kneading" mechanism located at the palm area of the hand, which spins when in use, and the other massage features are mainly utilized through the air sacs, increasing and decreasing at various levels on the hand and fingers. I am not sure it offered too much relief for someone who is typing and operating a mouse for hours at a time; further testing may be required. It does feel nice, though. Finally, you may be wondering how this fits into the scope of a tech website? Well, let me tell you something: sometimes I sit for up to 15 hours working on Neowin, and although I take breaks in between, it takes a toll on my body. I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief, a good massager like this Hand Massager can shed the strains of the day in just a couple of 15-minute bursts. On the official website, this has an MSRP of $99.99, but luckily for our readers, it is selling at $10 off for just $89.99 right now on Amazon. SKG Hand Massager with Heat OS500 for $89.99 (with $10 off coupon), $99.99 MSRP For me, this gets a thumbs hands(?) down. However, it could be improved by making it so that the protective covering could be removed and thrown into the washing machine, or get yourself some disposable gloves to use with it. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Thanks for the info, but I'm still not sure if I need this....
    • We check out the SKG PS700 Neck Massager by Steven Parker I was offered the chance to test out the SKG PS700 Neck Massager, and full disclosure, they let me keep it regardless of my findings. Anyway, I jumped at the chance due to my long hours sitting at my desk; I figured it could offer some neck pain relief. What's in the box: SKG PS700-2 Neck Massager Rechargeable Battery (inside massager) Type-C USB cable User Manual Quick Start guide 1-Year Warranty In short, everything you need to get started. According to the official listing, here are the key features: Biomimetic Kneading & High Torque Motor: Designed with innovative biomimetic kneading heads that perfectly simulate the touch of human hands. Powered by a high-torque motor, this massager delivers powerful and precise deep tissue relief to effectively target stiff neck muscles and release built-up tension Soothing Heat & Integrated Sound Relaxation: Experience the ultimate Relaxationation with our dual-action approach. The soothing heat function gently warms your neck, while the built-in sound Relaxation provides calming audio tracks, helping you achieve a state of mindfulness and mental tranquility during your physical massage Cordless Convenience & Travel-Ready & Father's Day Gifts: Crafted for maximum portability and ease of use. Its lightweight, cordless design allows you to enjoy a premium massage anywhere without the hassle of tangled wires-whether you're taking a quick break at your desk or winding down at home Versatile Relief for Home & Office: An essential wellness companion for office workers, gamers, frequent travelers, or anyone looking to integrate mindfulness into their daily routine. It seamlessly fits into your lifestyle, providing instant neck relief whenever and wherever you need it Safe & Premium Materials: Manufactured with high-quality, skin-friendly materials to ensure a safe and comfortable experience without irritation. SKG backs this device with dedicated customer service, making it a thoughtful tech-health gift for family and friends App & Bluetooth Music Control: Connect via Bluetooth to control your massage settings through the dedicated app and enjoy your favorite music during your massage session for a fully customizable and immersive relaxation experience Red Light Warmth Technology: Features advanced red light warmth technology that penetrates deep into neck muscles to enhance blood circulation and provide soothing comfort while relieving muscle tension and stiffness Design With all that out of the way, here are my own findings. SKG does not say what materials are used to make the neck massager. However, on the product website, it mentions "soft-touch silicone" with what looks like PU leather cushioning, with the rest being mostly made up of plastics. On the inside of the massager, there are two "biomimetic kneading heads" that are motorized for the different styles of massage, which are not actually listed at all in the paper user manual, but the standard included modes are: De-stress mode, Mediation mode, Relax mode, Shiatsu mode. The massager looks quite premium and is actually very comfortable to wear. This massager is small and light enough to go anywhere, as it doesn't get in the way of anything, so I was able to use it in the chair while writing this review. Unlike the back massager, SKG does not warn in the user guide not to use it for more than 30 minutes a day (or two 15-minute sessions). However, there is a long laundry list of important safeguards to consider before and during the use of the device, and it is warned that the neck massager is not waterproof. It also includes a 1,400mAh battery with a rated power of 14W and input of 5V, which is the standard for up to USB 3.0 power (although the Amperage is not mentioned at all). SKG does not say how long it takes to charge, but a quick calculation at 2A (if that is what it is) would mean it would take roughly 1.5 hrs to charge from empty. In any case, the light around the button changes from orange to green on a full charge. In addition, it is not possible to use the device while it is charging. On the right of the neck massager is the On/Off and modes button, which also acts as a joystick. You can operate all the modes directly from the power button, as well as the app, which I'll get into a bit later: Push up: Short press to adjust Heat levels On/Off button: long press Mode Switching: Short press (while in operation) ➕ Push left: increase Music volume ➖ push right: decrease Music volume Push down: Short-press to turn Music on or off The massager defaults to De-stress mode, and it is not stated anywhere if the neck massager has overheat protection. This time around, regarding heat, the only detail I could find is that it has "triple action soothing heat." The temperature stages are not listed anywhere in the paper manual, Amazon listing, or official website. The heat levels can be adjusted through the app or directly on the device using the joystick button. Usage There's also the SKG Health app, which makes using the massager far easier than feeling around for the button on the side of your neck. If the app is stopped, you are required to log in with a verification code over email, which I am not too pleased with, as this means it will only work that way for however long SKG decides to support it through said app. However, I was not able to get the app to connect to the OS500, which I have reported back to my contact. Bluetooth appeared to be working on the neck massager as it became available to pair with my phone, but the SKG app failed to discover it. Before I forget, there's also a switch next to the USB charging port to deactivate and activate the Voice Prompt, which, when enabled, audibly tells the user when switching intensities, modes, or connecting to the app and informs when the massages start and are completed. That said, on to my likes and dislikes, which are listed below. What I didn't like Unable to connect the Neck Massager to the app Use through the mobile app relies on continued support from SKG What I liked Can be used without the app Cordless use Light and comfortable to wear Heat is also quite comfortable Where to buy: According to the official website, this has an MSRP of $249.99, but is currently $50 (on Amazon). To sweeten the deal a bit more, there's also an in-page coupon that knocks a further $20 off the price. SKG PS700-2 Neck Massager for $179.99 on Amazon (was $199.99) Apply the in-page $20 off coupon for the final price of $179.99 Just like the back massager, this gets a confused thumbs up (due to the cost). However, I cannot rate it through app usage as it failed to connect. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      505
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      85
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!