578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

10 million downloads of firefox in a very short period of time.

Can opera boast of such milestones?

585268395[/snapback]

No, not at the same time. But Opera have been downloaded by many million users througout the time. I remember vagaly something about 20 million downloads or something. But I'm not sure.. Long time ago, mabye 2-3 years ago. And that was from a few sites only.

Have? these 10 mn ppl made the right choice?

585268395[/snapback]

Many did, many didn't. Do you think everyone who download use what they download? Many just tries it and throw it away.

EDIT:

I did some checking through Opera's pressreleases and found this:

Since it's launch on 28th of January and August, Opera 7.00 was downloaded over 10 millions times only from Opera.com.

Already in August, Opera 7 passed a new milestone with over 10 million copies downloaded just from www.opera.com.

After that I haven't found any figures...

Edited by [X]-bYtE
Well then download any of the recent trunk builds of Firefox and you'll notice a huge speed increase over 1.0

585268387[/snapback]

But the nightlies are barely even usable. I've tried 10 different nightlies over the past month, and each one had MAJOR usabilities issues. Crashes, pages rendering odd, and other misc bugs. The opera beta does NOT have these types of major issues. It has minor bugs, but nothing that really affects usabilities.
One more thing to ponder upon....

10 million downloads of firefox in a very short period of time.

Can opera boast of such milestones?

Have  these 10 mn ppl made the right choice?

585268395[/snapback]

Popularity has NEVER been a measure of quality, nor should it ever be.

Ah, but those were Firefox's development stages. It's first steps. Opera had been out for a quite a while and was 6-7 versions in. Anyway, I'm not going to compare Firefox 1.1 PR to Opera 7.54, or tell you to use version 1.1. I also didn't push that hard into getting people to use Firefox's pre-1.0 releases. I knew they were beta, and I knew lots of people didn't like betas.

Opera 7 was a complete rewrite of practically everything in the browser. The interface backend was rewritten (if I recall correctly,) the rendering engine was rewritten from scratch, they've recently changed the plugin engine (switch from the legacy nn4 plugin architecture to the new cross-browser architecture that was being made by Opera/Mozilla/Sun/Macromedia/whoever,) the javascript engine was rewritten from scratch because javascript performance and compliance used to suck [majorly], etc. If Opera 7 had recieved a new name then it would've been treated like a new product (which it basically is.) It's not really 6-7 versions in, it was totally recreated but branded with the same name.

First steps? Well, mozilla didnt really have to do much to the Mozilla code to turn it into firefox, remove mail/chat, tweak it around a little, the engines the same.

Yeah, it's not much different, which is why Mozilla can take the newest Mozilla code and transplant it into Firefox. It's basically the same browser, just a different setup.

Isnt that just like the aol thing? My friend uses it, makes images look pretty ****ty :\

I've heard that the end user will have the option of setting how much images and stuff should be compressed. I cannot state this as fact as I haven't had personal experience with SlipStream, that's just what I've heard. If it's true then you'll be able to perform less compression in exchange for higher quality images. SlipStream also compresses HTML/CSS/JS/XML/etc., does the "AOL thing" do that too? Just curious.

Uh.. Opera has gone through a few rewrites with both the rendering engine and the core UI. When you do that, it's almost like starting from scratch. Performance issues have to be readdressed. So don't try to feed me that BS. And the Gecko rendering engine has been around for a LONG time anyways.

Performance issues do have to be readdressed, and there's almost always a performance issue fixed with each release, sometimes they aren't even issues but are made faster anyways (like the email database searching which can now search about 10x as many emails as before with the same amount of time.) I would also have to agree with you about Gecko, it has been around much longer than Presto (Opera 7/8's rendering engine.)

When Opera has the beta on their front-page for download and many many people recommending it.. I think it's pretty safe to use and compare.

I do too.

Well then download any of the recent trunk builds of Firefox and you'll notice a huge speed increase over 1.0

I'm using a recent nightly from Firefox (I compiled it myself for my own processor) and there are some speed improvements, I'll grant you that much. However, my earlier speed comparison was done between my custom-compiled and tweaked Firefox to a stock Opera installation, so Firefox still hasn't taken the lead and with Opera 8.0 coming they will likely eat dust.

One more thing to ponder upon....

10 million downloads of firefox in a very short period of time.

Can opera boast of such milestones?

Have these 10 mn ppl made the right choice?

Opera can brag about such milestones, but it's all irrelevant. The amount of downloads has nothing to do with the quality of the software, it's all about marketing (and you can't say that Firefox hasn't been marketed excessively.) How many downloads there were makes no difference as to what the right choice is (do a google search for "argumentum ad populum" which is a logical fallacy.) If the end user is happy then they couldn't have possibly made the wrong choice (though I do wish the right choice was wrong sometimes, IE is a pain in the butt for web designers/developers.) If they choose to use IE over Firefox or Opera then they haven't necessarily made the wrong choice.

Ah, but those were Firefox's development stages. It's first steps. Opera had been out for a quite a while and was 6-7 versions in. Anyway, I'm not going to compare Firefox 1.1 PR to Opera 7.54, or tell you to use version 1.1. I also didn't push that hard into getting people to use Firefox's pre-1.0 releases. I knew they were beta, and I knew lots of people didn't like betas.

585266736[/snapback]

Opera 7 was a rewrite, so Opera 8 is really Opera 2.

Or Mozilla is Netscape 5, while Firefox is Netscape 6.

Or, to make the comparison better:

Mozilla is v1, as it was a complete rewrite. Opera 7 was also v1.

Now, Firefox is not a complete rewrite, but uses the existing Mozilla base, so it is v2. Opera 8, similarly, is not a complete rewrite, but it uses the base from v1 (Opera 7), so it is v2 as well.

So strictly speaking, Mozilla v2 is out now, and has been out since November. Opera v2 is still being beta tested.

One more thing to ponder upon....

10 million downloads of firefox in a very short period of time.

Can opera boast of such milestones?

Have  these 10 mn ppl made the right choice?

585268395[/snapback]

If you think ten million downloads equals ten million people, and you think that everyone who downloads Firefox starts using it, you are rather naive. Download number are largely irrelevant, especially when the Firefox download numbers were artificially inflated by a sense of "competition". Everyone was downloading Firefox like mad to reach a certain number.

So trying to use this marketing trick as a "milestone" or measure of actual usage is silly.

If you think ten million downloads equals ten million people, and you think that everyone who downloads Firefox starts using it, you are rather naive. Download number are largely irrelevant, especially when the Firefox download numbers were artificially inflated by a sense of "competition". Everyone was downloading Firefox like mad to reach a certain number.

So trying to use this marketing trick as a "milestone" or measure of actual usage is silly.

585272410[/snapback]

Is firefox team a fool by downloading the program themselves? Anyway people who have laptop and PC must have downloaded twice.

No one was mad to download when it was realeased.... , and the numbers were not

artificially inflated as well. By now even more people would have downloaded.

If a person is satisfied with the product only he will want to download and use the same, not otherwise or for creating records. :angry:

Is firefox team a fool by downloading the program  themselves? Anyway people who have laptop and PC must have downloaded twice.

I know several people who have downloaded Firefox several times in several different locations. If you read Slashdot, there are loads of comment saying the same thing. Do the math.

If a person is satisfied with the product only he will want to download and use the same, not otherwise or for creating records. :angry:

Huh?

The point is, the 10 million downloads thing was a hype, and people were trying to get as many downloads as possible to reach that goal. It says nothing about the number of people who actually downloaded it, or how many actually stuck with Firefox.

Is firefox team a fool by downloading the program  themselves? Anyway people who have laptop and PC must have downloaded twice.

No one was mad to download when it was realeased.... , and the numbers were not

artificially inflated as well. By now even more people would have downloaded.

If a person is satisfied with the product only he will want to download and use the same, not otherwise or for creating records. :angry:

585272482[/snapback]

I've downloaded Firefox 1.0 15 times since it was released. 3 were for other people, only 1 of which uses it, because I forced them to. I don't even use it as my main browser.

Is firefox team a fool by downloading the program themselves?

Almost all programmers use their own software, otherwise it wouldn't be worth the effort to program it. So, what was your point?

Anyway people who have laptop and PC must have downloaded twice.

Not necessarily. It only takes 1 download to install a program on 100+ computers, so it could definately be done for just two computers, assuming that they are on the same network (which is probably true considering that most laptops use wireless connections.) Not to mention that people have things like Jump Drives on them at all times (I have mine on my key ring.) You must also take into account that some people might've downloaded the program several times just for the sake of updating (the copy they're running and/or update their stored installers in case they need to reinstall later. I always download fresh copies of the software I use so that I have the updated installers for those "encase **** happens" scenarios.)

No one was mad to download when it was realeased.... , and the numbers were not

artificially inflated as well. By now even more people would have downloaded.

Technically, the numbers were artificially inflated. There were large crowds of firefox fanboys going around spamming download sites and giving fake reviews and comments which of course influenced people to download the software moreso than honest reviews would've (I'm not saying that it would've gotten bad reviews, but it would've likely came out to 4/5 on most comments rather than 5/5 which greatly influences someone's choice on downloading the software.) If they didn't flood download sites with fake reviews and comments then they probably wouldn't have had nearly as many downloads. Therefore, the download number was artificially inflated (the firefox fanboys basically lied to potential users just so they'd download it.)

I think Slipstream will be a flop. Won't be big until quite some time.

Why do you think so?

I've downloaded Firefox 1.0 15 times since it was released. 3 were for other people, only 1 of which uses it, because I forced them to. I don't even use it as my main browser.

I've downloaded it about 10 times since 0.6, and I also don't use it as my main browser (I use it for testing websites mostly.)

dont know why you argue vcv .. you know its no good :p fanbois are fanbois ... i used to be an avid fx user, but since Opera 7.54 I switched and am a lot happier ....

585268707[/snapback]

It's funny how rabit IE/Opera fans diss rabit Firefox fans for being fanboys... while failing to realise that they are nothing more than fanboys of a different product themselves.

I've used both Opera and Firefox for some time, started using Opera just before it hit 7.0 and Firefox when it was around .6. I used them both until Firefox got around .9, at that point I realised that I barely used Opera anymore. Couple weeks ago after I reformated I didn't even bother installing Opera anymore, eventhough I paid for it years back. Firefox just does everything better for me.

It's funny how rabit IE/Opera fans diss rabit Firefox fans for being fanboys... while failing to realise that they are nothing more than fanboys of a different product themselves.

I've used both Opera and Firefox for some time, started using Opera just before it hit 7.0 and Firefox when it was around .6. I used them both until Firefox got around .9, at that point I realised that I barely used Opera anymore. Couple weeks ago after I reformated I didn't even bother installing Opera anymore, eventhough I paid for it years back. Firefox just does everything better for me.

585275414[/snapback]

Years back? How many years? Your license wouldnt cover Opera 7 if it was a while ago :unsure:

It's funny how rabit IE/Opera fans diss rabit Firefox fans for being fanboys... while failing to realise that they are nothing more than fanboys of a different product themselves.

I've used both Opera and Firefox for some time, started using Opera just before it hit 7.0 and Firefox when it was around .6. I used them both until Firefox got around .9, at that point I realised that I barely used Opera anymore. Couple weeks ago after I reformated I didn't even bother installing Opera anymore, eventhough I paid for it years back. Firefox just does everything better for me.

585275414[/snapback]

There is a reason why Firefox Fanboys are considered the worst. They tend to be misinformed about Opera. A lot like it beacuse it's open-source.. even though that has no bearing on them.

I'm not saying all Firefox users are like that, or that none of Opera users are. But the ratio for Firefox is greater.

I'll admit that I'm a fanboy for Opera, but I'm not rabid.

I'd normally leave people to decide what browser they want to use, but I insist that if they're going to diss Opera/IE/The Rest Of The World that they diss it for the right reasons.

"Firefox!!111 is more secure and its fastre theanh Internet esxplorer and Opera licks docnkey tsticles!!!!!11111111usefirefox!" - is not a valid, nor grammatically correct reason.

"I like Firefox" - Good reason (Y). It's a personal preference.

It's funny how rabit IE/Opera fans diss rabit Firefox fans for being fanboys... while failing to realise that they are nothing more than fanboys of a different product themselves.

firefox fanboys and pushers are rightfully becoming more and more hated across the web. it is not that they love firefox. it's they way they are completely ignorant about other browsers, and just spew out what they've been brainwashed into thinking about these other browsers, without even trying it out themselves.

at least the opera fanboys have usually tried firefox before forming an opinion. you see, you have to pay for opera, but people prefer something if it's free. so they hear about the free firefox and obviously try it out.

on the other hand, firefox fanbois often don't bother to try out opera, so they just spew out the tired old lies they've heard from someone else who didn't try opera either, but who heard it from someone else who didn't try opera either, who... etc.

firefox fanboys are completely different from opera fanboys. while opera fanboys, rabid as they may be, are usually well informed, especially about the over-hyped firefox, firefox fanboys are usually completely ignorant about other browsers, but that has never stopped them from spreading fud about them...

killthefox4zr.gif

Firefox is downloaded 200 000 - 300 000 times every day, you can't be seriously saying that it's the same 20 000-30 000 people downloading it over and over again. Firefox is immensively more popular than Opera, denial won't change it.

From reading Firefox vs. Opera threads on various boards (this, mozillazine, opera forums) I fail to see any difference between the fans. Firefox and Opera both have their 'bad apples' and since Firefox is more popular, it's statistically bound to have more this kind of fans. It's the human nature, not the browser.

Edit: d_ralphie: Never have I seen so much FUD and bull**** concentrated in one post, congrats.

Firefox is downloaded 200 000 - 300 000 times every day, you can't be seriously saying that it's the same 20 000-30 000 people downloading it over and over again. Firefox is immensively more popular than Opera, denial won't change it.

a billion flies can't be wrong. eat ****!

and by the way, do you even know opera's download numbers?

From reading Firefox vs. Opera threads on various boards (this, mozillazine, opera forums) I fail to see any difference between the fans. Firefox and Opera both have their 'bad apples' and since Firefox is more popular, it's statistically bound to have more this kind of fans. It's the human nature, not the browser.

opera fanboys are infinitely more informed than the disgusting firefox fanboys.

Edit: d_ralphie: Never have I seen so much FUD and bull**** concentrated in one post, congrats.

585276110[/snapback]

oh please. i see more and more people not using firefox just because of the rabid fanboys that pollute the web. you won't see that with any other browser.

I like Firefox. I use Firefox. And I will keep using it. My Firefox is custom. I made it the way I want. The open source community has always been good to me, but you need the knowledge to fully "exploit" it to it's best. Internet Explorer is nothing close to a bad browser, it's just more "user friendly" out of the box.

Firefox is downloaded 200 000 - 300 000 times every day, you can't be seriously saying that it's the same 20 000-30 000 people downloading it over and over again. Firefox is immensively more popular than Opera, denial won't change it.

From reading Firefox vs. Opera threads on various boards (this, mozillazine, opera forums) I fail to see any difference between the fans. Firefox and Opera both have their 'bad apples' and since Firefox is more popular, it's statistically bound to have more this kind of fans. It's the human nature, not the browser.

Edit: d_ralphie: Never have I seen so much FUD and bull**** concentrated in one post, congrats.

585276110[/snapback]

Oh, well in that case I'll change back to IE since it's more popular than Firefox or Opera :rolleyes:

Lol, I've used Firefox for forever, but saying it's downloaded more is no reason to get it. Porn's downloaded more than either, why don't we "surf" with it. :rofl:

I've just now tried out Opera, and to tell you the truth, I use both just about the same amount. In fact, both are great, but all of you have your minds set on one view and won't look at the greatness of both.

Have we become so entangled in this world as to forget what they were both made for? To get away from IE (If it's really all that bad). If I was an IE user and I read this I wouldn't switch to either because of the way you two are acting.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!