578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

NeoTech: Where exactly did I say that I was listing reasons for getting Firefox? It was a response to Chode's post where he claimed that in truth less than 1.7 million people have downloaded Firefox.

d_ralphie: The only independent browser stats provider I know is w3schools, if there's some other that shows considerably higher amount of Opera users I'll gladly pull back my estimates about Firefox/Opera user ratios.

NeoTech: Where exactly did I say that I was listing reasons for getting Firefox? It was a response to Chode's post where he claimed that in truth less than 1.7 million people have downloaded Firefox.

585276222[/snapback]

My post was maths for a post higher up in the thread. READ.

Btw, 200,000 to 300,000 downloads daily? I think not.

They'd have their million mark in only 4 days at that rate. I don't know where you get your figures from but they are either a) Made Up or b) Ridiculously inflated.

elendil doesn't even read what we're actually writing.

585276302[/snapback]

Uh, yeah I do.

Chode: The 200k+ figure was from Asa Dotzler's weblog. He's a Moz.org staff member.

http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/asa/

I don't see anything in this thread that would make your post more accurate..

Uh, yeah I do.

Chode: The 200k+ figure was from Asa Dotzler's weblog. He's a Moz.org staff member.

http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/asa/

I don't see anything in this thread that would make your post more accurate..

585276345[/snapback]

what, pray tell, does this have to do with anything i've written?

i rest my case.

Opera betas are not like firefox nightlies at all.  They tend to be very stable.  Especially this beta, I have had very few crashes with it, and it is much faster on all accounts.  There is nothing in this beta that makes it not usable, unlike the firefox nightlies.

585261868[/snapback]

Only crashed a few times? Too bad...

I used the unstable firefox nightlies for about 6 months prior to 1.0 and I cannot ever remember one of them being unstable. Maybe once or twice, out of 150.

common sense says that he's just jacking Firefox.

585276350[/snapback]

:wacko: :no: :cry:

Ok, I see this is pointless.

As for NeoTech who wanted reasons to get Firefox: Listing reasons to use either one is pretty useless, both are free to download (+ relatively small) and both are very good browsers. Just download them and use whatever feels better.

what, pray tell, does this have to do with anything i've written?

i rest my case.

585276361[/snapback]

I was going to leave this thread be but now I have to ask you the same question.. Did you even read what I said? The whole post started with 'Chode:', why on earth would you think that I was replying to anything you have said?

Only crashed a few times? Too bad...

I used the unstable firefox nightlies for about 6 months prior to 1.0 and I cannot ever remember one of them being unstable. Maybe once or twice, out of 150.

585276389[/snapback]

Hmm.. I tried Firefox 1.0 for a day, and it crashed like every 30min... Atleast 10-15 times during the time I tested it. Opera 8.00 beta 1 which I use now have crashed 1 time since early December.

edit: sorry wrong quote... fixed now.

Exactly. :sleep: If I were you ralphie I would be less concerned with firefox and more concerned with fixing my broken computer.

585276425[/snapback]

my computer works perfectly. firefox is the only program which crashes regularly. and it crashes a lot. this is true for several computers, by the way. I have to do testing on both mac, linux and windows (9x/nt/2k/xp).

I was going to leave this thread be but now I have to ask you the same question.. Did you even read what I said? The whole post started with 'Chode:', why on earth would you think that I was replying to anything you have said?

585276444[/snapback]

uh, because you QUOTED me?

firefox fanboys and pushers are rightfully becoming more and more hated across the web. it is not that they love firefox. it's they way they are completely ignorant about other browsers, and just spew out what they've been brainwashed into thinking about these other browsers, without even trying it out themselves.

Or they compare their current browser with another that they used nearly a year ago and claim that it's still a valid reason to not try the product. One of my favorites is "I've tried Opera 7.11 and didn't like it so I won't bother trying Opera 8.0" (to paraphrase.) I cannot even count how many times I've heard something along those lines, and it's pathetic everytime I hear it.

Another of my favorite claims is "you can't compare apples to oranges" even though they usually do it themselves and the company which makes Firefox does it, but that's slightly off-topic.

at least the opera fanboys have usually tried firefox before forming an opinion. you see, you have to pay for opera, but people prefer something if it's free. so they hear about the free firefox and obviously try it out.

on the other hand, firefox fanbois often don't bother to try out opera, so they just spew out the tired old lies they've heard from someone else who didn't try opera either, but who heard it from someone else who didn't try opera either, who... etc.

Agreed. If people are willing to pay for a product when they could find another that is "just as good" (I hate that claim because they're tailored for totally different audiences, they can't possibly be "just as good" as eachother by any stretch of the imagination,) then that shows that they have an open mind and wouldn't mind trying a product if it will save them money. People like this typically have good reasons to keep paying for a product when there are free alternatives available. The same can't be said for a LOT of Firefox users which try to compare Firefox to Opera though; they are already happy with the free browser and usually have no intentions on reviewing a browser that they'd have to pay for.

I think the developers fell for this as well; it's obvious by the Firefox vs Opera comparison they made which didn't even come close to accurate (about 40% accuracy on the Opera column while 100% accuracy on the Firefox column.)

From reading Firefox vs. Opera threads on various boards (this, mozillazine, opera forums) I fail to see any difference between the fans. Firefox and Opera both have their 'bad apples' and since Firefox is more popular, it's statistically bound to have more this kind of fans. It's the human nature, not the browser.

You can't see any differences between them? Honestly? I'll agree with your more-popular-more-idiots claim, but I also have to say that the price of each adds to the idiocy a great deal. And I don't believe anyone here was saying it was the browser's fault.

Edit: d_ralphie: Never have I seen so much FUD and bull**** concentrated in one post, congrats.

Actually, he's completely correct. Read my response above.

a billion flies can't be wrong. eat ****!

I always loved that saying, hehe.

opera fanboys are infinitely more informed than the disgusting firefox fanboys.

Not always, but usually.

oh please. i see more and more people not using firefox just because of the rabid fanboys that pollute the web. you won't see that with any other browser.

I have almost quit using Firefox for that exact reason, actually. It's hard to stand by a product when the developers themselves openly promote lying by doing it themselves (their firefox vs opera comparison) and letting their affiliates (such as mozillazine) get away with promoting lying. That's also one of the reasons I love Opera so much, they don't openly promote lying. During the whole "let's flood download sites" parade of idiocy by Firefox evangelists, the Opera users were considering retaliation on them and two (if I recall correctly) Opera employees came into the topic and asked that the users not follow the same path. That says something about the people standing behind Opera.

d_ralphie: The only independent browser stats provider I know is w3schools, if there's some other that shows considerably higher amount of Opera users I'll gladly pull back my estimates about Firefox/Opera user ratios.

That's a bad place to pull figures from, as most people that go to that site are technologically-inclined, which skews their results (for firefox and opera) dramatically.

as long as we're sharing useless anecdotal evidence, i can say that firefox crashes a lot more than opera compared to how much i run both of them. i run opera all the time, and it hardly ever crashes. i run firefox only for testing, and it crashes a LOT!

Same for me (using the stable firefox release and opera 8 beta 1) The same couldn't be said of Opera 7.54 though, it was about equal for me. And before anyone asks, my computer is perfectly stable so those crashes were due to coding errors (perhaps not errors but incompatibilities with certain hardware.)

uh, because you QUOTED me?

The only part which was directed to you was "Uh, yeah I do." The rest was toward Chode.

megamanXplosion: Yeah, I can honestly say that I've seen plenty of IE/Opera trolls.. just as obnoxious Firefox trolls, if you are bored just read through some of the deleted/removed posts on mozillazine.

http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewforum.php?f=26

And about the w3schools link, I thought it would be funny to show that actually the huge majority of technologically inclined, or informed if you may (as d_ralphie put it), users prefer Firefox.

And about the w3schools link, I thought it would be funny to show that actually the huge majority of technologically inclined, or informed if you may (as d_ralphie put it), users prefer Firefox.

Argument based on popularity = Argumentum ad populum = Logical fallacy.

Firefox is just a gateway browser to Opera.

Oh, BTW, mods are against any public opinion (arguments are bad), and will close this thread.

585276789[/snapback]

They are against personal attacks, not debates. If they are against all debates or "any public opinion" then this topic should've been closed at least 2 months ago and the rules should be updated.

Argument based on popularity = Argumentum ad populum = Logical fallacy.

585276757[/snapback]

Ah, but it wasn't an argument in such sense, originally it was to support my post about Opera/Firefox user ratios. I wasn't saying at any point that Firefox's popularity makes it better.

It also servers as a counter to your and d_ralphie's claim that Opera users are more informed/technically inclined. W3schools' is a site where this would clearly skew stats in Opera's favor. However, since the stats give Opera it's usual 2-3% cut I'm tempted to say that your argument doesn't hold water.

I use Firefox at home, because it's so cute. ;)

At school I use Opera. You should see these teenages freakout. WTF?!?!11/!? is that? A Game?!?@!1/1?

LoL!

Both are great! Like a big bowl of that Tony the Tiger cereal. yum! hehehehe :laugh:

I must leave now :ninja:

Ah, but it wasn't an argument in such sense, originally it was to support my post about Opera/Firefox user ratios. I wasn't saying at any point that Firefox's popularity makes it better.

I thought that you were implying that Firefox was superior because more "technically inclined" users have it; I assume that you were referring to the more-downloads-more-idiots theory? I don't recall anyone disagreeing with it so it wasn't really obvious when reading your post, you were just repeating yourself. What my point earlier was that the price has an involvement in the idiocy because most people who are happy with freeware aren't going to extensively review alternative they'd need to pay for. Would you extensively review a product you'd need to pay for when you're happy with the free software you have? I don't think you would, and I don't think many others would.

It also servers as a counter to your and d_ralphie's claim that Opera users are more informed/technically inclined. W3schools' is a site where this would clearly skew stats in Opera's favor. However, since the stats give Opera it's usual 2-3% cut I'm tempted to say that your argument doesn't hold water.

Well if it was also a counter-argument to our "more informed" claim then my above comment still rings true, that's a logical fallacy; and you lack the evidence to link those percentages with the "more informed" user base because there's a load of random factors which needs to be considered but are unknown. You must also remember that some Firefox users are also Opera users, the same is true vice versa (probably moreso because everyone likes to save money if they can,) plus they could be viewing the site with both browsers because they're using the CSS preview tools and wish to test both browsers, etc. You also forget that "technologically inclined" doesn't imply that the person is willing to pay for software when they're happy with the freeware. You also, conveniently, forgot to include Firefox in the skewing-factor when it's obviously true that they would be skewed because the majority of people who visit that site are webmasters and those webmasters will likely be using Firefox for the simple reason that it does have more market-share (prioritizing the process of browser compatibility on their websites.) I'm sorry but your argument doesn't hold water.

I'd also like to point out that Opera will likely have at least 5% (among the "technically inclined" user base) by the end of 2005, which won't be "the usual." Opera is about to release a major new version of their browser (mass publicity,) they're lowering the price, they're making the license more user-friendly, they're going to include a web accelerator which could accelerate browsing by 500%, and they're starting an effective grass-roots marketing campaign in the United States at college universities/banks/wherever (which will be successful due to all of the recent interface changes to simplify the program for the not-so-technically inclined.) Opera's putting good use to that $28 million (if I recall correctly) they recieved from Microsoft over that court-case where Microsoft was practicing a monopoly (which was one of the things which held their marketshare back when they released 7.0; people couldn't use their MSN homepages due to browser sniffing.)

Maybe but neither does yours. They are simply opinions without any concrete evidence to back them up.

I don't have concrete evidence but I think my claim is very logical; I seriously doubt that many Firefox users are going to extensively review an application they'd pay for when they already have something that makes them happy and it's free, which leads to a lot of ignorance about Opera's capabilities. I don't think concrete evidence is really needed to support my claim, it's logical.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!