Rappy Veteran Posted November 4, 2004 Veteran Share Posted November 4, 2004 Opinions on the ban?...i think thats just a right ban...after all he did admit to what he was taking... :huh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzla Veteran Posted November 4, 2004 Veteran Share Posted November 4, 2004 I think it's disgusting that his ban is less than Rio Ferdinand who only missed a drugs test. It's pathetic, Rio hadn't taken drugs as he was instantly offering a hair follicle test straight afterwards. So now the FA are saying that missing a drugs test is more serious than actually taking drugs. What a bunch of backward retards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
..Vector.. Posted November 4, 2004 Share Posted November 4, 2004 indeed. It seems that if you aren't a first team player you get treated differently than if you are a crucial player in your team and Englands number 1 defender.... and as Dazzla said, Rio never even took drugs, where as Mutu did, it's just so f'd up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kriz Posted November 4, 2004 Share Posted November 4, 2004 2 years minimum ban is what he should have got. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ritalin Posted November 4, 2004 Share Posted November 4, 2004 what was he taking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kriz Posted November 4, 2004 Share Posted November 4, 2004 Cocaine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzla Veteran Posted November 4, 2004 Veteran Share Posted November 4, 2004 Cocaine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vagabond Posted November 4, 2004 Share Posted November 4, 2004 Well I think he got the right sentence. As WADA or what they are called say and the british FA that cocaine isn't a enhancement drug. Ferdinand got a to short suspension since missing a test is ruled as a automatic positive test so 2 years Ferdinand should have gotten. If Mutu had taken something that would be a enhancement drug and if he were to say he didn't take anything then the suspension would be 2 years I belive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kriz Posted November 4, 2004 Share Posted November 4, 2004 He should have got longer because he lied about it in the first place. He said it was a "sexual enhancement drug". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vagabond Posted November 4, 2004 Share Posted November 4, 2004 And that he said to the FA ?... It is what he says to them that decides the sentence not what he says to some journalists. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kriz Posted November 4, 2004 Share Posted November 4, 2004 Not sure who he said it do, might have been to the media, i read it in the paper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mariusu Posted November 4, 2004 Share Posted November 4, 2004 the idiot deserves the ban. period :yes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
felixml Posted November 4, 2004 Share Posted November 4, 2004 he got off easily, too easy. Let's see who gonna be chasing him now, just in case this is a minor, one time slip-up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vignesh Posted November 4, 2004 Share Posted November 4, 2004 He got what he deserved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Powa Posted November 4, 2004 Share Posted November 4, 2004 I think it's disgusting that his ban is less than Rio Ferdinand who only missed a drugs test. It's pathetic, Rio hadn't taken drugs as he was instantly offering a hair follicle test straight afterwards. So now the FA are saying that missing a drugs test is more serious than actually taking drugs. What a bunch of backward retards. 584863464[/snapback] Exactly what I was thinking. You took the words out of my mouth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts