Microsoft To Release Three Versions of X-Box 2's


Recommended Posts

One of them will be like a PC, shock

By Wil Harris: Thursday 11 November 2004, 10:23

A SLIDE from a non disclosure agreement (NDA) presentation seen by the INQ points towards Microsoft launching three versions of the Xbox 2, one of which is a fully functioning PC.

The presentation, understood to have been given to analysts and market researchers in the UK earlier this year, plots a timeline for the introduction of the systems. Xbox Next and Xbox Next HD are planned for Autumn 2005, whereas the Xbox Next PC is pencilled in for Autumn 2006.

The standard Xbox Next will not include a hard drive, which will allow Microsoft to cut costs on this basic unit. Xbox Next HD, as you might imagine, does include a hard drive and will offer increased functionality based on this. Xbox Next PC is, according to the presentation, an entry-level PC that runs Windows and all standard PC software. It also includes CD Burner, Wireless keyboard, mouse and controller and will work best connected to a high-definition TV or PC monitor. Media Center functionality - like movies, music and photos - is also included. The device will also play most available PC games.

- X-Box Next

- X-Box HD

- X-Box PC

System outline specifications note that internet browsing and instant messaging would be key applications, and that the entire unit will be smaller than the current Xbox, although it will not be possible to upgrade the shipping memory or processor.

The year-long gap between the mooted introductions of the 2 standard Xboxes before the Xbox Next PC is an interesting decision, which suggests that Microsoft realises the time that the market needs to acclimatise to TV media functionality. Since the Vole expects to ship Xbox Next before the Sony PlayStation 3, 2 versions of the console allow it to get the first wave out before PS3, but to also spoil the launch of Sony's flagship by concurrently announcing the PC version.

Source: The Inquirer

Hmm, they say they are releasing a PC type XBOX that will run Windows and PC software but the XBOX2 will be based on PowerPC chips and Windows and thus Windows software is compiled to run on an x86 platform and thats counting Longhorn in that to.

Am i the only one confused by this because either the story is bull or MS have made some massive strides with VPC.

I just dont see the point of them doing this. Why?

All we want is an improvement on what we have now. Xbox. Not three if i wanted a pc xbox(although thats waht the current is kinda like) id just build myself or buy a media center box.

or has the xbox modding community had an influence on this decision?

Hmm, they say they are releasing a PC type XBOX that will run Windows and PC software but the XBOX2 will be based on PowerPC chips and Windows and thus Windows software is compiled to run on an x86 platform and thats counting Longhorn in that to.

Am i the only one confused by this because either the story is bull or MS have made some massive strides with VPC.

584903135[/snapback]

you got a point there

hmm// there is some linux distros that can run in ppc and they have their x86 version. Microsoft has the source code of their OS so they can modify it to run on a ppc.

584903260[/snapback]

Its not just a case of simply recompiling the Windows code. And the other and probably the main hurdle would be the Windows software because that would need to be recompiled for PowerPC.

Im going to have to say that this is bull until i see proof because to my knowledge technically its not possible and emulation is not really going to be an option.

Edit: The only other possibility is that they have revised the specs and scrapped the IBM chips in favour of an x86 brand, but that can't be right because the game developers have already been given their Mac's to get to work with.

Arghh im confused i need to see proof because this is bugging the hell out of me.

hmm// there is some linux distros that can run in ppc and they have their x86 version. Microsoft has the source code of their OS so they can modify it to run on a ppc.

584903260[/snapback]

the PPC chip that microsoft was working on with IBM is not a standard PPC chip, it has a custom instruction set so the standard PPC linux would not work by default possibly, it would need to be recoded for the new IA to work

does anyone else think that selling the xbox in 2 forms, one with the hdd and one with out the hdd (pc one aside) is a stupid idea!? have they learned nothing from other companies that sold vital peripherals seperatley? the end user will not go out of their way to buy a peripheral after they buy the system, and what do u have? inconsistancies when making games... because now u have to worry about wether or not the person has an hdd and wether or not they are willing to go out and buy it for your game- to M$ i say, put an hdd in every xbox, shutup and eat the cost and your extremly stupid if u think this plan is gunna help you in anyway! :p

oh as for the xbox pc- keep the price low and its simply brilliant. give people an xbox and inexpensive pc. My only problem is the hdd vs. non hdd xbox, because u see it will only divide the user base.... sega has a million failed peripherals... oh and lets not forget what a HUGE success the PS2 hdd was! :p :p

does anyone else think that selling the xbox in 2 forms, one with the hdd and one with out the hdd (pc one aside) is a stupid idea!? have they learned nothing from other companies that sold vital peripherals seperatley? the end user will not go out of their way to buy a peripheral after they buy the system, and what do u have? inconsistancies when making games... because now u have to worry about wether or not the person has an hdd and wether or not they are willing to go out and buy it for your game- to M$ i say, put an hdd in every xbox, shutup and eat the cost and your extremly stupid if u think this plan is gunna help you in anyway! :p

oh as for the xbox pc- keep the price low and its simply brilliant.  give people an xbox and inexpensive pc.  My only problem is the hdd vs. non hdd xbox, because u see it will only divide the user base.... sega has a million failed peripherals... oh and lets not forget what a HUGE success the PS2 hdd was! :p :p

584903574[/snapback]

Nobody said they are going to be selling an external hdd. It's not that hard for the game to detect a hdd or a memory card. They will probably sell the non-hdd one for $200 and the hdd one for probably $350 - $400.

Since the Vole expects to ship Xbox Next before the Sony PlayStation 3, 2 versions of the console allow it to get the first wave out before PS3, but to also spoil the launch of Sony's flagship by concurrently announcing the PC version.

What's really funny is the fact that MS thinks they have a chance of competing with the PS3. :p

What's really funny is the fact that MS thinks they have a chance of competing with the PS3. :p

584903817[/snapback]

I think it's the other way around. Unless Sony gets something to compete with XBL they will lose the next gen console war.

What's really funny is the fact that MS thinks they have a chance of competing with the PS3. :p

584903817[/snapback]

Go back under your bridge troll, a TRUE gamer would agree that all consoles that have existed since the coleco vision. were and are Damn good

According to reports streaming in from some loose-penned European press, Microsoft will release three different versions of the Xbox Next. The standard Xbox Next will be a basic gaming console. The Xbox Next HD will include a hard drive. Then, about a year later, the Xbox Next PC will be released as a fully-functioning Windows Media Center PC, all in a package smaller than the current Xbox. It is slated to come with a wireless mouse and keyboard and a CD Burner. This should cause some healthy consumer confusion next year while making things difficult on developers. Keep in mind chances are good the thing won?t even be called Xbox ?Next.? Fanboys, start your engines!

http://www.engadget.com/entry/6717250847203461/

post-64875-1100199358.jpg

Edited by MvT Cracker
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!