me101 Veteran Posted October 13, 2001 Veteran Share Posted October 13, 2001 Found this over on Microsoft. Should be good for a few laughs... kb: 282401 - Install Windows XP on a Computer with Less Than 64 MB of RAM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thecoz Posted October 13, 2001 Share Posted October 13, 2001 1_0_ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KR0NiCBaKeD420 Posted October 13, 2001 Share Posted October 13, 2001 lol ! anybody here have a compy wit less than 64 megs of ram should try it ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nXP_151 Veteran Posted October 13, 2001 Veteran Share Posted October 13, 2001 LOL, maybe I try to install that in my old Pentium 150 MHz which only have 32 MB RAM and 1 GB HD :D. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fonze Posted October 13, 2001 Share Posted October 13, 2001 i have it installed on my Toshiba laptop. 266 Pentium MMX with 64 ram. it runs but it has a 74mb swap file =/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PabUK Veteran Posted October 14, 2001 Veteran Share Posted October 14, 2001 WTF is with that sig? That has got to be the biggest I have ever seen! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freeza Posted October 14, 2001 Share Posted October 14, 2001 lmao Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KR0NiCBaKeD420 Posted October 14, 2001 Share Posted October 14, 2001 lmmfao Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
configure Veteran Posted October 14, 2001 Veteran Share Posted October 14, 2001 er.. I think mort had had a bigger sig.. :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fonze Posted October 14, 2001 Share Posted October 14, 2001 yah, on the NvMax board their Sigs are huge, alot bigger than mine. although theirs are cool and mine is really plain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rudy Posted October 14, 2001 Share Posted October 14, 2001 i think u really should cut it down a lil bit cuz when most ppl read this board they dont care bout ur sig, they care bout the msg every1 post! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nXP_151 Veteran Posted October 14, 2001 Veteran Share Posted October 14, 2001 Maybe some of the users here have dialup connection, not all have DSL/Cable connection, so you guys with big signature needs to think about this. It takes a while to load with dialup connection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpeaR Posted October 14, 2001 Share Posted October 14, 2001 Well true but they dont take that much of bw. Once a pic is dl'd then the others are placed in the browser themselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nXP_151 Veteran Posted October 14, 2001 Veteran Share Posted October 14, 2001 You've got points there :). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
altezza Veteran Posted October 14, 2001 Veteran Share Posted October 14, 2001 Let's get back to main topic on the thread :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PabUK Veteran Posted October 14, 2001 Veteran Share Posted October 14, 2001 Lets not, that sig is ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
altezza Veteran Posted October 14, 2001 Veteran Share Posted October 14, 2001 You mean fonze's sig? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nXP_151 Veteran Posted October 14, 2001 Veteran Share Posted October 14, 2001 Originally posted by altezza Let's get back to main topic on the thread :D Yep, so any imagination yet what will happen if you still manage to install XP on 32 MB RAM system ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunter Posted October 14, 2001 Share Posted October 14, 2001 especially if you post like 4 times on the same page. thats kinda overkill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jkeyes Posted October 14, 2001 Share Posted October 14, 2001 yeah 4 is overkill 8 times is better :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hellgod Posted October 14, 2001 Share Posted October 14, 2001 I have a 233MMX that's my spare puter with 32MB ram XP loads but it takes for EVER TO BOOT!!!!!!!! (then dont ask about logging it on) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
altezza Veteran Posted October 15, 2001 Veteran Share Posted October 15, 2001 How long it takes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hellgod Posted October 15, 2001 Share Posted October 15, 2001 To long.. i uped the system to 128MB and belive this it works better than Windows 98 on the 233 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mith Posted October 16, 2001 Share Posted October 16, 2001 If you install XP onto a machine with 32mb RAM expect it to run like windows 2000 did on your old 486...slow booting..slow loading...slow running Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts