Dell UltraSharp 2005FPW 20" Widescreen LCD


Recommended Posts

- hypoxiaicon, thanks for trying to solve the images problems... No need to host the images because I solved the problem...

- The other LCD is 17-inch, but don't be fooled guys and gals! It's a perspictive illusion!! I just mounted the 17-inch LCD closer to the camera, the 20.1-inch was farther away! Tha's why it appears that there is no difference. Trust me, the difference is huge :yes:

It's a perspictive illusion!! I just mounted the 17-inch LCD closer to the camera, the 20.1-inch was farther away! Tha's why it appears that there is no difference. Trust me, the difference is huge

lol... I don't feel such a fool anymore. That monitor looks amazing - if I was more into computing I would have one in a flash. It must be so fun playing HL2 with that, and quite an advantage in CS:Source.

Nice review. I heard there were integrated speakers? Guess not heh? Not that I wanted it anyways. Just wondering, can you actually remove the stand and hook the monitor up to a VESA mount?

584971013[/snapback]

There is an optional sound bar and yes it actually comes detached from the stand.

I also notice that the 1024x768 screenshots are a bit blurry. This probably means that this monitor doesn't scale well at non-native resolutions? Just wondering, when you said that HL2 supports widescreen resolutions, does it actually support 1680x1050? Meaning 1:1 pixel support.

I also notice that the 1024x768 screenshots are a bit blurry. This probably means that this monitor doesn't scale well at non-native resolutions? Just wondering, when you said that HL2 supports widescreen resolutions, does it actually support 1680x1050? Meaning 1:1 pixel support.

584971283[/snapback]

lcd monitors can only be used at thier native resolution. Everything else will look blurry.

Can someone here post some nice wallpapers in 1680x1050 res? Thanks.

584971362[/snapback]

Neowin has a Wallpaper section for that. If you want to request Walls/Themes please use that part of the forums. :)

- Thanks youm0nt

- Thanks pOKa, to me, if you had a 2001FP you don?t need the new WS version!

- Thankkainashib>, images are working now!

patseguinb>, this is the premium you pay for buying cutting edge technology, Apple?s monitor are rreally great, but overpriced!!hypoxiaicon, images are working now, as for the choice between the 2 Dell LCD?s, I?d say go widescreen as new games are utilizing the technology. I?m sorry that I couldn?t take other pictures of the 17-inch with the 2005FPW because I packaged the ViewSonic and listed it on eBayiconboy>iconboy, I recommend going with the 2005FPW, for the same reason mentionDJ Prem>DJ PremRon21Ron21, lucky you! You?ve got it for $100 less than what I?ve paid! Images areAnother_PaulAnother_Paul, thankNetRyder NetRydertheyarecomingforyoucomingforyou, your eyes deserves a treat such anorky)

- norky, when playing games that doesn?t support WS, you?ll notice black lines covering the vertical areas on the left and right (to compensate for the lack of WS reSgt_Strider- Sgt_Strider, yes you can remove the stand and hang it on the wall&Sgt_Strider- Sgt_Strider, the picture was sometimes blurry cause my hand shacked while taking the pics!! And yes, HL2 actually supports 1680x1050 as native resolution

@reloaded2003

Are there any other games that support this widescreen resolution? Is it actually possible to force games to run at that resolution? Have you tried running CS: S at that resolution? How about Doom 3? Battlefield 1942? Thanks...

P.S: Can you also do me a favour and take a picture of the side of the LCD? I want to see how thick it is. Thanks again!

@reloaded2003

Are there any other games that support this widescreen resolution? Is it actually possible to force games to run at that resolution? Have you tried running CS: S at that resolution? How about Doom 3? Battlefield 1942? Thanks...

P.S: Can you also do me a favour and take a picture of the side of the LCD? I want to see how thick it is. Thanks again!

584972569[/snapback]

You can run, or hack, most games in widescreen...

Here's a few links with walkthroughs for setting up widescreen for games.

http://www.widescreengamingforum.com/forum...7ce1284dc7c7dac

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/forumdispla...p?s=&forumid=94

That should provide you with some reading material. :)

You can run, or hack, most games in widescreen...

Here's a few links with walkthroughs for setting up widescreen for games.

http://www.widescreengamingforum.com/forum...7ce1284dc7c7dac

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/forumdispla...p?s=&forumid=94

That should provide you with some reading material.  :)

584973067[/snapback]

Well, what if your PC doesn't have hte man power to run games at 1600x1050? How come nobody ever asks that?

How many PCs out there can handle half life 2 at 1600x1050?

It looks like you'll need the following PC to handle it, only due to it wanting a high native resolution:

Widescreen LCD - $650

Radeon x800xt - $550

1 gB RAM - $200

$1400.

What happens if we lower the widescreen resolution, how does HL2 LOOK?

-ELmO

Once again, how do you think it plays at 1600x1050?  Am I the only one who wants to play an FPS at the smoothest frame rate possible?

:rofl:

-ELmO

584975246[/snapback]

Well it all matters on what kind of computer you have..

If you have a low end system then obviously you won't be playing it on high detail and a high res.

I play HL2 on my 9800pro running at 1280x1024 with max detail. The game runs smooth.

While gaming is the main consideration for a lot of people here, I think the screen would be more suited to editing (be it in Photoshop or Cubase) and desktop use (website design, word processing).

What effect does using a different resolution have on a TFT? I know it has to be blurry, as it has to approximate pixels but is it enough to make non-native resolutions unusable/impractical?

NEway, on a side note... when I searched on Google for the monitor this was the 6th result down: Neowin.net > Dell? UltraSharp? 2005FPW

Well, what if your PC doesn't have hte man power to run games at 1600x1050?  How come nobody ever asks that?

How many PCs out there can handle half life 2 at 1600x1050? 

It looks like you'll need the following PC to handle it, only due to it wanting a high native resolution:

Widescreen LCD - $650

Radeon x800xt - $550

1 gB RAM - $200

$1400.

What happens if we lower the widescreen resolution, how does HL2 LOOK?

-ELmO

584974171[/snapback]

Not true at all!

Although I'm planning to move to AMD FX-55 with SLI (2 x nVidia 6800 GTO), my current desktop is working great with HL2 in 1600x1050! The game is very smooth and you can look at screenshots. Here is my current desktop (Gateway) specs:

- P4 2.66

- 512MB PC1066 RDRAM

- ATI Radeon 9800 Pro 128MB AGP 8X

- Creative Soundblaster Audigy

Yet, your comments would be true if we were talking about Doom 3!

While gaming is the main consideration for a lot of people here, I think the screen would be more suited to editing (be it in Photoshop or Cubase) and desktop use (website design, word processing).

What effect does using a different resolution have on a TFT? I know it has to be blurry, as it has to approximate pixels but is it enough to make non-native resolutions unusable/impractical?

NEway, on a side note... when I searched on Google for the monitor this was the 6th result down: Neowin.net > Dell? UltraSharp? 2005FPW

584975541[/snapback]

My main use of PC's is editing, designing, web surfing, and programming. I really like the way that this WS LCD affected my desktop workplace. Photoshop and Word work even better on WS! You can understand what I mean when you picture 2 documents of MS Word aligned horizontally in print view at 100% magnification! Or Photoshop displaying a high resolution image taken by your digital camera and being able to view it at 66.7% magnification without the need to scroll!!

Yet if you tried to view the desktop in a resolution other than the native (1680x1050), say (1240x1024) you?ll end up viewing a stretched and kind of blurry desktop...

By the way, here?s the manual link and more images of the 2005FPW LCD from Dell, it seems that I forgot to mention that the monitor can rotate a 90 degree (Portrait view): Dell 2005FPW Manual and Images

hey guys....can you look at my specs...based on that, do you think i could play MOST games at 1680x1050?

Doom, obviously i cant play high...only 1024x768 medium....but maybe half life 2?

i still havent played it yet, im going out of town, maybe ill buy it when i get back, or maybe up in austin....havent decided yet

but i think im going to scratch the idea of buying the 2001FP...monitors like these are the future and seem to be perfect for longhorn...

why buy an expensive monitor which wont really be good for longhorn?

this one will obviousy :) so longer value, and you can use it more

please respond, i plan on buying this soon :D

hey guys....can you look at my specs...based on that, do you think i could play MOST games at 1680x1050?

Doom, obviously i cant play high...only 1024x768 medium....but maybe half life 2?

i still havent played it yet, im going out of town, maybe ill buy it when i get back, or maybe up in austin....havent decided yet

but i think im going to scratch the idea of buying the 2001FP...monitors like these are the future and seem to be perfect for longhorn...

why buy an expensive monitor which wont really be good for longhorn?

this one will obviousy :) so longer value, and you can use it more

please respond, i plan on buying this soon :D

584977915[/snapback]

Actually Windows longhorn will be better on a widescreen monitor..

The sidebar in longhorn is perfect for widescreen's.

So if you want something for the future go with the widescreen and if you want something thats better for CURRENT gaming go with the 2001.

I'm going with the 2005 because the only 2 games that I play are Vice City and CS:S which both support 1680x1050 :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!