Recommended Posts

Someone please close this thread.  I can't believe you guys are all still going around and around on this topic.  Value is in the eye of the consumer.  If I had a Mac, I would certainly not use a Dell display, and vice versa.  Does anyone care about price?  Well, I did when 15" LCD monitors used to cost $2500.

NetRyder, I hope you read your TomsHardware.com.  Monitors are more than just their specs.  Run the full gambit of tests on everything Apple and Dell make, and see for yourself that the results won't be what you expect.  Monitors are not all made alike.  If Apple made a monitor to the exact specs of a Dell monitor, there's no way they would get away with the price they sell it for.  I won't say you're wrong at all, but I would suggest more homework than the websites for Apple and Dell.  Don't knock it until you see them side by side in real-world tests.  The results may shock all of you. :devil:

585022760[/snapback]

There's no reason to close the thread since it's perfectly civil. Nobody is flaming, and it's just a discussion. Or would you rather have it closed because it's an eye-opener to people who are still under the false impression that the ACDs are the best displays on the planet?

Trust me, I have done my 'homework.' I wouldn't get into this discussion if I was uninformed. It's funny you should mention TomsHardware, because I don't see a review of the 2005FPW anywhere on it. Can you show me an impartial review that compares the 2005FPW and the 20" ACD? Shows who has been doing their homework.

Besides, like Chad said, if you look at the two displays side by side (sheesh, cover up the bezel if you hate the sight of it so much), you'll clearly be able to tell the difference. One of my friends in the residence halls just received a 2005FPW, and I've seen the Apple Displays in the university computer store. As you rightly said, don't knock it until you see it, and I can bet most of these people who claim the ACD is a better display haven't had a chance to see a real 2005FPW in front of them.

Apprently, NetRyder, you have missed the point. Whether the review came out or not, fact is that tests time and time again have shown that the specs shown on a website are not going to be the desired, usuable specs, especially when it comes to those who are picky about color reproduction. That's why Tom's Hardware created a standard for their monitor testing that looks beyond all the advertised fluff companies put out there, and actually look at real-world usage. Once color calibrated, the results can possibly tell a different story. Hell, I never run a monitor without tweaking the controls a bit to make it look more pristine.

In all honesty, none of this matters unless a reputable review site comes out with test results. Secondly, I doubt a Mac user would go out and buy a Dell monitor, and vice versa. I've found that unless someone needs a special monitor (touchscreen, integrated credit card swiper, anti-microbial), most people tend to buy the brand that matches with their PC. It's all tying back to the fact that Apple is on their own little island, and the PC realm has a giant continent (let's call it Pangea). Personally, I just think this whole discussion is futile unless Apple's LCD monitor just really blows chunks up against Dell. Then I'll just have to rethink what kind of monitor I'll buy when I get my G5. I wonder if LaCie does decent LCD monitors... :devil:

I gotta put out one last thought here:

It's such a shame that brand name has become so insignificant nowadays, especially with everyone outsourcing things to everyone else. I just remember how computers used to be when I was younger. But times have changed. I think that as consumers, we all really get the short end of the stick nowadays. Kudos to those who build for quality, and a lump of coal to those who build crap for $$$.

because apple users are a special bread!

585024229[/snapback]

You mean like Pumpernickel?

Yes, I know what you mean...I'm a Windows and Mac user, and the Mac user is certainly different. They're not as rare anymore.

I'm thinking that part of the lesson we're learning is that the people we look to for quality are not beinging us top quality like they used to. Apple's final generation of CRT displays were all OEM'ed Mitsubishi Diamondtrons, and they were great monitors. Perhaps Apple has made bad decisions on the LCD manufacturer (LG in this case) or specs.

I'm drawing blanks now...must be this Dell CRT monitor (OEM'ed by Sony) I sit in front of eight hours a day that's zapping my brain... :wacko:

In all honesty, none of this matters unless a reputable review site comes out with test results.  Secondly, I doubt a Mac user would go out and buy a Dell monitor, and vice versa.  I've found that unless someone needs a special monitor (touchscreen, integrated credit card swiper, anti-microbial), most people tend to buy the brand that matches with their PC.  It's all tying back to the fact that Apple is on their own little island, and the PC realm has a giant continent (let's call it Pangea).  Personally, I just think this whole discussion is futile unless Apple's LCD monitor just really blows chunks up against Dell.  Then I'll just have to rethink what kind of monitor I'll buy when I get my G5.  I wonder if LaCie does decent LCD monitors... :devil:

.

585024346[/snapback]

If all I had was a Mac, I wouldn't hesitate to get the Dell. In fact, I've been looking at the 2001 since it came out...all the while, I was using a Macintosh 100% of the time.

The Apple monitor isn't bad, but it's not as good as the Dell-branded one. And at double the price, it's not the smartest choice

Apprently, NetRyder, you have missed the point.  Whether the review came out or not, fact is that tests time and time again have shown that the specs shown on a website are not going to be the desired, usuable specs, especially when it comes to those who are picky about color reproduction.  That's why Tom's Hardware created a standard for their monitor testing that looks beyond all the advertised fluff companies put out there, and actually look at real-world usage.  Once color calibrated, the results can possibly tell a different story.  Hell, I never run a monitor without tweaking the controls a bit to make it look more pristine.

If you re-read my post above, you'll see that I'm not making judgements simply based on what's on Dell's and Apple's websites. Besides the fact that the specs show the Dell to be a better display, I have actually SEEN both displays in front of me, and I can honestly say that the real-life experience actually matches what the specs say. The ACD is a great display (in fact, it used to be my favorite one at some point), but the 2005FPW is simply better, and when you can get it at a significantly lower price, the choice is clear as day.

It's all tying back to the fact that Apple is on their own little island, and the PC realm has a giant continent (let's call it Pangea).

And you're fine with that state of affairs? This is precisely the reason Apple can get away with overcharging customers. If HP made a better 20" display than the 2005FPW and charged less, people would go with the HP, and Dell would be forced to bring down their prices. In the PC market, there's a huge choice, and people go for what is the best and get the best value for their money.

On the other hand, when people buy an Apple computer, most of them feel the need to be locked into buying everything with an Apple logo on it (it's the same reason they'll buy the Airport Extreme, like Chad mentioned earlier), even though there are other, in many cases, better choices out there. That's simply not necessary since the 2005FPW would work just as well with a Mac as it would with a PC, and you would be getting a better display while saving a truckload of cash.

Kudos to those who build for quality, and a lump of coal to those who build crap for $$$.

585024346[/snapback]

I don't know what you're getting at with this post, but if you're referring to Apple as the one that "builds for quality" and Dell as the one that "builds crap," you're mistaken. I still don't get this whole idea of the Apple display being of higher "quality." It simply doesn't make any sense. It's been mentioned time and again that Apple and Dell both got their displays from LG, so neither one manufactures its own displays.

Thankfully, NetRyder, Apple at least got rid of the ADC port. It was a great idea, but now it opens up the doors for users to use other manufacturer's monitors with the Mac. Just think about this whole discussion, this (almost) opens up the idea of a cross-platform KVM solution. If only Apple would change out the keyboard, or keyboard OEMs make a true cross-platform keyboard. DVI video, USB keyboard and mouse...I think that's not too much to ask for those of us that occasionally or frequently use Mac. Add on digital audio I/O for those 5.1 and 7.1 speaker systems, and that could be an awesome setup.

As far the Apple fanaticism is concerned, if nothing else it's a great marketing concept to have a solution for everything under one brand. Does it work well? Being that Apple still only take up a tiny piece of the action, and it keeps that small sliver happy, I'd say they've executed well. Are the products high-quality? Well, some people have found that to be false. Can it reach out to PC users? Apple is sure trying with iPod and iTunes, but I'm not one to predict who the winner will be.

As far as quality goes...well, I used to work for Gateway (it was for the money and watching hot women walk by our store, good thing I snapped out of that). I recommended that my mom and my little brother (who we sent off to college this fall) get Dell machines. They're reliable and fast, and my mom is very happy with her Dell 17" LCD monitor. One dead subpixel, but otherwise it looks great. Apple monitors look great too. They sure as anything don't manufacture them, but they do spec out what's inside them. If Apple made crap (like the 23" with the pink shift) than that's bad juju for everyone who bought them, and moreso to Apple. If Dell sells a better monitor for cheaper, then that's great for everyone including Dell themselves.

Speak, the reason Apple got rid of the ADC port is because a) it couldn't provide enough power and b) no-one could be bothered making graphics cards with the things on. I really doubt cheaper cards and monitors came into the equation.

PS: Please stop posting in that horrible green font. It's making my eyes bleed. Thankyou.

I think the main issue is the percieved 'quality' of Apple displays. I hope this thread has made some people wake up to the fact that if you step out of Steve Jobs reality distortion field for a second these are pretty poor quality 20" panel's compared to stuff that is much cheaper.

585022075[/snapback]

I think most people realise the most of the time, Steve BS in his Keynotes. Did you hear the laugh after he proclaimed that the apple displays are the "best in the industry"? (WWDC 2004)

Just think about this whole discussion, this (almost) opens up the idea of a cross-platform KVM solution.  If only Apple would change out the keyboard, or keyboard OEMs make a true cross-platform keyboard.  DVI video, USB keyboard and mouse...I think that's not too much to ask for those of us that occasionally or frequently use Mac.  Add on digital audio I/O for those 5.1 and 7.1 speaker systems, and that could be an awesome setup.

585024604[/snapback]

I'm confused... Apple now uses DVI, but you could get DVI out of their old ADC monitors (with a breakout box). Their USB keyboards are pretty much standard, except we have some things like F13 through F16 instead of things like Scroll Lock and Print Screen, along with an Option key and a Command key instead of a Windows key. Their USB mouse is a standard mouse, except with one button, and work fine in a Windows environment (until you have to right-click).

No reason you couldn't plug in any Logitech or Microsoft (for example) mouse or keyboard into a KVM and they wouldn't work in OS X. Logitech is great with cross platform keyboards, they even include both Mac and Windows specific keys!

Digital I/O? Optical Out on the G5's?

An Apple Display on a Macintosh is already calibrated pretty much perfectly, fits with the PowerBooks and PowerMacs, has FireWire and USB ports in it, and a DVI connection. Now I know the Dell has a DVI connection, but I think the low-hassle setup and the beautiful looks of the Cinema Display are worth the extra $500.

Oh so expensive, but OH SO WORTH IT.

One of the best investments since the iPod. (The iPod came way before the PowerBook. I was a 1st generation owner--still am!)

I couldn't be happier. The only thing, I haven't mastered the hot points on the dual screen, yet, since I resort to only using the cinema display when working on the PowerBook.

I'll have to put them side to side, just for thrills, showing how well they work together, how well they match up. It's a beautiful thing.

And if anyone gets a chance. Hit up the Apple Store. (I don't know if all will participate, especially mini stores, but...) The North Michigan Avenue has two 30'' displays on display, side by side--and wow. It is unbelieveable. Overkill for me, but sure as hell nice to look at.

Edit: P.S. I am looking to get the Altec Lansing 2.1 to match the aesthetics of the cinema and the PowerBook itself. I just am not sure about the extra controllers and such, so I will have to check them out before I buy. :)

I'm confused... Apple now uses DVI, but you could get DVI out of their old ADC monitors (with a breakout box). Their USB keyboards are pretty much standard, except we have some things like F13 through F16 instead of things like Scroll Lock and Print Screen, along with an Option key and a Command key instead of a Windows key. Their USB mouse is a standard mouse, except with one button, and work fine in a Windows environment (until you have to right-click).

No reason you couldn't plug in any Logitech or Microsoft (for example) mouse or keyboard into a KVM and they wouldn't work in OS X. Logitech is great with cross platform keyboards, they even include both Mac and Windows specific keys!

Digital I/O? Optical Out on the G5's?

585030889[/snapback]

I've never seen a DVI-based KVM, though. A 30" Apple Cinema Display to use on both a Mac and PC at the flip of a switch? Nice stuff. I know that mice are no problem, and if keyboard mapping and labeling is done, then we have something.

S/PDIF out on the G5, and S/PDIF out on a PC (usually via SB Audigy or some integrated solutions), into a KVM and out to 5.1 speakers from Logitech or Klipsch. Fun stuff.

I've never seen a DVI-based KVM, though.  A 30" Apple Cinema Display to use on both a Mac and PC at the flip of a switch?  Nice stuff.  I know that mice are no problem, and if keyboard mapping and labeling is done, then we have something.

585035286[/snapback]

Belkin makes one that I always see. You can't use a 30" on it though, it's not a Dual-Link DVI Port. I hope to get one when I go to college in July to hook up my PC (whenever I get the money to build it) and G5 tower.

you can ask the same thing about clothes-

why do those musty old raggy looking clothes cost so much less than the super hot designer gear. this is especially evident with girls where they will pay more for a designer bra that only person see's but them, than all of the food they eat in a month.

you can ask the same thing about clothes-

why do those musty old raggy looking clothes cost so much less than the super hot designer gear. this is especially evident with girls where they will pay more for a designer bra that only person see's but them, than all of the food they eat in a month.

585045940[/snapback]

I tried deciphering that one... and I think I got it...

Are you calling me a girl? :huh:

How is it less hassle-free? You plug in either one and it should just work. What's the difference?

585035658[/snapback]

lol my 2001FP was hasle free....DVI plug in. Computer On...

Look Mom! A SEXY PICTURE! :blush:

So inquiring minds would like ot know how the ACD is "hasle-free" :laugh:

lol my 2001FP was hasle free....DVI plug in. Computer On...

Look Mom! A SEXY PICTURE! :blush:

So inquiring minds would like ot know how the ACD is "hasle-free" :laugh:

585048938[/snapback]

The ACD does come with a pre-calibrated color profile when you connect it to a Mac. It's a nice thing to have.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!