Should Barry be in the Hall of Fame?


Should Bonds be in the HOF?  

95 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Bonds be in the HOF?

    • Yes
      34
    • No
      61


Recommended Posts

His homerun record numbers should indeed be questioned if not stricken. Even if he gets past Hank Aaron this year, I and several others will probably not think of Bonds as the all time king. There are other players who have cheated the game and are still considered some of the greats. Gaylord Perry comes to mind. His spitball got him over 300 wins. Sammy Sosa and the corked bat. His stat still stand as the only player to hit 60+ homeruns for three straight seasons. When people question gambling affecting the integrity of the game, I point to 1919 Blacksox Scandal. Players for the White Sox actually throwing games in the World Series because of gambling. After that, fans began to wonder if all games are fixed. This affected everyone in baseball, not just the Sox. Someone said earlier that betting your team to win does not hurt the game. Problem is, if I remember correctly since I am getting older, he also bet on the Reds to LOSE some of the time. He also bet on other games that he was not involved in, but he had access to the other managers to get some inside info if he so wished. That leads me to question all games of that era. Betting on baseball by an active player or manager can cause a ripple effect throughout the entire sport. One guy jucing up does not have the same effect.

Ok, 2 on, 2 out, down by 4 Bonds hits a homerun.  Next batter flies out.  Game over, homerun has NO AFFECT ON THE OUTCOME.  Similar situation, tying run on third, two out, very slow runner, manager calls for a squeeze and runner is easily tagged out.  Manager's decision blew any chance for the batter to knock in the tying run.  You think leaving a pitcher in too long does not have affect?  Grady Little got fired in Boston because he left Pedro in too long against the Yankees.  Cost them the game and the ALCS.  Don't try to tell me that a manager cannot affect the outcome.

585082019[/snapback]

C'mon man! First of all, it did affect the outcome because it changed the score. Instead of a 4-0 game it was a 4-3 game. There is a difference between affecting the outcome and determining a winner. The bottom line is whan a manager makes a decision the scoreboard does not change! SOMEONE ELSE'S physical action determines the end result! So again, leaving Pedro in the game did not put ANY runs on the board, it may have increased the odds of the Yankees scoring, but the batters still had to put the ball in play. The fact that they hit the ball where nobody could catch it is what cost Boston the game.

Pete Rose jeopardized the integrity of the game, therefore he was banned from joining the hall of fame.  When you take steroids, you jeopardize yourself and your health, not the game of baseball.  When a player starts betting on games he plays in, that is when you cross the line.  Will Mark McGwire be banned from the hall of fame for taking steroids?  I think not.  Then why should Bonds? 

Bonds' success isn't all about steroids, though you can argue that it did help him hit a few extra during his record breaking year.  The only reason why I'm defending Bonds is because he does have natural skill, unlike other steroid users like Giambi who take them and still perform average compared to others.  If steroids were to give Bonds the numbers he has, then I'm sure others would also be on par with the same numbers, which no one is.

585084353[/snapback]

L3thal; you never answered the question, DO YOU THINK BONDS CHEATED? Dont forget, he used a substance banned by MLB!

Fact 1: Betting on a game in which you have an influence definately compromises the integrity of the game. Fact 2: The integrity of any game, in which an active cheater had an influence on the outcome, is also compromised. This takes me to my original question, Why should Barry Bonds be treated any differently than Pete Rose?

L3thal; you never answered the question, DO YOU THINK BONDS CHEATED? Dont forget, he used a substance banned by MLB!

585098732[/snapback]

Did you read my post, or did you just click on Reply?

Bonds' success isn't all about steroids, though you can argue that it did help him hit a few extra during his record breaking year.

I clearly stated that he used steroids which helped him hit more HR's :rolleyes:

Did you read my post, or did you just click on Reply?

I clearly stated that he used steroids which helped him hit more HR's :rolleyes:

585101239[/snapback]

Instead of beating around the bush, why cant you just clearly state whether or not you think he cheated? And do you think cheaters should be in the HOF. :angry:

Fact 1: Betting on a game in which you have an influence definately compromises the integrity of the game.  Fact 2: The integrity of any game, in which an active cheater had an influence on the outcome, is also compromised. This takes me to my original question, Why should Barry Bonds be treated any differently than Pete Rose?

585099252[/snapback]

Actually, those are both opinions. :laugh:

:rofl: (Y)

How clever.  How long did it take you to come up with that? :rolleyes:

585103153[/snapback]

not bad up until this one! THIS IS WEAK! I liked the hand thing you put on the other thread though. Look, I never said that Bonds isn't one of the greatest players ever, he certainly is, but the HOF is not all about statistics. My question is mostly in relation to the HOF, not whether or not Bonds is a good player. You cant start letting admitted cheaters in. If you want to keep arguing this, leave his stats and abilities out and tell me why a cheater deserves to be honored and glorified.

Take away his steroids, he still stands out with his talent. He is not your average MLB player and he has showed it since his rookie year. Yes, he admitted using steroids for a year or two, but that shouldn't be the sole reason to keep him out of the Hall of Fame.

This is just a natural progression. I mean look at the sad state of professional sports. It's a farce, it's comical.

I say let him in and give him a big plaque that says exactly what he's done. And if we don't learn anything from it and we continue on like we are, the so be it.

Take away his steroids, he still stands out with his talent.  He is not your average MLB player and he has showed it since his rookie year.  Yes, he admitted using steroids for a year or two, but that shouldn't be the sole reason to keep him out of the Hall of Fame.

585109436[/snapback]

What he has admitted to doing shows a lack of integrity, character, sportsmanship, and a total disregard for respect and rules of the game! That should defineately be the sole reason for him not to be in the HOF!

Ok, I'm lost.

When did Barry Bonds publically and officially state that he used steroids? From everything I've read and everything I've heard, he admitted to using an ointment cream that was given to him by the BALCO dude. The BALCO dude was on TV and said that he had clients take steriods...but NEVER mentioned Barry's name. So, either I've missed something of GREAT importance or, in all truth and honesty, the sports world is still accusing him of something not proven.

Guilty until proven innocent?

Ok, I'm lost.

When did Barry Bonds publically and officially state that he used steroids? From everything I've read and everything I've heard, he admitted to using an ointment cream that was given to him by the BALCO dude. The BALCO dude was on TV and said that he had clients take steriods...but NEVER mentioned Barry's name. So, either I've missed something of GREAT importance or, in all truth and honesty, the sports world is still accusing him of something not proven.

Guilty until proven innocent?

585111002[/snapback]

It hasn't been proven, but do you really think Barry is going to admit to it, especially when many of the other players who admitted to using steriods are claiming that Bond's "trainer" is they one they got their steriods from? It's suspicious don't you think?

It's suspicious don't you think?

585113805[/snapback]

There are lots of suspicious things out there. It's what you call, circumstancial evidence, which isn't good enough to blame him for it. Just because others got steroids from the BALCO guy, doesn't mean Bonds also used them. Afterall, the guy was Bonds' best friend, so he could've given him only the cream and nothing else.

The poll wasn't part of the original thread.  I added it.

585119731[/snapback]

Right. But the poll was added the same day I started the topic, Dec 7. There have been well over 1000 views since then. Its not a big deal, I was just curious. Keep up the good work!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft making much needed change to Windows 11, 10 Patch Tuesday security updates by Sayan Sen Recently, Microsoft delivered its latest Defender patches for Windows 11 ISOs. These definitions are released from time to time alongside the general security updates available during Patch Tuesday. Speaking of Defender, the company has now announced another important change that affects how security updates are delivered to enterprise devices running Windows. According to a recent announcement, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint's endpoint detection and response (EDR) updates will no longer be bundled with the monthly Windows security updates or Patch Tuesdays. Instead the company is shifting delivery of these updates to Microsoft Update, bringing EDR servicing in line with several other Microsoft Defender components. If you recall, Microsoft last year moved PowerShell updates to Microsoft Update (MU) as well since it provides automatic updates for Microsoft products and services. Thus the move is intended to allow Microsoft to deliver EDR improvements and security enhancements independently of the OS's regular monthly update cycle; this should enable faster deployment of protection updates without requiring organizations to wait for the next Patch release. For those unfamiliar, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint's EDR capabilities are designed to help organizations detect, investigate, and respond to advanced threats across managed devices. Keeping these components updated is critical for maintaining protection against evolving attack techniques. The rollout has already began for Windows 10 devices in late May 2026 (last month) and Microsoft says it will gradually expand support to Windows 11 and the remaining supported Windows versions over the coming months. The company expects deployment across Windows 10 and Windows 11 to be completed by fall 2026 or around Q3 of this year. Once the transition is complete, EDR updates will be delivered through Microsoft Update using KB5005292, provided the required prerequisite updates have already been installed. Microsoft is also introducing a new Defender Update Service as part of the change. Following installation of the first update, devices will automatically create a new directory located at %ProgramData%\Microsoft\Microsoft Defender\Defender Update. Microsoft notes that restarts may occasionally be necessary in case of "rare" failure scenarios. For most organizations, the tech giant says no action will be required as long as Microsoft Update is already permitted within their update management strategy. Admins who rely on manually deployed update packages, however, will need to adjust their processes to ensure the new Defender update package is included. Microsoft also recommends reviewing internal documentation and notifying helpdesk and security operations teams about the updated delivery mechanism to avoid confusion during the transition. As a prerequisite, the tech giant notes that systems must be running Sense version 10.8798.25857.1000 or later and have one of the following Windows updates (or later) installed: Win11 24H2 KB5062660 (2025-07 Cumulative Update Preview) Win11 23H2 KB5062663 (2025-07 Cumulative Update Preview) Win11 22H2 KB5062663 (2025-07 Cumulative Update Preview) Win10 22H2 KB5062649 (2025-07 Cumulative Update Preview) Win10 1809 KB5063877 (2025-08 Cumulative Update) Server 2019 KB5063877 (2025-08 Cumulative Update) Server 2022 KB5063880 (2025-08 Cumulative Update) Server 2025 KB5063878 (2025-08 Cumulative Update) As always, organizations should verify that their update policies align with the new servicing approach before the broader rollout reaches all supported Windows platforms later this year. In case of major problems, the EDR update can be rolled back to the inbox version stored in %ProgramFiles%\\Windows Defender Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) using: MpCmdRun.exe -RevertMde -Product Edr -ToVersion Inbox For those who have access to the Microsoft 365 Admin Center portal, you can view the message here under ID MC1381119.
    • My problem with these smart scopes is that IMO they're not really an entrance into astronomy, they're an entrance to looking at pretty(ish) pictures that you take by essentially pressing a button and letting the scope do the work. I still maintain that getting some binoculars or a solid dedicated telescope (which doesn't have to mean expensive) and actually spending time learning the night sky and using a telescope is a much better way to actually learn. But, granted, the learning curve is a bit steeper (as it tends to be).
    • I never played Crazy Taxi before, but this looks like a fun game!
    • The perception of Microsoft Edge is unfortunate as it's a world class browser. I'm not exaggerating when I say it's the best browser I've ever used with its feature set, speed, reliability and advanced security. Running the extension Ublock Origin is a must though to deal with advertising and trackers.
    • You can check out our latest 9070 GRE review with scores for the XT too, but these are on Windows: Gaming performance Productivity performance
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      248
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      73
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!