WashPost: IAEA Leader's Phone Tapped by US

[OrangeSoul]

The Bush administration has dozens of intercepts of Mohamed ElBaradei's phone calls with Iranian diplomats and is scrutinizing them in search of ammunition to oust him as director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, according to three U.S. government officials.

But the diplomatic offensive will not be easy. The administration has failed to come up with a candidate willing to oppose ElBaradei, who has run the agency since 1997, and there is disagreement among some senior officials over how hard to push for his removal, and what the diplomatic costs of a public campaign against him could be.

Although eavesdropping, even on allies, is considered a well-worn tool of national security and diplomacy, the efforts against ElBaradei demonstrate the lengths some within the administration are willing to go to replace a top international diplomat who questioned U.S. intelligence on Iraq and is now taking a cautious approach on Iran.

The intercepted calls have not produced any evidence of nefarious conduct by ElBaradei, according to three officials who have read them. But some within the administration believe they show ElBaradei lacks impartiality because he tried to help Iran navigate a diplomatic crisis over its nuclear programs. Others argue the transcripts demonstrate nothing more than standard telephone diplomacy.

"Some people think he sounds way too soft on the Iranians, but that's about it," said one official with access to the intercepts.

In Vienna, where the IAEA has its headquarters, officials said they were not surprised about the eavesdropping.

"We've always assumed that this kind of thing goes on," IAEA spokesman Mark Gwozdecky said. "We wish it were otherwise, but we know the reality."

more here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/artic...?nav=rss_nation

[Jerichohol]

Isnt this illegal?

Although eavesdropping, even on allies, is considered a well-worn tool of national security and diplomacy, the efforts against ElBaradei demonstrate the lengths some within the administration are willing to go to replace a top international diplomat who questioned U.S. intelligence on Iraq and is now taking a cautious approach on Iran.

Surely if the administration is openly admitting this, someone should say something. Does this position not get an electable diplomat or a person who is "placed"

[Fred Derf Veteran]

"Some people think he sounds way too soft on the Iranians, but that's about it," said one official with access to the intercepts.

585087770[/snapback]

Get with the program guy! America has chosen Iran as the next enemy. Either you're with the Americans or you're in league with the terrorists. So says Bush, so says us all.

[/sarcasm]

[Osiris]

I hope the fella stands his ground. Give em the finger I say.