• 0

CMS better than Postnuke


Question

My current web host just wiped out my site (due to a hardware failure) so I decided to start again and implement a few ideas I?ve been thinking about. For the past year I?ve been using postnuke and have found it reliable, however a lot of people recently have been putting it down, so I was wondering if someone could recommend a better CMS and give reasons for why it is better.

I was intending on using the multi-site feature of postnuke (which allows one instance of the script to run multiple sites through detecting variations in the domain) so I would like a CMS that had a similar feature to this.

Also I was intending to write a lot of add-on modules for postnuke to provide free services like image hosting, so if I were to use another CMS an advanced plug-in development system would be very useful. Anything like the recent postnuke one would be great, which implements SMARTY templates.

Thank you for any guidance you can offer, unfortunately I?ve found it hard trying to compare the features of CMS that people have recommended in other threads so if you could include why you think its better I would be very grateful.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/257769-cms-better-than-postnuke/
Share on other sites

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  Xen said:
CPGNuke - Like phpnuke *alittle* but more customization and hell more security.

585107441[/snapback]

its nothing like phpnuke AT ALL complate rewrite (this is version 9) nice new HTML theming engin so use nvu to make new themes now :)) tons of new features only 7 queries for the whole forums page (the one which should have the most) comparted to phpnuke 29 or more...

  • 0

supposedly the next major version (think 5.x) of Mambo will support multi-sites by default but at the moment, there's a "hack" that supports 3 sites in one DB. here's a link to an extensive thread discussing multi-site functionality in mambo

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Apple prices for sure suck, but performance, upgradability and flexibility are subjective to the use case and machine. For example, you will not find a mini PC in the same starting price range that has the same performance as a Mac Mini, nor will it be very upgradable, if at all at that size. Many cost-effective laptops are not upgradable past the storage. Inexpensive laptops are underperforming in comparison to more expensive models that might actually cost more than a MacBook . You won’t find battery life is comparable unless you go with Snapdragon, which limits compatibility and sacrifices upgradability. AIOs suck in both spaces, so I’ll not mention them. As for flexibility, I can do more in my use cases with a Mac than I can with a Windows or Linux machine. Where Apple really screws their users over is with upgrades, especially since you have to do them during purchase. The area where Apple can’t compete at all is desktop machines (not discussing AIOs). Outside of cost, it’s all subjective and situational.
    • Not with Proton, no. macOS isn’t Linux in any way, shape, or form.
    • AIDA64 was just showing the variable speed. Open Task Manager and go on the CPU tab and see the magic of your CPU speed going up and down as the PC does things in the background. C States Auto/Disabled actually forces all cores on (disabling the ability to park unneeded 3D Cache cores when they aren't needed), but does not have any effect on the CPU speed. I think setting the Power Plan in Windows to High Performance does boost the CPU clock higher, which also results in less energy efficiency with "everything turned up to 11" all the time when it isn't even needed. Older generation CPUs did not have the variable speeds we now have in modern CPUs, they operated on a fixed clock speed.
    • one drive saved my life .ive freed up some space i now have 227gigs.
    • "What the f is that name of that program?! Good thing I can find it in the easily accessible, and alphabetized list of apps." 🙂 I don't use the Start Menu a lot, but I'd be super annoyed if there wasn't some form of an app drawer in Windows.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      SekTheFirst earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      zayanhani earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      HarryTaylor earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Year In
      Eternal Tech earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Eternal Tech earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      655
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      237
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      231
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      141
    5. 5
      +FloatingFatMan
      138
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!