[NCAA] Another blow to the BCS


Recommended Posts

Apparent concern over the Bowl Championship Series process had led The Associated Press to pull its football poll from the BCS system used to select the national title game and the three other BCS bowls, The Boston Globe is reporting.

BCS coordinator Kevin Weiberg, the commissioner of the Big 12, told The Globe he has received a letter from AP indicating it wasn't comfortable being part of the process.

The move would take place starting next season. The BCS is expected to make a statement later Tuesday.

The eight teams selected for the four major bowls -- Orange, Rose, Sugar, and Fiesta -- are picked by the BCS, which uses a combination of the AP poll (voted on by writers and broadcasters), the ESPN/USA Today coaches' poll, and several computer rankings. Each segment receives a one-third weighting in picking the teams.

In the wake of Texas leapfrogging Cal for a BCS bowl bid, the Charlotte Observer announced it no longer will vote in The AP poll.

Source: ESPN

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/260471-ncaa-another-blow-to-the-bcs/
Share on other sites

They should not have removed strength of schedule. If you beat easy teams and go undefeated, you do not deserve to go to the national championship. Playoffs will never work due to money. The +1 Game idea is the best they've come up with so far, and it sounds fair.

They should not have removed strength of schedule. If you beat easy teams and go undefeated, you do not deserve to go to the national championship. Playoffs will never work due to money. The +1 Game idea is the best they've come up with so far, and it sounds fair.

I think they should set up a playoff system where each game is a "bowl game" and the further into the bracket the bigger the name of the bowl game...beginning bowls should be the "Champs Sports Bowl" and later games are the "Suger", "Rose", etc....that way each team gets paid when they lose, and keeps progressing to higher paying games.

I think they should set up a playoff system where each game is a "bowl game" and the further into the bracket the bigger the name of the bowl game...beginning bowls should be the "Champs Sports Bowl" and later games are the "Suger", "Rose", etc....that way each team gets paid when they lose, and keeps progressing to higher paying games.

585146280[/snapback]

Not a bad idea, but that means a school will make tremendous amounts of money over other schools who would've been in that bown instead,

The only thing they actually did wrong this year was putting Texas in instead of Cal and leaving undefeated Boise St. out.  Yes, Boise St. did face some easy teams, but they remained undefeated, so they should be in there.

585144755[/snapback]

bleh...u forget about the most dominant defense in the nation: auburn

per game though, auburn allowed 11.2 pts. vatech 12.6.

and just so people don't misunderstand me, i didn't mean the person who has the best defense is the best team in the country, but when i look at a head to head matchup, ie osu vs. miami, or lsu vs. ok, i always pick defense. those past two years i was right.

i like the way auburn has played after breaks. they had a week off before goergia and dominated them. and 2 weeks off before the sec title game and scored a td in less than a minute. auburn will have to have a very impressive showing againt va tech AND oklahoma has to win.

i think the reason why auburn isnt playing in the national championship is because williams/brown/campbell arent as glorified in the media as much as peterson/white and bush/leinart. its sad really...2 teams OU struggled against(OK St. and A&M) get dominated. A&M got trampled by a injury-plagued tennessee team who had to go with their third string freshman qb. cal got their asses handed to them by a texas tech team who finished tied for third in the big12 south.

sorry...im still distraught over this whole thing.....i really know how usc felt last year

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The current Statcoungter desktop numbers has Google Chrome increasing it's market share this past year and currently commanding 75% share. Everybody else is just making up the numbers with even MS Edge losing 3% this past year and has dipped just below 10% share which is staggering considering it's default on every Windows deviced purchased. If these numbers are correct that terrible Edge number is both devastating and embarrassing for MS especially when you add in the terribly low Bing market share. This leads me to ask a couple of questions as the default browser holding just less than 10% market share seems really weird. It used to be that all Chromium browsers were being counted as Google Chrome in some cases.  Is this still happening? Do these high Google Chrome numbers contains some Edge user numbers?
    • Yeah, all web browsers seem to have some junk in them these days. The regular Brave browser has a lot of unnecessary stuff in it, similar to Microsoft Edge, so I don't see any benefits of using Brave over Microsoft Edge if you already have Microsoft Edge fully set up with adblockers and that. The cleanest or best free browser outside of 'Microsoft Edge' I’ve tried so far is 'Opera Air'. It still has some bloat, but nowhere near as much as Brave browser, for example. I have a system wide Adblocking program for Windows 11 that doesn't just blocks ads in the the web browser, but over the whole thing. I don't really need a web browser with an inbuilt adblocker because of that.
    • I have been using Firefox for years.
    • I'd trust open source stuff on github more then closed source binaries from Microsoft.
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      491
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      68
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!