Recommended Posts

Isaw the problem but I dont remember where. All progress bar are working fine for me now but anyone klnow how to fix that??

585246097[/snapback]

KoL,

I looked at the skin with SkinStudio and 'technically' everything appears to be correct, based on my knowledge of SkinStudio from converting other MSStyles. Maybe Frogboy can help out?

If it makes any difference in finding the issue, I've also seen it do that during installshield and various other install/uninstall apps too. I even uninstalled, deleted all WB files, and then re-installed to make sure it wasn't an issue. I'm running the very latest beta 4.49b.rc.[002] for WB.

Again, great work on this theme. I'm running it in one form or the other on all my PCs at the house and work! :woot: :woot:

Thats something that I dont know how to fix it  :pinch:

I looked everywhere and I couldnt find it.

585246486[/snapback]

This is one that always crops up with most people, only problem is you start getting into shared coloured problems that is why Luna is very dark text on that highlighted blue part. I was playing with the Slate version, so have a look in Miscellaneous>Colors>Selections>Background - Highlighted has to be the same colour as the system menu so the text does not look all weird. So once you have altered that. You will see it looks good but the text is somewhat white and the classic menus has no 2D rectangular selection also now the text just highlights. So you'll have to change the one above it Text - Highlighted to say 164,164,162 and change Background - Highlighted back to say 206,206,204 which 118,118,120 was default IIRC. You'll just have to play around with those untill it satisfies you. But you should see your now pretty close to nice clean crisp text hopefully and still readable.

The progress bar issue showed up in the uninstaller for Java  5.0. Also, the Control panel doesn't get properly skinned.

585247055[/snapback]

what part of the Control Panel?? Everything seems to look fine here.

This is one that always crops up with most people, only problem is you start getting into shared coloured problems that is why Luna is very dark text on that highlighted blue part. I was playing with the Slate version, so have a look in Miscellaneous>Colors>Selections>Background - Highlighted has to be the same colour as the system menu so the text does not look all weird. So once you have altered that. You will see it looks good but the text is somewhat white and the classic menus has no 2D rectangular selection also now the text just highlights. So you'll have to change the one above it Text - Highlighted to say 164,164,162 and change Background - Highlighted back to say 206,206,204 which 118,118,120 was default IIRC. You'll just have to play around with those untill it satisfies you. But you should see your now pretty close to nice clean crisp text hopefully and still readable.

585247900[/snapback]

Thanks a lot VF I'll try that. :)

Nice job KoL!  Any luck getting FOOOD's permission to release some avi's/toolbars to go with this?

585268737[/snapback]

I have permission to create avi and toolbar using iCandy Jr. but Im nopt sure if Im going to make them yet. I like how the theme looks with Luna default :)

Yes, this skin does look good with a variety of different toolbars, that?s for sure. Maybe, if you feel like it, they can be released as a separate download. I think SkinStudio allows toolbars/avi?s to be created as standalone object:blush:us;) ;)

I would like to bring other toolbars over to WB myself, but I don?t know how to convert a png to tga file. When I have tried in the past, all the toolbars remain with a solid background color, instead of having a transparent surrounding.

I have permission to create avi and toolbar using iCandy Jr. but Im nopt sure if Im going to make them yet. I like how the theme looks with Luna default  :)

585269785[/snapback]

I loaded up iCandy Jr. for Firefox and it looks great with this theme. That's one way to see how much more you would like the buttons than the default luna. ;)

Yes, this skin does look good with a variety of different toolbars, that?s for sure.  Maybe, if you feel like it, they can be released as a separate download.  I think SkinStudio allows toolbars/avi?s to be created as standalone objects.&nb:blush:ush:&nb;); ;)

I would like to bring other toolbars over to WB myself, but I don?t know how to convert a png to tga file.  When I have tried in the past, all the toolbars remain with a solid background color, instead of having a transparent surrounding.

585269993[/snapback]

Myabe I'll make a version with Toolbar and Avis and include it on the zip

Myabe I'll make a version with Toolbar and Avis and include it on the zip

585270223[/snapback]

:D Awesome, great. Also, how about making a "glossy" substyle? I think it would look really awesome, especially in blue. Just an idea. This is a truely fantastic theme :yes:

Hi KoL...

Firstly, great skin... It colourises beautifully. Very usable and easy on the eyes.

There is no argument, at all, that WB has far more features and a smaller footprint than VS', this has been proven time and again, and is no longer up for debate, and the only real problem still facing WB is the quality of the user skins and community perception due to less-than-spectacular previous versions. So, with that in mind, I have just three questions for you:

One: How was your experience using skin studio to create/port the skin?

Two: What is your personal opinion re: WB and using it as a primary windows skinning engine?

Three: Most importantly, will we be seeing more skins from you? Created first using WB and then ported to VS should the community demand it?

I dont work for Stardock, but I'm the kinda guy that raelly wants this quality piece of software to succeed.

Once more, thanks!

:D Awesome, great. Also, how about making a "glossy" substyle? I think it would look really awesome, especially in blue. Just an idea. This is a truely fantastic theme :yes:

585270638[/snapback]

I dont think Im going to create the glossy effect

Hi KoL...

  Firstly, great skin... It colourises beautifully. Very usable and easy on the eyes.

  There is no argument, at all, that WB has far more features and a smaller footprint than VS', this has been proven time and again, and is no longer up for debate, and the only real problem still facing WB is the quality of the user skins and community perception due to less-than-spectacular previous versions. So, with that in mind, I have just three questions for you:

One: How was your experience using skin studio to create/port the skin?

Two: What is your personal opinion re: WB and using it as a primary windows skinning engine?

Three: Most importantly, will we be seeing more skins from you? Created first using WB and then ported to VS should the community demand it?

I dont work for Stardock, but I'm the kinda guy that raelly wants this quality piece of software to succeed.

Once more, thanks!

585272032[/snapback]

Its not the first time thatI create a WB theme/port and Im still learning SkinStudio. I like WB and SkinStudi and Ive been using WB before XP. You'll see more WB sklins in the future. Everytime that I create an original MSStyle you'll see a WB version

.

I dont think Im going to create the glossy effect

Its not the first time thatI create a WB theme/port and Im still learning SkinStudio. I like WB and SkinStudi and Ive been using WB before XP. You'll see more WB sklins in the future. Everytime that I create an original MSStyle you'll see a WB version

.

585272486[/snapback]

Woohoo! That's great news. :woot: :woot:

Hey KoL!

Got a question.... whenever there's a "grouped" application that's active and flashing on the taskbar, the VS won't really tell me which window is flashing....

say, I have a few MSN chat windows opened, it will be grouped. and one of my contacts IM'ed me..... I click the taskbar of MSN group, and it won't show me which one is flashing....

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!