Recommended Posts

Worm protection, it's called Updated AntiVirus Software and Applying Security Patches not limits to the TCP/IP protocol. This doesn't stop you from getting a Worm. Therefore it is irrelevant to most people. I don't feel sorry for people who get infected from a Worm because they are too lazy or incompetent to have updated AV and apply security patches. Even if this limit only remotely affected my internet connection in ANY way I would want it removed.

Like what? I am currently downloading 10 items through Bittorent (Azureus) and have not seen a single error.

Well 10 items isn't much, if you mean 10 files.

If you don't understand why the patch came about, that's ok. The patch works for what it was meant to do.

I agree if you are saying that too many people have applied it without understanding the first thing about it.

That's as far as my agreement goes.

well,people my humble opinion is that this patch breaks ALMOST all the idea of SP2,this will make your surface attack probability increase on your system.

i don't recomemnd to crack this.

585424341[/snapback]

IF that was "almost all of the idea of SP2", Microsoft could have released a hotfix of a few kilobytes instead of the actual SP2, get a grip.

This is why I dont let my boss know about this stuff (I inform him not to install patches from 3rd parties unless we discuss it, as hes still naive to everything he sees). This reminds me of when he visited a miscellaneous box.sk site and what does he do when it says 'You must click yes to download this [iTEM]'. *suspense here...* He clicked YES! I later told him he was a 'bad dog!' and that he shouldn't believe everything he sees and rectified is mistake. Now what does this have to do with this topic you may ask? It illustrates that people that don't understand what they are doing, will keep making dumb mistakes and so on. If you do not understand why Microsoft did what they did, and what implications it has on your 'eXPerience', then you SHOULD research how TCP/IP works, and reply to posts regarding the subject in a constructive and contributing manner. Thank you for your time. Happy broswing ^_^

It will slow the initial spreading of worms so that quicker action can be taken.

585427130[/snapback]

How does that improve your security if you have updated AV, all security patches applied and a firewall?

If a worm is on your system what does this patch do to protect you?

How does that improve your security if you have updated AV, all security patches applied and a firewall?

If a worm is on your system what does this patch do to protect you?

585427140[/snapback]

This limitation wasn't designed to protect the user who has the virus but it is designed to slow down the spread of a worm until the AV companies release new definitions and the user updates their patterns.

When a virus hits AV companies don't automatically have a fix for it. Depending on the company it could take a day before they receive the virus, analyze the virus and make the dat file available to the public to download. Then you have to remember you won't receive the update right away depending on your update schedule.

This limitation wasn't designed to protect the user who has the virus but it is designed to slow down the spread of a worm until the AV companies release new definitions and the user updates their patterns.

When a virus hits AV companies don't automatically have a fix for it. Depending on the company it could take a day before they receive the virus, analyze the virus and make the dat file available to the public to download. Then you have to remember you won't receive the update right away depending on your update schedule.

Which means it does NOTHING for your own personal security. All the worms that hit were caused because people never applied security patches that had been out for six months or more. It is totally irrelevant if you apply this to your system or not. All this does it "potentially" slow the spread of a worm between careless users, not a big loss IMO. Maybe they will learn to use updated AV and apply security patches.

Which means it does NOTHING for your own personal security. All the worms that hit were caused because people never applied security patches that had been out for six months or more. It is totally irrelevant if you apply this to your system or not. All this does it "potentially" slow the spread of a worm between careless users, not a big loss IMO. Maybe they will learn to use updated AV and apply security patches.

585433228[/snapback]

Of course it does,this fix not only limits the initial spreading stages of any worm,it reduces the risk of being detectable to port scanners.remember that there are port scanners capable of detecting when the system is vulnerable at any instance (u could be port scannned for almost a day),depending on how many applications u are using,the more applications (more connections opened of course) being used,the more vulnerable u are.

the idea is to be resilent in the web.Opening more connections= (it's like buliding more doors to your house for the thieves :laugh: ) in childish words

And P2P programs are the biggest conduct for worms and viruses nowdays :sleep:

remember that these applications of massive file sharing,increased the spreading of viruses and worms for the last decade.that's why we have ,bloody AV's and FW?s on our systems.these P2P applications open multiple connections on your system.

Well and the final words are.The operating system (abbreviated as OS) wasn't meant to live side by side with an antivirus or third party firewall,it was meant to have a basic,reliable and resilent operation,without dangers.

i felt explaining this to an ignorant kid,i should call you "mastertech of naiveness":DD

Edited by EduardValencia

Please explain exactly how this reduces you from being detected by port scanners if you are not infected by a worm?

And P2P programs are the biggest conduct for worms and viruses nowdays

remember that these applications of massive file sharing,increased the spreading of viruses and worms for the last decade.that's why we have ,bloody AV's and FW?s on our systems.these P2P applications open multiple connections on your system.

Nope, it is still email by far.

Well and the final words are.The operating system (abbreviated as OS) wasn't meant to live side by side with an antivirus or third party firewall,it was meant to have a basic,reliable and resilent operation,without dangers.

Then you run Windows without AV and a Firewall. Good security advice there!:no::

i felt explaining this to an ignorant kid,i should call you "mastertech of naiveness

Your naive in thinking this has ANY affect on security for a system not infected with a worm.

Here is the real point, once your infected you machine is compromised! Any virus writer with half a brain will include a workaround for this in the virus. The whole thing is idiotic, this does nothing to improve your security, you have to be infected with a worm first of all which means your security has already been compromised. All this does is make it take a little bit longer to infect other careless users who did not patch. Like I said once your system is compromised the worm could easily and probably will just unpatch this. This is a big joke.

Windows XP SP2 will bring TCP connection limits that may cause issues with busy software. A blurb on Warp2Search.net reveals that P2P software resulted in an Event Log message about too many connection attempts.

This new feature is one of the stack?s ?springboards,? security features designed to proactively reduce the future threat from attacks like blaster and Sasser that typically spread by opening connections to random addresses. In fact, if this feature had already been deployed, Sasser would have taken much longer to spread.

It?s not likely to help stop the spread of spam unless spammers are trying to reach open e-mail relays in the same way, by opening connections on SMTP ports of random IP addresses. This is new with XP SP2 and they're trying to get it right so that it does not interfere with normal system operation or performance of normal, legitimate applications, but does slow the spread of viral code. New connection attempts over the limit for half-open connections get queued and worked off at a certain (limited rate).

this explain your doubts?

I understand how it works. Sasser spread because people didn't apply a six month old patch and either had no AV or it was outdated, those who did were unaffected. You also did not answer the question how does having this enabled on your PC secure your PC from being infected by a worm? How does this do anything on your PC to protect you from anything?

Do you realize that once your infected, a worm can easily change this making it useless? Scaring people into believing this in some way secures your PC more is laughable.

All this does is make it take a little bit longer to infect other careless users who did not patch.

585437060[/snapback]

That's exactly the idea, and it doesn't hurt your connections/speed at all anyway, so why mess with it? :wacko:

Don't come here bashing microsoft of their security methods,when u got infected by a worm,i'll be there to remember you

Who's bashing Microsoft's security methods? I promote security! Such as not getting infected with a worm in the first place! Complaining about people changing a TCP/IP setting and then trying to scare them with it is something that affects their security is pure propaganda. You failed to inform them that changing this setting on their computer WILL NOT protect them from anything. I wouldn't worry the people this might affect don't patch and run updated AV so they are highly likely to have not changed this setting and if they do the only people affected are others who don't patch and use updated AV. Worrying about this setting as some sort of security risk is just not founded.

Who's bashing Microsoft's security methods? I promote security! Such as not getting infected with a worm in the first place! Complaining about people changing a TCP/IP setting and then trying to scare them with it is something that affects their security is pure propaganda. You failed to inform them that changing this setting on their computer WILL NOT protect them from anything. I wouldn't worry the people this might affect don't patch and run updated AV so they are highly likely to have not changed this setting and if they do the only people affected are others who don't patch and use updated AV. Worrying about this setting as some sort of security risk is just not founded.

585444145[/snapback]

Mastertech u are an advanced user,i'm not questoning your method,i've patched various systems to test them and had a problem with 2 worms and spent almost a month fixing the problem (it wasn't my network though), in my personal opinion it's not recommendable to users who lacks knowledge about the benefits/consequences that this might bring spesially in networked enviroments.I'd preferably say that this patch is for users who love updating their systems continiously,and want them tweaked it to the hilt.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Doesn't DDG mainly use Bing?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      70
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      58
    5. 5
      neufuse
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!